The definitive documents of the 1948 war

[P F Tinmore]

what does that have to do with anything ?

Did the Palestinians go to Europe and attack the Zionists?

Or

Did the Zionists go to Palestine to attack the Palestinians?

 

[Hossfly]

what does that have to do with anything ?

Did the Palestinians go to Europe and attack the Zionists?

Or

Did the Zionists go to Palestine to attack the Palestinians?

What a brilliant answer! A Turnspeak blabberwocky reply.
What Palestine? Never heard of it till Arafart was kicked out of Jordan.

 

[P F Tinmore]

what does that have to do with anything ?

Did the Palestinians go to Europe and attack the Zionists?

Or

Did the Zionists go to Palestine to attack the Palestinians?

What a brilliant answer! A Turnspeak blabberwocky reply.
What Palestine? Never heard of it till Arafart was kicked out of Jordan.

No wonder you can't keep up with your end of a discussion.

 

[Hossfly]

Did the Palestinians go to Europe and attack the Zionists?

Or

Did the Zionists go to Palestine to attack the Palestinians?

What a brilliant answer! A Turnspeak blabberwocky reply.
What Palestine? Never heard of it till Arafart was kicked out of Jordan.

No wonder you can't keep up with your end of a discussion.

Izzat right,bro? Since I've been here I have to see you give a definitive answer to anything.Not one.And I doubt if I ever will.

 

[Wolverine1984]

what does that have to do with anything ?

Did the Palestinians go to Europe and attack the Zionists?

Or

Did the Zionists go to Palestine to attack the Palestinians?

Neither , the war happened between residents of the mandate, and has no relation to Europe. (That is why it is called civil war).

 

[P F Tinmore]

What a brilliant answer! A Turnspeak blabberwocky reply.
What Palestine? Never heard of it till Arafart was kicked out of Jordan.

No wonder you can't keep up with your end of a discussion.

Izzat right,bro? Since I've been here I have to see you give a definitive answer to anything.Not one.And I doubt if I ever will.

What question have you asked that you do not think I had adequately answered?

 

[Hossfly]

No wonder you can't keep up with your end of a discussion.

Izzat right,bro? Since I've been here I have to see you give a definitive answer to anything.Not one.And I doubt if I ever will.

What question have you asked that you do not think I had adequately answered?

Any question or reply is met with your deflections.And I mean never a sensible answer.Specifically a definitive one. Go figger.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Izzat right,bro? Since I've been here I have to see you give a definitive answer to anything.Not one.And I doubt if I ever will.

What question have you asked that you do not think I had adequately answered?

Any question or reply is met with your deflections.And I mean never a sensible answer.Specifically a definitive one. Go figger.

That's what I thought. You don't have a question.

 

[P F Tinmore]

what does that have to do with anything ?

Did the Palestinians go to Europe and attack the Zionists?

Or

Did the Zionists go to Palestine to attack the Palestinians?

Neither , the war happened between residents of the mandate, and has no relation to Europe. (That is why it is called civil war).

So, why did the Zionists import all those settlers...er...residents?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I'm sorry I thought you said 'There were no factions'.

Either way , the emigrating Jews and the Palestinians lived under the same mandate and started fighting , this is a civil war.

Your statement that the Palestinians were attacked (One sided) does not represent the truth.

The war was between the Palestinians and the Zionists.

Did the Palestinians go to Europe and attack the Zionists?

Your Arab buddies are too busy firing anti-tank weapons at Israeli school buses.

 

[P F Tinmore]

what does that have to do with anything ?

Did the Palestinians go to Europe and attack the Zionists?

Or

Did the Zionists go to Palestine to attack the Palestinians?

Neither , the war happened between residents of the mandate, and has no relation to Europe. (That is why it is called civil war).

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm7dMhE80dw]Alnakba English P1 - YouTube[/ame]

It was not a civil war. It was an invasion with the plan of taking over Palestine.

 

[Wolverine1984]

I'll take Al-Gazira's word for it ... I find it very objective.
Any proof for your claim or you just dealing with hearsay ?

 

[P F Tinmore]

I'll take Al-Gazira's word for it ... I find it very objective.
Any proof for your claim or you just dealing with hearsay ?

The video is based on documented history.

 

[Wolverine1984]

And how do you know that exactly ?
This video is based on a biased interpretation of documented history maybe ...

It's extremely hypocritical of you to shout 'Israeli Propoganda' while basing your claims on Palestinian propaganda.

I don't deal with hearsay, post a wiki link , or lose the argument.

 

[P F Tinmore]

And how do you know that exactly ?
This video is based on a biased interpretation of documented history maybe ...

It's extremely hypocritical of you to shout 'Israeli Propoganda' while basing your claims on Palestinian propaganda.

I don't deal with hearsay, post a wiki link , or lose the argument.

Are you claiming victory without viewing the issues?

 

[Wolverine1984]

I viewed the issues quite enough, you failed to make a case.

 

[P F Tinmore]

I viewed the issues quite enough, you failed to make a case.

You say that without even looking at my case.

 

[Wolverine1984]

You presented a claim ('There was no civil war - it is Israeli propaganda') and failed to prove it , hence you have no case.

 

[P F Tinmore]

You presented a claim ('There was no civil war - it is Israeli propaganda') and failed to prove it , hence you have no case.

Your claim is based on false premise. You have failed to prove your point.

 

[Wolverine1984]

You presented a claim ('There was no civil war - it is Israeli propaganda') and failed to prove it , hence you have no case.

Your claim is based on false premise. You have failed to prove your point.

I don't need to prove anything , the burden of proof is on you.

It's a fact that the war was going on between 2 factions.
It's a fact that both of the factions were residing in the same mandate.
There is nothing false here. And that is the definition of civil war.

You tried to refute that , failed to do so , and now here we are...
My point is proven while yours is not.