"The Left Is Killing Free Speech"

[Camp]

You are describing PoliticalChick. Virtually all of her threads quickly break down into her refusing to respond to challenges about her quotes being taken out of context and distorted, constantly deflecting, using opinions as facts and her sources being unacceptable in an academic setting, etc. This is a good example. It is a book by a biased commentator and offers agenda driven opinions. Her debating points culled from this kind of source are refuted with scientific and academically recognized source material that she ignores and simply repeats the biased source she has selected for her argument. Her supporters whine that she is being treated unfairly because she somehow should have the right to use politically biased commentary the same way as academically accepted sources that have been peer reviewed for accuracy. PolitcalChick does not debate, she lectures and misleads.

Mean while you have provided a classic example by being a douche bag and character assassinating another.................

He's pretty good at lying, too.

I always ask you to point out the specific lie and you never do. What is it that you claim in a lie in that post? I however catch you lying consistently and prove it with impeccable links.

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. 53% of the faculty on college campuses had 'cool' and/or negative feelings toward evangelicals. [http://www.jewishresearch.org/PDFs2/FacultyReligion07.pdf]

Think this sort of bigotry would be allowed if it targeted blacks or gays?

Bigotry? Pardon me?

Articulate your point.

There's a big difference between true bigotry and people on the left not enjoying the company of people who consistently claim anyone who thinks differently will be sent to burn in a firey pit by some celestial North Korea.

100 million killed by Leftist regimes in the last century alone.
Lest you miss the point, today's Democrat Party espouses the same aims that the Communist Party, USA did.
True story.

The Communists like the Dems about as much as they like Sarah Palin. Probably less most days because they aren't supposed to be such Wall Street cocksucking assholes.

You fudging on purpose?

The statement was, the modern Democrat Party stands for the same things that the Communist Party did.



Need a list?

 

[NYcarbineer]

1. She works for Fox. She slit her own throat on that when she took the blood money.
2. I don't see anyone attacking her but me so far, and I'm mostly attacking her book, but now that I know she was fucking Anthony Weiner and thinks Jesus came to visit her the fun can begin.

You're clearly looking at this from a partisan political perspective, which means you're not going to address or admit to any of her points.

I provided the links below as further evidence that more and more committed Democrats are admitting what is happening.

They don't work for Fox.

• Bill Maher Rails Against Crazy Political Correctness From Liberals Tells Media Matters to Shut The F ck Up Video RealClearPolitics
• Jerry Seinfeld says political correctness is hurting comedy - CBS News
• Don Lemon weighs in on PC culture Liberals are the most easily offended and the least tolerant - Salon.com
• Not a Very P.C. Thing to Say -- NYMag
• Liberal Turley against political correctness in News Forum
• Are Liberals Becoming Too Sensitive and Politically Correct
• The Charges Against Laura Kipnis and P.C. -- NYMag

You really think that whether a comedian's act is liked or disliked has anything to do with 'killing' free speech?

wow

Amazing how much you chose not to see in those links.

Always fascinating to see how obedient adherence to hardcore partisan ideology distorts perception.

I believe you. I believe that's all you got from those links.

"wow"

.

So I'm not allowed to exercise my free speech of choosing to address the points one at a time?

Nazi. lololol

That, of course, is not what I said.

And...

DING!!

As USMB's King of the Straw Man, you are allowed one (1) "that's not what I said" per thread.

You may attempt to communicate with me on another thread, and I will make a determination at that time whether I will choose to respond.

You're like clockwork, I'll give ya that!



.

I didn't say you said it. I asked you if that was your opinion.

You've dodged the issue twice now. Can we conclude you've conceded your position as indefensible?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'd like to hear where the Right has been forcibly silenced in a manner that violated legitimately protected free speech rights in the Constitution.

And, importantly, I'd like to hear enough of those examples to where it goes beyond isolated anecdotes and thus is widespread enough to justify a broadbrush labeling of Liberalism.

"A prominent Silicon Valley chief executive stepped down just days after his appointment, amid a firestorm across the Internet that was sparked by employees who complained about his opposition to gay marriage.

