The Gay Agenda

[Wacky Quacky]

so, this is nice, nobody cares what kind of sexual perversion occurs around children, and we are speaking of children created in test tubes, or adopted.

So adopted children who may grow up normal (heterosexual) should not have a choice as to the type of environment they grow up in.

So any kind of sexual activity is okay in a house of children that are not biologically your own.

interesting, no limits on sex, no type of activity is too perverted, as long as the door is closed.

yet, we have the same people advocating for Gay's to be able to freely adopt children at the same time the same people are engaged in criminal child pornography.

Yes, I am the one who should not have a say, its okay for pedophiles to advocate for the right to adopt children. Its okay for fisters, pumpers, men attracted to fem bois, its all okay for these people to adopt children? No limits on society.

S.F. gay rights advocate sentenced for child porn - SFGate

Veteran gay rights advocate and former San Francisco Human Rights Commission staff member Larry Brinkin was sentenced to one year in county jail Wednesday for possessing child pornography.

As part of a plea agreement, Brinkin, 67, will serve six months of his sentence in county jail and six months in home detention, the district attorney's office said. He will have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life.

Brinkin, who worked as a senior contract compliance officer with the rights commission until his 2010 retirement, was arrested in June 2012 after e-mail attachments were found on his AOL subscriber's account that contained images of toddlers engaged in sex acts with men.

Exactly. As long as it's behind closed doors, all is fair, from traditional missionary style to fisting up the ass.

The rest of your post about child pornography is completely off topic.

 

[elektra]

so, this is nice, nobody cares what kind of sexual perversion occurs around children, and we are speaking of children created in test tubes, or adopted.

So adopted children who may grow up normal (heterosexual) should not have a choice as to the type of environment they grow up in.

So any kind of sexual activity is okay in a house of children that are not biologically your own.

interesting, no limits on sex, no type of activity is too perverted, as long as the door is closed.

yet, we have the same people advocating for Gay's to be able to freely adopt children at the same time the same people are engaged in criminal child pornography.

Yes, I am the one who should not have a say, its okay for pedophiles to advocate for the right to adopt children. Its okay for fisters, pumpers, men attracted to fem bois, its all okay for these people to adopt children? No limits on society.

S.F. gay rights advocate sentenced for child porn - SFGate

Veteran gay rights advocate and former San Francisco Human Rights Commission staff member Larry Brinkin was sentenced to one year in county jail Wednesday for possessing child pornography.

As part of a plea agreement, Brinkin, 67, will serve six months of his sentence in county jail and six months in home detention, the district attorney's office said. He will have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life.

Brinkin, who worked as a senior contract compliance officer with the rights commission until his 2010 retirement, was arrested in June 2012 after e-mail attachments were found on his AOL subscriber's account that contained images of toddlers engaged in sex acts with men.

Exactly. As long as it's behind closed doors, all is fair, from traditional missionary style to fisting up the ass.

The rest of your post about child pornography is completely off topic.

Off topic, a Convicted Felon Homosexual Pedophile Democrat politician from the Gay Capital of the USA, that openly and successfully advocates for the Gay Agenda is off topic in a thread about the Gay Agenda?

 

[Wacky Quacky]

so, this is nice, nobody cares what kind of sexual perversion occurs around children, and we are speaking of children created in test tubes, or adopted.

So adopted children who may grow up normal (heterosexual) should not have a choice as to the type of environment they grow up in.

So any kind of sexual activity is okay in a house of children that are not biologically your own.

interesting, no limits on sex, no type of activity is too perverted, as long as the door is closed.

yet, we have the same people advocating for Gay's to be able to freely adopt children at the same time the same people are engaged in criminal child pornography.

Yes, I am the one who should not have a say, its okay for pedophiles to advocate for the right to adopt children. Its okay for fisters, pumpers, men attracted to fem bois, its all okay for these people to adopt children? No limits on society.

S.F. gay rights advocate sentenced for child porn - SFGate

Exactly. As long as it's behind closed doors, all is fair, from traditional missionary style to fisting up the ass.

The rest of your post about child pornography is completely off topic.

Off topic, a Convicted Felon Homosexual Pedophile Democrat politician from the Gay Capital of the USA, that openly and successfully advocates for the Gay Agenda is off topic in a thread about the Gay Agenda?

Yes. This thread is about homosexuality, not pedophelia. They are two completely unrelated topics.

 

[elektra]

Exactly. As long as it's behind closed doors, all is fair, from traditional missionary style to fisting up the ass.

The rest of your post about child pornography is completely off topic.

Off topic, a Convicted Felon Homosexual Pedophile Democrat politician from the Gay Capital of the USA, that openly and successfully advocates for the Gay Agenda is off topic in a thread about the Gay Agenda?

Yes. This thread is about homosexuality, not pedophelia. They are two completely unrelated topics.

The thread is about The Homosexual agenda, you are wrong again.

Pedophile Homosexuality perpetrated by a Democrat Homosexual Pedophile Politician who successfully advocated an agenda to allow Homosexuals to adopt boys is not related to the Homosexual agenda?

