Agnapostate
Rookie
- Banned
- #41
The people who kept the Torah however, knew better.
Simply the Torah, or the OT in general? Because I find it interesting that Joshua was apparently able to "stop the Sun."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The people who kept the Torah however, knew better.
Yeah? What's interesting about God stopping the sun, or sending it travelling backward in the sky?
uh....... that's false..........
Nahom- discovered
Bountiful- discovered
ancient mayan ruins- evidence
it's all here. I challenge you to refute just 1 of the evidences found on the website.
Mormon Truth and Book of Mormon Evidences: Not Proof, But Indications of Plausibility
Truth, the people in the video are biblical archeologists who have uncovered thousands of years worth of evidence of the existence of ancient Israel, Egypt, etc. and then there are others who are archeologists who have uncovered the Native Americans and their history. They have absolutely nothing against Mormonism whatsoever - they just cannot find one shred of evidence that anything that the Book of Mormon suggests happened has ever actually happened. Your source is a Mormon source - do you have a completely neutral source that has verified the items you mentioned above have been found?
If not, I suggest you withdraw your claim that there is evidence of anything in the Book of Mormon except Joseph Smith being a guy known for his tall tales.
You know, after all the persecution Jews have gone through and continue to go through one would expect a Jew to be less of an judgemental ass. Instead of claiming because someone may or may not believe in the book of Mormon how about you actually address the issue and prove the people that say they have found evidence are actually wrong. Again for the slow, not JUST Mormons claim these thngs.
Truth, the people in the video are biblical archeologists who have uncovered thousands of years worth of evidence of the existence of ancient Israel, Egypt, etc. and then there are others who are archeologists who have uncovered the Native Americans and their history. They have absolutely nothing against Mormonism whatsoever - they just cannot find one shred of evidence that anything that the Book of Mormon suggests happened has ever actually happened. Your source is a Mormon source - do you have a completely neutral source that has verified the items you mentioned above have been found?
If not, I suggest you withdraw your claim that there is evidence of anything in the Book of Mormon except Joseph Smith being a guy known for his tall tales.
You know, after all the persecution Jews have gone through and continue to go through one would expect a Jew to be less of an judgemental ass. Instead of claiming because someone may or may not believe in the book of Mormon how about you actually address the issue and prove the people that say they have found evidence are actually wrong. Again for the slow, not JUST Mormons claim these thngs.
Okay ... as with all "evidence" to support religious myth, post one link that is not affiliated with them. Yes, I will check who funds the sources as I always do.
You know, after all the persecution Jews have gone through and continue to go through one would expect a Jew to be less of an judgemental ass. Instead of claiming because someone may or may not believe in the book of Mormon how about you actually address the issue and prove the people that say they have found evidence are actually wrong. Again for the slow, not JUST Mormons claim these thngs.
Okay ... as with all "evidence" to support religious myth, post one link that is not affiliated with them. Yes, I will check who funds the sources as I always do.
Just because a Mormon Link is involved does not mean only Mormons were involved. But then critical thinking is not high on the list of things some of you people have. Links have already been provided. Links that include non Mormon scholars.
Okay ... as with all "evidence" to support religious myth, post one link that is not affiliated with them. Yes, I will check who funds the sources as I always do.
Just because a Mormon Link is involved does not mean only Mormons were involved. But then critical thinking is not high on the list of things some of you people have. Links have already been provided. Links that include non Mormon scholars.
So then ... you can't find one that isn't affiliated or funded by the Mormons which supports your statement? Just like all the ones about the christian bible ...
Just because a Mormon Link is involved does not mean only Mormons were involved. But then critical thinking is not high on the list of things some of you people have. Links have already been provided. Links that include non Mormon scholars.
So then ... you can't find one that isn't affiliated or funded by the Mormons which supports your statement? Just like all the ones about the christian bible ...
Look you idiot, once again who sponsored it is irrelevant. What is relevant is that NON Mormons are involved. Remind us again why a non Christian group would sponsor research into the Bible or the Book of Mormon? Well other then attack sites designed to ATTACK the books, ignoring evidence and just cherry picking what they post or write. Kinda like you.
So then ... you can't find one that isn't affiliated or funded by the Mormons which supports your statement? Just like all the ones about the christian bible ...
Look you idiot, once again who sponsored it is irrelevant. What is relevant is that NON Mormons are involved. Remind us again why a non Christian group would sponsor research into the Bible or the Book of Mormon? Well other then attack sites designed to ATTACK the books, ignoring evidence and just cherry picking what they post or write. Kinda like you.
Who sponsors it is very relevant ... since they don't want to lose the money they need to continue they have to only show data that agrees with the sponsors. You missed the fact that it was you who contended that there was actual evidence from non-whatever (Mormon of other christian group) that supports the book. There is none in reality, just loose connections and the appearance of names in other lores and myths. That is not hard evidence, it is circumstantial. Since the Book of Mormon only appeared after these people were discovered it would be easy to write in a few facts to make it appear more accurate than it is.
Look you idiot, once again who sponsored it is irrelevant. What is relevant is that NON Mormons are involved. Remind us again why a non Christian group would sponsor research into the Bible or the Book of Mormon? Well other then attack sites designed to ATTACK the books, ignoring evidence and just cherry picking what they post or write. Kinda like you.