Brendan Eich resigned from Mozilla, the organization behind the Firefox Web browser, after intense criticism over a six-year-old, $1,000 donation he made in support of a 2008 California ballot initiative to ban gay marriage."
Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich Steps Down - WSJ

 

[NYcarbineer]

You are describing PoliticalChick. Virtually all of her threads quickly break down into her refusing to respond to challenges about her quotes being taken out of context and distorted, constantly deflecting, using opinions as facts and her sources being unacceptable in an academic setting, etc. This is a good example. It is a book by a biased commentator and offers agenda driven opinions. Her debating points culled from this kind of source are refuted with scientific and academically recognized source material that she ignores and simply repeats the biased source she has selected for her argument. Her supporters whine that she is being treated unfairly because she somehow should have the right to use politically biased commentary the same way as academically accepted sources that have been peer reviewed for accuracy. PolitcalChick does not debate, she lectures and misleads.

Mean while you have provided a classic example by being a douche bag and character assassinating another.................

He's pretty good at lying, too.

I always ask you to point out the specific lie and you never do. What is it that you claim in a lie in that post? I however catch you lying consistently and prove it with impeccable links.

Calling people liars as a baseless perjorative is one of her tactics to avoid legitimate debate.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You are describing PoliticalChick. Virtually all of her threads quickly break down into her refusing to respond to challenges about her quotes being taken out of context and distorted, constantly deflecting, using opinions as facts and her sources being unacceptable in an academic setting, etc. This is a good example. It is a book by a biased commentator and offers agenda driven opinions. Her debating points culled from this kind of source are refuted with scientific and academically recognized source material that she ignores and simply repeats the biased source she has selected for her argument. Her supporters whine that she is being treated unfairly because she somehow should have the right to use politically biased commentary the same way as academically accepted sources that have been peer reviewed for accuracy. PolitcalChick does not debate, she lectures and misleads.

Mean while you have provided a classic example by being a douche bag and character assassinating another.................

He's pretty good at lying, too.

I always ask you to point out the specific lie and you never do. What is it that you claim in a lie in that post? I however catch you lying consistently and prove it with impeccable links.

Great example of one of your lies.

 

[Darkwind]

a. The Left survives on demonization of the Right…rather than debating ideas: they teach their drones that the Right is not wrong, but evil…

Which liberals on this forum refuse to debate the issues?

I wouldn't call what most of them do "debate"
.

On this site anything like "debate" is rare. The "now that faggots can marry I can marry my gym bag" doesn't actually count as debate.

Neither does using the word 'racist' exclusively to silence rebuttal.

However, idiots are going to be stupid and the left has an abundance.

Who does that? Who on the EXCLUSIVELY uses the word 'racist' to silence rebuttal?

How about we compare that to the rampant use of 'PC police' to silence rebuttal?

Every one of you leftists here on USMB....nearly every pundit on the left nutwing media....

That extensive enough for you?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You are describing PoliticalChick. Virtually all of her threads quickly break down into her refusing to respond to challenges about her quotes being taken out of context and distorted, constantly deflecting, using opinions as facts and her sources being unacceptable in an academic setting, etc. This is a good example. It is a book by a biased commentator and offers agenda driven opinions. Her debating points culled from this kind of source are refuted with scientific and academically recognized source material that she ignores and simply repeats the biased source she has selected for her argument. Her supporters whine that she is being treated unfairly because she somehow should have the right to use politically biased commentary the same way as academically accepted sources that have been peer reviewed for accuracy. PolitcalChick does not debate, she lectures and misleads.

Mean while you have provided a classic example by being a douche bag and character assassinating another.................

He's pretty good at lying, too.

I always ask you to point out the specific lie and you never do. What is it that you claim in a lie in that post? I however catch you lying consistently and prove it with impeccable links.

Calling people liars as a baseless perjorative is one of her tactics to avoid legitimate debate.

So THAT'S why you're called the NYLiar!

 

[MsnBama]

And tell us, exactly, what are the first ten words that begin page 122? Either post the words, or you're lying eh?

 

[Darkwind]

You are describing PoliticalChick. Virtually all of her threads quickly break down into her refusing to respond to challenges about her quotes being taken out of context and distorted, constantly deflecting, using opinions as facts and her sources being unacceptable in an academic setting, etc. This is a good example. It is a book by a biased commentator and offers agenda driven opinions. Her debating points culled from this kind of source are refuted with scientific and academically recognized source material that she ignores and simply repeats the biased source she has selected for her argument. Her supporters whine that she is being treated unfairly because she somehow should have the right to use politically biased commentary the same way as academically accepted sources that have been peer reviewed for accuracy. PolitcalChick does not debate, she lectures and misleads.

