Shrimpbox
Gold Member
Well let's examine your example num. petreaus shared a limited amount,of top secret material with a person who had clearance to review some top secret stuff. No damage to national security has been claimed. He was found guilty and will never be able to be involved in national security matters again notwithstanding his exemplary lifetime service to this country and his winning strategies in the Iraq war.
Hilary's emails are stashed in China, Russia, and Iran, just to name a few. Her damage to national security may be greater than snowden's. She has continually lied about her email conduct. She is also the criminal that people like you parade as your presidential candidate. So if you consider petreaus guilty you must consider Hilary's turbocharged egregious national security behavior to be punishable by an even stiffer sentence. I mean you do believe in fairness and equal justice for all, right?
Hilary's emails are stashed in China, Russia, and Iran, just to name a few. Her damage to national security may be greater than snowden's. She has continually lied about her email conduct. She is also the criminal that people like you parade as your presidential candidate. So if you consider petreaus guilty you must consider Hilary's turbocharged egregious national security behavior to be punishable by an even stiffer sentence. I mean you do believe in fairness and equal justice for all, right?