DigitalDrifter
Diamond Member
Yes.
No, banning ARs is smart. There's no legit reason for a civilian to have an AR.
So in other words ban all semi-auto firearms?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes.
No, banning ARs is smart. There's no legit reason for a civilian to have an AR.
AM not saying you are wrong,The White House: defended with military
Congress: armed guards
Banks: armed guards
Police Station: armed officers
Etc…
Schools: unguarded, allow shooters to roam school for 15 minutes murdering passive poorly hid children until police arrive
Arm the schools
Seems like common sense to me, especially with social media, MSM, and big tech etc keeping our kids wired, scared, angry, jealous, etc, desperate for attention even if wanting to die, along with starting dopamine addictions.AM not saying you are wrong,
but think about it, What the hell is going on in Our country
That we are even talking about Armed guards in our schools?
So in other words ban all semi-auto firearms?
So in other words ban all semi-auto firearms?
sure would help if you explained how it is lazy??No, that's the solution of the intellectually lazy. It's as stupid as the people who want to ban ARs
sure would help if you explained how it is lazy??
it can happen overnight and well proven to defend against shooters intent on doing harm,,
when you consider their desire to molest and mutilate children this comes as no surprise,,I finally decided if they won't make change after babies shot so violently in SandyHook, they're beyond help!
Sandy Hook was caused by a young man with a history of mental illness that was ignored by his mother. He killed her to gain access to her guns. He then proceeded to the school to carry out his massacre. What law would have prevented that from happening?I finally decided if they won't make change after babies shot so violently in SandyHook, they're beyond help!
Like Canada's?When was America "mostly conservative", exactly?
It should point out we had a HIGHER murder rate in this country in the good old days of the 1920s.
Then we passed sensible gun laws like the Firearms Act of 1934.
Only to his family... Get real, if we loved our kids, we'd have sensible gun laws.
But we love our guns more.
Japan doesn't have guns to any extent. What causes their high number of suicides?Yet oddly, Germany, France, Canada, the UK, Japan, etc. all do some version of my plan, and have nowhere near our problems with murder.
Sensible gun laws. LolSandy Hook was caused by a young man with a history of mental illness that was ignored by his mother. He killed her to gain access to her guns. He then proceeded to the school to carry out his massacre. What law would have prevented that from happening?
We would have to get back to being a moral country. You see that happening?That's an easy true, but it's not the correct answer.
The correct answer is to have a society where we don't need armed guards at schools. Just like how it was when I was a kid.
The answer isn't more guards, less guns, more rules or anything. The answer is find out what's changed in America in the past 30 years and removing it or fixing it.
Armed guards in school isn't the right answer because that's just a reaction to nutballs and criminals. The right answer is to get rid of the nutballs and criminals, not adapt to them.
I guess you idiot loser "hunters" need an auto. to defend yourselves vs that deer or duck! Fk'n morons!
Tall buildings?Japan doesn't have guns to any extent. What causes their high number of suicides?
And frankly, not so bad, considering what they were rightfully upset about.
Sandy Hook was caused by a young man with a history of mental illness that was ignored by his mother. He killed her to gain access to her guns. He then proceeded to the school to carry out his massacre. What law would have prevented that from happening?
And there you go. hundreds of riots injuring thousands of people killing dozens doing billions in damage is justified in your mind over some drug bust felony gone bad by a career criminal trying to resist arrest!
GUESS WHAT, DUMMASS?! Likewise and far more was J6 likewise justified when the police there instigated the whole thing to a crowd who up to that point were peacefully standing around protesting the stealing of a national election, about a million times more important than Floyd!
The lions share of them aren't being charged. Certainly not the ones who stayed outside. The ones who stormed it are. The people who organized and instigated it (namely Trump) should also be charged.Thank you for finally seeing that, justifying it and admitting that the protesters at the capitol, the lions share of which did nothing but walk around were completely within their rights as well. You might even say that J6 was frankly, not so bad, considering what they were rightfully upset about.
Japan doesn't have guns to any extent. What causes their high number of suicides?