Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You’re the one who parsed his quote.Typical Trumpist moron to give half a quote and call it truth.“I would love to be able to regulate the content of speech, but the First Amendment prevents me from doing so.”The government should never be the speech regulating business, but realistically, notwithstanding Lieu's comments, the right has been in the speech regulating business as well. The Patriot Act was nothing but monitoring what people say to one another. You can't cry fire in a crowded theater, you can't threaten politicians, write about terrorist actions, etc. without a visit from the FBI, and rightfully so.A. He’s supporting the suppression of speech.This is what Lieu said:
"The First Amendment prevents me from doing so. And that’s simply a function of the First Amendment. But I think over the long run, it’s better the government does not regulate the content of speech. I would urge these private sector companies to regulate it better themselves.”
I would remind you the Bill of Rights was drafted by "liberals" and that it is and are "liberal" courts that are the most ardent supporters of free speech and the free press. It is the right that advocates for press suppression and engages in anti-press rhetoric. Look at the rightist posts on this board.
B. The Founding Fathers are the anti Democratic Party of Liberty and God haters today.
Politically correct speech can get ridiculous, but Lieu was asking for private action and not governmental action. And please do nor kid yourself, the right has its own form of political correctness as well.
You lied in typical Leftard fashion.
Says Brit Timmy who will get arrested if he says anything bad about Mohammed.It’s conservatives who actively attack our rights . Except for the 2nd, they wipe their ass with the constitution.
Anyone get fired or lose their business because they support homosexual marriage? Got a long list of those that support traditional marriage who have.This is what Lieu said:
"The First Amendment prevents me from doing so. And that’s simply a function of the First Amendment. But I think over the long run, it’s better the government does not regulate the content of speech. I would urge these private sector companies to regulate it better themselves.”
I would remind you the Bill of Rights was drafted by "liberals" and that it is and are "liberal" courts that are the most ardent supporters of free speech and the free press. It is the right that advocates for press suppression and engages in anti-press rhetoric. Look at the rightist posts on this board.
Democrats will say whatever they think will best cover their true intentions.
I'll remind you that the classical liberals of the time of the founding have no philosophical relationship whatsoever to the idiots currently using the tag, who are essentially European-style socialists with a dash of an Orwellian plotline.
Talk to us of campus "free-speech zones", the prosecution and persecution of individuals who speak their mind, and the anti-American hive mind of our current media - all "liberal" constructs.
You people are useless to this nation. Keep pushing, please.
Thank you for proving my point of the right's anti-press rhetoric. Free speech and the free press run hand in hand. The founding father's understood that. The dumbed down Trumpist right does not.
Ah, so you are for polygamy and incest.Anyone get fired or lose their business because they support homosexual marriage? Got a long list of those that support traditional marriage who have.This is what Lieu said:
"The First Amendment prevents me from doing so. And that’s simply a function of the First Amendment. But I think over the long run, it’s better the government does not regulate the content of speech. I would urge these private sector companies to regulate it better themselves.”
I would remind you the Bill of Rights was drafted by "liberals" and that it is and are "liberal" courts that are the most ardent supporters of free speech and the free press. It is the right that advocates for press suppression and engages in anti-press rhetoric. Look at the rightist posts on this board.
Democrats will say whatever they think will best cover their true intentions.
I'll remind you that the classical liberals of the time of the founding have no philosophical relationship whatsoever to the idiots currently using the tag, who are essentially European-style socialists with a dash of an Orwellian plotline.
Talk to us of campus "free-speech zones", the prosecution and persecution of individuals who speak their mind, and the anti-American hive mind of our current media - all "liberal" constructs.
You people are useless to this nation. Keep pushing, please.
Thank you for proving my point of the right's anti-press rhetoric. Free speech and the free press run hand in hand. The founding father's understood that. The dumbed down Trumpist right does not.
Being able to marry either sex = more freedom. Once again , cons are against freedom.
Says Brit Timmy who will get arrested if he says anything bad about Mohammed.It’s conservatives who actively attack our rights . Except for the 2nd, they wipe their ass with the constitution.
This is what Lieu said:
"The First Amendment prevents me from doing so. And that’s simply a function of the First Amendment. But I think over the long run, it’s better the government does not regulate the content of speech. I would urge these private sector companies to regulate it better themselves.”
I would remind you the Bill of Rights was drafted by "liberals" and that it is and are "liberal" courts that are the most ardent supporters of free speech and the free press. It is the right that advocates for press suppression and engages in anti-press rhetoric. Look at the rightist posts on this board.
Democrats will say whatever they think will best cover their true intentions.
I'll remind you that the classical liberals of the time of the founding have no philosophical relationship whatsoever to the idiots currently using the tag, who are essentially European-style socialists with a dash of an Orwellian plotline.
Talk to us of campus "free-speech zones", the prosecution and persecution of individuals who speak their mind, and the anti-American hive mind of our current media - all "liberal" constructs.
You people are useless to this nation. Keep pushing, please.
