Marion Anne Perrine Le Pen, a.k.a. Marine Le Pen
Le Pen, who is predicted to make it to the second round of elections, blasted Hollande, saying, “Like many other political figures, [Hollande] completely renounces the restoration of democracy and independence which is so ardently the wish of the French people.”
“These last words of the year offer at least a relief,” she said. “We know that next year we will not have to undergo such a slew of platitudes and statements in total mismatch with the reality of the country and the sufferings of the French.”
“To speak of isolation for a project that is, on the contrary, in the sense of history, after Brexit and the election of Donald Trump, a return of peoples’ global aspiration for independence, is a manifest misunderstanding of the evolution of the world and of the deep desires of its peoples, including the French people,” Le Pen added.
The populist party leader concluded, “The president’s wishes finally remind us that on the threshold of this New Year, a very clear alternative will be presented to the French. Either the pursuit of the globalist and Europeanist model” or a “commitment to return [sovereignty] to the people.”
“These last words of the year offer at least a relief,” she said. “We know that next year we will not have to undergo such a slew of platitudes and statements in total mismatch with the reality of the country and the sufferings of the French.”
“To speak of isolation for a project that is, on the contrary, in the sense of history, after Brexit and the election of Donald Trump, a return of peoples’ global aspiration for independence, is a manifest misunderstanding of the evolution of the world and of the deep desires of its peoples, including the French people,” Le Pen added.
The populist party leader concluded, “The president’s wishes finally remind us that on the threshold of this New Year, a very clear alternative will be presented to the French. Either the pursuit of the globalist and Europeanist model” or a “commitment to return [sovereignty] to the people.”
Le Pen Hits back at Hollande’s anti-Populist NYE Speech: ‘After Trump, Brexit, the French Want Independence’
by Victoria Friedman
1 Jan 2017
Le Pen: 'After Trump, Brexit, the French Want Independence'
by Victoria Friedman
1 Jan 2017
Le Pen: 'After Trump, Brexit, the French Want Independence'
I will bet you a dollar to a croissant that a lot of French people are now sorry they did not vote for Marine’s father, Jean-Marie Le Pen. Remember him? He is the guy the world press vilified because he voiced concerns over France’s immigration mess, and he did it 14 years before Obama dumped United Nations refugees on France and Europe. Socialists even dredged up their favorite putdown for pâre Le Pen —— Fascist. I did not know much about Le Pen back then, but I was all for him at the time. The press has not changed since Le Pen shook up France’s elections back in 2002.
Standby for a major character assassination should the daughter become France’s next president. Standby for Armageddon if the French people refuse to do as the world press tells them to do.
European Communists have not been so angry since the Soviet Union imploded. Today, they are pumped up because Marine Le Pen has a good shot at winning it all. As usual, mainstream media coverage throughout Europe is pro-Communist. I have not really looked into American media coverage concerning Marine Le Pen, but it will probably be the same as Europe.
One thing is certain, the media will portray Marine Le Pen as the Devil’s Daughter, while Communists/Socialists are the only ones quaking in their boots.
I always hoped that a few members of the press would act as referees in political prizefights, but so far it looks like 99.999 percent of the mainstream press joined the Socialists in beating up on Marine Le Pen. The American press, along with the international press, is so blinded by the opportunity to resurrect its WWII’s moral superiority complex (noble Communists vs. Fascist brutes) they cannot see that that time passed. Institutionalized Fascism may have been beaten in Nazi Germany all those years ago, but Fascists are alive and well and living amongst the Socialists/Communists. That is a new evil and the present-day press corps is a part of it.
Le Pen may not be God's perfect messenger, but she is not wrong in wanting to take France out of the EU, and hopefully out of the U.N. I have not read that she would dump the U.N., but that possibility does appear to fit into her political posture. I can only hope she does just that if she wins. If she does take France out of the EU, followed by walking out of the UN, will amount to a far greater good than any evil she might have implied during her campaign. I am pulling for Marine Le Pen because I do not see even one national leader of a major Christian country willing to begin the process of dismantling this globalization madness coming from the Communist left as well as coming from international moneylenders and borrowers.
