Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone who believes in God needs to watch the Cosmos. Watch the new one with Neil Degrasse Tyson and the old one with Carl Sagan. Once you learn the history of man, science and religion you will realize god(s) were made up long before we decided to just go with one god. Religious ignorance has held us back thousands of years. Religious people love to brag that it was on their watch that we came up with cures and that it was religious people who got us on the moon. They expose their ignorance to the fact that many of the scientists were/are atheists. They try to ignore the history of how many scientists were put to death for heresy by the churches for things that turned out to be correct. But today the church doesn't get so upset if you suggest the earth isn't the center of the universe or that the sun revolves around the earth because churches change with the times. They've learned not to fight science and instead ignore your anti scientific history and embrace science. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
300 years before Christ, Aristarchus of Samos discovered the earth was not the center of the universe. But it wasn't until the year 1500 of our lord that someone dared suggest it again. Who squashed this fact for 1800 years? Religion.
Think about instead of the 50 year cold war and all the other wars we fought if we would have put the time and energy into colonizing Mars. Take all the nukes we have built since the 1950's and tell me how much money that is. Human beings are stupid. One way to tell how dumb someone is, ask them if they believe in god.
Pythagoras refuted geocentrism in the 6th Century BC. He was a religious freak and a priest. Aristarchus of Samos studied at the Lyceum (dedicated to the god Apollo). Francis Bacon is said to have invented the scientific method. He was a priest. Copernicus was a Polish priest. Mendels was a priest, and the father of genetics (and a major influence on Darwin). You might say that Dostoyevsky (Jesus freak) is the father of modern psychology (if you read Crime and Punishment). Pascal (Jesus freak) was a mathematical genius and the father of computing. At least 35 craters on the moon are named after Jesuits, all of whom made significant contributions to science. Lemaitre was a priest who first proposed the Big Bang theory. The list goes on and on.
Not sure how you figure that the Cold War can be blamed on religion, or that nukes are a religious invention. It's true that Niels Bohr was an early nuclear physicist. If you read his stuff, or Einstein's, you get the sense that scientific breakthroughs often comes as a result of inspiration, or some sort of epiphany. It's often similar to an experience of the sacred. Einstein's revelation about the theory of relativity sounds like a mystical experience, as he describes it.
The practices of religion serve to break down mental pre-conceptions and constructs, filters and biases, and to enable the practitioner to see with fresh eyes.
Religion is not the cause of war. It can be used as a tool of exploitation, for political ends, just as patriotism or humanism can. Today's wars are sold to the public by appealing to secular humanism. If the entire world were atheistic, the incidences of war would not diminish by one scintilla.
And I think it's helpful to understand that the TV show Cosmos plays very loosely and creatively with history, to the point of willful deceit in my opinion.
The cosmos even admits that Giordano Bruno believed in god too. But the church burned him because he believed the universe was bigger than the church believed. The cosmos also explained how Newton thought he could figure out hidden messages in the bible. Nothing ever came from it.
Plato decided to hide math and science from the masses. He didn't think they could handle it. He's connected with christianity.
And we know that many of the discoveries you think someone discovered in 1500ad was actually discovered and lost 1000 years earlier.
Don't forget that until America most countries church and state were one and the same.
I don't put all the blame for wars on religion but they sure don't do much to stop them. You think atheist liberals would war more than conservative theists? I doubt that very much. We'd rather spend the money on science and poverty. Instead of stealing Iraq's oil let's figure out how to harness photosynthesis
Giordano Bruno was a Dominican friar. He was clergy, a part of a Church brotherhood. He had many clashes with his Church superiors and fellow brothers, who he publicly chided as idiots. And, yes, the Church burned him at the stake. Of course, burning someone to death sounds outrageous to us because it is, indeed, outrageous. I try to put outrageous historical acts into context, though. In Bruno's time, local lords were hanging people or putting people in the stocks for the crime of vagrancy (without a trial). Women were drowned during Bruno's time for adultery, by secular authorities.
A common misunderstanding of today is that the Medieval Church was scouring the countryside burning laymen at the stake. While the Church was a moral authority of the time, they had little sway over the punishments of laypeople. What the Medieval Inquisition did was punish its own clergy in some very high profile cases which are retold again and again by historians. The Spanish Inquisition and others were completely taken over by secular authorities.
"Throughout the Inquisition's history, it was rivaled by local ecclesiastical and secular jurisdictions. No matter how determined, no pope succeeded in establishing complete control over the prosecution of heresy. Medieval kings, princes, bishops, and civil authorities all had a role in prosecuting heresy, except where they individually opposed the practice. The practice reached its apex in the second half of the 13th century. During this period, the tribunals were almost entirely free from any authority, including that of the pope. Therefore, it was almost impossible to eradicate abuse.[4]
In southern Europe, Church-run courts existed in the kingdom of Aragon during the medieval period, but not elsewhere in the Iberian peninsula or some other kingdoms, including England In Scandinavian kingdoms it had hardly any impact." -wikipedia
What Cosmos does in its cartoons is that it portrays Bruno as a mild mannered scientist. He was neither mild mannered, nor what we would consider an actual scientist. He was not a "martyr for science". He was a friar who was executed for his theological beliefs on pantheism and other 'heresies'. The Church at the time had no official position on heliocentrism, and Bruno's scientific beliefs were not even brought up at his trial. Cosmos comes out in its debut episode and spins a fantastical yarn that has to be regarded as intentionally deceptive.
