Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You might be descended from a monkey. You have string hair and you smell like wet dog but Blacks share an ancestor with apes. We arent descended from them. You pretty much made my point though. No where in history has chattel slavery existed until whites came up with it during the 1600's.Show us where in history any enslaved were considered non human like the chattel slavery whites invented in the 1600's. This should be interesting.You obviously have no clue what youre talking about. There were Black, NA, and white indentured servants and they existed at the same time in history. When it was found that it was more expensive to have indentured servants due to laws governing contracts land owners turned to free slave labor in the form of kidnapped Africans that were strong enough to survive where whites weakly perished and NA's melted into the wilderness never to be found again. The only thing that was in common was that indentured servants were forced to work as well as the enslaved. The similarities stopped there.If it was in the spectrum of slavery it would be called slavery not indentured servitude. They make a distinction for a reason despite what some of your professors think.
Utter rubbish...what overly simplistic and ignorant thoughts you have.
Back in the thirties under Stalinist Rule...many were deceived into believing that Russia was a worker's paradise....by clever propaganda or advertising.
The reality however was that Russia was a vast slave state... many if not most leftwingers to this day still believe in communism as a remedy for the failures they see in Capitalism.
Do you not understand how poor whites in England were deceived by the recruiters sent out to get cheap labor for America....they used the term servitude and these worthless piece of papers called 'contracts' to get people to sign their lives away in order to get passage over here.
Much evidence has already been presented to demonstrate the real truths of what it was like to be an indentured servant...yet you want to ignore all that because you have too much invested in the exclusiveness of black victimhood.
These so called white indentured 'servants'(all slaveholders referred to their slaves as servants) had no access to the courts because they had no money to hire a lawyer to begin with but even if they somehow found someone that had money and was willing to help them everything was stacked against them.....the society of that time was controlled by the Aristocrats and they were not about to let go of a system that assured them of cheap labor.....but it was not all smooth sailing for the masters....many of these so called servants ran away and there were some riots and mutinies...thus when servile blacks became available...they began to buy blacks to replace their former white slaves.
nope-----there were indentured servants and chattel slaves of all races all over the world for millennia
Plantation owners and most of the whites of that era considered blacks to be not fully human...this is well documented...and even many today still believe that and with good reason.
Modern Genetics has shown that we are all descended from monkeys but blacks have a closer link to them than all other races.
In America now most blacks have a lot of white blood so the modern Negro in America is quite different from those who got off the boat from Africa. In those days mixed blood negroes were called Mulattoes but that term is no longer around but I think it is a better description of most modern day negroes....they are more than just African-Americans.
Anyhow................
The Hidden History & Truth Of White Slavery In The North America!
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/hidden-history-white-slavery-us-norman-mccreary
Nope. Slaves during the roman times were still considered people. Try again.Show us where in history any enslaved were considered non human like the chattel slavery whites invented in the 1600's. This should be interesting.You obviously have no clue what youre talking about. There were Black, NA, and white indentured servants and they existed at the same time in history. When it was found that it was more expensive to have indentured servants due to laws governing contracts land owners turned to free slave labor in the form of kidnapped Africans that were strong enough to survive where whites weakly perished and NA's melted into the wilderness never to be found again. The only thing that was in common was that indentured servants were forced to work as well as the enslaved. The similarities stopped there.If it was in the spectrum of slavery it would be called slavery not indentured servitude. They make a distinction for a reason despite what some of your professors think.
Utter rubbish...what overly simplistic and ignorant thoughts you have.
Back in the thirties under Stalinist Rule...many were deceived into believing that Russia was a worker's paradise....by clever propaganda or advertising.
The reality however was that Russia was a vast slave state... many if not most leftwingers to this day still believe in communism as a remedy for the failures they see in Capitalism.
Do you not understand how poor whites in England were deceived by the recruiters sent out to get cheap labor for America....they used the term servitude and these worthless piece of papers called 'contracts' to get people to sign their lives away in order to get passage over here.