I admit that Le Pen is reported as being anti-immigrant, anti-Semite, a Fascist, etc., but it is her anti-Socialist stand that has unified the press against her. According to the press, it is only Le Pen who is an anti-Semite living on a continent full of people who support Palestinian terrorism against Israelis. That support is interpreted by the press as being the correct position, while Le Pen's past comments are somehow much more disgraceful.
My hope is that Marine Le Pen does take France out of the EU, and perhaps out of the U.N. I refer to Socialism, immigration, and antisemitism when I talk about Le Pen even though I realize they are domestic nuts & bolts issues for the French to cope with. Any negative effect Le Pen might have on conservative politics throughout Europe stemming from those issues would be important to a sovereign United States.
Jean-Marie Le Pen was called a racist, fascist, anti-Semite, determined to bring France, and by extension the entire world, back to the dark ages. Once again, Socialists/Communists are using misdirection to position themselves as the saviors of all that is holy and good. If Marine Le Pen is not defeated the world is doomed, or so the scare tactic goes. That media maneuver permits the Left to deflect the spotlight from the Communist movement.
The rest of us had better understand that Socialists do not get their dander up without good reason. Socialists at home and abroad already trotted out their tried and true heavy artillery for Donald Trump; pretended concern for threatened liberty and passionate dismay over yet another rebirth of Fascism. Combine the rhetoric with scholarly newspeak and there is no reason to change the dialogue for Marine Le Pen.
Communists/Socialists always say they want to defeat a potential Fascist dictator. They never admit they want to advance totalitarian Communism. They get away with their crap in France because they can put Marine Le Pen’s face on Fascism by pointing to one woman. Since Stalin’s demise national Communism is faceless outside of Communist-controlled countries. Communists are ecstatic whenever they find a Le Pen they can paint as dangerous to freedom; the same freedom that their kind deny to everyone living in Communist paradises.
Recent events clearly show that Communists hate Caucasians and/or Christians, while those described as Fascists supposedly hate all non-white, non-Christians. Only those who openly oppose Communism/Socialism are described by the press as being dangerous. It never occurs to France’s rank & file Socialists that Marine La Pen has every reason to fear for France. All that matters to the media is that she is not a Socialist; ergo, she must be a Fascist.
To better-understand Le Pen’s position on immigration keep in mind that Europe is not a continent of immigrants; so people migrating to France have one hell of a nerve demanding the French handover their country to people who came from a life under the most brutal political regimes on earth. In that context there are only two roads to travel if immigration is not stopped: Either immigrants assimilate peacefully in numbers the French people will accept, or immigrants change the French culture to reflect the culture they came from. Communists prefer the latter.
Communists/Socialists always claimed that they had the Right to impose themselves upon individuals who wanted no part of them. That original Right has been expanded to include the Right to destroy any culture they do not approve of. To access those Rights requires big government. To insure those Rights requires totalitarian government. That is reason enough to be against big government advocates on the Left.
Incidentally, I have not read that La Pen plans on turning the French government into a totalitarian government. Of course she could be hiding her true objective in the same way American Communists running the Democratic party have been hiding theirs since the FDR years. If Le Pen is pulling an Obama, I have not read how she, Le Pen, would bring about the transition to a totalitarian government. France will still have a representative form of government if Le Pen beats the odds, or is she being accused of wanting to destroy that, too?
If there is an international right-wing movement, it is a spontaneous reaction to contemporary, envious, racist, Communist, losers (in this context “contemporary” begins with the collapse of the Soviet Union). Those on the Left lost more than their muscle when the Soviet Union went belly up. They also lost their cloak of non-racist credibility (Chicoms are not Caucasian as were most Communists in the former Soviet Union).
There is one question I would like to put to those who oppose Le Pen so vehemently. Is there any chance that Europe will accept all of our losers if European Communists ever do achieve total victory?
To anyone who might read this post, please do not interpret it to mean that I think, or imply, that all non-Caucasian Americans are Socialists/Communists. Many are, while the vast majority are not.
