That's not how it works Bernie

[Arianrhod]

Then there is this gem from the goof.....

Scintillating debate technique, clearly irrefutable.

 

[g5000]

The President does not set the agenda for the Supreme Court. They also do not revisit the same case after a ruling. It would take a roughly similar case with different legal arguments. Are you any smarter Arainrhod?

But socialists do things differently. First thing to go is that pesky Constitution.

Every election, we hear how important the election is because the President appoints justices to the Supreme Court. Then the Right says we must elect a President who will appoint someone who will help overturn Roe v. Wade.

Explain the difference between that sentiment and the one Bernie voiced about appointing a justice who will overturn Citizens United.

This should be fun.

 

[g5000]

Speaking of Supreme Court appointments, check out Planned Parenthood of Central New Jersey v. Farmer and read the majority opinion written by Maryanne Barry. She has been floated as a possible appointment by one of the candidates.

 

[saveliberty]

The President does not set the agenda for the Supreme Court. They also do not revisit the same case after a ruling. It would take a roughly similar case with different legal arguments. Are you any smarter Arainrhod?

But socialists do things differently. First thing to go is that pesky Constitution.

Every election, we hear how important the election is because the President appoints justices to the Supreme Court. Then the Right says we must elect a President who will appoint someone who will help overturn Roe v. Wade.

Explain the difference between that sentiment and the one Bernie voiced about appointing a justice who will overturn Citizens United.

This should be fun.

I already did, thanks for playing. Btw, I'd like to see Citizens United overturned too. At the same time unions should be barred from the same activities.

 

[g5000]

The President does not set the agenda for the Supreme Court. They also do not revisit the same case after a ruling. It would take a roughly similar case with different legal arguments. Are you any smarter Arainrhod?

But socialists do things differently. First thing to go is that pesky Constitution.

Every election, we hear how important the election is because the President appoints justices to the Supreme Court. Then the Right says we must elect a President who will appoint someone who will help overturn Roe v. Wade.

Explain the difference between that sentiment and the one Bernie voiced about appointing a justice who will overturn Citizens United.

This should be fun.

I already did, thanks for playing.

No you haven't.

No one has explained the difference between both sides demanding a President who will appoint a Justice who will overturn a decision they don't like.

You can't claim you have done something you haven't tried.

 

[daws101]

how would the op know any thing about civics she's under 40 ..
Civics Education Testing Only Required In 9 States For High School Graduation: CIRCLE Study
10/12/2012 02:03 am ET


A study by the Center for Information and Research on Civil Learning & Engagement at Tufts University has found that most states do not emphasize civic education, which includes learning about citizenship, government, law, current events and related topics.

In the current school year, 21 states require a state-designed social studies test — a significant decrease from 2001, when 34 states conducted regular assessments on social studies subjects. Only nine states require students to pass a social studies test to graduate from high school: Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia. Georgia’s will be phased out, but Maryland and Florida are slated to add high-stakes tests.

Although 39 states require at least one course in American government or civics, only eight states administer statewide, standardized tests specifically in civics/American government: California, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Missouri, Ohio, Virginia, and West Virginia. Of those, Ohio and Virginia are the only ones that require students to pass said test in order to graduate from high school.

The study also points out that since 2000, social studies assessments have shifted from a combination of multiple-choice and performance tasks — like essays — to almost exclusively multiple-choice exams.

“States are, to a greater extent, using multiple-choice only tests that focus primarily on memorizing information, rather than demonstrating civic skills,” the report states.

The shift away from civic education over the past decade can be partially attributed to federal policies like No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top. According to CIRCLE, recent research suggests states have shifted educational resources away from social studies toward subjects that appear on statewide assessments.

“Social studies courses such as history, civics, and economics provide students with the necessary civic skills and knowledge to be effective 21st century citizens,” the report concludes. “However, since the passage of No Child Left Behind, many states have shifted focus away from social studies and have dramatically reduced the number of social studies assessments.”
Civics Education Testing Only Required In 9 States For High School Graduation: CIRCLE Study

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

The man is either stupid or senile. First he exposes his ignorance about economics on Twitter and now he does the same on civics


‘That’s not how it works’: Bernie Sanders’ SCOTUS pledge proves somebody ‘failed civics class’



On the 6th anniversary of Citizens United yesterday, Bernie Sanders unloaded on the SCOTUS decision.