Much evidence has already been presented to demonstrate the real truths of what it was like to be an indentured servant...yet you want to ignore all that because you have too much invested in the exclusiveness of black victimhood.
These so called white indentured 'servants'(all slaveholders referred to their slaves as servants) had no access to the courts because they had no money to hire a lawyer to begin with but even if they somehow found someone that had money and was willing to help them everything was stacked against them.....the society of that time was controlled by the Aristocrats and they were not about to let go of a system that assured them of cheap labor.....but it was not all smooth sailing for the masters....many of these so called servants ran away and there were some riots and mutinies...thus when servile blacks became available...they began to buy blacks to replace their former white slaves.
nope-----there were indentured servants and chattel slaves of all races all over the world for millennia
Roman slavery was CHATTEL SLAVERY-----so was slavery of the far east. There were variations in the
systems just as there were SOME variations in the slavery
of the Americas-----but your theory that "whites invented
the most extreme slavery in the 1600s" is BEYOND IDIOTIC ----but consistent with the insane social theories of your
strung out mentors of the 60s
Show us where Plato said that slaves were not human.Plato considered non greek slaves to be nothing more
than animated tools----not human. The greeks had both
black and white slaves
Nope. Slaves during the roman times were still considered people. Try again.Show us where in history any enslaved were considered non human like the chattel slavery whites invented in the 1600's. This should be interesting.You obviously have no clue what youre talking about. There were Black, NA, and white indentured servants and they existed at the same time in history. When it was found that it was more expensive to have indentured servants due to laws governing contracts land owners turned to free slave labor in the form of kidnapped Africans that were strong enough to survive where whites weakly perished and NA's melted into the wilderness never to be found again. The only thing that was in common was that indentured servants were forced to work as well as the enslaved. The similarities stopped there.Utter rubbish...what overly simplistic and ignorant thoughts you have.
Back in the thirties under Stalinist Rule...many were deceived into believing that Russia was a worker's paradise....by clever propaganda or advertising.
The reality however was that Russia was a vast slave state... many if not most leftwingers to this day still believe in communism as a remedy for the failures they see in Capitalism.
Do you not understand how poor whites in England were deceived by the recruiters sent out to get cheap labor for America....they used the term servitude and these worthless piece of papers called 'contracts' to get people to sign their lives away in order to get passage over here.
Much evidence has already been presented to demonstrate the real truths of what it was like to be an indentured servant...yet you want to ignore all that because you have too much invested in the exclusiveness of black victimhood.
These so called white indentured 'servants'(all slaveholders referred to their slaves as servants) had no access to the courts because they had no money to hire a lawyer to begin with but even if they somehow found someone that had money and was willing to help them everything was stacked against them.....the society of that time was controlled by the Aristocrats and they were not about to let go of a system that assured them of cheap labor.....but it was not all smooth sailing for the masters....many of these so called servants ran away and there were some riots and mutinies...thus when servile blacks became available...they began to buy blacks to replace their former white slaves.
nope-----there were indentured servants and chattel slaves of all races all over the world for millennia
Roman slavery was CHATTEL SLAVERY-----so was slavery of the far east. There were variations in the
systems just as there were SOME variations in the slavery
of the Americas-----but your theory that "whites invented
the most extreme slavery in the 1600s" is BEYOND IDIOTIC ----but consistent with the insane social theories of your
strung out mentors of the 60s
Show us where Plato said that slaves were not human.Plato considered non greek slaves to be nothing more
than animated tools----not human. The greeks had both
black and white slaves
No thanks. Just show me the quote.Show us where Plato said that slaves were not human.Plato considered non greek slaves to be nothing more
than animated tools----not human. The greeks had both
black and white slaves
read THE REPUBLIC
No thanks. Just show me the quote.Show us where Plato said that slaves were not human.Plato considered non greek slaves to be nothing more
than animated tools----not human. The greeks had both
black and white slaves
read THE REPUBLIC
No thanks. Just show me the quote.Show us where Plato said that slaves were not human.Plato considered non greek slaves to be nothing more
than animated tools----not human. The greeks had both
black and white slaves
read THE REPUBLIC
Humans. Slaves were considered humans..Nope. Slaves during the roman times were still considered people. Try again.Show us where in history any enslaved were considered non human like the chattel slavery whites invented in the 1600's. This should be interesting.You obviously have no clue what youre talking about. There were Black, NA, and white indentured servants and they existed at the same time in history. When it was found that it was more expensive to have indentured servants due to laws governing contracts land owners turned to free slave labor in the form of kidnapped Africans that were strong enough to survive where whites weakly perished and NA's melted into the wilderness never to be found again. The only thing that was in common was that indentured servants were forced to work as well as the enslaved. The similarities stopped there.