A number of hardcore Caucasian Communists do exist. I hate the numbers game, but my best assessment is that their combined number represents one percent of the adult American population. That one percent exercises political power and media influence that far outweighs their mass. If I am right that means that there are approximately three million hardcore Communists in the U.S. No doubt, most of them are parasites feeding on unnecessary federal, state, and local governments.
When American Communists are defined by a specific number, that number appears large, but it is still insignificant when measured against the number of American non-Communists. My estimate would be validated if a way could be found to have people vote either for, or against, Socialism/Communism without the misdirection, doublespeak, and newspeak thrown in.
Today’s European press settled on reporting that young Muslims feel discriminated against when all they really want is to belong —— to be treated equally. Poverty, desperation, unemployment, etc., are the results of discrimination, or so the story goes.
Organized groups claiming they want equality always mean they want special privileges. That is doubly true when the group making demands is a religious assembly. In France’s case, French Muslims claim they want equality while calling for Muslim enclaves on French soil —— a contradiction worthy of the Left’s finest doublespeak.
Of course, French Muslims expect the Gallic welfare state to continue subsidizing them. Denying benefits to people who swear to destroy your country would quickly be denounced as evidence of more discrimination.
Parenthetically, what poetic justice it is to see Communists, who despise every religion except their own, now being forced to support a competing religion hellbent on transforming France into a Supreme Deity theocracy.
If it ever comes down to a pitched battle between Muslims and Communists at least a part of me will be rooting for the Muslims. It is only fair that Socialists take the hit because it is they who are responsible for the division within every Christian country; a split that Muslim fundamentalists continue to exploit with great success. As I said so often: “Muslims never attack a unified enemy.”
The same thing that is happening in France will happen in every country invaded by millions of Muslim refugees. Muslims have no intention of assimilating into the mainstream of any society that is not Islamic. Muslim leaders have openly admitted that they want to transform France and Great Britain into Islamic countries. Failing at that they see a violent separatist movement as plan B. Let me put it another way: Muslims will never assimilate the way Mormons did even if you give Muslims a state the size of Utah.
NOTE: There is a community of Hasidic Jews in New City, in Rockland County New York that is basically the kind of enclave Muslims would like to establish in France. Hasidic Jews are not promoting a separatist movement as far as I know, and their numbers are infinitely smaller than American Muslims yet many similarities with French Muslims exist. Then-first lady Hillary Clinton got over 90 percent of the votes cast by the Hasidic community in 2000. I believe that President Bubba did something or other to buy those votes for his wife. Now I am wondering how then-Senator Clinton felt about Muslim enclaves in France or here? In lieu of her defeat in November, it is still a fair question to ask because of her views on globalization and multiculturalism. In fact, all of the leading “International community” Democrats should be asked a few pointed questions on the subject.
There is a myth being put about for obvious reasons that says American Muslims are different than European Muslims because they are Americans first and Muslims second. Muslim conduct before and after 9/11 says otherwise. I do not recall American Muslims condemning the first World Trade Towers bombing, and it was several years after 9/11 before even one influential Muslim organization condemned that attack. I will not point to the deafening silence heard throughout the American Muslim community every time America is attacked overseas. And let us not forget the tens of millions of dollars donated by American Muslims to questionable Muslim charities.
There is one red flag for Americans coming out of the bloodshed in Europe. Those attacks demonstrate the folly in disarming law-abiding Americans —— a long sought goal of big government liberals. At least well-armed Americans will not die victims after the American government proves itself to be just as useless as French and German governments after American Muslims have the numbers to turn violent in this country. Rest assured, it will happen when Islam’s strategic planners look at the successes they enjoyed in Europe.
Notice that the one world government agenda prohibits anybody high-up in the French government from saying to Muslims: “If you want to live in an Islamic country because you will get a better deal you are free to leave France at any time.” Ditto the U.S. of A.
A favorite talking point heard on the Left says that other immigrant groups who came here, most notably, Irish, Italians, and Latinos were discriminated against yet they all eventually assimilated. Discrimination aimed at religions such as Catholicism and Judaism is much different than discrimination aimed at a foreign nationality yet the devotees of those groups assimilated, too. Here is the difference with Muslims as I see it.
