The Deep State Won't Let Go Of Russian Hacking Claims - 6 Russian Hackers Charged With A Crime

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,086
2,645
Without hard evidence that will ever be seen, the FBI charged 6 Russian hackers who have never been to the United States, who will never see the United States, who will never be brought to the United States, who will never stand trial in the United States, whose case will never be heard in the United States, and the evidence against will never be seen by any American Judge, court, or US citizen was charged for 'allegedly attempting to impact the 2016 USA election'.

One of the supposed hackers was one mentioned by proven criminal and fake Russian Collusion Narrative investigator Robert Mueller. Mueller's team initially indicted these Russian hackers.

The DOJ alleged the GRU hackers launched cyberattacks that damaged Ukraine’s electrical grid and interfered in France’s 2017 elections. (And since the Deep State needed to blame someone for allegedly interfering in our election / hacked a certain server, Liberals / the Deep State apparently blamed them, too..)


The GRU hackers were charged with conspiracy to conduct computer fraud and abuse, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, damaging protected computers, and aggravated identity theft in an indictment returned by a federal grand jury in Pittsburgh.

One of the Russians charged on Monday, Anatoliy Sergeyevich Kovalev, was also previously indicted by former special counsel Robert Mueller.



It's rather convenient to be able to accuse, indict, and charge people who will never get a chance to argue their case / defend themselves with crimes, declare to the world it is so, never have to present evidence, and never expect to have to because the guys you blame will NEVER be caught and brought to the US to dispute the accusations..... Just sayin'....


“For more than two years we have worked tirelessly to expose these Russian GRU Officers who engaged in a global campaign of hacking, disruption and destabilization, representing the most destructive and costly cyber-attacks in history,” said U.S. Attorney Scott Brady of the Western District of Pennsylvania."

YET FOR 2 YEARS THIS PROVEN CRIMINAL FBI HAS BEENSITTING ON TONS OF EVIDENCE OF DEMOCRAT CRIMES, EVIDENCE OF THEIR OWN FISA COURT CRIMES PERPETRATED OVER DECADES, AND HUNTER BIDEN'S LAPTOP THAT NOT ONLY PROVED THE PRESIDENT'S INNOCENCE DURING THE DEMOCRATS FAU IMPEACHMENT COUP BUT EXPOSED BOTH HUNTER AND JOE BIDEN PERPETRATINBG INFLUENCE PEDDLING AND TREASON, SELLING OUT TO THE CHINESE....

.....but hell, way to go, FBI! You indicted and charged 6 Russian Hackers that YOU claim hacked our election yet don't have to show any evidence to prove your claims. I am sure we all will sleep better tonight knowing the FBI is on the job protecting us.


:p



 
I'm not saying the Russians aren't into attempting to hack elections - Obama himself said in 2016 that foreign nations attempt to hack our elections every year. Nothing new. Obama and his DHS Director attempted to hack several states election processes in 2016...and failed.
 
Without hard evidence that will ever be seen, the FBI charged 6 Russian hackers
That's quite a statement to make in and of itself without the hard evidence.

We've got to give the rank-and-file FBI a little more credit than that — I'm not saying all the special agents out there are faithful Constitutionalists — but these are political charges by the top bosses at FBI and the jackasses at D.O.J. going to court on their own behalf with a "prepared statement" of information that did not arise from any bona fide investigation by named identified agents or witnesses appearing in court to testify to any actual information.

The prosecutors have played blind man's bluff on the plea bargain too many times and gotten away with it on the railroad court circuit. They've got too much power without the Constitutional requirement to hold an actual trial over life-ruining criminal charges before inflicting statutory punishments without due process.
 
We've got to give the rank-and-file FBI a little more credit than that — I'm not saying all the special agents out there are faithful Constitutionalists — but these are political charges by the top bosses at FBI and the jackasses at D.O.J. going to court on their own behalf with a "prepared statement" of information that did not arise from any bona fide investigation by named identified agents or witnesses appearing in court to testify to any actual information.

WHY do we have to give anyone in the FBI any credit?

For the last 4 years, we find out, many of the 'rank and file' FBI agents gave their bosses credible evidence of who committed crimes and who did not, and in the end their bosses did the exact opposite of what their 'rank and file FBI agents' and the evidence they came up with proved.

What ever the FBI leadership said, whatever they did - to include FISA Court violations for DECADES, framing innocent people, holding investigations based on know Russian-authored propaganda and despite knowing the people they were doing after were innocent....

If the FBI leadership - especially Mueller, proven to have committed FISA Court abuses as FBI Director and proven to have put innocent men in jail when he knew and had evidence they were innocent - files to Indict and charge anyone I am more likely inclined to believe - because of their own track record and proven crimes - NOT to believe them.

As I pointed out, don't blame me for that - this is on the FBI itself. THEY are the ones who have completely destroyed their own credibility!
 
Until Comey is charged with crimes, until McCabe, Strzok, Page, Baker, and others are charged with crimes and are convicted and punished...until Wray is fired and held accountable for Perjury and obstructing Justice...until someone from outside the FBI is placed in charge of the FBI, there is hardly one damn thing the FBI told me I would believe / take at face value now.
 
