The Gay Agenda

[JakeStarkey]

Rightly so, you retard.

Google ritardando Jake, just so you know who the retard is.

[MENTION=23420]Quantum Windbag[/MENTION]



I'm lawling so hard at [MENTION=20412]JakeStarkey[/MENTION] right now

Lawl all you want. You amuse me.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Google ritardando Jake, just so you know who the retard is.

@Quantum Windbag



I'm lawling so hard at @JakeStarkey right now

Lawl all you want. You amuse me.

and here we go, typical starkey post....you amuse me......keep on posting.

 

[elektra]

My, my, my. Look at how upset some people get when gays ask to be able to file a married tax return and enjoy all the exact same government presents we straight people do!

All this violent talk. Clearly they don't want anyone else getting government gifts but themselves.

Hypocrites. Worse than hippies, really. Hippies don't care if everyone gets government presents. But the homophobes don't want anyone but themselves getting stuff from the government.

Yes, I do get upset with the Homosexual Fisters, Pumpers, and Anal lovers who wish to adopt children and teach them the lifestyle of Fisting and Pumping and Anal sex.

Explain how this is a right of man, to teach anything they can imagine sexually to children?

 

[Wacky Quacky]

This comes from a guy who thinks he's an intellectual yet doesn't even know basic facts about history, he just repeats leftist talking points.

Natural law and classical liberalism have nothing to do with the Marxist gay rights movement, which is about as genuine as astroturf. Gay rights, civil rights, animal rights, environmentalists are all the same, just different fronts for lefties to recruit stupid college age kids.

I mean look at this article about Jefferson (classic, classical liberal) and homosexuality (notice how the author parses words and says it's about the act, well no fucking doh. if two guys don't buttfuck we wouldn't give a shit. So is the author saying you can be a homo without the sex part? how is that possible?

Thomas Jefferson wasn't a homophobe


So, I guess, in a way, it's true that Jefferson (and others) were wrong about same-sex sexual acts, but it's only fair to note that from their vantage point, it was only about those sexual acts and not about orientation. It was definitely not about love or coupling or getting married, to most people in those days.


So married wasn't even an issue, and yes it would have been turned down faster than Starkey at a Hawaiian Tropic Ladies Night.

But I love how this author talks about homosexuality without sex. Uh isn't that the point of it, is there another kind? LOLOLOL

This from buckeyes who believes his opinion is fact.

You despise equality and cherish racism, sexism, and other forms of deviancy.

What consenting adults do is not your business.

And your deflection about homosexuality without sex is noted.

Again starkey, you rattled off the liberal list of bullshit again, but have nothing to back it up...again. I killed you in several debates like the southern strategy and the French revolution, proto communist debate.

Uh we're talking about homosexuality in this thread, perhaps you missed that part, so you stock libtard consenting adults bs has nothing to do with it.

And homosexuality without sex is impossible. that's the funny part that liberals think that it exists. I love my family and friends, some of which are men, but I'm not gay, see how that works. Do I really have to spell it out for you?

and jakey which republican are you voting for? LOLOLOLOLOL this guy!!!!

Sexual orientation is about who you are physically attracted to. Sex is the end result of the attraction. Can you be straight without having sex?

 

[Wacky Quacky]

My, my, my. Look at how upset some people get when gays ask to be able to file a married tax return and enjoy all the exact same government presents we straight people do!

All this violent talk. Clearly they don't want anyone else getting government gifts but themselves.

Hypocrites. Worse than hippies, really. Hippies don't care if everyone gets government presents. But the homophobes don't want anyone but themselves getting stuff from the government.

Yes, I do get upset with the Homosexual Fisters, Pumpers, and Anal lovers who wish to adopt children and teach them the lifestyle of Fisting and Pumping and Anal sex.

Explain how this is a right of man, to teach anything they can imagine sexually to children?

Explain how being gay automatically leads to teaching children fisting?

 

[1751_Texan]

Any heterosexual who has sex out of marriage is a pervert.

Boy is that dumb, and you just wrote off something like 25% or men and 15% of women.
Infidelity Statistics | Statistic Brain

I don't have a dog in this fight...but to isolate the comment from the context it was given is odd.

 

[elektra]

My, my, my. Look at how upset some people get when gays ask to be able to file a married tax return and enjoy all the exact same government presents we straight people do!

All this violent talk. Clearly they don't want anyone else getting government gifts but themselves.

Hypocrites. Worse than hippies, really. Hippies don't care if everyone gets government presents. But the homophobes don't want anyone but themselves getting stuff from the government.

Yes, I do get upset with the Homosexual Fisters, Pumpers, and Anal lovers who wish to adopt children and teach them the lifestyle of Fisting and Pumping and Anal sex.

Explain how this is a right of man, to teach anything they can imagine sexually to children?

Explain how being gay automatically leads to teaching children fisting?

explain how you can automatically come up with something I did not say.

So are you saying this will never happen? Has not happened, and if it does, you will feel no responsibility for promoting this type of a culture.

So you come up with a false statement and attribute it to me while dodging a real issue. Bravo.