"Pope Clement VII (r. 1523–1534) had reacted favorably to a talk about Copernicus's theories, rewarding the speaker with a rare manuscript. There is no indication of how Pope Paul III, to whom On the Revolutions was dedicated reacted; however, a trusted advisor, Bartolomeo Spina of Pisa (1474–1546) intended to condemn it but fell ill and died before his plan was carried out (see Rosen, 1975). Thus, in 1600 there was no official Catholic position on the Copernican system, and it was certainly not a heresy. When Giordano Bruno (1548–1600) was burned at the stake as a heretic, it had nothing to do with his writings in support of Copernican cosmology, and this is clearly shown in Finocchiaro's reconstruction of the accusations against Bruno (see also Blumenberg's part 3, chapter 5, titled “Not a Martyr for Copernicanism: Giordano Bruno”)."
Nicolaus Copernicus Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Niel deGrasse Tyson has been caught in other fabrications, and his loyal followers have been hypocritically erasing evidence of that from his wiki pages.
Neil deGrasse Tyson falls from grace over quote fabrication scandal - Houston science news Examiner.com
Tyson is a serial religion basher, and he uses fabrications to build his arguments.
Sealybobo, you're the perfect candidate to be a deGrasse Tyson acolyte. You say that Plato hid math and scientific knowledge from the masses and then you immediately connect Plato to Christianity. That might even be too far an intellectual stretch for the Tyson cult. The continuity between Greek and Christian concepts has nothing to do with any policy on sharing math and science with people, obviously. You'd have to be blinded by some sort of anti-Christian agenda to make that claim.
They explain in the old Cosmos how Plato is connected to Christianity. I'll try to find it.
Democritus was a great man back in ancient Greece. He believed that the prevailing religions of his time were evil and that neither souls nor immortal gods existed. There is no evidence that Democritus was persecuted for his beliefs. But then again, he came from Abdera, a very liberal open society where you could think what you want. However, in his time the brief tradition of tolerance for unconventional views was beginning to erode.
For instance, the prevailing belief was that the moon and the sun were gods. Another contemporary of Democritus, named Anaxagoras, taught that the moon was a place made of ordinary matter and that the sun was a red-hot stone far away in the sky. For this, Anaxagoras was condemned convicted and imprisoned for impiety a religious crime. People began to be persecuted for their ideas. A portrait of Democritus is now .
on the Greek 1 00-drachma note but his ideas were suppressed and his influence on history made minor.
The mystics were beginning to win. Pythagoras who lived here on Samos in the 6th century BC.
this small Greek Orthodox shrine was erected on his front porch. There's a continuity of tradition from Pythagoras to Christianity. Plato was a follower of Pythagoras.
Plato believed that ideas were far more real than the natural world. He advised the astronomers not to waste their time observing stars and planets. It was better, he believed, just to think about them. Plato expressed hostility to observation and experiment. He taught contempt for the real world and disdain for the practical application of scientific knowledge. Plato's followers succeeded in extinguishing the light .
of science and experiment that had been kindled by Democritus Plato's unease with the world as revealed by our senses was to dominate and stifle Western philosophy. Even as late as 1600 .
It wasn't until the 1600's we rediscovered what Plato hid from the masses. He didn't want the masses having the truth. The facts. Science. Because science makes people question the church. That's science 101. Question authority. Don't put your trust in the writings of the ancients. They say miracles occurred? That's not enough for science. Not after peer review. I seriously question the writings of the ancients.
Anyone who believes in God needs to watch the Cosmos. Watch the new one with Neil Degrasse Tyson and the old one with Carl Sagan. Once you learn the history of man, science and religion you will realize god(s) were made up long before we decided to just go with one god. Religious ignorance has held us back thousands of years. Religious people love to brag that it was on their watch that we came up with cures and that it was religious people who got us on the moon. They expose their ignorance to the fact that many of the scientists were/are atheists. They try to ignore the history of how many scientists were put to death for heresy by the churches for things that turned out to be correct. But today the church doesn't get so upset if you suggest the earth isn't the center of the universe or that the sun revolves around the earth because churches change with the times. They've learned not to fight science and instead ignore your anti scientific history and embrace science. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
300 years before Christ, Aristarchus of Samos discovered the earth was not the center of the universe. But it wasn't until the year 1500 of our lord that someone dared suggest it again. Who squashed this fact for 1800 years? Religion.
Think about instead of the 50 year cold war and all the other wars we fought if we would have put the time and energy into colonizing Mars. Take all the nukes we have built since the 1950's and tell me how much money that is. Human beings are stupid. One way to tell how dumb someone is, ask them if they believe in god.
Pythagoras refuted geocentrism in the 6th Century BC. He was a religious freak and a priest. Aristarchus of Samos studied at the Lyceum (dedicated to the god Apollo). Francis Bacon is said to have invented the scientific method. He was a priest. Copernicus was a Polish priest. Mendels was a priest, and the father of genetics (and a major influence on Darwin). You might say that Dostoyevsky (Jesus freak) is the father of modern psychology (if you read Crime and Punishment). Pascal (Jesus freak) was a mathematical genius and the father of computing. At least 35 craters on the moon are named after Jesuits, all of whom made significant contributions to science. Lemaitre was a priest who first proposed the Big Bang theory. The list goes on and on.
