The Economic Impact of Raising Taxes on High-Income Households

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Flaylo, Apr 26, 2012.

  1. Flaylo
    Offline

    Flaylo Handsome Devil

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,664
    Thanks Received:
    448
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    In some grass near you
    Ratings:
    +451
    Jared Bernstein: The Economic Impact of Raising Taxes on High-Income Households



    Well rightwingers?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. SniperFire
    Offline

    SniperFire Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    13,627
    Thanks Received:
    1,219
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Inside Your Head
    Ratings:
    +1,223
    huffpo.

    ROTFL
     
  3. Rocko
    Offline

    Rocko Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    Messages:
    9,217
    Thanks Received:
    1,446
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    NY
    Ratings:
    +3,912
    Big time rich people are going to continue to do well no matter what the tax code is. The middle class, not so much.
     
  4. Flaylo
    Offline

    Flaylo Handsome Devil

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,664
    Thanks Received:
    448
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    In some grass near you
    Ratings:
    +451
    Lets see your source and that wasn't written by HP, they hotlinked it from another site.
     
  5. Mr. Shaman
    Offline

    Mr. Shaman Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    23,892
    Thanks Received:
    817
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +819
    Here's another......

    .....as-well-as Bill Clinton's....


     
  6. Londoner
    Offline

    Londoner Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,142
    Thanks Received:
    977
    Trophy Points:
    285
    Ratings:
    +1,704
    The nation's most sustained economic growth was during the postwar years when taxes were over 70% on the highest bracket.

    Tax money was used - along with other policies - to strengthen the economic solvency of the middle class. For example, when you use tax dollars to subsidize education, the effect is that middle class families have more money for consumption. When they spend more, the capitalist is forced to add jobs. It's called a virtuous cycle.

    What Republicans don't understand is that the market will not pay workers enough to consume and drive the domestic economy. Walmart wants sweatshop labor costs - which is why they get all their manufacturing labor from China. Therefore you need a combination of tax and after-market policies to strengthen middle class demand. America's greatest economic growth occurred when we understood this logic. Unfortunately, special interests clogged the information system and convinced us to get rid of the middle class. Now there is not enough consumption to justify adding jobs. It's a toxic cycle.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  7. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    glad to see you coming to your senses
     
  8. Mr. Shaman
    Offline

    Mr. Shaman Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    23,892
    Thanks Received:
    817
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +819
    .....Not-to-mention.....Education being a LONG-TERM inve$tment (in our Country).....a concept long-ago lost, during the greed of the Bush Years.
     
  9. KissMy
    Offline

    KissMy Free Breast Exam

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    12,062
    Thanks Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    In your head
    Ratings:
    +2,922
    My property taxes have been soaring 6 times faster than the economy. I am not rich. Gas taxes have jumped, people who drive to work are not rich. Stop using your tax the rich rhetoric to tax the poor.
     
  10. eflatminor
    Offline

    eflatminor Classical Liberal

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    9,243
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,049
    There's a fatal flaw in this piece. When he states "In other words, any negative impact on economic growth from increasing taxes on high-income people would be more than offset by the positive effects of using the resulting revenue gain to reduce the budget deficit"

    Let's for a moment assume he's correct, that an increase in the tax rates would result in an increase in revenue. While there's lots of evidence to suggest the exact opposite would be the case, let's pretend he's right about revenue going up after a tax rate increase.

    The problem is that spending is so out of control that no tax rate increase could possibly produce enough additional revenue to actually REDUCE the deficit, much less our debt. The automatic increases planned in federal spending will far outweigh any increase in revenue, thereby further increasing deficits and debt. Hell, we could CONFISCATE all assets from America's richest citizens and we still couldn't close this year's deficit, much less attack the debt we've compiled. Bottom line, with the spending we're currently planning, a tax rate increase is not going to "reduce the budget deficit". No fucking way.

    Besides, as Washington has shown us again and again, any time they get more revenue, it is never used to reduce the deficit, it is spent. Always!

    So, I tell you what, you support real REDUCTIONS in federal spending now (not some future promise) and I'll support increasing taxes to help pay off debt. Deal?
     

Share This Page