If a Russian Facebook ad changed your vote from Clinton to Trump...you are an intellectual lightweight. It was for the best, but damn, you are easy to manipulate.
 
Without hard evidence that will ever be seen
Why are you claiming this?

There will NEVER be a trial.

The State / DOJ will NEVER have to present the 'undeniable' evidence they claim to have.

The accused and their lawyers will never have the chance to debunk/disprove the state's/DOJ's charges.

It's not even 'He said - She said'...it's just 'HE said'.
 
After operation Crossfire Hurricane? I think an argument can be made that the FBI is highly political, and completely untrustworthy.

It should have been dissolved and rebuilt from the ground up, the CIA, and NSA too. Hell, probably the whole DHS if we are honest.

guncontrol800.jpg


11e49dfe096f47b81ae2c626f11b147326336ae88d85990105510ebda7149237.jpg

Why Is The FBI's Top Child Porn Lawyer Involved In Hunter Biden Laptop Case?

This Cult From the 80s Was Patient Zero for Epstein and Pizzagate Conspiracies
 
Without hard evidence that will ever be seen, the FBI charged 6 Russian hackers who have never been to the United States, who will never see the United States, who will never be brought to the United States, who will never stand trial in the United States, whose case will never be heard in the United States, and the evidence against will never be seen by any American Judge, court, or US citizen was charged for 'allegedly attempting to impact the 2016 USA election'.

One of the supposed hackers was one mentioned by proven criminal and fake Russian Collusion Narrative investigator Robert Mueller. Mueller's team initially indicted these Russian hackers.

The DOJ alleged the GRU hackers launched cyberattacks that damaged Ukraine’s electrical grid and interfered in France’s 2017 elections. (And since the Deep State needed to blame someone for allegedly interfering in our election / hacked a certain server, Liberals / the Deep State apparently blamed them, too..)


The GRU hackers were charged with conspiracy to conduct computer fraud and abuse, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, damaging protected computers, and aggravated identity theft in an indictment returned by a federal grand jury in Pittsburgh.

One of the Russians charged on Monday, Anatoliy Sergeyevich Kovalev, was also previously indicted by former special counsel Robert Mueller.



It's rather convenient to be able to accuse, indict, and charge people who will never get a chance to argue their case / defend themselves with crimes, declare to the world it is so, never have to present evidence, and never expect to have to because the guys you blame will NEVER be caught and brought to the US to dispute the accusations..... Just sayin'....


“For more than two years we have worked tirelessly to expose these Russian GRU Officers who engaged in a global campaign of hacking, disruption and destabilization, representing the most destructive and costly cyber-attacks in history,” said U.S. Attorney Scott Brady of the Western District of Pennsylvania."

YET FOR 2 YEARS THIS PROVEN CRIMINAL FBI HAS BEENSITTING ON TONS OF EVIDENCE OF DEMOCRAT CRIMES, EVIDENCE OF THEIR OWN FISA COURT CRIMES PERPETRATED OVER DECADES, AND HUNTER BIDEN'S LAPTOP THAT NOT ONLY PROVED THE PRESIDENT'S INNOCENCE DURING THE DEMOCRATS FAU IMPEACHMENT COUP BUT EXPOSED BOTH HUNTER AND JOE BIDEN PERPETRATINBG INFLUENCE PEDDLING AND TREASON, SELLING OUT TO THE CHINESE....

.....but hell, way to go, FBI! You indicted and charged 6 Russian Hackers that YOU claim hacked our election yet don't have to show any evidence to prove your claims. I am sure we all will sleep better tonight knowing the FBI is on the job protecting us.


:p



The document/True Bill of the grand jury is quite complicated and includes screenshot of the screens produced and a very detailed trail across networks (affected and used) and individual computers and entities affected in multiple countries and governments. It would be interesting to see what evidence the grand jury saw.
The Russians and other intelligence services around the world play their games and make computer assaults as is the nature of information systems attacks and espionage as we undoubtedly do.
I am not too inclined to be very excited, but glad we are trying to keep up with the game.
Here is the indictment/true bill itself:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1328521/download
 
If a Russian Facebook ad changed your vote from Clinton to Trump...you are an intellectual lightweight. It was for the best, but damn, you are easy to manipulate.
It did for many people who either don’t follow politics or are just not very smart. You’ll find most in Red states.

And while you want to minimize it for dishonest reasons, one of the most widely seen fake Facebook ads was the one saying that the Pope endorsed Trump. That’s not just some “Russian Facebook ad”. That influenced many Catholics.
 
If a Russian Facebook ad changed your vote from Clinton to Trump...you are an intellectual lightweight. It was for the best, but damn, you are easy to manipulate.
It did for many people who either don’t follow politics or are just not very smart. You’ll find most in Red states.

And while you want to minimize it for dishonest reasons, one of the most widely seen fake Facebook ads was the one saying that the Pope endorsed Trump. That’s not just some “Russian Facebook ad”. That influenced many Catholics.

So if they were influenced in RED STATES, how did it impact the electoral college? You said yourself, they are RED STATES...so they were already going for Trump. Seems to me there was no impact based on what you say.
 

Forum List

Back
Top