 

[Wacky Quacky]

Yes, I do get upset with the Homosexual Fisters, Pumpers, and Anal lovers who wish to adopt children and teach them the lifestyle of Fisting and Pumping and Anal sex.

Explain how this is a right of man, to teach anything they can imagine sexually to children?

Explain how being gay automatically leads to teaching children fisting?

explain how you can automatically come up with something I did not say.

So are you saying this will never happen? Has not happened, and if it does, you will feel no responsibility for promoting this type of a culture.

So you come up with a false statement and attribute it to me while dodging a real issue. Bravo.

It already does happen, and will continue to happen, from some straight parents. It's a result of being a sick minded individual, not from being gay. Or are you suggesting that no straight couple has ever engaged in fisting or anal sex?

 

[elektra]

Explain how being gay automatically leads to teaching children fisting?

explain how you can automatically come up with something I did not say.

So are you saying this will never happen? Has not happened, and if it does, you will feel no responsibility for promoting this type of a culture.

So you come up with a false statement and attribute it to me while dodging a real issue. Bravo.

It already does happen, and will continue to happen, from some straight parents. It's a result of being a sick minded individual, not from being gay. Or are you suggesting that no straight couple has ever engaged in fisting or anal sex?

Oh, this is not about Gay people now? You want to discuss Straight people? Seems like you hate a fact so you want to discuss anything but the facts. That is the problem with this debate, you will do anything to not discuss any facts that dispute your feelings.

You are stating that any sexual activity that deviates from hetrosexual sex can not be a consideration when it comes to the adoption of children, and this okay because in the past somebody that was hetrosexual was a bad parent?

There is no sex so deviant that the people who perform such deviant sex should be denied the physical possession of other people's children.

Seriously, no deviant sexual behavior can be considered when those individuals want to adopt children?

 

[Wacky Quacky]

explain how you can automatically come up with something I did not say.

So are you saying this will never happen? Has not happened, and if it does, you will feel no responsibility for promoting this type of a culture.

So you come up with a false statement and attribute it to me while dodging a real issue. Bravo.

It already does happen, and will continue to happen, from some straight parents. It's a result of being a sick minded individual, not from being gay. Or are you suggesting that no straight couple has ever engaged in fisting or anal sex?

Oh, this is not about Gay people now? You want to discuss Straight people? Seems like you hate a fact so you want to discuss anything but the facts. That is the problem with this debate, you will do anything to not discuss any facts that dispute your feelings.

You are stating that any sexual activity that deviates from hetrosexual sex can not be a consideration when it comes to the adoption of children, and this okay because in the past somebody that was hetrosexual was a bad parent?

There is no sex so deviant that the people who perform such deviant sex should be denied the physical possession of other people's children.

Seriously, no deviant sexual behavior can be considered when those individuals want to adopt children?

I really don't care if people engage in fisting, or anal, or shoving their fist in someone's ass. As long as it stays in the bedroom it's no concern of mine.

Performing a certain sexual activity does not automatically lead people to teaching their kids about it. So no, there is no sexual act that can prevent someone from raising a child (unless it involves the child or an animal, of course).

You're making the mistake of thinking that people who engage in certain sexual activities will raise children who engage in the same sexual activity. Tell me, in what positions did your parents normally have sex?

 

[Toro]

My, my, my. Look at how upset some people get when gays ask to be able to file a married tax return and enjoy all the exact same government presents we straight people do!

All this violent talk. Clearly they don't want anyone else getting government gifts but themselves.

Hypocrites. Worse than hippies, really. Hippies don't care if everyone gets government presents. But the homophobes don't want anyone but themselves getting stuff from the government.

Yes, I do get upset with the Homosexual Fisters, Pumpers, and Anal lovers who wish to adopt children and teach them the lifestyle of Fisting and Pumping and Anal sex.

Explain how this is a right of man, to teach anything they can imagine sexually to children?

Great point.

Straight people must also no longer be allowed to adopt children, because they will teach their kids how to give a blowjob, sado-masochism and the proper etiquette at a swingers party.

 

[Toro]

Oh, this is not about Gay people now? You want to discuss Straight people? Seems like you hate a fact so you want to discuss anything but the facts.

That you think gay parents shouldn't be allowed to adopt kids because they will teach their kids "anal fisting" disqualifies you completely from any claim on "facts" in an argument.

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

Rawlings knows that political philosophy, natural law, classical liberalism and the American principles of equality and due process before the law contradict his hetero-fascism.

Like all good little fascists, though, that won't stop him from doing that which he accuses others of doing if given a chance. Because his level of morality is so low on the scale, he believes his opposition would do to him if only he had the balls to do what he wants to his enemies.

In no way shape or form is his right to private association threatened by marriage equality.

He may not, however, have special rights in public accommodation.

You're a liar. The principle of public accommodation obviously ends at the moment behavior or expression enter the equation. Your argument is that the government may legitimately compel one to engage in behavior or make expressions that are contrary to their ideological convictions. You're mad. See my signature below again.