Mean while you have provided a classic example by being a douche bag and character assassinating another.................

He's pretty good at lying, too.

I always ask you to point out the specific lie and you never do. What is it that you claim in a lie in that post? I however catch you lying consistently and prove it with impeccable links.

Calling people liars as a baseless perjorative is one of her tactics to avoid legitimate debate.

So THAT'S why you're called the NYLiar!

I've been dealing with carby since the other forum......His lies go back a looooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnngggggggggggggggg way...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Bigotry? Pardon me?

Articulate your point.

There's a big difference between true bigotry and people on the left not enjoying the company of people who consistently claim anyone who thinks differently will be sent to burn in a firey pit by some celestial North Korea.

100 million killed by Leftist regimes in the last century alone.
Lest you miss the point, today's Democrat Party espouses the same aims that the Communist Party, USA did.
True story.

The Communists like the Dems about as much as they like Sarah Palin. Probably less most days because they aren't supposed to be such Wall Street cocksucking assholes.

You fudging on purpose?

The statement was, the modern Democrat Party stands for the same things that the Communist Party did.



Need a list?

By all means, publish said list. Make sure that you get it from the actual Democratic Party, and the actual Communist Party. And since you couldn't answer this: And tell us, exactly, what are the first ten words that begin page 122? you are lying about reading this book, which you obviously don't own...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Either she doesn't know any real liberals, or she's suffering from Stockholm Syndrome after working for Fox News.

And you guys aren't losing Free Speech, you're losing your default ability to lord it over the rest of us, pun intended, and have your faith be the only fucking one that matters. Talk it up, boys.

You people /your people are using the FCC and IRS as weapons against free speech. It's why Lois Lerner shut up and destroyed her emails. It's why you first pursued resuscitation of the antiquated Fairness Doctrine.....when that failed, you found some sheep's clothing in the form of Net Neutrality.

The Fairness Doctrine should never have been revoked. It's why there's nothing like decent news anymore. And net neutrality is about protecting free speech, not suppressing it.

1. "The Fairness Doctrine should never have been revoked. "

So.....how do you decide between wearing the brown shirt, or waving the red flag?


2. "And net neutrality is about protecting free speech,..."
Of course it is...that is Obama's history....not.

a. "Chicago radio station WGN-AM is again coming under attack from the presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama for offering airtime to a controversial author.

It is the second time in recent weeks the station has been the target of an "Obama Action Wire" alert to supporters of the Illinois Democrat."
Obama Vs. WGN Take Two

Monday night's target was David Freddoso, who the campaign said was scheduled to be on the station from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. Chicago time.


b. "The official White House blog now asks Americans: “If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to [email protected].”
Morning Bell The People Spreading Disinformation About Obamacare

And tell us, exactly, what are the first ten words that begin page 122? Either post the words, or you're lying eh?

I love it!

I always note that i never lie...and you're about to prove it!


News' blondes fit that bill." In particular, they explained that "Fox News' blonde bombshells" such as Megyn Kelly...."

Oppps!

I quoted 18 words! My bad.
'


So...I put you in your place once again....this is getting to be a habit.


Apology in order?

 

[NYcarbineer]

I'd like to hear where the Right has been forcibly silenced in a manner that violated legitimately protected free speech rights in the Constitution.

And, importantly, I'd like to hear enough of those examples to where it goes beyond isolated anecdotes and thus is widespread enough to justify a broadbrush labeling of Liberalism.

"A prominent Silicon Valley chief executive stepped down just days after his appointment, amid a firestorm across the Internet that was sparked by employees who complained about his opposition to gay marriage.

Brendan Eich resigned from Mozilla, the organization behind the Firefox Web browser, after intense criticism over a six-year-old, $1,000 donation he made in support of a 2008 California ballot initiative to ban gay marriage."
Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich Steps Down - WSJ

He voluntarily stepped down. He chose not to fight for what he believed in.

So what?

There you have the PC response. One bad isolated anecdote that doesn't even meet the criteria,

and that's what's used to broadbrush Liberals.

Okay, so if you think that proves your point, let me use an even better example to prove that conservatives are even worse:

Pa. staffer fired from Catholic school after parents learned of her marriage to a woman and complained: report

Pa. staffer in same-sex marriage fired from Catholic school - NY Daily News

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

I don't see much debate currently .......

Lot of childish character assassination on both sides ...............

OP, rein your shit back in and go back to your original premise............