Thank you for proving my point of the right's anti-press rhetoric. Free speech and the free press run hand in hand. The founding father's understood that. The dumbed down Trumpist right does not.
We don't currently have a free press. We have Democratic Party employees.
The funny thing is I had to go to another site to find Lieu' full quote. Why had not your site, the Victory Girls, not quote his full statement? I suspect because the full quote takes away from their point. It was intellectual dishonesty for them not to report the full quote. I published the full quote for all to read and to put his statement in context.You’re the one who parsed his quote.Typical Trumpist moron to give half a quote and call it truth.“I would love to be able to regulate the content of speech, but the First Amendment prevents me from doing so.”The government should never be the speech regulating business, but realistically, notwithstanding Lieu's comments, the right has been in the speech regulating business as well. The Patriot Act was nothing but monitoring what people say to one another. You can't cry fire in a crowded theater, you can't threaten politicians, write about terrorist actions, etc. without a visit from the FBI, and rightfully so.A. He’s supporting the suppression of speech.This is what Lieu said:
"The First Amendment prevents me from doing so. And that’s simply a function of the First Amendment. But I think over the long run, it’s better the government does not regulate the content of speech. I would urge these private sector companies to regulate it better themselves.”
I would remind you the Bill of Rights was drafted by "liberals" and that it is and are "liberal" courts that are the most ardent supporters of free speech and the free press. It is the right that advocates for press suppression and engages in anti-press rhetoric. Look at the rightist posts on this board.
B. The Founding Fathers are the anti Democratic Party of Liberty and God haters today.
Politically correct speech can get ridiculous, but Lieu was asking for private action and not governmental action. And please do nor kid yourself, the right has its own form of political correctness as well.
You lied in typical Leftard fashion.
Entire quote:
“I would love to be able to regulate the content of speech. The First Amendment prevents me from doing so. And that’s simply a function of the First Amendment. But I think over the long run, it’s better the government does not regulate the content of speech. I would urge these private sector companies to regulate it better themselves.”
Now go into hyper spin cycle.
Says Brit Timmy who will get arrested if he says anything bad about Mohammed.It’s conservatives who actively attack our rights . Except for the 2nd, they wipe their ass with the constitution.
More lies .
Nice attempt to divert from the fact he said he would love to be able to regulate the content of speech.The funny thing is I had to go to another site to find Lieu' full quote. Why had not your site, the Victory Girls, not quote his full statement? I suspect because the full quote takes away from their point. It was intellectual dishonesty for them not to report the full quote. I published the full quote for all to read and to put his statement in context.You’re the one who parsed his quote.Typical Trumpist moron to give half a quote and call it truth.“I would love to be able to regulate the content of speech, but the First Amendment prevents me from doing so.”The government should never be the speech regulating business, but realistically, notwithstanding Lieu's comments, the right has been in the speech regulating business as well. The Patriot Act was nothing but monitoring what people say to one another. You can't cry fire in a crowded theater, you can't threaten politicians, write about terrorist actions, etc. without a visit from the FBI, and rightfully so.A. He’s supporting the suppression of speech.
B. The Founding Fathers are the anti Democratic Party of Liberty and God haters today.
Politically correct speech can get ridiculous, but Lieu was asking for private action and not governmental action. And please do nor kid yourself, the right has its own form of political correctness as well.
You lied in typical Leftard fashion.
Entire quote:
“I would love to be able to regulate the content of speech. The First Amendment prevents me from doing so. And that’s simply a function of the First Amendment. But I think over the long run, it’s better the government does not regulate the content of speech. I would urge these private sector companies to regulate it better themselves.”
Now go into hyper spin cycle.
Ah, so you are for polygamy and incest.Anyone get fired or lose their business because they support homosexual marriage? Got a long list of those that support traditional marriage who have.This is what Lieu said:
"The First Amendment prevents me from doing so. And that’s simply a function of the First Amendment. But I think over the long run, it’s better the government does not regulate the content of speech. I would urge these private sector companies to regulate it better themselves.”
I would remind you the Bill of Rights was drafted by "liberals" and that it is and are "liberal" courts that are the most ardent supporters of free speech and the free press. It is the right that advocates for press suppression and engages in anti-press rhetoric. Look at the rightist posts on this board.
Democrats will say whatever they think will best cover their true intentions.
I'll remind you that the classical liberals of the time of the founding have no philosophical relationship whatsoever to the idiots currently using the tag, who are essentially European-style socialists with a dash of an Orwellian plotline.
Talk to us of campus "free-speech zones", the prosecution and persecution of individuals who speak their mind, and the anti-American hive mind of our current media - all "liberal" constructs.
You people are useless to this nation. Keep pushing, please.
Thank you for proving my point of the right's anti-press rhetoric. Free speech and the free press run hand in hand. The founding father's understood that. The dumbed down Trumpist right does not.
Being able to marry either sex = more freedom. Once again , cons are against freedom.
“In a rare and somewhat frightening bout of honesty, California Democrat Ted Lieu made two stunning (or maybe not) admissions on the air recently 1) that he would love to control speech and 2) the only thing stopping him from doing so is that danged US Constitution.”
