Moonglow
Diamond Member
So albino blacks are members of the white race...Yeah, I can't see the logic in that assumption.White is not a race, it's a skin tone.
As long as skin tone determines race, white is a race.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So albino blacks are members of the white race...Yeah, I can't see the logic in that assumption.White is not a race, it's a skin tone.
As long as skin tone determines race, white is a race.
White Men: Time to Discover Your Cultural Blind Spots | Michael Welp
I am pink-------what is my race?
Wise only has a B.A. in political science so I'm afraid I'm going to have to say he's full of shit.
The difference between Wise and your uncle tom is that what Wise said s factually correct, it was not jus an opinion. Your black lawn jockey was completely incorrect in what he sad.
.
Well, you seemed to think that Riley's opinions should be weighed against his education since you remarked that you were more educated than he is. I simply used the same yardstick.
Besides, there is some truth to what Wise says but he is full of it when he defends the violence of rioting blacks by comparing it to the Revolutionary War. I.E., that whites were willing to commit violence to achieve their ends. Here's the difference though: American whites did not start the violence, Britain did. All we did was declare our independence.
In the case of the black rioters, half the time they rioted after a police involved shooting, they did so immediately after the shooting instead of waiting to see if the investigation ruled it unjustified. Every time a cop shoots a black man they assume it was racially motivated and unjustified and then start looting, burning and destroying property of those who had nothing to do with it.
You are the one who decided that since Riley was a educated black man that he was saying something I might listen to. Those were your words, not mine.
First of all, I posted the link for anyone who might be interested to see what he had to say, not just for you. Secondly, I only said he was educated, not how much. You are the one who made the comparison.
What Riley said was not factually correct. You posted what he said because you claim it was what white people were thinking. So what yardstick did you use?
Yes, I claimed that he said what a lot of whites say about the relationship between law enforcement and the black community. So what?
You lie a lot ghost rider and what you believe is basically a lie. There have been thousands of situations where blacks have been shot by cops where there have been no riots or complaints. And there have been plenty of instances where whites have rioted without having a reason to.white people rioting in america - Yahoo Search Results
Of course there were shootings with no subsequent riots, any idiot knows that. But half the riots and protests that did happen, starting with the Michael Brown shooting up to now, happened right after the shooting and before any investigation was conducted. Not to mention the fact that in the Michael Brown case that started the whole mess, protesters started the "Hands up, don't shoot" gesture when it turned out to be bullshit as it was discovered that Brown never said or did any such thing.
In addition to all this, he matched the description of a black male in a white T-shirt who had just stolen cigars from a store and as it turns out, it was him. It was determined that Wilson acted accordingly and in self defense based on forensic evidence and witness testimony. Yet Brown is still viewed as some kind of Martyr.
But in usual white racist fashion you ignore such things and only look for things blacks do.. In the riots you talk about they happened after the courts decided not to indict police who murdered unarmed blacks or blacks who were complying with the officers "request.
Wise is the one who brought up black rioters in the video, remember? He's the one who made the comparison to Colonial Revolutionaries, not me. All I did was point out that these were entirely different circumstances, that there was no real comparison as in the case of the colonists, it was Britain that started the violence.
And once again you have twisted and conflated everything I've said and have labeled me a racist based on your own misinterpretations and simple disagreements from arguments you don't even remember. You've been doing this ever since the first time we interacted.
Have you even noticed that I've never called you racist or insulted your intelligence or insulted you in any way? That I never accused you of lying or called you a liar? Does that matter to you at all? Some of your posts to me look like this:
"Fuck! Fuckety fuck! racist Fuckety fuck fuck fuck! racist Fuckaboo, fuckaloo, fuck-uh-you! racist Fucking fuckety fuck and furthermore, FUCK!
I'm not going to waste a lot of words with you.
Because it's the same thing every time. This thread is about whites looking at themselves to understand how there is such a dramatic ability for some whites to see overt injustice and modern white racism while others deny it. You have yet to do that.
Reparations have nothing to do with that but you aren't interested in addressing this subject. This is always what you racists here do. If the thread is about the so called wrongs ad failings of blacks you are ready to run your mouth off at Nascar speed. But when it comes to looking at what whites do wrong you and those like you can't do that. This is apparently because you don't think you need to. And that means you think you are superior. Hence you are a racist.
Let me show you a couple of examples of why I call you a racist. You suggested I read something from Jason Reilly. You did that because he said things the way whites saw them. And despite the fact I have bee black for 57 years and have seen things that have caused problems in the black community, I cannot be correct because I don't believe things are as whites see them so I can't be right. You stated the mess in Ferguson was started by blacks with the hand up don't shoot. But the mess was started by a white cop who murdered an unarmed black kid. You ignore all wrongs done by whites.