Bernie Sanders ✔@BernieSanders​

Any Supreme Court nominee of mine will make overturning Citizens United one of their first decisions.
6:57 PM - 21 Jan 2016

'That's not how it works': Bernie Sanders' SCOTUS pledge proves SOMEBODY 'failed civics class'

He's a Socialist, the brain just doesn't function like normal peoples' brains.

Remember?

 

[g5000]

Just remember all your self-righteous huffing and puffing you did in this topic, boys and girls, when later this year you hear your right wing media outlets demanding a Roe v Wade litmus test from the Republican candidates.

 

[saveliberty]

No you haven't.

No one has explained the difference between both sides demanding a President who will appoint a Justice who will overturn a decision they don't like.

You can't claim you have done something you haven't tried.

Everything was fine until Bernie added, "one of the first things my appointee(s) will do". Bernie has no say over court cases heard, nor can he bring a case back for retrial. I did cover that.

 

[Iceweasel]

The President does not set the agenda for the Supreme Court. They also do not revisit the same case after a ruling. It would take a roughly similar case with different legal arguments. Are you any smarter Arainrhod?

But socialists do things differently. First thing to go is that pesky Constitution.

Every election, we hear how important the election is because the President appoints justices to the Supreme Court. Then the Right says we must elect a President who will appoint someone who will help overturn Roe v. Wade.

Explain the difference between that sentiment and the one Bernie voiced about appointing a justice who will overturn Citizens United.

This should be fun.

Of course it will be fun. It will reveal what a numbskull you truly are. Which Republican candidate has said their Supreme appointment's first duty will be over tuning Row v. Wade?

 

[Iceweasel]

Just remember all your self-righteous huffing and puffing you did in this topic, boys and girls, when later this year you hear your right wing media outlets demanding a Roe v Wade litmus test from the Republican candidates.

Being asked in the future doesn't make you case, Sport. There's no basis for a national abortion law anyway, and there's nothing to prevent people from pooling their money together to support candidates. Like UNIONS have been doing! And doing it against member's will, they take the money and funnel it to their buddies in the party. You are seriously fucked up.

 

[Papageorgio]

How dare that Bernie guy say he will appoint justices who will overturn Citizens United?

Doesn't he know anything about civics? He's supposed to say he will appoint justices who will overturn Roe v Wade, dammit!

Don't you get tired of the same BS every election? We are going to over turn this, we are going to over turn that. When these guys talk about what they will over turn, it just means they are going to add more laws and regs that will further complicate our justice system and screw the middle class.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

The President does not set the agenda for the Supreme Court. They also do not revisit the same case after a ruling. It would take a roughly similar case with different legal arguments. Are you any smarter Arainrhod?

But socialists do things differently. First thing to go is that pesky Constitution.

Every election, we hear how important the election is because the President appoints justices to the Supreme Court. Then the Right says we must elect a President who will appoint someone who will help overturn Roe v. Wade.

Explain the difference between that sentiment and the one Bernie voiced about appointing a justice who will overturn Citizens United.

This should be fun.

Fun if you like hearing crickets. You just kicked SassySkank in her sizable ass because she can't explain that one.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

The President does not set the agenda for the Supreme Court. They also do not revisit the same case after a ruling. It would take a roughly similar case with different legal arguments. Are you any smarter Arainrhod?

But socialists do things differently. First thing to go is that pesky Constitution.

Every election, we hear how important the election is because the President appoints justices to the Supreme Court. Then the Right says we must elect a President who will appoint someone who will help overturn Roe v. Wade.

Explain the difference between that sentiment and the one Bernie voiced about appointing a justice who will overturn Citizens United.

This should be fun.

Of course it will be fun. It will reveal what a numbskull you truly are. Which Republican candidate has said their Supreme appointment's first duty will be over tuning Row v. Wade?

You're kidding, right? Answer: None of them. They don't make this a publicity stunt, like Trump.
When Dubya took office he overloaded the DOJ with graduates from the Liberty University Christian School of Law.
Now, I'll leave it up to you to connect the dots.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The President does not set the agenda for the Supreme Court. They also do not revisit the same case after a ruling. It would take a roughly similar case with different legal arguments. Are you any smarter Arainrhod?

But socialists do things differently. First thing to go is that pesky Constitution.

Every election, we hear how important the election is because the President appoints justices to the Supreme Court. Then the Right says we must elect a President who will appoint someone who will help overturn Roe v. Wade.

Explain the difference between that sentiment and the one Bernie voiced about appointing a justice who will overturn Citizens United.

This should be fun.

