There is nothing in decent from a common ancestor or natural selection that violates the Baconian method.
Not for natural selection as that is observable, but it's variations within a species. Not the common ancestor that is defined by Darwin. You are caught trying to introduce a false statement into a true, scientific observable one. One that was discovered by a creation scientist first. Typical of immoral atheist scientists, Darwin stole his claim saying he came up with it at the same time. If common ancestry is so common in plants and animals, then why does it not occur with today's creatures? Moreover, there is no transitional fossils that we see. In fact, there are absolute zero transitional fossils. All the human skulls or fossils they found are of people who lived in the past and died where they were found.
There are many transitional fossils. This has been addressed for you repeatedly so your statement that there are no transitional fossils is willful ignorance and / or profoundly ignorant
CC200: Transitional fossils