Not sure how you figure that the Cold War can be blamed on religion, or that nukes are a religious invention. It's true that Niels Bohr was an early nuclear physicist. If you read his stuff, or Einstein's, you get the sense that scientific breakthroughs often comes as a result of inspiration, or some sort of epiphany. It's often similar to an experience of the sacred. Einstein's revelation about the theory of relativity sounds like a mystical experience, as he describes it.
The practices of religion serve to break down mental pre-conceptions and constructs, filters and biases, and to enable the practitioner to see with fresh eyes.
Religion is not the cause of war. It can be used as a tool of exploitation, for political ends, just as patriotism or humanism can. Today's wars are sold to the public by appealing to secular humanism. If the entire world were atheistic, the incidences of war would not diminish by one scintilla.
And I think it's helpful to understand that the TV show Cosmos plays very loosely and creatively with history, to the point of willful deceit in my opinion.
The cosmos even admits that Giordano Bruno believed in god too. But the church burned him because he believed the universe was bigger than the church believed. The cosmos also explained how Newton thought he could figure out hidden messages in the bible. Nothing ever came from it.
Plato decided to hide math and science from the masses. He didn't think they could handle it. He's connected with christianity.
And we know that many of the discoveries you think someone discovered in 1500ad was actually discovered and lost 1000 years earlier.
Don't forget that until America most countries church and state were one and the same.
I don't put all the blame for wars on religion but they sure don't do much to stop them. You think atheist liberals would war more than conservative theists? I doubt that very much. We'd rather spend the money on science and poverty. Instead of stealing Iraq's oil let's figure out how to harness photosynthesis
Giordano Bruno was a Dominican friar. He was clergy, a part of a Church brotherhood. He had many clashes with his Church superiors and fellow brothers, who he publicly chided as idiots. And, yes, the Church burned him at the stake. Of course, burning someone to death sounds outrageous to us because it is, indeed, outrageous. I try to put outrageous historical acts into context, though. In Bruno's time, local lords were hanging people or putting people in the stocks for the crime of vagrancy (without a trial). Women were drowned during Bruno's time for adultery, by secular authorities.
A common misunderstanding of today is that the Medieval Church was scouring the countryside burning laymen at the stake. While the Church was a moral authority of the time, they had little sway over the punishments of laypeople. What the Medieval Inquisition did was punish its own clergy in some very high profile cases which are retold again and again by historians. The Spanish Inquisition and others were completely taken over by secular authorities.
"Throughout the Inquisition's history, it was rivaled by local ecclesiastical and secular jurisdictions. No matter how determined, no pope succeeded in establishing complete control over the prosecution of heresy. Medieval kings, princes, bishops, and civil authorities all had a role in prosecuting heresy, except where they individually opposed the practice. The practice reached its apex in the second half of the 13th century. During this period, the tribunals were almost entirely free from any authority, including that of the pope. Therefore, it was almost impossible to eradicate abuse.[4]
In southern Europe, Church-run courts existed in the kingdom of Aragon during the medieval period, but not elsewhere in the Iberian peninsula or some other kingdoms, including England In Scandinavian kingdoms it had hardly any impact." -wikipedia
What Cosmos does in its cartoons is that it portrays Bruno as a mild mannered scientist. He was neither mild mannered, nor what we would consider an actual scientist. He was not a "martyr for science". He was a friar who was executed for his theological beliefs on pantheism and other 'heresies'. The Church at the time had no official position on heliocentrism, and Bruno's scientific beliefs were not even brought up at his trial. Cosmos comes out in its debut episode and spins a fantastical yarn that has to be regarded as intentionally deceptive.
"Pope Clement VII (r. 1523–1534) had reacted favorably to a talk about Copernicus's theories, rewarding the speaker with a rare manuscript. There is no indication of how Pope Paul III, to whom On the Revolutions was dedicated reacted; however, a trusted advisor, Bartolomeo Spina of Pisa (1474–1546) intended to condemn it but fell ill and died before his plan was carried out (see Rosen, 1975). Thus, in 1600 there was no official Catholic position on the Copernican system, and it was certainly not a heresy. When Giordano Bruno (1548–1600) was burned at the stake as a heretic, it had nothing to do with his writings in support of Copernican cosmology, and this is clearly shown in Finocchiaro's reconstruction of the accusations against Bruno (see also Blumenberg's part 3, chapter 5, titled “Not a Martyr for Copernicanism: Giordano Bruno”)."
Nicolaus Copernicus Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Niel deGrasse Tyson has been caught in other fabrications, and his loyal followers have been hypocritically erasing evidence of that from his wiki pages.
Neil deGrasse Tyson falls from grace over quote fabrication scandal - Houston science news Examiner.com
Tyson is a serial religion basher, and he uses fabrications to build his arguments.
Sealybobo, you're the perfect candidate to be a deGrasse Tyson acolyte. You say that Plato hid math and scientific knowledge from the masses and then you immediately connect Plato to Christianity. That might even be too far an intellectual stretch for the Tyson cult. The continuity between Greek and Christian concepts has nothing to do with any policy on sharing math and science with people, obviously. You'd have to be blinded by some sort of anti-Christian agenda to make that claim.
The original Cosmos had to have very few edits after all these years, including this. Do you refute Sagan's stories too?