That's kind of a whitewash.he is full of it when he defends the violence of rioting blacks by comparing it to the Revolutionary War. I.E., that whites were willing to commit violence to achieve their ends. Here's the difference though: American whites did not start the violence, Britain did. All we did was declare our independence.
In the case of the black rioters, half the time they rioted after a police involved shooting, they did so immediately after the shooting instead of waiting to see if the investigation ruled it unjustified.
The difference between Wise and your uncle tom is that what Wise said s factually correct, it was not jus an opinion. Your black lawn jockey was completely incorrect in what he sad.
.
Well, you seemed to think that Riley's opinions should be weighed against his education since you remarked that you were more educated than he is. I simply used the same yardstick.
Besides, there is some truth to what Wise says but he is full of it when he defends the violence of rioting blacks by comparing it to the Revolutionary War. I.E., that whites were willing to commit violence to achieve their ends. Here's the difference though: American whites did not start the violence, Britain did. All we did was declare our independence.
In the case of the black rioters, half the time they rioted after a police involved shooting, they did so immediately after the shooting instead of waiting to see if the investigation ruled it unjustified. Every time a cop shoots a black man they assume it was racially motivated and unjustified and then start looting, burning and destroying property of those who had nothing to do with it.
You are the one who decided that since Riley was a educated black man that he was saying something I might listen to. Those were your words, not mine.
First of all, I posted the link for anyone who might be interested to see what he had to say, not just for you. Secondly, I only said he was educated, not how much. You are the one who made the comparison.
What Riley said was not factually correct. You posted what he said because you claim it was what white people were thinking. So what yardstick did you use?
Yes, I claimed that he said what a lot of whites say about the relationship between law enforcement and the black community. So what?
You lie a lot ghost rider and what you believe is basically a lie. There have been thousands of situations where blacks have been shot by cops where there have been no riots or complaints. And there have been plenty of instances where whites have rioted without having a reason to.white people rioting in america - Yahoo Search Results
Of course there were shootings with no subsequent riots, any idiot knows that. But half the riots and protests that did happen, starting with the Michael Brown shooting up to now, happened right after the shooting and before any investigation was conducted. Not to mention the fact that in the Michael Brown case that started the whole mess, protesters started the "Hands up, don't shoot" gesture when it turned out to be bullshit as it was discovered that Brown never said or did any such thing.
In addition to all this, he matched the description of a black male in a white T-shirt who had just stolen cigars from a store and as it turns out, it was him. It was determined that Wilson acted accordingly and in self defense based on forensic evidence and witness testimony. Yet Brown is still viewed as some kind of Martyr.
But in usual white racist fashion you ignore such things and only look for things blacks do.. In the riots you talk about they happened after the courts decided not to indict police who murdered unarmed blacks or blacks who were complying with the officers "request.
Wise is the one who brought up black rioters in the video, remember? He's the one who made the comparison to Colonial Revolutionaries, not me. All I did was point out that these were entirely different circumstances, that there was no real comparison as in the case of the colonists, it was Britain that started the violence.
And once again you have twisted and conflated everything I've said and have labeled me a racist based on your own misinterpretations and simple disagreements from arguments you don't even remember. You've been doing this ever since the first time we interacted.
Have you even noticed that I've never called you racist or insulted your intelligence or insulted you in any way? That I never accused you of lying or called you a liar? Does that matter to you at all? Some of your posts to me look like this:
"Fuck! Fuckety fuck! racist Fuckety fuck fuck fuck! racist Fuckaboo, fuckaloo, fuck-uh-you! racist Fucking fuckety fuck and furthermore, FUCK!
I'm not going to waste a lot of words with you.
Aw come on, you're not having fun anymore? Before you go, waste the word "racist" for me just one more time. I can never get enough of that.
Because it's the same thing every time. This thread is about whites looking at themselves to understand how there is such a dramatic ability for some whites to see overt injustice and modern white racism while others deny it. You have yet to do that.
I'll acknowledge that as soon as you acknowledge that blacks can be racist.
Reparations have nothing to do with that but you aren't interested in addressing this subject. This is always what you racists here do. If the thread is about the so called wrongs ad failings of blacks you are ready to run your mouth off at Nascar speed. But when it comes to looking at what whites do wrong you and those like you can't do that. This is apparently because you don't think you need to. And that means you think you are superior. Hence you are a racist.