Who sponsors it is very relevant ... since they don't want to lose the money they need to continue they have to only show data that agrees with the sponsors. You missed the fact that it was you who contended that there was actual evidence from non-whatever (Mormon of other christian group) that supports the book. There is none in reality, just loose connections and the appearance of names in other lores and myths. That is not hard evidence, it is circumstantial. Since the Book of Mormon only appeared after these people were discovered it would be easy to write in a few facts to make it appear more accurate than it is.
Wrong again dipstick, but par for the course for a God Hater.
Who sponsors it is very relevant ... since they don't want to lose the money they need to continue they have to only show data that agrees with the sponsors. You missed the fact that it was you who contended that there was actual evidence from non-whatever (Mormon of other christian group) that supports the book. There is none in reality, just loose connections and the appearance of names in other lores and myths. That is not hard evidence, it is circumstantial. Since the Book of Mormon only appeared after these people were discovered it would be easy to write in a few facts to make it appear more accurate than it is.
Wrong again dipstick, but par for the course for a God Hater.
I don't hate any of the gods ... I just hate when people make such wild claims about their religious beliefs with absolutely nothing credible to back them up. Now, where are those non-biased links supporting any of your claims?
Wrong again dipstick, but par for the course for a God Hater.
I don't hate any of the gods ... I just hate when people make such wild claims about their religious beliefs with absolutely nothing credible to back them up. Now, where are those non-biased links supporting any of your claims?
Once again RETARD, the links provide NON Mormon Scholars, evidence is still evidence no matter who SPONSORS the research, you are DENSE.
I don't hate any of the gods ... I just hate when people make such wild claims about their religious beliefs with absolutely nothing credible to back them up. Now, where are those non-biased links supporting any of your claims?
Once again RETARD, the links provide NON Mormon Scholars, evidence is still evidence no matter who SPONSORS the research, you are DENSE.
Evidence is always edited by who pays for it. Now, those non-biased links please or just give it up. Just because you hate me so much doesn't make you always right, now let your hatred aside a moment and find some credible non-biased links please.
Once again RETARD, the links provide NON Mormon Scholars, evidence is still evidence no matter who SPONSORS the research, you are DENSE.
Evidence is always edited by who pays for it. Now, those non-biased links please or just give it up. Just because you hate me so much doesn't make you always right, now let your hatred aside a moment and find some credible non-biased links please.
In other words you do not want evidence, but hey thanks for play you dumb fuck.
I don't hate any of the gods ... I just hate when people make such wild claims about their religious beliefs with absolutely nothing credible to back them up. Now, where are those non-biased links supporting any of your claims?
Once again RETARD, the links provide NON Mormon Scholars, evidence is still evidence no matter who SPONSORS the research, you are DENSE.
Evidence is always edited by who pays for it. Now, those non-biased links please or just give it up. Just because you hate me so much doesn't make you always right, now let your hatred aside a moment and find some credible non-biased links please.
Once again RETARD, the links provide NON Mormon Scholars, evidence is still evidence no matter who SPONSORS the research, you are DENSE.
Evidence is always edited by who pays for it. Now, those non-biased links please or just give it up. Just because you hate me so much doesn't make you always right, now let your hatred aside a moment and find some credible non-biased links please.
So using that logic I and all Republicans can dismiss anything Obama or the Democrats have to say on facts or evidence or well anything, unless of course they can provide us with some unbiased source for those statements or facts? Thanks for clearing that up for me.
Now, where are the non-biased credible links to support the wild claim of the Book of Mormon being truth?
uh....... that's false..........
Nahom- discovered
Bountiful- discovered
ancient mayan ruins- evidence
it's all here. I challenge you to refute just 1 of the evidences found on the website.
Mormon Truth and Book of Mormon Evidences: Not Proof, But Indications of Plausibility
Truth, the people in the video are biblical archeologists who have uncovered thousands of years worth of evidence of the existence of ancient Israel, Egypt, etc. and then there are others who are archeologists who have uncovered the Native Americans and their history. They have absolutely nothing against Mormonism whatsoever - they just cannot find one shred of evidence that anything that the Book of Mormon suggests happened has ever actually happened. Your source is a Mormon source - do you have a completely neutral source that has verified the items you mentioned above have been found?
If not, I suggest you withdraw your claim that there is evidence of anything in the Book of Mormon except Joseph Smith being a guy known for his tall tales.
You know, after all the persecution Jews have gone through and continue to go through one would expect a Jew to be less of an judgemental ass. Instead of claiming because someone may or may not believe in the book of Mormon how about you actually address the issue and prove the people that say they have found evidence are actually wrong. Again for the slow, not JUST Mormons claim these thngs.
Okay ... as with all "evidence" to support religious myth, post one link that is not affiliated with them. Yes, I will check who funds the sources as I always do.
Just because a Mormon Link is involved does not mean only Mormons were involved. But then critical thinking is not high on the list of things some of you people have. Links have already been provided. Links that include non Mormon scholars.
So then ... you can't find one that isn't affiliated or funded by the Mormons which supports your statement? Just like all the ones about the christian bible ...