Athens, in the time of Plato and Aristotle had a vast slave population. All of that brave Athenian talk about democracy applied only to a privileged few. Plato and Aristotle were comfortable in a slave society.
Their way dominated for over 20 centuries. In the recognition that the cosmos is knowable, that there is a mathematical underpinning to nature, they greatly advanced the cause of science. But in the suppression of disquieting facts and that science should be kept for a small elite , the distaste for experiment, the embrace of mysticism, the easy acceptance of slave societies, their influence has significantly set back the human endeavor.
The books of the lonian scientists are entirely lost. We rediscovered them in the middle east many years later from another great man who said "don't put your trust in the writings of the ancients". That was 1000 years ago. I forgot his name.
This knowledge was suppressed by the Greeks. Ridiculed and forgotten by the Platonists and by the Christians who adopted much of the philosophy of Plato.
Finally, the Western world reawakened. Experiment and open inquiry slowly became respectable once again. The enlightenment period. Forgotten books and fragments were read once more. Leonardo and Copernicus and Columbus were inspired by the lonian tradition.
The idea that the earth was just a planet and that we're citizens of the universe was rejected and forgotten.
This idea was first argued by Aristarchus 2300 years ago. He held that the Earth moves around the sun. He correctly located our place in the solar system. For his trouble, he was accused of heresy. Plato's way ruled. Science lost, religion won. And we all lost.
They explain in the old Cosmos how Plato is connected to Christianity. I'll try to find it.
Democritus was a great man back in ancient Greece. He believed that the prevailing religions of his time were evil and that neither souls nor immortal gods existed. There is no evidence that Democritus was persecuted for his beliefs. But then again, he came from Abdera, a very liberal open society where you could think what you want. However, in his time the brief tradition of tolerance for unconventional views was beginning to erode.
For instance, the prevailing belief was that the moon and the sun were gods. Another contemporary of Democritus, named Anaxagoras, taught that the moon was a place made of ordinary matter and that the sun was a red-hot stone far away in the sky. For this, Anaxagoras was condemned convicted and imprisoned for impiety a religious crime. People began to be persecuted for their ideas. A portrait of Democritus is now .
on the Greek 1 00-drachma note but his ideas were suppressed and his influence on history made minor.
The mystics were beginning to win. Pythagoras who lived here on Samos in the 6th century BC.
this small Greek Orthodox shrine was erected on his front porch. There's a continuity of tradition from Pythagoras to Christianity. Plato was a follower of Pythagoras.
Plato believed that ideas were far more real than the natural world. He advised the astronomers not to waste their time observing stars and planets. It was better, he believed, just to think about them. Plato expressed hostility to observation and experiment. He taught contempt for the real world and disdain for the practical application of scientific knowledge. Plato's followers succeeded in extinguishing the light .
of science and experiment that had been kindled by Democritus Plato's unease with the world as revealed by our senses was to dominate and stifle Western philosophy. Even as late as 1600 .
It wasn't until the 1600's we rediscovered what Plato hid from the masses. He didn't want the masses having the truth. The facts. Science. Because science makes people question the church. That's science 101. Question authority. Don't put your trust in the writings of the ancients. They say miracles occurred? That's not enough for science. Not after peer review. I seriously question the writings of the ancients.
The continuity between Greek thought (Pythagorus and Plato), the Roman world and eventually Christian writers like Paul of Tarsus have nothing to do with opposition to science.
Pythagoras's religious and scientific views were, in his opinion, inseparably interconnected. Pythagoras was rather inclusive in his teaching, even allowing female members in his order. Of course, you had to obey the rules of the order to be a member. Pythagoras' meeting places were burned because he became a threat to the political order of the day.
Plato believed that society was best served by a meritocratic system, as opposed to a democratic system. If he were alive today, he would say that politicians should have to pass an intellectual test to gain their position, as opposed to winning a popularity contest. That's a political philosophy and has nothing to do with your science vs religion false dichotomy.
"[Anaxagoras' scientific] speculations made him vulnerable in Athens to a charge of impiety. Diogenes Laertius reports the story that he was prosecuted by Cleon for impiety, but Plutarch says that Pericles sent his former tutor, Anaxagoras, to Lampsacus for his own safety after the Athenians began to blame him for the Peloponnesian war."
There is always a political motive to sham trials. The Peloponnesian War was a struggle over political power like all wars, but I'm sure if you bend your thoughts severely enough you can conclude that the war was caused by religion. "The real cause I consider to be the one which was formally most kept out of sight. The growth of the power of Athens, and the alarm which this inspired in Lacedaemon, made war inevitable."- Thucydides
It's interesting that you mention Anaxagoras, who believed in a sort of intelligent design underpinning the universe. This he called nous. He claimed that "nous (intellect or mind) was the motive cause of the cosmos."
Anaxagoras Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
"Nous then is not only first cause, it also, one might say, is the preserver of order in the cosmos, as it maintains the rotations that govern all the natural processes. Anaxagoras does not explain how these processes work, or how nous can affect the ingredients."
Any theories about nous are metaphysical and totally outside the purview of scientific questioning. Anaxagoras is an example of a creationist whose metaphysical ideas do not interfere with his scientific observations.
They explain in the old Cosmos how Plato is connected to Christianity. I'll try to find it.
