Either that or just plain ignorant.You're a liar, valox.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Either that or just plain ignorant.You're a liar, valox.
You're a liar, valox.
Here is how I see it all. The Democrats want to floor the car down the road into oncomming traffic and have a head-on collision with their foot on the floorboard. The Republicans are saying "Oh, well, we will only do 60 into that head-on collision..." Time and time again they have both failed to see the big picture. Yes, I do agree that the liberal policies of invasive government in the business world has dissolved the idea of free markets that grew this nation's economy into the most powerful in the world in a historically short amount of time. Lest we forget, though, that the first stimulus bill was proposed by a Republican White House... The term "too big to fail" was coined, completely destroying any notion of free market this nation had left. The only way to save it is to get back to the basic principles our founding fathers built this nation upon. They all feared exactly what is happening today. I don't have them readily available at this time but I will find several chilling quotes from the likes of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison that almost seem like they were gazing into a crystal ball and focusing on this exact time we are in. The bottom line is, it has gotten bad, both parties are responsible for the failure, and both parties need to be responsible for the reform. If they won't comply, then We The People need to reform Washington...
The nation cannot sustain what the democrats are doing. Then what ? Better have a plan of your own. When this falls apart the savages will be furious.
JRK,
The stimulus failed since it was mostly paltry tax cuts and income supplements. It didn't properly investment into America.
The Democratic Party is a center-right party and only retains power since the GOP is bat shit crazy.
Plus, it is FISCAL cliff, not the physical cliff. It was the GOP who put us here.
You just, more than likely unknowingly, proved a point of the OP. The commies with the aid of the media are winning the marketing battle. It was the white house that came up with the idea of sequestration not the republicans. They forgot the first rule of dealing with Maobama, if his lips are moving he's more than likely lying his ass off. Prime example, he campaigned on raising 80 billion in revenue, after the election he's now demanding 165 billion, can you say more than double? Before the election he agreed to $2.50 in cuts for every dollar in new revenue, now he wants $4.25 in new revenue for every dollar of cuts, plus he wants another 150 billion in new stimulus. So just continue your march in zombie land listening to your dear leader, with any luck there will be enough pieces to put the country back together when he's done.
How did the White House create sequestration when it was the Republicans who demanded cuts for raising the debt ceiling?
JRK,
The stimulus failed since it was mostly paltry tax cuts and income supplements. It didn't properly investment into America.
JRK,
The stimulus failed since it was mostly paltry tax cuts and income supplements. It didn't properly investment into America.
... and since Obama didn't pay attention to make sure that it was going where it was supposed to go.
If Obama had payed attention to that instead of turning his attention to his project of increasing regulations on shell-shocked employers via the ACA, we might have had some more of that infrastructure he claims to value and the recovery might have gained traction.
Opportunity squandered.
You just, more than likely unknowingly, proved a point of the OP. The commies with the aid of the media are winning the marketing battle. It was the white house that came up with the idea of sequestration not the republicans. They forgot the first rule of dealing with Maobama, if his lips are moving he's more than likely lying his ass off. Prime example, he campaigned on raising 80 billion in revenue, after the election he's now demanding 165 billion, can you say more than double? Before the election he agreed to $2.50 in cuts for every dollar in new revenue, now he wants $4.25 in new revenue for every dollar of cuts, plus he wants another 150 billion in new stimulus. So just continue your march in zombie land listening to your dear leader, with any luck there will be enough pieces to put the country back together when he's done.
How did the White House create sequestration when it was the Republicans who demanded cuts for raising the debt ceiling?
The WH introduced it in the negotiations, it was Maobamas idea. Supposedly it would force the congress to act to avoid it, the house addressed the problem and Reid refused. You can sell out all honesty and try to blame the republicans but we know it's BS.
JRK,
The stimulus failed since it was mostly paltry tax cuts and income supplements. It didn't properly investment into America.
... and since Obama didn't pay attention to make sure that it was going where it was supposed to go.
If Obama had payed attention to that instead of turning his attention to his project of increasing regulations on shell-shocked employers via the ACA, we might have had some more of that infrastructure he claims to value and the recovery might have gained traction.
Opportunity squandered.
The Democratic Party is a center-right party and only retains power since the GOP is bat shit crazy.
Plus, it is FISCAL cliff, not the physical cliff. It was the GOP who put us here.
