The Clock Ticks: Offensive Jihad

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by PoliticalChic, Jan 18, 2011.

  1. PoliticalChic
    Online

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    55,677
    Thanks Received:
    15,568
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +24,781
    "1. IN EGYPT, an extraordinarily important fatwa has been issued by Dr. Imad Mustafa, of al-Azhar University, the world’s most important Islamic university.

    2. …Mustafa has publicly and explicitly come up with a new concept, one that up until now was supposedly restricted to groups like al-Qaida: “Then there is another type of fighting against the non- Muslims known as offensive jihad... which is to pursue the infidels into their own land without any aggression [on their part]...

    3. “Two schools [of Islamic jurisprudence] have ruled that offensive jihad is permissible in order to secure Islam’s border, to extend God’s religion to people in cases where the governments do not allow it, such as the Pharaoh did with the children of Israel, and to remove every religion but Islam from the Arabian peninsula.”

    4. …this means that it is permissible to wage jihad against a country if anything “necessary” to Islam according to (hard-line) clerics’ interpretations is blocked (polygamy, child marriage, special privileges at work places, building mosques anywhere, permitting the wearing of head scarves or burkas).

    5. In practice, according to this doctrine, then, any non-Muslim can be attacked anywhere. Thus, mainstream, powerful clerics are now calling for a seventh century- style jihad against non-Muslim lands even if the victims cannot be accused of attacking Muslim ruled lands. Merely to “extend God’s religion” to others is a sufficient motive. Mustafa says that two of Islam’s main schools have always endorsed offensive jihad, but I doubt if he would have made that argument ten or 20 years ago.

    6. …radical groups now have mainstream support for their most extreme, aggressive behavior. Even if nobody repeats Mustafa’s statement publicly – if for no other reasons than it is bad public relations in the West – this idea will be more and more taken for granted. Presumably, Mustafa won’t be forced to retract this fatwa by his colleagues or Egypt’s government.

    7. Moreover, we probably won’t see senior clerics denouncing and rejecting the doctrine of offensive jihad.
    This is a development of stupendous proportions that will probably not be covered in the Western mass media. If this viewpoint continues to spread, along with the growing al-Qaida type doctrine of the Muslim Brotherhood, it could be a historical turning point that will greatly intensify revolutionary Islamist terrorism and attacks on the West.ShrinkWrapped: Stories You May Have Missed If You Only Read the New York Times: Updated
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Ropey
    Online

    Ropey Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit! Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2010
    Messages:
    32,838
    Thanks Received:
    5,461
    Trophy Points:
    1,150
    Location:
    Fryolater
    Ratings:
    +7,766
    Simply another name for their "Spiritual Jihad".

    Which is to take place first and only if it is attacked or failing does the "Physical Jihad" take place and even then, only if the proponents of the jihad are powerful enough.

    Which is why the war needs to be fought on their land.

    They (Extremists) are clear. Extremists never keep quiet. il Duce, Stalin and Hitler and Achmadinejad all proudly proclaimed their stances.

    While the masses stood unbelieving for far too long. The root seems rotten to the Core. These are not the leaders of Egypt speaking here. When Egypt's dictator and the dictatorship is overthrown, then we will finally see more of their truth.

    We will see it in Tunisia as well. What the people truly want.

    Then the blinders will finally be off.
     

Share This Page