Democritus was a great man back in ancient Greece. He believed that the prevailing religions of his time were evil and that neither souls nor immortal gods existed. There is no evidence that Democritus was persecuted for his beliefs. But then again, he came from Abdera, a very liberal open society where you could think what you want. However, in his time the brief tradition of tolerance for unconventional views was beginning to erode.
For instance, the prevailing belief was that the moon and the sun were gods. Another contemporary of Democritus, named Anaxagoras, taught that the moon was a place made of ordinary matter and that the sun was a red-hot stone far away in the sky. For this, Anaxagoras was condemned convicted and imprisoned for impiety a religious crime. People began to be persecuted for their ideas. A portrait of Democritus is now .
on the Greek 1 00-drachma note but his ideas were suppressed and his influence on history made minor.
The mystics were beginning to win. Pythagoras who lived here on Samos in the 6th century BC.
this small Greek Orthodox shrine was erected on his front porch. There's a continuity of tradition from Pythagoras to Christianity. Plato was a follower of Pythagoras.
Plato believed that ideas were far more real than the natural world. He advised the astronomers not to waste their time observing stars and planets. It was better, he believed, just to think about them. Plato expressed hostility to observation and experiment. He taught contempt for the real world and disdain for the practical application of scientific knowledge. Plato's followers succeeded in extinguishing the light .
of science and experiment that had been kindled by Democritus Plato's unease with the world as revealed by our senses was to dominate and stifle Western philosophy. Even as late as 1600 .
It wasn't until the 1600's we rediscovered what Plato hid from the masses. He didn't want the masses having the truth. The facts. Science. Because science makes people question the church. That's science 101. Question authority. Don't put your trust in the writings of the ancients. They say miracles occurred? That's not enough for science. Not after peer review. I seriously question the writings of the ancients.
The continuity between Greek thought (Pythagorus and Plato), the Roman world and eventually Christian writers like Paul of Tarsus have nothing to do with opposition to science.
Pythagoras's religious and scientific views were, in his opinion, inseparably interconnected. Pythagoras was rather inclusive in his teaching, even allowing female members in his order. Of course, you had to obey the rules of the order to be a member. Pythagoras' meeting places were burned because he became a threat to the political order of the day.
Plato believed that society was best served by a meritocratic system, as opposed to a democratic system. If he were alive today, he would say that politicians should have to pass an intellectual test to gain their position, as opposed to winning a popularity contest. That's a political philosophy and has nothing to do with your science vs religion false dichotomy.
"[Anaxagoras' scientific] speculations made him vulnerable in Athens to a charge of impiety. Diogenes Laertius reports the story that he was prosecuted by Cleon for impiety, but Plutarch says that Pericles sent his former tutor, Anaxagoras, to Lampsacus for his own safety after the Athenians began to blame him for the Peloponnesian war."
There is always a political motive to sham trials. The Peloponnesian War was a struggle over political power like all wars, but I'm sure if you bend your thoughts severely enough you can conclude that the war was caused by religion. "The real cause I consider to be the one which was formally most kept out of sight. The growth of the power of Athens, and the alarm which this inspired in Lacedaemon, made war inevitable."- Thucydides
It's interesting that you mention Anaxagoras, who believed in a sort of intelligent design underpinning the universe. This he called nous. He claimed that "nous (intellect or mind) was the motive cause of the cosmos."
Anaxagoras Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
"Nous then is not only first cause, it also, one might say, is the preserver of order in the cosmos, as it maintains the rotations that govern all the natural processes. Anaxagoras does not explain how these processes work, or how nous can affect the ingredients."
Any theories about nous are metaphysical and totally outside the purview of scientific questioning. Anaxagoras is an example of a creationist whose metaphysical ideas do not interfere with his scientific observations.
Don't forget back then there was no separation of church and state. So the church was playing politics and going to war and keeping the people down and turning a blind eye to slavery.
Anyone who believes in God needs to watch the Cosmos. Watch the new one with Neil Degrasse Tyson and the old one with Carl Sagan. Once you learn the history of man, science and religion you will realize god(s) were made up long before we decided to just go with one god. Religious ignorance has held us back thousands of years. Religious people love to brag that it was on their watch that we came up with cures and that it was religious people who got us on the moon. They expose their ignorance to the fact that many of the scientists were/are atheists. They try to ignore the history of how many scientists were put to death for heresy by the churches for things that turned out to be correct. But today the church doesn't get so upset if you suggest the earth isn't the center of the universe or that the sun revolves around the earth because churches change with the times. They've learned not to fight science and instead ignore your anti scientific history and embrace science. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
300 years before Christ, Aristarchus of Samos discovered the earth was not the center of the universe. But it wasn't until the year 1500 of our lord that someone dared suggest it again. Who squashed this fact for 1800 years? Religion.
Think about instead of the 50 year cold war and all the other wars we fought if we would have put the time and energy into colonizing Mars. Take all the nukes we have built since the 1950's and tell me how much money that is. Human beings are stupid. One way to tell how dumb someone is, ask them if they believe in god.
Pythagoras refuted geocentrism in the 6th Century BC. He was a religious freak and a priest. Aristarchus of Samos studied at the Lyceum (dedicated to the god Apollo). Francis Bacon is said to have invented the scientific method. He was a priest. Copernicus was a Polish priest. Mendels was a priest, and the father of genetics (and a major influence on Darwin). You might say that Dostoyevsky (Jesus freak) is the father of modern psychology (if you read Crime and Punishment). Pascal (Jesus freak) was a mathematical genius and the father of computing. At least 35 craters on the moon are named after Jesuits, all of whom made significant contributions to science. Lemaitre was a priest who first proposed the Big Bang theory. The list goes on and on.