If I feel superior it's because I don't insult my opponent, insult his/her intelligence or blithely throw the words "racist", "liar" or "Uncle Tom" out there every time someone disagrees with me. If I feel superior it's because I address my debate opponents with civility and respect and I don't have such a narrow view of people to where the only two possible reasons for anyone to disagree with me on any aspect of the subject of racism is that they are racist or an Uncle Tom.
Let me show you a couple of examples of why I call you a racist. You suggested I read something from Jason Reilly. You did that because he said things the way whites saw them. And despite the fact I have bee black for 57 years and have seen things that have caused problems in the black community, I cannot be correct because I don't believe things are as whites see them so I can't be right. You stated the mess in Ferguson was started by blacks with the hand up don't shoot. But the mess was started by a white cop who murdered an unarmed black kid. You ignore all wrongs done by whites.
First of all, you were calling me racist long before I posted that article. Secondly, it is a known fact that Brown robbed the store that day. Two legal entities in two investigations - The county grand jury and the U.S. Justice Department - determined that the evidence and witness testimony made it clear that Brown attacked Wilson and Wilson fired in self defense.
I'm sorry but "a white cop who murdered an unarmed black kid" is simply not what happened.
The criminal justice system favors Blacks. The public schools favor Blacks. Government favors Blacks. The fact that Blacks are so far behind Whites in IQ while excelling at savage behavior has nothing to do with Whites (and some Asians, some Jews, and some Indians from India, etc.) being way more advanced for the most part. You cannot change DNA, at the present time. And programs to help Blacks only makes things worse, since they are destined to fail, and non-Blacks get annoyed that they are being discriminated against for no reason.
White Men: Time to Discover Your Cultural Blind Spots | Michael Welp
Here we go again. With the lists of "white privilege" that include "post cards or greeting cards" with pictures of folks my own race. Dammit -- Start a NET business. Give Hallmark a fucking HEART ATTACK when you reach $10Mill in sales your first year.
Go post a GOFUNDME or organize the business. This is NOT "white privilege" -- this is whining. Whining when you could be FIXING things. Hell, maybe I'll do it just so I don't have to listen to lists of stupid "white privileges" like this anymore..
I might be able to swing two goats and one sheep for you.Women are STILL held in pretty much slavery in a lot of places in the world. They go from being the property of their fathers to being the property of their husbands. Perhaps I should demand reparations from all men. Same thing. Lol.
I am pink-------what is my race?
I am pink-------what is my race?
Dunno .. But by standard taxonomical methods, I would guess your Genus to be Tourista and your specie to be Miamian. Use sunscreen...
The FBI just called and said that you're a liar...
"Of the offenders for whom race was known, 52.4 percent were black, 45.2 percent were white, and 2.4 percent were of other races. The race was unknown for 4,077 offenders..."
Expanded Homicide Data
He's a little bit confused about "rates".. Apparently it's only the absolute number of anything that concerns him. Without doing the math to see how it pans out amongst various sub-groups of the question..
It's a massive WHITE crime wave to him. And blacks don't have a crime issue because more whites are criminals sort of thing. Liberal arts in action..
Yet he misquotes this "whites have a higher rate of crime" thing like he's done the math..
I'm not confused about a damn thing. Whites commit more crime. That's just the way it is. There is only one rate, the total.
Whites commit more crime because their group is over 3 times bigger. Just like Pekinese bite more humans than Doberman.. Doesn't say a thing about which breed is MORE LIKELY to bite does it?
Piss poor excuse. ..
It's not an excuse. That's the language of communicating with statistics and facts. You might get away with loose and fast at a street rally. But not ever in any kind of meaningful debate or conversation..
That's kind of a whitewash.he is full of it when he defends the violence of rioting blacks by comparing it to the Revolutionary War. I.E., that whites were willing to commit violence to achieve their ends. Here's the difference though: American whites did not start the violence, Britain did. All we did was declare our independence.
In the case of the black rioters, half the time they rioted after a police involved shooting, they did so immediately after the shooting instead of waiting to see if the investigation ruled it unjustified.
So when the slave revolts occurred why were the events not viewed as the slaves merely defending their lives and attempting to escape their captors? How were they different than the violence perpetrated during the Revolutionary War?
Well, you seemed to think that Riley's opinions should be weighed against his education since you remarked that you were more educated than he is. I simply used the same yardstick.
Besides, there is some truth to what Wise says but he is full of it when he defends the violence of rioting blacks by comparing it to the Revolutionary War. I.E., that whites were willing to commit violence to achieve their ends. Here's the difference though: American whites did not start the violence, Britain did. All we did was declare our independence.