The photographer and the baker will win their cases, incidentally, so will The Little Sisters and Hobby Lobby.

As I wrote earlier today. . . .

Leftists don't care about the truth. They don't debate the issues. They don't address the actual arguments of their opponents. The Marxist ideology is a mindless collection of slogans. The leftist is a vile, morally and intellectually bankrupt thug.

In other words, they don't make arguments. They accuse. They shout epithets. They filibuster, talk over.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Rawlings knows that political philosophy, natural law, classical liberalism and the American principles of equality and due process before the law contradict his hetero-fascism.

Like all good little fascists, though, that won't stop him from doing that which he accuses others of doing if given a chance. Because his level of morality is so low on the scale, he believes his opposition would do to him if only he had the balls to do what he wants to his enemies.

In no way shape or form is his right to private association threatened by marriage equality.

He may not, however, have special rights in public accommodation.

You're a liar. The principle of public accommodation obviously ends at the moment behavior or expression enter the equation. Your argument is that the government may legitimately compel one to engage in behavior or make expressions that are contrary to their ideological convictions. You're mad. See my signature below again.

The photographer and the baker will win their cases, incidentally, so will The Little Sisters and Hobby Lobby.

As I wrote earlier today. . . .

Leftists don't care about the truth. They don't debate the issues. They don't address the actual arguments of their opponents. The Marxist ideology is a mindless collection of slogans. The leftist is a vile, morally and intellectually bankrupt thug.

In other words, they don't make arguments. They accuse. They shout epithets. They filibuster, talk over.

The cake baker lost and now has to pay up. Do try and keep up.

 

[elektra]

so, this is nice, nobody cares what kind of sexual perversion occurs around children, and we are speaking of children created in test tubes, or adopted.

So adopted children who may grow up normal (heterosexual) should not have a choice as to the type of environment they grow up in.

So any kind of sexual activity is okay in a house of children that are not biologically your own.

interesting, no limits on sex, no type of activity is too perverted, as long as the door is closed.

yet, we have the same people advocating for Gay's to be able to freely adopt children at the same time the same people are engaged in criminal child pornography.

Yes, I am the one who should not have a say, its okay for pedophiles to advocate for the right to adopt children. Its okay for fisters, pumpers, men attracted to fem bois, its all okay for these people to adopt children? No limits on society.

S.F. gay rights advocate sentenced for child porn - SFGate

Veteran gay rights advocate and former San Francisco Human Rights Commission staff member Larry Brinkin was sentenced to one year in county jail Wednesday for possessing child pornography.

As part of a plea agreement, Brinkin, 67, will serve six months of his sentence in county jail and six months in home detention, the district attorney's office said. He will have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life.

Brinkin, who worked as a senior contract compliance officer with the rights commission until his 2010 retirement, was arrested in June 2012 after e-mail attachments were found on his AOL subscriber's account that contained images of toddlers engaged in sex acts with men.

 

[KNB]

Heterosexual couples have had anal sex behind closed doors while their children are in the other room. You should pass a law against that and strictly enforce it, since it's such an abomination against God or whatever.

 

[OKTexas]

My, my, my. Look at how upset some people get when gays ask to be able to file a married tax return and enjoy all the exact same government presents we straight people do!

All this violent talk. Clearly they don't want anyone else getting government gifts but themselves.

Hypocrites. Worse than hippies, really. Hippies don't care if everyone gets government presents. But the homophobes don't want anyone but themselves getting stuff from the government.

The only ones into "government gifts" are the Liberals. I don't want anything from the government, but thank you anyway.

Marriage = 1 MAN + 1 WOMAN

You get over a thousand different forms of cash and prizes from the government for being married. Government is all up in our marriages because we demanded it.

Gays are just asking for the exact same legal protections.

This has nothing to do with your God or your religious beliefs. If you are all about GOD HATES FAGS, that's your business. If your church only wants to join men and women together in matrimony, that's your business. If your brand of Christianity asks you to be a fag-bashing hater, that's your right.

But this has to do with secular legal protections. Cash and prizes is what this is all about. The ones you enjoy and want to keep only for yourself.

They want the protections, play by the rules, 1 man - 1 woman, just like every one else. They already have equality, but noooooo, that's not good enough. They have equality, live with it.

 

[KNB]

"1 man and 1 woman, just like everyone else." Except for homosexuals and lesbians. In their case it would be 1 man and 1 man, or 1 woman and 1 woman, equally married just like everyone else.

 

[OKTexas]

"1 man and 1 woman, just like everyone else." Except for homosexuals and lesbians. In their case it would be 1 man and 1 man, or 1 woman and 1 woman, equally married just like everyone else.

Like I said, equal isn't good enough, they have to have something special. You what something special, give it a name and sell it to the legislatures.

 

[KNB]

Wanting to get married like everyone else isn't "wanting something special". It's wanting the same thing as everyone else.

If you're going to argue that heterosexual marriage is "something special", I'll point yet again at the 24-hr drive-through convenience wedding chapels in Las Vegas which make "traditional marriage" as "special" as a special dollar menu.