 

[Seawytch]

"1 man and 1 woman, just like everyone else." Except for homosexuals and lesbians. In their case it would be 1 man and 1 man, or 1 woman and 1 woman, equally married just like everyone else.

Like I said, equal isn't good enough, they have to have something special. You what something special, give it a name and sell it to the legislatures.

Actually what it seems like is that YOU are the one that wants a special right. You do realize that you can marry someone of the same sex too, rendering your "special" argument...well, "special" in a short bus kinda way.

 

[Seawytch]

Off topic, a Convicted Felon Homosexual Pedophile Democrat politician from the Gay Capital of the USA, that openly and successfully advocates for the Gay Agenda is off topic in a thread about the Gay Agenda?

Yes. This thread is about homosexuality, not pedophelia. They are two completely unrelated topics.

The thread is about The Homosexual agenda, you are wrong again.

Pedophile Homosexuality perpetrated by a Democrat Homosexual Pedophile Politician who successfully advocated an agenda to allow Homosexuals to adopt boys is not related to the Homosexual agenda?

Only if you would like to apply the actions of Gerry Sanduski to all straight male coaches...or the actions of Westboro Baptist to all Christians.

 

[Plasmaball]

Yes. This thread is about homosexuality, not pedophelia. They are two completely unrelated topics.

The thread is about The Homosexual agenda, you are wrong again.

Pedophile Homosexuality perpetrated by a Democrat Homosexual Pedophile Politician who successfully advocated an agenda to allow Homosexuals to adopt boys is not related to the Homosexual agenda?

Only if you would like to apply the actions of Gerry Sanduski to all straight male coaches...or the actions of Westboro Baptist to all Christians.

That's somehow different..or those men who touch little girls ..they must be victims in her view.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

so, this is nice, nobody cares what kind of sexual perversion occurs around children, and we are speaking of children created in test tubes, or adopted.

So adopted children who may grow up normal (heterosexual) should not have a choice as to the type of environment they grow up in.

So any kind of sexual activity is okay in a house of children that are not biologically your own.

interesting, no limits on sex, no type of activity is too perverted, as long as the door is closed.

yet, we have the same people advocating for Gay's to be able to freely adopt children at the same time the same people are engaged in criminal child pornography.

Yes, I am the one who should not have a say, its okay for pedophiles to advocate for the right to adopt children. Its okay for fisters, pumpers, men attracted to fem bois, its all okay for these people to adopt children? No limits on society.

S.F. gay rights advocate sentenced for child porn - SFGate

Exactly. As long as it's behind closed doors, all is fair, from traditional missionary style to fisting up the ass.

The rest of your post about child pornography is completely off topic.

Off topic, a Convicted Felon Homosexual Pedophile Democrat politician from the Gay Capital of the USA, that openly and successfully advocates for the Gay Agenda is off topic in a thread about the Gay Agenda?

Actually, the entire thread is off topic, given the fact there is no "gay agenda."

 

[elektra]

Exactly. As long as it's behind closed doors, all is fair, from traditional missionary style to fisting up the ass.

The rest of your post about child pornography is completely off topic.

Off topic, a Convicted Felon Homosexual Pedophile Democrat politician from the Gay Capital of the USA, that openly and successfully advocates for the Gay Agenda is off topic in a thread about the Gay Agenda?

Actually, the entire thread is off topic, given the fact there is no "gay agenda."

Close your eyes, nothing to see here? Move on! These are not the Droids you are looking for.

Actually, what you mean to state is that the topic is a false premise, which would be your opinion. The thread is off topic? No Gay Agenda? Weak response.

 

[hazlnut]

Not liberty, but "tolerance," "love" and "equality." . . .

homosexuality - Sid Roth It's Supernatural - YouTube

In other words, tyranny under the banner of politically correct statism.

Godwin's law needs an update because too often people go full retard hitler comparison right out of the gate.

You realize all credibility is flushed straight down the toilet.

 

[GISMYS]

THINK! YOU NEED NOT LIVE YOUR LIFE IN THE ABOMINATION OF SICK MINDED SEXUAL PERVERSION,CONFESS AND REPENT AND GOD WILL FORGIVE AND WASH YOU CLEAN.==Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God. 1 CORINTHIANS 6:9-11

 

[bendog]

The scary part is that so many of them are buyers for clothing retailers. (-:

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

Rawlings knows that political philosophy, natural law, classical liberalism and the American principles of equality and due process before the law contradict his hetero-fascism.

Like all good little fascists, though, that won't stop him from doing that which he accuses others of doing if given a chance. Because his level of morality is so low on the scale, he believes his opposition would do to him if only he had the balls to do what he wants to his enemies.

In no way shape or form is his right to private association threatened by marriage equality.

He may not, however, have special rights in public accommodation.

You're a pathological liar and a sociopath.

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

Exactly. As long as it's behind closed doors, all is fair, from traditional missionary style to fisting up the ass.

The rest of your post about child pornography is completely off topic.

Off topic, a Convicted Felon Homosexual Pedophile Democrat politician from the Gay Capital of the USA, that openly and successfully advocates for the Gay Agenda is off topic in a thread about the Gay Agenda?

Actually, the entire thread is off topic, given the fact there is no "gay agenda."

