Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think someone from tramp admin spread around fake news, due to the media's want to call John Bolton and it will be a disaster, and he will say I didn't say that in the book, we should pick Pompeo, and Mulvaney to call.
I think its a set up, only tramp can do EP on his book.
Bolton lawyer slams 'corrupted' White House review process after book leak
A lawyer for former national security adviser John Bolton accused White House officials of leaking details of Bolton's forthcoming book following a report that the manuscript contained the allegation that President Trump directly tied security aid for Ukraine to the country investigating his political rivals.
--------------------------------------------------A lawyer for former national security adviser John Bolton accused White House officials of leaking details of Bolton's forthcoming book following a report that the manuscript contained the allegation that President Trump directly tied security aid for Ukraine to the country investigating his political rivals.
snip
The attorney's statement stopped short of confirming the contents of the Times' report. Cooper did not respond to requests for comment from The Hill.
Agreed.What? WTF?I’m fine with that, but everything he says has to be questioned. I doubt he is above lying under oath. He’s a neocon you know?Put him under oath.Why would anyone believe Bolton, a well known crazed Neocon jackass? Donnie fired the scumbag. No doubt he will shit on Donnie and he is not above lying.
Of course he should be questioned. But if all you’re going to do is claim he’s lying, then you’re case is rather weak.
I mean, if Bolton testifies that Trump connected aid and investigations, then Trump would need to respond. If the response is just “he’s lying” then that’s a very weak response.
You’re just mad because the attempts to suppress the people from knowing the truth isn’t going as well as you’d hoped.Great, show where they mischaracterized Bolton's book....Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
The New York Times is credible? LOL Since when?
How do you discredit something that they obviously stole or had leaked to them? Bolton is blaming the White House for leaking it, which makes no sense whatsoever, unless of course is a Deep State operative for the NSC.
Bolton didn't leak it.You had to figure Bolton would leak unpublished excerpts of his upcoming book to drum up some enthusiasm. There's no difference between Bolton and Avenotti.
Bolton wasn't in on the call.Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
There’s much more to this than the phone call. Bolton was in on many things.
They're deep state same as Bolton.
God you're clueless.
Don't see where Lakhota actually said that.. Maybe it got edited.. Because it would be wrong.. The Huffpo article relies on the NYT for the actual content of those drafts...
AND -- if the NYT HAS the drafts, whytfuck are they NOT QUOTING BOLTON?????
It smells.. And the denial from Bolton's people that ANY copies are anywhere but at the WH and NSC for review kinda undermines the claim...
At BEST -- it's another case of 3rd party hearsay with a lot of DRAMATIC Adam Schiffless made up parody tossed into the middle...
Quote the DAMN draft IF you have it...
Don't get your panties in a wad. You can be sure the Times has the stuff.
They are NOT QUOTING BOLTON.. You know moron with those "quotey" thingies.... IF they've seen the draft(s) first hand -- they WOULD be quoting him...
It's another whistleblower heard it 3rd hand kinda deal... Bar talk... LOTS of fucking bar talk in D.C.
In due time, my dear. In due time...
Echos of the last 3 years. LMAO The Biden 5 are probably wishing all this shit would just go away.
.
Bolton wasn't in on the call.Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
There’s much more to this than the phone call. Bolton was in on many things.
The impeachment is about the phone call. Nothing else factual has been provided as evidence.
What? WTF?I’m fine with that, but everything he says has to be questioned. I doubt he is above lying under oath. He’s a neocon you know?Put him under oath.Why would anyone believe Bolton, a well known crazed Neocon jackass? Donnie fired the scumbag. No doubt he will shit on Donnie and he is not above lying.
Of course he should be questioned. But if all you’re going to do is claim he’s lying, then you’re case is rather weak.
I mean, if Bolton testifies that Trump connected aid and investigations, then Trump would need to respond. If the response is just “he’s lying” then that’s a very weak response.
Bolton wasn't in on the call.Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
There’s much more to this than the phone call. Bolton was in on many things.
The impeachment is about the phone call. Nothing else factual has been provided as evidence.
You’re factually incorrect. The case against Trump goes well beyond the phone call with Zelensky.
Bolton wasn't in on the call.Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
There’s much more to this than the phone call. Bolton was in on many things.
The impeachment is about the phone call. Nothing else factual has been provided as evidence.
You’re factually incorrect. The case against Trump goes well beyond the phone call with Zelensky.
That's funny! That is all the House used as evidence and then lied about it being factual, instead choosing to believe something along Schiff's fairy tale.
Bombshell # 5987Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
It's about more than just that one phone call. It was a course of conduct for which he was impeached. I highly recommend you actually read the articles of impeachment or have them explained to you if you're that incapable of understanding them.Bolton wasn't in on the call.Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
There’s much more to this than the phone call. Bolton was in on many things.
The impeachment is about the phone call. Nothing else factual has been provided as evidence.
Vindman brother did.. so it’s probably bias like his brother testimonyBolton didn't leak it.You had to figure Bolton would leak unpublished excerpts of his upcoming book to drum up some enthusiasm. There's no difference between Bolton and Avenotti.
Nope.That’s also factually incorrect. There were thousands of pages of testimony corroborating the Democratic case.
I think someone from tramp admin spread around fake news, due to the media's want to call John Bolton and it will be a disaster, and he will say I didn't say that in the book, we should pick Pompeo, and Mulvaney to call.
I think its a set up, only tramp can do EP on his book.
Bolton lawyer slams 'corrupted' White House review process after book leak
A lawyer for former national security adviser John Bolton accused White House officials of leaking details of Bolton's forthcoming book following a report that the manuscript contained the allegation that President Trump directly tied security aid for Ukraine to the country investigating his political rivals.
--------------------------------------------------A lawyer for former national security adviser John Bolton accused White House officials of leaking details of Bolton's forthcoming book following a report that the manuscript contained the allegation that President Trump directly tied security aid for Ukraine to the country investigating his political rivals.
snip
The attorney's statement stopped short of confirming the contents of the Times' report. Cooper did not respond to requests for comment from The Hill.
now read about the
With National Security Council Shakeup, Steve Bannon Gets A Seat At The Table
------------------------------------
I still think its a set up, look at how tramps defense team said mistruths on Sat.
You might wanna call the Ukraine foreign minister in the Ukraine president and ask them why they disagree with youIt's about more than just that one phone call. It was a course of conduct for which he was impeached. I highly recommend you actually read the articles of impeachment or have them explained to you if you're that incapable of understanding them.Bolton wasn't in on the call.Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
There’s much more to this than the phone call. Bolton was in on many things.
The impeachment is about the phone call. Nothing else factual has been provided as evidence.
The articles don't list a crime or impeachable wrongdoing.It's about more than just that one phone call. It was a course of conduct for which he was impeached. I highly recommend you actually read the articles of impeachment or have them explained to you if you're that incapable of understanding them.
Bolton wasn't in on the call.
Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
There’s much more to this than the phone call. Bolton was in on many things.
The impeachment is about the phone call. Nothing else factual has been provided as evidence.
You’re factually incorrect. The case against Trump goes well beyond the phone call with Zelensky.
That's funny! That is all the House used as evidence and then lied about it being factual, instead choosing to believe something along Schiff's fairy tale.
That’s also factually incorrect. There were thousands of pages of testimony corroborating the Democratic case.