You started off good, I had hopes, but now, there is an air of familiarity in this thread.

I had such high hopes it could be different, well, hard to change the spots on that leopard isn't it??

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

And tell us, exactly, what are the first ten words that begin page 122? Either post the words, or you're lying eh?

Lame points are usually not responded to ...............

I suspect many have you on ignore, like I am fixing to.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Articulate your point.

There's a big difference between true bigotry and people on the left not enjoying the company of people who consistently claim anyone who thinks differently will be sent to burn in a firey pit by some celestial North Korea.

100 million killed by Leftist regimes in the last century alone.
Lest you miss the point, today's Democrat Party espouses the same aims that the Communist Party, USA did.
True story.

The Communists like the Dems about as much as they like Sarah Palin. Probably less most days because they aren't supposed to be such Wall Street cocksucking assholes.

You fudging on purpose?

The statement was, the modern Democrat Party stands for the same things that the Communist Party did.



Need a list?

By all means, publish said list. Make sure that you get it from the actual Democratic Party, and the actual Communist Party. And since you couldn't answer this: And tell us, exactly, what are the first ten words that begin page 122? you are lying about reading this book, which you obviously don't own...

Tap-dance on this:

.... take a look at the aims of the Communist Party, USA, and the aims of the modern Democrat Party.


......it is ...extraordinary.....the correspondence between the aims of the communist party and the aims of the Democrats.....





1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.



2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.



3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.



4. . Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.



5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.



6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.



7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.



8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."



9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."



10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.



11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."


12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.



13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce



Now....wouldn't an honest appraisal agree that all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive?
Well????

I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals



You might take a look at this one, too.


10 planks of Communist manifesto

Communist Manifesto 10 Planks


1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.


2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.


3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.



"Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"

Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains Inheritance And Wall Street Firedoglake




And this:

"Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too.Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917(Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately."
Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.


They didn't call it ObamaCare....


More?

Sure:

"Communist Party USA Chairman Vows Cooperation With Democratic PartyThe chairman of the National Committee of the Communist Party USA has penned a 2,023-word manifesto making the critical point that American Communists are eager to work with the Democratic Party to advance the modern communist agenda and achieve communist goals.

Communist Party chairman John Bachtellpublished his essay last week at People’s World, a “daily news website of, for and by the 99% and the direct descendant of the Daily Worker.”Communist Party USA Work With Democrats The Daily Caller

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Either she doesn't know any real liberals, or she's suffering from Stockholm Syndrome after working for Fox News.

And you guys aren't losing Free Speech, you're losing your default ability to lord it over the rest of us, pun intended, and have your faith be the only fucking one that matters. Talk it up, boys.

You people /your people are using the FCC and IRS as weapons against free speech. It's why Lois Lerner shut up and destroyed her emails. It's why you first pursued resuscitation of the antiquated Fairness Doctrine.....when that failed, you found some sheep's clothing in the form of Net Neutrality.

The Fairness Doctrine should never have been revoked. It's why there's nothing like decent news anymore. And net neutrality is about protecting free speech, not suppressing it.

1. "The Fairness Doctrine should never have been revoked. "

So.....how do you decide between wearing the brown shirt, or waving the red flag?


2. "And net neutrality is about protecting free speech,..."
Of course it is...that is Obama's history....not.

a. "Chicago radio station WGN-AM is again coming under attack from the presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama for offering airtime to a controversial author.

It is the second time in recent weeks the station has been the target of an "Obama Action Wire" alert to supporters of the Illinois Democrat."
Obama Vs. WGN Take Two

Monday night's target was David Freddoso, who the campaign said was scheduled to be on the station from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. Chicago time.


b. "The official White House blog now asks Americans: “If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to [email protected].”
Morning Bell The People Spreading Disinformation About Obamacare

And tell us, exactly, what are the first ten words that begin page 122? Either post the words, or you're lying eh?

I love it!

I always note that i never lie...and you're about to prove it!


News' blondes fit that bill." In particular, they explained that "Fox News' blonde bombshells" such as Megyn Kelly...."

Oppps!

I quoted 18 words! My bad.
'


So...I put you in your place once again....this is getting to be a habit.


Apology in order?

Good for you, now you own the book, since you couldn't answer right away you were lying. Now, really, was that so hard? And next time, don't bother to buy this crap in a concise form. It's all over the damn Internet.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

There's a big difference between true bigotry and people on the left not enjoying the company of people who consistently claim anyone who thinks differently will be sent to burn in a firey pit by some celestial North Korea.