In the case of the black rioters, half the time they rioted after a police involved shooting, they did so immediately after the shooting instead of waiting to see if the investigation ruled it unjustified. Every time a cop shoots a black man they assume it was racially motivated and unjustified and then start looting, burning and destroying property of those who had nothing to do with it.
You are the one who decided that since Riley was a educated black man that he was saying something I might listen to. Those were your words, not mine.
First of all, I posted the link for anyone who might be interested to see what he had to say, not just for you. Secondly, I only said he was educated, not how much. You are the one who made the comparison.
What Riley said was not factually correct. You posted what he said because you claim it was what white people were thinking. So what yardstick did you use?
Yes, I claimed that he said what a lot of whites say about the relationship between law enforcement and the black community. So what?
You lie a lot ghost rider and what you believe is basically a lie. There have been thousands of situations where blacks have been shot by cops where there have been no riots or complaints. And there have been plenty of instances where whites have rioted without having a reason to.white people rioting in america - Yahoo Search Results
Of course there were shootings with no subsequent riots, any idiot knows that. But half the riots and protests that did happen, starting with the Michael Brown shooting up to now, happened right after the shooting and before any investigation was conducted. Not to mention the fact that in the Michael Brown case that started the whole mess, protesters started the "Hands up, don't shoot" gesture when it turned out to be bullshit as it was discovered that Brown never said or did any such thing.
In addition to all this, he matched the description of a black male in a white T-shirt who had just stolen cigars from a store and as it turns out, it was him. It was determined that Wilson acted accordingly and in self defense based on forensic evidence and witness testimony. Yet Brown is still viewed as some kind of Martyr.
But in usual white racist fashion you ignore such things and only look for things blacks do.. In the riots you talk about they happened after the courts decided not to indict police who murdered unarmed blacks or blacks who were complying with the officers "request.
Wise is the one who brought up black rioters in the video, remember? He's the one who made the comparison to Colonial Revolutionaries, not me. All I did was point out that these were entirely different circumstances, that there was no real comparison as in the case of the colonists, it was Britain that started the violence.
And once again you have twisted and conflated everything I've said and have labeled me a racist based on your own misinterpretations and simple disagreements from arguments you don't even remember. You've been doing this ever since the first time we interacted.
Have you even noticed that I've never called you racist or insulted your intelligence or insulted you in any way? That I never accused you of lying or called you a liar? Does that matter to you at all? Some of your posts to me look like this:
"Fuck! Fuckety fuck! racist Fuckety fuck fuck fuck! racist Fuckaboo, fuckaloo, fuck-uh-you! racist Fucking fuckety fuck and furthermore, FUCK!
I'm not going to waste a lot of words with you.
Aw come on, you're not having fun anymore? Before you go, waste the word "racist" for me just one more time. I can never get enough of that.
Because it's the same thing every time. This thread is about whites looking at themselves to understand how there is such a dramatic ability for some whites to see overt injustice and modern white racism while others deny it. You have yet to do that.
I'll acknowledge that as soon as you acknowledge that blacks can be racist.
Reparations have nothing to do with that but you aren't interested in addressing this subject. This is always what you racists here do. If the thread is about the so called wrongs ad failings of blacks you are ready to run your mouth off at Nascar speed. But when it comes to looking at what whites do wrong you and those like you can't do that. This is apparently because you don't think you need to. And that means you think you are superior. Hence you are a racist.
If I feel superior it's because I don't insult my opponent, insult his/her intelligence or blithely throw the words "racist", "liar" or "Uncle Tom" out there every time someone disagrees with me. If I feel superior it's because I address my debate opponents with civility and respect and I don't have such a narrow view of people to where the only two possible reasons for anyone to disagree with me on any aspect of the subject of racism is that they are racist or an Uncle Tom.
Let me show you a couple of examples of why I call you a racist. You suggested I read something from Jason Reilly. You did that because he said things the way whites saw them. And despite the fact I have bee black for 57 years and have seen things that have caused problems in the black community, I cannot be correct because I don't believe things are as whites see them so I can't be right. You stated the mess in Ferguson was started by blacks with the hand up don't shoot. But the mess was started by a white cop who murdered an unarmed black kid. You ignore all wrongs done by whites.
First of all, you were calling me racist long before I posted that article. Secondly, it is a known fact that Brown robbed the store that day. Two legal entities in two investigations - The county grand jury and the U.S. Justice Department - determined that the evidence and witness testimony made it clear that Brown attacked Wilson and Wilson fired in self defense.
I'm sorry but "a white cop who murdered an unarmed black kid" is simply not what happened.
I'll admit to black racism when it is shown to me that blacks have done everything to whites that whites have done to blacks.