Fun if you like hearing crickets. You just kicked SassySkank in her sizable ass because she can't explain that one.

Oh good, it's Ms I Found Your IP Address, chiming in...not knowing IP addresses don't have letters in them. BAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

The man is either stupid or senile. First he exposes his ignorance about economics on Twitter and now he does the same on civics


‘That’s not how it works’: Bernie Sanders’ SCOTUS pledge proves somebody ‘failed civics class’



On the 6th anniversary of Citizens United yesterday, Bernie Sanders unloaded on the SCOTUS decision.

Bernie Sanders ✔@BernieSanders​

Any Supreme Court nominee of mine will make overturning Citizens United one of their first decisions.
6:57 PM - 21 Jan 2016

'That's not how it works': Bernie Sanders' SCOTUS pledge proves SOMEBODY 'failed civics class'

He's a Socialist, the brain just doesn't function like normal peoples' brains.

Remember?

View attachment 60727

From the neo-Nazi whose lederhosen are just about 3 sizes too small.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

The President does not set the agenda for the Supreme Court. They also do not revisit the same case after a ruling. It would take a roughly similar case with different legal arguments. Are you any smarter Arainrhod?

But socialists do things differently. First thing to go is that pesky Constitution.

Every election, we hear how important the election is because the President appoints justices to the Supreme Court. Then the Right says we must elect a President who will appoint someone who will help overturn Roe v. Wade.

Explain the difference between that sentiment and the one Bernie voiced about appointing a justice who will overturn Citizens United.

This should be fun.

Fun if you like hearing crickets. You just kicked SassySkank in her sizable ass because she can't explain that one.

Oh good, it's Ms I Found Your IP Address, chiming in...not knowing IP addresses don't have letters in them. BAHAHAHAHAHAHA

What a poor memory. Too much meth, perhaps. That was your FB address, SkankyPants. Not your IP address.

NOW...answer G5000's response or just shut this thread down before you embarrass yourself even more.

 

[Iceweasel]

The President does not set the agenda for the Supreme Court. They also do not revisit the same case after a ruling. It would take a roughly similar case with different legal arguments. Are you any smarter Arainrhod?

But socialists do things differently. First thing to go is that pesky Constitution.

Every election, we hear how important the election is because the President appoints justices to the Supreme Court. Then the Right says we must elect a President who will appoint someone who will help overturn Roe v. Wade.

Explain the difference between that sentiment and the one Bernie voiced about appointing a justice who will overturn Citizens United.

This should be fun.

Of course it will be fun. It will reveal what a numbskull you truly are. Which Republican candidate has said their Supreme appointment's first duty will be over tuning Row v. Wade?

You're kidding, right? Answer: None of them. They don't make this a publicity stunt, like Trump.
When Dubya took office he overloaded the DOJ with graduates from the Liberty University Christian School of Law.
Now, I'll leave it up to you to connect the dots.

The dots are between your ears. When did he say his appointment's first duty will be to overturn Roe v. Wade?

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

Waiting for someone to respond intelligently to G's comments... Waiting....Waiting...

Ooops! Here, I helped you out, as usual... Now, SkankyPants, what was that you were saying about Bernie?

Ted Cruz Vows to Put “Principled Judicial Conservatives” on the Supreme Court

Ted Cruz Vows to Put “Principled Judicial Conservatives” on the Supreme Court

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

The President does not set the agenda for the Supreme Court. They also do not revisit the same case after a ruling. It would take a roughly similar case with different legal arguments. Are you any smarter Arainrhod?

But socialists do things differently. First thing to go is that pesky Constitution.

Every election, we hear how important the election is because the President appoints justices to the Supreme Court. Then the Right says we must elect a President who will appoint someone who will help overturn Roe v. Wade.

Explain the difference between that sentiment and the one Bernie voiced about appointing a justice who will overturn Citizens United.

This should be fun.

Of course it will be fun. It will reveal what a numbskull you truly are. Which Republican candidate has said their Supreme appointment's first duty will be over tuning Row v. Wade?

You're kidding, right? Answer: None of them. They don't make this a publicity stunt, like Trump.
When Dubya took office he overloaded the DOJ with graduates from the Liberty University Christian School of Law.
Now, I'll leave it up to you to connect the dots.

The dots are between your ears. When did he say his appointment's first duty will be to overturn Roe v. Wade?

I didn't say that. The POTUS can only appoint SCOTUS judges, but they only appoint judges who side with them politically, in case you didn't notice.