I have numbers, studies, and FEAs to back up my theory. What do you have? Speculation? Questions? You have NOTHING.You know gamalon, you're the one with the conspiracy theory to defend. I'm just pointing out what a load of crap your theory, the Official Conspiracy Theory is.
You don't think that planes removing structural members has anything to do with the towers collapses? You don;t think that structures with different designs are going to react differently to fires? Tell me something. You are the one who first set the comparison standards did you not? Steel framed? High rise? Right? If you can add selection parameters, why can't I. APPLES to APPLES right?So I have to point to another identical structure that had the exact same thing happen to it and remained standing. Gee, I guess you win. You're really reaching.
Oh wait! So fires can cause steel to partially collapse, but total collapse is out of the question? Do you have the design of the building? How did it compare WTC7, WTC1, or WTC2? Or are you again insinuating that all structures should behave the same? Was the fire fought at all by firefighters?Why don't you look at the Windsor hotel fire in Madrid Spain, a modern steel framed high rise that burned out of control for nearly twenty four hours virtually gutting it and finally had some limited structural failure near the top where the fire was the hottest.
See above.And that failure, as would be expected was slow, uneven with the structural members showing deformation. When the fire was out the vast majority of the building frame was standing. Hotter, longer more complete involvement but it didn't collapse completely in a matter of seconds.
You conspiracy theory really is ridiculous.