Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There is nothing preventing reradiation of energy absorbed by CO2 and I don't give a shit whether it gets there by conduction or radiation. One problem you've ignored is how poor a conductor is air. If you want to insist that all the energy trapped by CO2 within the first few meters has to make its way to the stratosphere solely by conduction, you're even more in a hole with your claim that this process doesn't trap thermal energy and warm the planet.
You said observed. Uh, nope!There is nothing preventing reradiation of energy absorbed by CO2 and I don't give a shit whether it gets there by conduction or radiation. One problem you've ignored is how poor a conductor is air. If you want to insist that all the energy trapped by CO2 within the first few meters has to make its way to the stratosphere solely by conduction, you're even more in a hole with your claim that this process doesn't trap thermal energy and warm the planet.
LWNJ's like WA here can't stand the truth. And when the facts back them into the corner, they come out attacking the messenger instead of the message.OP is quoting the blaze and breitbart. Partisan publications known for propaganda and lies. The odd part is people believe the propaganda without question. It's kind of eerie...The odd part is they can be told in no uncertain terms that they have been lied to, just like the media admitted to lying, and they will march blindly on and believe exactly what they have been told. Look how many still quote CNN. It seems they can't be lied to enough.
Nothing can make them believe the truth. It's kind of eerie..
TheBlaze has an impeccable reputation, snowflake. Deal with it. The data wasn't created by them - it was shared by them. And the data is indisputable.
You said observed. Uh, nope!There is nothing preventing reradiation of energy absorbed by CO2 and I don't give a shit whether it gets there by conduction or radiation. One problem you've ignored is how poor a conductor is air. If you want to insist that all the energy trapped by CO2 within the first few meters has to make its way to the stratosphere solely by conduction, you're even more in a hole with your claim that this process doesn't trap thermal energy and warm the planet.
LWNJ's like WA here can't stand the truth. And when the facts back them into the corner, they come out attacking the messenger instead of the message.OP is quoting the blaze and breitbart. Partisan publications known for propaganda and lies. The odd part is people believe the propaganda without question. It's kind of eerie...The odd part is they can be told in no uncertain terms that they have been lied to, just like the media admitted to lying, and they will march blindly on and believe exactly what they have been told. Look how many still quote CNN. It seems they can't be lied to enough.
Nothing can make them believe the truth. It's kind of eerie..
TheBlaze has an impeccable reputation, snowflake. Deal with it. The data wasn't created by them - it was shared by them. And the data is indisputable.
Global warming my Ass! I damn near froze to death deer hunting last fall/ winter. Seemed "really cold" must be we are getting used to the High temperatures caused by Global warming. Maybe these retards should actually go outside longer than to get in their Limos.
You wouldn’t know weather from climate!LWNJ's like WA here can't stand the truth. And when the facts back them into the corner, they come out attacking the messenger instead of the message.OP is quoting the blaze and breitbart. Partisan publications known for propaganda and lies. The odd part is people believe the propaganda without question. It's kind of eerie...The odd part is they can be told in no uncertain terms that they have been lied to, just like the media admitted to lying, and they will march blindly on and believe exactly what they have been told. Look how many still quote CNN. It seems they can't be lied to enough.
Nothing can make them believe the truth. It's kind of eerie..
TheBlaze has an impeccable reputation, snowflake. Deal with it. The data wasn't created by them - it was shared by them. And the data is indisputable.
Global warming my Ass! I damn near froze to death deer hunting last fall/ winter. Seemed "really cold" must be we are getting used to the High temperatures caused by Global warming. Maybe these retards should actually go outside longer than to get in their Limos.
Once more
Weather .NEQ. Climate
Aaaaand she triples down.
She’s been so thoroughly defeated with facts (all links posted) in this thread that she’s begging me to provide an argument against myself to help her!
Do I have anything to say? Sure! I've filled this thread with indisputable proof that "Global Warming" is a scam
And you are a very poor conductor for independent thought, absorption of facts, and acceptance of reality. What a shame.First, as I have stated a few times now, air is an extremely poor conductor
And you are a very poor conductor for independent thought, absorption of facts, and acceptance of reality. What a shame.First, as I have stated a few times now, air is an extremely poor conductor
You've only posted links to debunked conspiracy babbling.
First, as I have stated a few times now, air is an extremely poor conductor and its ability to conduct deteriorates with increasing altitude. So I reject your assumption that after absorbing IR from the surface, all further transmission is by conduction and convection.['quote]
Of course you are wrong...but what else is new?
Second, the greenhouse effect increases the equilibrium temperature of the planet by increasing the amount of thermal energy in the pipeline. The longer it takes the average quanta of energy to leave, the higher the equilibrium temperature. Having it travel all but the first few meters by conduction will dramatically increase the amount of energy in the pipeline. It will not eliminate the greenhouse effect, it would make it far, far more effective at increasing temperatures.['quote]
Alas, it does preclude the possibility of a radiative greenhouse effect as described by climate science...and with it the possibility of AGW due to extra CO2 in the atmosphere...there is a reason the climate sensitivity to CO2 has dropped from 6 degrees to less than a degree and is still trending towards zero where it belongs.
So, I am done with this argument. This appears to be just more of your troll-shit.
Right...just more lies from the biggest liar on the board..
So, what are some theoretical examples of hard data that could falsify your beliefs on climate science?
And you are a very poor conductor for independent thought, absorption of facts, and acceptance of reality. What a shame.First, as I have stated a few times now, air is an extremely poor conductor
Exactly. Even after they are caught lying to you. That’s what I mean when I say you are a very poor conductor for independent thought, absorption of facts, and acceptance of reality.Well, in this context (the one where I am not a climate scientist) I tend to adopt the majority opinions of those with advanced educations in this field doing research and publishing their results.