100 million killed by Leftist regimes in the last century alone.
Lest you miss the point, today's Democrat Party espouses the same aims that the Communist Party, USA did.
True story.

The Communists like the Dems about as much as they like Sarah Palin. Probably less most days because they aren't supposed to be such Wall Street cocksucking assholes.

You fudging on purpose?

The statement was, the modern Democrat Party stands for the same things that the Communist Party did.



Need a list?

By all means, publish said list. Make sure that you get it from the actual Democratic Party, and the actual Communist Party. And since you couldn't answer this: And tell us, exactly, what are the first ten words that begin page 122? you are lying about reading this book, which you obviously don't own...

Tap-dance on this:

.... take a look at the aims of the Communist Party, USA, and the aims of the modern Democrat Party.


......it is ...extraordinary.....the correspondence between the aims of the communist party and the aims of the Democrats.....





1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.



2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.



3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.



4. . Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.



5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.



6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.



7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.



8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."



9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."



10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.



11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."


12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.



13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce



Now....wouldn't an honest appraisal agree that all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive?
Well????

I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals



You might take a look at this one, too.


10 planks of Communist manifesto

Communist Manifesto 10 Planks


1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.


2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.


3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.



"Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"

Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains Inheritance And Wall Street Firedoglake




And this:

"Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too.Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917(Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately."
Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.


They didn't call it ObamaCare....


More?

Sure:

"Communist Party USA Chairman Vows Cooperation With Democratic PartyThe chairman of the National Committee of the Communist Party USA has penned a 2,023-word manifesto making the critical point that American Communists are eager to work with the Democratic Party to advance the modern communist agenda and achieve communist goals.

Communist Party chairman John Bachtellpublished his essay last week at People’s World, a “daily news website of, for and by the 99% and the direct descendant of the Daily Worker.”Communist Party USA Work With Democrats The Daily Caller

Yes, well as I said, from the actual parties. TY.

This BTW, The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals Total made-up nonsense by a loon the FBI kicked out and then kept an eye on. John Bircher crap.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And tell us, exactly, what are the first ten words that begin page 122? Either post the words, or you're lying eh?

I wanted to be sure you didn't miss this:

I love it!

I always note that i never lie...and you're about to prove it!


News' blondes fit that bill." In particular, they explained that "Fox News' blonde bombshells" such as Megyn Kelly...."

Oppps!

I quoted 18 words! My bad.
'


So...I put you in your place once again....this is getting to be a habit.


Apology in order?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You people /your people are using the FCC and IRS as weapons against free speech. It's why Lois Lerner shut up and destroyed her emails. It's why you first pursued resuscitation of the antiquated Fairness Doctrine.....when that failed, you found some sheep's clothing in the form of Net Neutrality.

The Fairness Doctrine should never have been revoked. It's why there's nothing like decent news anymore. And net neutrality is about protecting free speech, not suppressing it.

1. "The Fairness Doctrine should never have been revoked. "

So.....how do you decide between wearing the brown shirt, or waving the red flag?


2. "And net neutrality is about protecting free speech,..."
Of course it is...that is Obama's history....not.

a. "Chicago radio station WGN-AM is again coming under attack from the presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama for offering airtime to a controversial author.

It is the second time in recent weeks the station has been the target of an "Obama Action Wire" alert to supporters of the Illinois Democrat."
Obama Vs. WGN Take Two

Monday night's target was David Freddoso, who the campaign said was scheduled to be on the station from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. Chicago time.


b. "The official White House blog now asks Americans: “If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to [email protected].”
Morning Bell The People Spreading Disinformation About Obamacare

And tell us, exactly, what are the first ten words that begin page 122? Either post the words, or you're lying eh?

I love it!

I always note that i never lie...and you're about to prove it!


News' blondes fit that bill." In particular, they explained that "Fox News' blonde bombshells" such as Megyn Kelly...."

Oppps!

I quoted 18 words! My bad.
'


So...I put you in your place once again....this is getting to be a habit.


Apology in order?

Good for you, now you own the book, since you couldn't answer right away you were lying. Now, really, was that so hard? And next time, don't bother to buy this crap in a concise form. It's all over the damn Internet.

" since you couldn't answer right away you were lying."

I never lie, as we both just proved.

But your post is a weasel's attempt to get out from giving the apology you owe.