Not sure how you figure that the Cold War can be blamed on religion, or that nukes are a religious invention. It's true that Niels Bohr was an early nuclear physicist. If you read his stuff, or Einstein's, you get the sense that scientific breakthroughs often comes as a result of inspiration, or some sort of epiphany. It's often similar to an experience of the sacred. Einstein's revelation about the theory of relativity sounds like a mystical experience, as he describes it.
The practices of religion serve to break down mental pre-conceptions and constructs, filters and biases, and to enable the practitioner to see with fresh eyes.
Religion is not the cause of war. It can be used as a tool of exploitation, for political ends, just as patriotism or humanism can. Today's wars are sold to the public by appealing to secular humanism. If the entire world were atheistic, the incidences of war would not diminish by one scintilla.
And I think it's helpful to understand that the TV show Cosmos plays very loosely and creatively with history, to the point of willful deceit in my opinion.
The cosmos even admits that Giordano Bruno believed in god too. But the church burned him because he believed the universe was bigger than the church believed. The cosmos also explained how Newton thought he could figure out hidden messages in the bible. Nothing ever came from it.
Plato decided to hide math and science from the masses. He didn't think they could handle it. He's connected with christianity.
And we know that many of the discoveries you think someone discovered in 1500ad was actually discovered and lost 1000 years earlier.
Don't forget that until America most countries church and state were one and the same.
I don't put all the blame for wars on religion but they sure don't do much to stop them. You think atheist liberals would war more than conservative theists? I doubt that very much. We'd rather spend the money on science and poverty. Instead of stealing Iraq's oil let's figure out how to harness photosynthesis
Giordano Bruno was a Dominican friar. He was clergy, a part of a Church brotherhood. He had many clashes with his Church superiors and fellow brothers, who he publicly chided as idiots. And, yes, the Church burned him at the stake. Of course, burning someone to death sounds outrageous to us because it is, indeed, outrageous. I try to put outrageous historical acts into context, though. In Bruno's time, local lords were hanging people or putting people in the stocks for the crime of vagrancy (without a trial). Women were drowned during Bruno's time for adultery, by secular authorities.
A common misunderstanding of today is that the Medieval Church was scouring the countryside burning laymen at the stake. While the Church was a moral authority of the time, they had little sway over the punishments of laypeople. What the Medieval Inquisition did was punish its own clergy in some very high profile cases which are retold again and again by historians. The Spanish Inquisition and others were completely taken over by secular authorities.
"Throughout the Inquisition's history, it was rivaled by local ecclesiastical and secular jurisdictions. No matter how determined, no pope succeeded in establishing complete control over the prosecution of heresy. Medieval kings, princes, bishops, and civil authorities all had a role in prosecuting heresy, except where they individually opposed the practice. The practice reached its apex in the second half of the 13th century. During this period, the tribunals were almost entirely free from any authority, including that of the pope. Therefore, it was almost impossible to eradicate abuse.[4]
In southern Europe, Church-run courts existed in the kingdom of Aragon during the medieval period, but not elsewhere in the Iberian peninsula or some other kingdoms, including England In Scandinavian kingdoms it had hardly any impact." -wikipedia
What Cosmos does in its cartoons is that it portrays Bruno as a mild mannered scientist. He was neither mild mannered, nor what we would consider an actual scientist. He was not a "martyr for science". He was a friar who was executed for his theological beliefs on pantheism and other 'heresies'. The Church at the time had no official position on heliocentrism, and Bruno's scientific beliefs were not even brought up at his trial. Cosmos comes out in its debut episode and spins a fantastical yarn that has to be regarded as intentionally deceptive.
"Pope Clement VII (r. 1523–1534) had reacted favorably to a talk about Copernicus's theories, rewarding the speaker with a rare manuscript. There is no indication of how Pope Paul III, to whom On the Revolutions was dedicated reacted; however, a trusted advisor, Bartolomeo Spina of Pisa (1474–1546) intended to condemn it but fell ill and died before his plan was carried out (see Rosen, 1975). Thus, in 1600 there was no official Catholic position on the Copernican system, and it was certainly not a heresy. When Giordano Bruno (1548–1600) was burned at the stake as a heretic, it had nothing to do with his writings in support of Copernican cosmology, and this is clearly shown in Finocchiaro's reconstruction of the accusations against Bruno (see also Blumenberg's part 3, chapter 5, titled “Not a Martyr for Copernicanism: Giordano Bruno”)."
Nicolaus Copernicus Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Niel deGrasse Tyson has been caught in other fabrications, and his loyal followers have been hypocritically erasing evidence of that from his wiki pages.
Neil deGrasse Tyson falls from grace over quote fabrication scandal - Houston science news Examiner.com
Tyson is a serial religion basher, and he uses fabrications to build his arguments.
Sealybobo, you're the perfect candidate to be a deGrasse Tyson acolyte. You say that Plato hid math and scientific knowledge from the masses and then you immediately connect Plato to Christianity. That might even be too far an intellectual stretch for the Tyson cult. The continuity between Greek and Christian concepts has nothing to do with any policy on sharing math and science with people, obviously. You'd have to be blinded by some sort of anti-Christian agenda to make that claim.