You just, more than likely unknowingly, proved a point of the OP. The commies with the aid of the media are winning the marketing battle. It was the white house that came up with the idea of sequestration not the republicans. They forgot the first rule of dealing with Maobama, if his lips are moving he's more than likely lying his ass off. Prime example, he campaigned on raising 80 billion in revenue, after the election he's now demanding 165 billion, can you say more than double? Before the election he agreed to $2.50 in cuts for every dollar in new revenue, now he wants $4.25 in new revenue for every dollar of cuts, plus he wants another 150 billion in new stimulus. So just continue your march in zombie land listening to your dear leader, with any luck there will be enough pieces to put the country back together when he's done.
I would like to see a source for this. Plus, I didn't prove the OP and still hold my ground - Democrats are a center-right party, not liberal.
You do realize that I voted for Gary Johnson, not Obama. Why you keep on insisting that he is my dear leader is bizarre.
The Democratic President was re-elected. Whose in denial?
They haven't been Democrats since the first half of the 20th century but running as Communists might create a problem for their image.
Here's the funny thing..they claim that maistream republicans are "extremist" and all Christians who are pro-life are "fundies"...but when you point out the fact that progressives in the 30s lent credibility and funding to both Communist fascist regimes, and the Nazi regime, they threaten you with prosecution for *slander*.
True story. Everything old is new again. We're headed for a holocaust the likes of which has never been seen before, and which will signify the end of the world as we know it.
You just, more than likely unknowingly, proved a point of the OP. The commies with the aid of the media are winning the marketing battle. It was the white house that came up with the idea of sequestration not the republicans. They forgot the first rule of dealing with Maobama, if his lips are moving he's more than likely lying his ass off. Prime example, he campaigned on raising 80 billion in revenue, after the election he's now demanding 165 billion, can you say more than double? Before the election he agreed to $2.50 in cuts for every dollar in new revenue, now he wants $4.25 in new revenue for every dollar of cuts, plus he wants another 150 billion in new stimulus. So just continue your march in zombie land listening to your dear leader, with any luck there will be enough pieces to put the country back together when he's done.
I would like to see a source for this. Plus, I didn't prove the OP and still hold my ground - Democrats are a center-right party, not liberal.
You do realize that I voted for Gary Johnson, not Obama. Why you keep on insisting that he is my dear leader is bizarre.
Here's a source:What Is 'Sequestration' and Whose Idea Was It?
Quote form Bob Woodward
In his book The Price of Politics, the reporter who gained fame from the Watergate scandal outlined that it was White House Office of Management Director Jack Lew and Legislative Affairs Director Rob Nabors who took the sequestration proposal to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. They also presented it to House Republicans.
If Maobama didn't know what the folks in the west wing are doing it would still be on him for his incompetence. Also if you think the commiecrat leadership is anywhere near the center, much less center right, your delusional.
They haven't been Democrats since the first half of the 20th century but running as Communists might create a problem for their image.
Here's the funny thing..they claim that maistream republicans are "extremist" and all Christians who are pro-life are "fundies"...but when you point out the fact that progressives in the 30s lent credibility and funding to both Communist fascist regimes, and the Nazi regime, they threaten you with prosecution for *slander*.
True story. Everything old is new again. We're headed for a holocaust the likes of which has never been seen before, and which will signify the end of the world as we know it.
Is that what the voices in your head tell you?
I would like to see a source for this. Plus, I didn't prove the OP and still hold my ground - Democrats are a center-right party, not liberal.
You do realize that I voted for Gary Johnson, not Obama. Why you keep on insisting that he is my dear leader is bizarre.
Here's a source:What Is 'Sequestration' and Whose Idea Was It?
Quote form Bob Woodward
In his book The Price of Politics, the reporter who gained fame from the Watergate scandal outlined that it was White House Office of Management Director Jack Lew and Legislative Affairs Director Rob Nabors who took the sequestration proposal to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. They also presented it to House Republicans.
If Maobama didn't know what the folks in the west wing are doing it would still be on him for his incompetence. Also if you think the commiecrat leadership is anywhere near the center, much less center right, your delusional.
No where in that post claimed that Obama agreed to $2.50 in cuts for every dollar in new revenue, now he wants $4.25 in new revenue for every dollar of cuts.
Perhaps you want to try again?