I call you what your words show you to be. Brown took a box if cigars worth less than 50 bucks. A misdemeanor. So lets not exaggerate things. Darren Wilson murdered an unarmed black kid and got away with it.
You don't question the decision, why it took so long, how Wilson got to practice his testimony for weeks, that the prosecutor did not cross examine Wilson,that the prosecutors assistant refused to give vital legal information to the grand jury in regard to the fleeing felon statute, that at least one witness for Wilson lied, that some witnesses for Brown did not get to testify, that the autopsy showed that Brown was in no position to be attacking Wilson, the police in Ferguson had ever been prosecuted by that DA for other acts of aggression against black citizens. To you its cut and dry just because the local grand jury ran by the DA who was controlled by law enforcement in Ferguson decided there was not enough evidence to even have a trial.
And I supposed Eric Garner did not die of a chokehold either. You insult me with your posts. They are at full of lies and racism. I don't have any sympathy for crying whites who want to play victim just so you can undo everything done for equal opportunity so you dey all others equal opportunity again. When I read the bullshit here from whites about how grateful we should be because we could be living in a mud hut in Africa and your ass says nothing but decides to attack every black person here for things we say, you have no right to cry about being called a racist. I called Reilly an uncle tom because that's what he is. I know how things are for black communities as I have worked in the trenches. He has not and he barks out what white racists believes giving them validation. That's what an uncle tom does.
I will use curse words when the situation shows that's how things need to be said in order to communicate the proper amount of disdain your crap deserves. That's just how it's going to be. So go to work finding instances where blacks have done everything to whites here in America whites have done to us and then I'll admit there is black racism.
White Men: Time to Discover Your Cultural Blind Spots | Michael Welp
Here we go again. With the lists of "white privilege" that include "post cards or greeting cards" with pictures of folks my own race. Dammit -- Start a NET business. Give Hallmark a fucking HEART ATTACK when you reach $10Mill in sales your first year.
Go post a GOFUNDME or organize the business. This is NOT "white privilege" -- this is whining. Whining when you could be FIXING things. Hell, maybe I'll do it just so I don't have to listen to lists of stupid "white privileges" like this anymore..
Can't stand the truth son?
White Men: Time to Discover Your Cultural Blind Spots | Michael Welp
Here we go again. With the lists of "white privilege" that include "post cards or greeting cards" with pictures of folks my own race. Dammit -- Start a NET business. Give Hallmark a fucking HEART ATTACK when you reach $10Mill in sales your first year.
Go post a GOFUNDME or organize the business. This is NOT "white privilege" -- this is whining. Whining when you could be FIXING things. Hell, maybe I'll do it just so I don't have to listen to lists of stupid "white privileges" like this anymore..
Can't stand the truth son?
What truth? that post cards and Greeting Cards are RACIST and part of white privilege? No -- I don't accept that. And any right thinking group of blacks could have fixed that issue 44 yrs ago.. Even easier now with the Web.
I can fix your inferiority complex for $14.95 with an assorted gift box of fine art Black Greeting cards from at least a DOZEN Black entrepreneurs who have FIXED THE PROBLEM. And gotten rich in the process...
Here's a picture of one of them that didn't sit around moaning about "white privilege" over greeting cards..
African American Greeting Cards | The Black Art Depot
Best Shop For African American Gifts | Black-Gifts.com
Now I've fixed the geneological heritage that "white people destroyed" for you with $100 DNA test kit and some of your own work to research it. And for FREE -- I've busted up all that "white privilege" about greeting cards.
Heck man -- in about a week you might start to lose some of the rage and anger if I keep helping you fix your issues..
He's a little bit confused about "rates".. Apparently it's only the absolute number of anything that concerns him. Without doing the math to see how it pans out amongst various sub-groups of the question..
It's a massive WHITE crime wave to him. And blacks don't have a crime issue because more whites are criminals sort of thing. Liberal arts in action..
Yet he misquotes this "whites have a higher rate of crime" thing like he's done the math..
I'm not confused about a damn thing. Whites commit more crime. That's just the way it is. There is only one rate, the total.
Whites commit more crime because their group is over 3 times bigger. Just like Pekinese bite more humans than Doberman.. Doesn't say a thing about which breed is MORE LIKELY to bite does it?
Piss poor excuse. ..
It's not an excuse. That's the language of communicating with statistics and facts. You might get away with loose and fast at a street rally. But not ever in any kind of meaningful debate or conversation..
It's already been determined that some don't understand percentages and per capita. It is a waste of time arguing with these kinds of people. Better to just mock them and let them continue on their miserable ways.