The original Cosmos had to have very few edits after all these years, including this. Do you refute Sagan's stories too?
Athens, in the time of Plato and Aristotle had a vast slave population. All of that brave Athenian talk about democracy applied only to a privileged few. Plato and Aristotle were comfortable in a slave society.
Their way dominated for over 20 centuries. In the recognition that the cosmos is knowable, that there is a mathematical underpinning to nature, they greatly advanced the cause of science. But in the suppression of disquieting facts and that science should be kept for a small elite , the distaste for experiment, the embrace of mysticism, the easy acceptance of slave societies, their influence has significantly set back the human endeavor.
The books of the lonian scientists are entirely lost. We rediscovered them in the middle east many years later from another great man who said "don't put your trust in the writings of the ancients". That was 1000 years ago. I forgot his name.
This knowledge was suppressed by the Greeks. Ridiculed and forgotten by the Platonists and by the Christians who adopted much of the philosophy of Plato.
Finally, the Western world reawakened. Experiment and open inquiry slowly became respectable once again. The enlightenment period. Forgotten books and fragments were read once more. Leonardo and Copernicus and Columbus were inspired by the lonian tradition.
The idea that the earth was just a planet and that we're citizens of the universe was rejected and forgotten.
This idea was first argued by Aristarchus 2300 years ago. He held that the Earth moves around the sun. He correctly located our place in the solar system. For his trouble, he was accused of heresy. Plato's way ruled. Science lost, religion won. And we all lost.
I saw Carl Sagan speak at UCSC when I was in High School. I like him. I just think he's off base when he bashes religion.
I'm glad you mentioned slavery, as the abolitionist movement was Christian in character. Sojourner Truth, Henry Ward Beecher, Harriet Beecher Stowe, John Brown, etc.. Super-ultra Jesus Freaks.
Frederick Douglass was an ordained minister at the African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church, and he rightly pointed out the hypocrisy of many so-called 'Christian' slave owners. He wrote in his Narrative of the Life of an American Slave, "I love the pure, peaceable, and impartial Christianity of Christ: I therefore hate the corrupt, slaveholding, women-whipping, cradle-plundering, partial and hypocritical Christianity of this land. Indeed, I can see no reason, but the most deceitful one, for calling the religion of this land Christianity. I look upon it as the climax of all misnomers, the boldest of all frauds, and the grossest of all libels…"
Today we like to call MLK by the title 'Doctor', or 'Civil Rights Leader' King. In the media or in public school, he is rarely referred to as a reverend. His doctorates were in theology. His speeches derive their power from the Bible.
Don't forget back then there was no separation of church and state. So the church was playing politics and going to war and keeping the people down and turning a blind eye to slavery.
Churches don't have armies, with a couple of historical exceptions. Monarchs, chiefs and presidents go to war.
The separation of church and state is a metaphorical description that takes on different meanings depending on the country and time in question.
In ancient Greece, there was no comprehensive blanketing religious authority.There were a variety of cults.
Some cults eventually developed hierarchical priesthoods that controlled access to sacrifices, but "early on at least every adult (or every adult male) was considered eligible to perform sacrifices to the gods. This might occur in the home or it might occur publicly in a temple. Priests often attended sacrifices but their presence was by no means required."
In Medieval times, Popes were often ignored by monarchs and lesser royal rulers.
History is replete with autocrats who bent religion to their interests of maintaining power. Politics corrupts religion. It's more accurate to phrase it that way than to say that religion corrupts politics.
What about the king James version? Church was the state and the state was the church. Kings and pharaoh's were divine
When I watched a show on ancient Greek gods I noticed the similarities between them and our modern day superheros. Most of the hero's back then were either gods or demi gods. One hero, I believe it was Jason or the guy who killed Medusa was 100% mortal. He reminded me of batman. They appeal to us because they're just like usHubris Iconography
If religion is based on sentiment rather than logic, where do we get horror film avatars such as Leatherface (a chainsaw-wielding cannibal) that capture human fascination with chaos? Chaos is, after all, an intellectual concept and not a sentimental one.
On the other hand, if science is based on logic and not speculation, where do we get movies like "Pi: Faith in Chaos" (1998) which celebrate human fascination with scientific imagination? Scientific imagination (i.e., science-fiction) is, after all, the stuff of condoned play and not obligatory ethics.
It seems that science and religion somehow temper each other, which is why philosophy is so important, since it juggles both spiritualism (i.e., metaphysics) and analytics (i.e., reductionism).
I like the American comic book icon Superman (DC Comics) who represents social fascination with both transcendentalism (i.e., daydreams) and sociology (i.e., humanism).
Superman - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
View attachment 36386
It seems like religion is evolving. Christianity is definitely the best of all the ones that came before or after.
It seems like religion is evolving. Christianity is definitely the best of all the ones that came before or after.
I disagree. Maybe because I lived quite a long time in India.
Hinduism is a far more humanitarian religion.
Besides the really bizarre world of uncountable gods it developed around 5000 years ago as creation myth of India. Not the cosmos, not the earth, just India.
So it is absolutely ethnic, not at all missionary, and has a much higher developed spirituality than the three desert religions from the Middle East. This is prett much hidden by the sensation media who mostly report about crazy rituals like the bathing in the Ganges at Varanasi where dead corpses are floating by.