nope-----there were indentured servants and chattel slaves of all races all over the world for millennia
Roman slavery was CHATTEL SLAVERY-----so was slavery of the far east. There were variations in the
systems just as there were SOME variations in the slavery
of the Americas-----but your theory that "whites invented
the most extreme slavery in the 1600s" is BEYOND IDIOTIC ----but consistent with the insane social theories of your
strung out mentors of the 60s
what does "considered people" mean in your addled mind----the ROMAN OWNER could legally kill them or eat them or feed
them to the dogs. Sex was completely free to the owner----of any flavor or kind or perversion. Are you suggesting
that scarlett did not consider mammy to be a PERSON?
romans had both black and white and greek slaves----they really liked blonds
No thanks. Just show me the quote.Show us where Plato said that slaves were not human.Plato considered non greek slaves to be nothing more
than animated tools----not human. The greeks had both
black and white slaves
read THE REPUBLIC
do your own googling ------did your owner eat your fingers?
So you cant provide a quote on a claim you made? I figured.No thanks. Just show me the quote.Show us where Plato said that slaves were not human.Plato considered non greek slaves to be nothing more
than animated tools----not human. The greeks had both
black and white slaves
read THE REPUBLIC
do your own googling ------did your owner eat your fingers?
I dont like reading lies that white people write. Yes that says a lot about me I agree.No thanks. Just show me the quote.Show us where Plato said that slaves were not human.Plato considered non greek slaves to be nothing more
than animated tools----not human. The greeks had both
black and white slaves
read THE REPUBLIC
Obviously you do not like to read....that says a lot about you.
So you cant provide a quote on a claim you made? I figured.No thanks. Just show me the quote.Show us where Plato said that slaves were not human.Plato considered non greek slaves to be nothing more
than animated tools----not human. The greeks had both
black and white slaves
read THE REPUBLIC
do your own googling ------did your owner eat your fingers?
You dont figure with your fingers even if I had an owner.So you cant provide a quote on a claim you made? I figured.No thanks. Just show me the quote.Show us where Plato said that slaves were not human.
read THE REPUBLIC
do your own googling ------did your owner eat your fingers?
you don't know how to figure------your owner ate your fingers
I dont like reading lies that white people write. Yes that says a lot about me I agree.No thanks. Just show me the quote.Show us where Plato said that slaves were not human.Plato considered non greek slaves to be nothing more
than animated tools----not human. The greeks had both
black and white slaves
read THE REPUBLIC
Obviously you do not like to read....that says a lot about you.
Actually its not. Thats just another white lie.I dont like reading lies that white people write. Yes that says a lot about me I agree.No thanks. Just show me the quote.Show us where Plato said that slaves were not human.
read THE REPUBLIC
Obviously you do not like to read....that says a lot about you.
good-----stay away from the library------it is 99% white
You dont figure with your fingers even if I had an owner.So you cant provide a quote on a claim you made? I figured.No thanks. Just show me the quote.read THE REPUBLIC
do your own googling ------did your owner eat your fingers?
you don't know how to figure------your owner ate your fingers
Actually its not. Thats just another white lie.I dont like reading lies that white people write. Yes that says a lot about me I agree.No thanks. Just show me the quote.read THE REPUBLIC
Obviously you do not like to read....that says a lot about you.
good-----stay away from the library------it is 99% white