This is what I hope gains a lot more emphasis in the future: Islam’s true believers are determined to combine religion and government into one entity; that is the history of Islam; whereas, the political evolution of the West was fueled by the desire to separate church and state. America’s Founding Fathers devised a model that accommodated that separation to everyone’s satisfaction. To now claim that Muslims can assimilate is the same as saying Christians can assimilate in an Islamic country, but only after they forget Jesus Christ.
Muslims cannot, and will not, remain content living in any country that is not an Islamic theocracy. They must always work to destroy any country that is not governed by Sharia law. The present-day conflict between West and East is not a conflict between “My God is better than your God.” It is a conflict between theocratic government and non-theocratic government.
Godless Socialist/Communist governments are also theocracies that only added fuel to the fire as events in France have shown.
A word of advice for American Socialists who defend Islam: Muslims will never accept Socialism’s tax collector’s morality —— until the tax collector is a Muslim.
In short: Muslims simply cannot assimilate in a non-Islamic country because their core beliefs will not allow it. Muslims do NOT want a separation of church and state. They want the exact opposite. I offer this one excerpt from a 2005 article to fortify my reasoning:
As Mr. Belien reports, look what a typical radical Muslim leader, Dyab Abou Jahjah, the leader of the Brussels-based Arab European League says: "We reject integration when it leads to assimilation. I don't believe in a host country. We are at home here and whatever we consider our culture to be also belongs to our chosen country. I'm in my country, not the country of the Westerners."
Or consider the statement of a German radical Islamists that I recounted in my book (based on a National Public Radio news story broadcast): "Germany is an Islamic country. Islam is in the home, in schools. Germans will be outnumbered. We [Muslims] will say what we want. We'll live how we want. It's outrageous that Germans demand we speak their language. Our children will have our language, our laws, our culture ("The West's Last Chance," page 75).
Or consider the statement of a German radical Islamists that I recounted in my book (based on a National Public Radio news story broadcast): "Germany is an Islamic country. Islam is in the home, in schools. Germans will be outnumbered. We [Muslims] will say what we want. We'll live how we want. It's outrageous that Germans demand we speak their language. Our children will have our language, our laws, our culture ("The West's Last Chance," page 75).
Islamist threat in France
By Tony Blankley
Nov 9, 2005
RealClearPolitics - Commentary - Islamist Threat in France by Tony Blankley
By Tony Blankley
Nov 9, 2005
RealClearPolitics - Commentary - Islamist Threat in France by Tony Blankley
NOTE: The myth of Muslim assimilation runs deeply in France. I once envisioned a two panel cartoon. The first panel depicted then Frances’s president Jacques Chirac on the balcony of a minaret calling the French people to prayer. The second panel showed Muslims dancing around a bonfire at the base of the Eiffel Tower.
Irrespective of what France does, it appears that some other countries in Europe are finally facing their immigration problem, too. No matter how everything turns out, I only want Le Pen to do one thing: Withdraw France from the EU. If that happens international Socialism/Communism will take a big hit.
Finally, look at how far Socialism has come since 1913 and the XVI Amendment. There are infinitely more Socialists living on tax dollars today than ever before. In the beginning, Socialists used violence, and the threat of violence, to force themselves into a spot at the public trough. (Look at the violence in France because French Communists fear a Le Pen victory. What will it be if she wins?) The difference between the early days of American Socialism and now is that Socialists acquired the bureaucratic clout to protect their spot at the trough. The best way to protect themselves is to increase their number at the tax tub which they do all of the time. So long as so many Socialist parasites feed on tax dollars, Socialism/Communism is alive and well in Europe and here.
p.s. TITLE CLARIFICATION FOR YOUNGSTERS: When David O. Selznick married Louie B. Mayer’s daughter Sam Goldwyn got credit for this gem "The son-in-law also rises". I have my doubts because I doubt if Goldwyn read Ernest Hemingway’s novel "The Sun Also Rises".