You must know, that the only religion that shredded all the gods, Buddhism, evolved from Hinduism.
Buddha, or with his earthly name Siddhartha Gautama, was originally Hindu, born in Nepal around 500 B.C. as son of a rich noble family.
By the way, the Buddhists you may have seen walking around in the US trying to collect money in their funny yellow wraps are no real Buddhists. They are mostly idiots and parasites, real Buddhists don't try to missionize people either.
I had a private audience with the Swami of the biggest Hindu congregetion, and also a long afternoon with a Buddhist monk in Srinagar in Kashmir. Though I am an atheist to the bone, the insights were interesting.
O.k., the Hindu philosophy is quite confusing, because it seems that they do not really believe in gods.
Except the dumb ones. It is more metaphysical, they use the gods like a pergola to trail their spiritual thoughts around some imaginable entities.
Buddhists are much closer to our modern science than you can imagine. Basically they say in pholosophical terms the same thing as Carl Sagan does. We are stardust, and we return to stardust and finally disappear in the eternal Nirwana, where our universe will disappear too as far as we know today.
They see the life we have here on earth as the precious thing it is, which should be used the best way possible by, interestingly, the golden rule of Immanuel Kant if you boil it down to the essentials.
As any religion, they have developed a whole bunch of fancy habits, but these are merely more than the mental stairs to help you step by step to find your satori (enlightenment).
Nothing for me, as I said I am an atheist, plus engineer, which leads me to simply acccept my end as some diluted subatomic particles in the vast cosmos. But for someone who needs a bit soul food and mental caressing, Buddhism is something I would have no problem to accept.
I wasn't considering Buddhist or Hindu when I said christianity was the best of all the religions. I meant the ones that believe in gods.
I wasn't considering Buddhist or Hindu when I said christianity was the best of all the religions. I meant the ones that believe in gods.
Ah, you meant just the three from the desert?
the more i listen to these so called know it all in astro this and physist that. oops on the spelling, I'm more and more convinced they are all just as lost in the dark and guessing at answers then any and all religions. Some their theories, and most if not all are only theories, are far fetched. For all we know the last answer will hopefully never be answered. string theory, don't know gravity, don't know black holes then. If I told you something you had no way of proving yourself, would you take my word for it? then why take theirs? lol faith in your fellow man?Anyone who believes in God needs to watch the Cosmos. Watch the new one with Neil Degrasse Tyson and the old one with Carl Sagan. Once you learn the history of man, science and religion you will realize god(s) were made up long before we decided to just go with one god. Religious ignorance has held us back thousands of years. Religious people love to brag that it was on their watch that we came up with cures and that it was religious people who got us on the moon. They expose their ignorance to the fact that many of the scientists were/are atheists. They try to ignore the history of how many scientists were put to death for heresy by the churches for things that turned out to be correct. But today the church doesn't get so upset if you suggest the earth isn't the center of the universe or that the sun revolves around the earth because churches change with the times. They've learned not to fight science and instead ignore your anti scientific history and embrace science. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
300 years before Christ, Aristarchus of Samos discovered the earth was not the center of the universe. But it wasn't until the year 1500 of our lord that someone dared suggest it again. Who squashed this fact for 1800 years? Religion.
Think about instead of the 50 year cold war and all the other wars we fought if we would have put the time and energy into colonizing Mars. Take all the nukes we have built since the 1950's and tell me how much money that is. Human beings are stupid. One way to tell how dumb someone is, ask them if they believe in god.
I wasn't considering Buddhist or Hindu when I said christianity was the best of all the religions. I meant the ones that believe in gods.
Ah, you meant just the three from the desert?
Pretty much. It amazes me what a wild and unbelievable story each of them has concocted or that those stories are still believed by so many people. All the stuff the Mormons say. And for a Jew or Christian to make fun of a Mormon when their bibles have such wild stories too? The 3 desert stories were clearly written by ancient superstitious primitive men hundreds and even thousands of years ago.
But the stuff Buddhists and Hindu's say still hold weight today. I don't buy into either 100% but neither of them are saying a god came and told them so they at least aren't starting off the conversation with a lie I need to believe before we can even move forward.
I remember as a little child questioning my aunt who was telling me all the bible stories were literal stories. Turning 5 loaves of bread and 3 fish into enough for 5000 for example. Even my young immature mind couldn't just accept that on faith. Even young me doubted that and needed proof.
And anything I don't believe in the Hindu or Buddhist religions, doesn't mean I go to hell, right? So your religion doesn't make me defensive at all.
This is what Christians don't get. Their organized religion is not good for people. Its a lie. They use this lie to manipulate them. It is also used to divide us, for example against Muslims. See how we got into this trouble? The Muslims were picking on the Jews in Israel and wanted the Jews wiped off the face of the earth and now us Christians come running for Gihad. They're all nuts.
Hitler may have been an atheist but atheist are not evil. At least me and my friends aren't.
Wow! I just googled this:
That is right around the age when I realized Christianity was bullshit. Or should I say, all organized religions.
- Buddhism is a religion to about 300 million people around the world. The word comes from 'budhi', 'to awaken'. It has its origins about 2,500 years ago when Siddhartha Gotama, known as the Buddha, was himself awakened (enlightened) at the age of 35.