task0778
Diamond Member
The basis for the investigation into the presumed Russian interference with the 2016 presidential election and the attendant Trump collusion was the hacking of the DNC emails, right? The story goes that exposure of those emails affected the election, benefiting Trump, and that somehow he colluded with the Russians, either before or after the fact.
It has already been shown that the download speed of the emails could only have been achieved by loading it on a device attached to the server itself. It was too fast to have been sent via the internet to a hacker. But now, the Department of Justice had made an admission in response to a court filing that reveals they did not carry out their basic responsibilities.
Further, the DNC would not let FBI investigators review the DNC server. Instead, the DNC provided the FBI with analysis of a technical review done through a cyber-security contract with Crowdstrike. Suspecting they could prove the Russian hacking claim was false, lawyers representing Roger Stone requested the full Crowdstrike report on the DNC hack. When the DOJ responded to the Stone motion they made a rather significant admission. Not only did the FBI not review the DNC server, the FBI/DOJ never even saw the Crowdstrike report. Instead, what they got was the DNC’s redacted summary of the original report. The intelligence community, on which the US taxpayers spend scores of billions of dollars annually, put its credibility behind the DNC’s word, without even letting us know the basis for their “conclusion.” (snip)
This means the FBI and DOJ, and all of the downstream claims by the intelligence apparatus; including the December 2016 Joint Analysis Report and January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, all the way to the Weissmann/Mueller report and the continued claims therein; were based on the official intelligence agencies of the U.S. government and the U.S. Department of Justice taking the word of a hired contractor for the Democrat party….. despite their inability to examine the server and/or actually see an unredacted technical forensic report from the investigating contractor.
The entire apparatus of the U.S. government just took their word for it…
…and used the claim therein as an official position….
…which led to a subsequent government claim, in court, of absolute certainty that Russia hacked the DNC.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._of_their_responsibilities.html#ixzz5qvou8ZyN
Guys - there HAD to be some lower-level people within the FBI/DOJ that were involved in this, or knew about it and said nothing. Yeah, some top guys quit or got fired and that's good. But there were others who had to know this was bullshit, yet did nothing about it and said nothing to anybody about it. And THAT is a problem, there IS a Deep State out there. Whether they were politically motivated to keep their mouths shut or too scared to lose their jobs over it, the truth is we have people in positions of responsibility who lack the integrity to do the honest thing, they had to know this wasn't the right way to do business. And, there doesn't seem to be a way to blow the whistle or tell anybody, and the MSM would've sat on it anyway or squashed it.
It has already been shown that the download speed of the emails could only have been achieved by loading it on a device attached to the server itself. It was too fast to have been sent via the internet to a hacker. But now, the Department of Justice had made an admission in response to a court filing that reveals they did not carry out their basic responsibilities.
Further, the DNC would not let FBI investigators review the DNC server. Instead, the DNC provided the FBI with analysis of a technical review done through a cyber-security contract with Crowdstrike. Suspecting they could prove the Russian hacking claim was false, lawyers representing Roger Stone requested the full Crowdstrike report on the DNC hack. When the DOJ responded to the Stone motion they made a rather significant admission. Not only did the FBI not review the DNC server, the FBI/DOJ never even saw the Crowdstrike report. Instead, what they got was the DNC’s redacted summary of the original report. The intelligence community, on which the US taxpayers spend scores of billions of dollars annually, put its credibility behind the DNC’s word, without even letting us know the basis for their “conclusion.” (snip)
This means the FBI and DOJ, and all of the downstream claims by the intelligence apparatus; including the December 2016 Joint Analysis Report and January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, all the way to the Weissmann/Mueller report and the continued claims therein; were based on the official intelligence agencies of the U.S. government and the U.S. Department of Justice taking the word of a hired contractor for the Democrat party….. despite their inability to examine the server and/or actually see an unredacted technical forensic report from the investigating contractor.
The entire apparatus of the U.S. government just took their word for it…
…and used the claim therein as an official position….
…which led to a subsequent government claim, in court, of absolute certainty that Russia hacked the DNC.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._of_their_responsibilities.html#ixzz5qvou8ZyN
Guys - there HAD to be some lower-level people within the FBI/DOJ that were involved in this, or knew about it and said nothing. Yeah, some top guys quit or got fired and that's good. But there were others who had to know this was bullshit, yet did nothing about it and said nothing to anybody about it. And THAT is a problem, there IS a Deep State out there. Whether they were politically motivated to keep their mouths shut or too scared to lose their jobs over it, the truth is we have people in positions of responsibility who lack the integrity to do the honest thing, they had to know this wasn't the right way to do business. And, there doesn't seem to be a way to blow the whistle or tell anybody, and the MSM would've sat on it anyway or squashed it.