It's about the repulsion of homofascism.

And you too are a pathological liar and a sociopath.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Gay Agenda is Equality Before the Law. Terrible, just Terrible, for you apparently.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Rawlings knows that political philosophy, natural law, classical liberalism and the American principles of equality and due process before the law contradict his hetero-fascism.

Like all good little fascists, though, that won't stop him from doing that which he accuses others of doing if given a chance. Because his level of morality is so low on the scale, he believes his opposition would do to him if only he had the balls to do what he wants to his enemies.

In no way shape or form is his right to private association threatened by marriage equality.

He may not, however, have special rights in public accommodation.

You're a pathological liar and a sociopath.

Only one, such as you, would deny civil rights to others.

Once again, munchkin, your civil and religious liberties are not infringed upon by marriage equality.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Off topic, a Convicted Felon Homosexual Pedophile Democrat politician from the Gay Capital of the USA, that openly and successfully advocates for the Gay Agenda is off topic in a thread about the Gay Agenda?

Actually, the entire thread is off topic, given the fact there is no "gay agenda."

It's about the repulsion of homofascism.

And you too are a pathological liar and a sociopath.

You are projecting your moral and personal decay on others.

 

[GreenBean]

Exactly. As long as it's behind closed doors, all is fair, from traditional missionary style to fisting up the ass.

The rest of your post about child pornography is completely off topic.

Off topic, a Convicted Felon Homosexual Pedophile Democrat politician from the Gay Capital of the USA, that openly and successfully advocates for the Gay Agenda is off topic in a thread about the Gay Agenda?

Actually, the entire thread is off topic, given the fact there is no "gay agenda."

Yup, there is no Gay Agenda, just like "there's no such thing as the Mafia".
Wake up you blithering Idiot !

Gay Agenda is a term coined by The Institute for the Scientific Investigation of Sexuality, which later became the Family Research Council. They made some startling sensationalist claims , such as

just shy of 80% of gay men have sexually transmitted diseases
75% regularly ingest their partners poop

It did for the anti-gay movement what reefer-madness did for the anti-marijuana lobby. Some of their later material such as Stonewall: 25 Years of Deception, is more sophisticated and verifiably factual .

The tactics employed by current day Liberals and in particular Gay Activists was developed in the 30s and 40s by the Nazis and Stalinist Russia , was perfected by the totalitarian dictators of Communist China in the 50s and 60s, and utilized extensively by American Liberals since at least the early 70s. Exposed in a fictional format by George Orwell's work of Fiction entitled 1984, it was scientifically first exposed by Robert Jay Lifton in "Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of 'Brainwashing' in China" in the 60s in the 60s .

It's incorporation into the Gay Arsenal began with a book by Marshall Kirk, a researcher in neuropsychiatry and his sidekick Hunter Madsen. ... it presents an impassioned plea, and a brilliant strategy for homosexual activists to implement an aggressive, concerted and organized campaign to mold public perceptions, and brainwash the young.

Gay Brainwashing Techniques

Read After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays and get back to me .... yes I know it's a big book, most of its way over YOUR head , and there's not too many pretty pictures to help explain it to you - but if in your obviouslly very limited mental capacity you do somehow manage to eek your way through it then you might be somewhat , only somewhat qualified to make an assine simplistic juvenile comment such as "there is no such thing as the Gay Agenda" you friggin Moron !

 

[GreenBean]

so, this is nice, nobody cares what kind of sexual perversion occurs around children, and we are speaking of children created in test tubes, or adopted.

So adopted children who may grow up normal (heterosexual) should not have a choice as to the type of environment they grow up in.

So any kind of sexual activity is okay in a house of children that are not biologically your own.

interesting, no limits on sex, no type of activity is too perverted, as long as the door is closed.

yet, we have the same people advocating for Gay's to be able to freely adopt children at the same time the same people are engaged in criminal child pornography.

Yes, I am the one who should not have a say, its okay for pedophiles to advocate for the right to adopt children. Its okay for fisters, pumpers, men attracted to fem bois, its all okay for these people to adopt children? No limits on society.

S.F. gay rights advocate sentenced for child porn - SFGate

Veteran gay rights advocate and former San Francisco Human Rights Commission staff member Larry Brinkin was sentenced to one year in county jail Wednesday for possessing child pornography.

As part of a plea agreement, Brinkin, 67, will serve six months of his sentence in county jail and six months in home detention, the district attorney's office said. He will have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life.

Brinkin, who worked as a senior contract compliance officer with the rights commission until his 2010 retirement, was arrested in June 2012 after e-mail attachments were found on his AOL subscriber's account that contained images of toddlers engaged in sex acts with men.

The case you linked from San Fran Sisco is only one of Many. Gay males who only account for 2-3% of the population are responsible for nearly 1/3 of all Child MOlestation cases - while the other 95 - 98% of the population - hetersexuals account for 2/3

Think about those numbers - think about them , such a small minority who are only 2 to 3 out every 100 people are responsible for nearly 35 out of 100 cases of Child Molestation !

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The Gay Agenda

There’s still no such thing as a ‘gay agenda.’