Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It is exactly why they're doing it. To contain and wipe out the poor....they control the food, they control the money, they limit the birthrate, and now they can also physically control the neighborhoods.
It is exactly why they're doing it. To contain and wipe out the poor....they control the food, they control the money, they limit the birthrate, and now they can also physically control the neighborhoods.
The ACLU does not protect anyone's rightsSo..the progressives declare a war on minorities with abortion, which targets minority neighborhoods (and countries) with laser precision...
and now they claim we need the equipment to allow the police to move in on those neighborhoods that are the most dangerous...i.e., minority neighborhoods...
And, incidentally..children of color that come in? They go into camps...while those who traffic, exploit and otherwise abuse (and kill) them go free.
Warsaw, anyone?
I wish I knew or could understand the level of cognitive dissonance it takes to quote a liberal group such as the ACLU protecting your rights and claim that liberals are declaring war on your rights at the same time.
Its truely amazing...spectacular even
The ACLU monitors the events of the day picks an event, deems it a liberal political cause and files a lawsuit.
It is exactly why they're doing it. To contain and wipe out the poor....they control the food, they control the money, they limit the birthrate, and now they can also physically control the neighborhoods.
When you say "they are doing it", who is "they"?
Progressives in general, and our current admin.
lie of the days is "the progressives declare a war on minorities with abortion, which targets minority neighborhoods (and countries) with laser precision..."
a prolifer lies and a mommy dies
Dick Cheney, Progressive, speaks:
NCJ Number: NCJ 211756
Title: Another Man's Treasure
Date Published: 1998
Thought of as the ultimate recycling program, the 1033 Program has provided equipment of all types, from mobile homes to helicopters and gas masks, to agencies across the country. The article discusses the many ways this excess equipment is used by law enforcement and corrections agencies. For example, the South Carolina Department of Corrections received mobile homes, gas masks, and an armored vehicle through the program. The mobile homes are used as classrooms for the training of officers; the gas masks are useful in the event of a prison disturbance; and the armored vehicle is available for prison disturbances as well as hostage and stand off situations. The history of the program, which began in 1989, is described and contact information for the 1033 Program is provided.
Speaking at a news conference with Rep. John Conyers and myself, Chief Godbee expressed dismay that there has been no action to revive the assault-weapons ban that was allowed to expire in 2004 when George W. Bush was president.
...
Leaders calling for a renewed ban are, not surprisingly, those most exposed to them on the streets: America’s police chiefs. Many of them are NRA members, but they know assault weapons put the lives of their officers and citizens at risk.
According to Miami Police Chief John Timoney, assault weapons have become “the weapon of choice among gangs here. . . . The guns keep coming in, their prices are dropping.”
In Miami, assault weapons were used in about 4 percent of all homicides in 2004 as the weapons ban expired. Now, Timoney says, the number is about 21 percent.
This month, Police Chief magazine reprinted a letter from Chief Joseph M. Polisar, then head of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, originally published in 2004 as the assault weapons ban expired. Polisar vowed that the chiefs would continue to push for the ban, noting it had proved “remarkably effective in reducing the number of crimes involving assault weapons. Since
1994 the proportion of assault weapons traced to crimes has fallen by a dramatic 66 percent.”
But politicians are more intimidated by the gun manufacturers and the National Rifle Association than they are moved by the police chiefs or by common sense. The result is that gun ownership is less well-policed than driving. There is no required training to own or use a gun, even an assault weapon. And as Holmes showed, in Colorado and many states, you can build an arsenal overnight capable of bringing down an airplane or shooting up a baseball crowd without any meaningful checks or accountability.
Will the laws change now? Speaking on ABC News, Philadelphia Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey was skeptical, and he was worried that outrage will “fade into the background” and nothing will be done: “We talk about this constantly, and absolutely nothing happens, because many of our legislators, unfortunately, at the federal level, lack the courage to do anything.”
To change that, Americans must stand up and face down the gun lobby. Police chiefs — Republicans, Democrats, NRA members — will help show the way. The national debate is not about the Second Amendment, a gun for housekeeping or guns for hunting. We are talking about guns for terror that threaten national security and aid domestic and foreign terrorists.
Let’s lift the conversation from gun control to guns out of control and ban assault weapons to protect national security and domestic tranquility.
Our national security should be a common note for all of us.
Police chiefs are right: Ban assault weapons - Chicago Sun-Times
lie of the days is "the progressives declare a war on minorities with abortion, which targets minority neighborhoods (and countries) with laser precision..."
a prolifer lies and a mommy dies
Since when do prolifers want mom's to die. Only a fraction of abortions are for mom's at risk. Not all of us oppose it for that reason, yet are still considered prolifers. Perhaps too broad a brush Jake?
Anybody care to discuss the merits of the National Guard having military weapons and the police not so much?