That Danged Constitution - Victory Girls Blog
There isn’t a Leftist alive who doesn’t want to control speech.
Says Brit Timmy who will get arrested if he says anything bad about Mohammed.It’s conservatives who actively attack our rights . Except for the 2nd, they wipe their ass with the constitution.
More lies .
Says Brit Timmy who will get arrested if he says anything bad about Mohammed.It’s conservatives who actively attack our rights . Except for the 2nd, they wipe their ass with the constitution.
More lies .
OK, go down to Piccadilly circus and start yelling, Mohammed was a pervert and a false prophet, see how long it takes for the bobbies to lock your ass up.
There’s a reason we shot your asses when you tried to take our guns.Says Brit Timmy who will get arrested if he says anything bad about Mohammed.It’s conservatives who actively attack our rights . Except for the 2nd, they wipe their ass with the constitution.
More lies .
OK, go down to Piccadilly circus and start yelling, Mohammed was a pervert and a false prophet, see how long it takes for the bobbies to lock your ass up.
Well the subject is America and it’s constitution.
Too bad you're not a real liberal, you fucking commie cocksucker.This is what Lieu said:
"The First Amendment prevents me from doing so. And that’s simply a function of the First Amendment. But I think over the long run, it’s better the government does not regulate the content of speech. I would urge these private sector companies to regulate it better themselves.”
I would remind you the Bill of Rights was drafted by "liberals" and that it is and are "liberal" courts that are the most ardent supporters of free speech and the free press. It is the right that advocates for press suppression and engages in anti-press rhetoric. Look at the rightist posts on this board.
Says Brit Timmy who will get arrested if he says anything bad about Mohammed.It’s conservatives who actively attack our rights . Except for the 2nd, they wipe their ass with the constitution.
More lies .
OK, go down to Piccadilly circus and start yelling, Mohammed was a pervert and a false prophet, see how long it takes for the bobbies to lock your ass up.
Well the subject is America and it’s constitution.
The funny thing is I had to go to another site to find Lieu' full quote. Why had not your site, the Victory Girls, not quote his full statement? I suspect because the full quote takes away from their point. It was intellectual dishonesty for them not to report the full quote. I published the full quote for all to read and to put his statement in context.You’re the one who parsed his quote.Typical Trumpist moron to give half a quote and call it truth.“I would love to be able to regulate the content of speech, but the First Amendment prevents me from doing so.”The government should never be the speech regulating business, but realistically, notwithstanding Lieu's comments, the right has been in the speech regulating business as well. The Patriot Act was nothing but monitoring what people say to one another. You can't cry fire in a crowded theater, you can't threaten politicians, write about terrorist actions, etc. without a visit from the FBI, and rightfully so.A. He’s supporting the suppression of speech.
B. The Founding Fathers are the anti Democratic Party of Liberty and God haters today.
Politically correct speech can get ridiculous, but Lieu was asking for private action and not governmental action. And please do nor kid yourself, the right has its own form of political correctness as well.
You lied in typical Leftard fashion.
Entire quote:
“I would love to be able to regulate the content of speech. The First Amendment prevents me from doing so. And that’s simply a function of the First Amendment. But I think over the long run, it’s better the government does not regulate the content of speech. I would urge these private sector companies to regulate it better themselves.”
Now go into hyper spin cycle.
Anyone get fired or lose their business because they support homosexual marriage? Got a long list of those that support traditional marriage who have.This is what Lieu said:
"The First Amendment prevents me from doing so. And that’s simply a function of the First Amendment. But I think over the long run, it’s better the government does not regulate the content of speech. I would urge these private sector companies to regulate it better themselves.”
I would remind you the Bill of Rights was drafted by "liberals" and that it is and are "liberal" courts that are the most ardent supporters of free speech and the free press. It is the right that advocates for press suppression and engages in anti-press rhetoric. Look at the rightist posts on this board.
Democrats will say whatever they think will best cover their true intentions.
I'll remind you that the classical liberals of the time of the founding have no philosophical relationship whatsoever to the idiots currently using the tag, who are essentially European-style socialists with a dash of an Orwellian plotline.
Talk to us of campus "free-speech zones", the prosecution and persecution of individuals who speak their mind, and the anti-American hive mind of our current media - all "liberal" constructs.
You people are useless to this nation. Keep pushing, please.
Thank you for proving my point of the right's anti-press rhetoric. Free speech and the free press run hand in hand. The founding father's understood that. The dumbed down Trumpist right does not.
Being able to marry either sex = more freedom. Once again , cons are against freedom.
“In a rare and somewhat frightening bout of honesty, California Democrat Ted Lieu made two stunning (or maybe not) admissions on the air recently 1) that he would love to control speech and 2) the only thing stopping him from doing so is that danged US Constitution.”
That Danged Constitution - Victory Girls Blog
There isn’t a Leftist alive who doesn’t want to control speech.
Just a rare Leftist in a rarer moment of honesty. The Hard Left Antifa Democrats would never get a single vote if they ever told voters what they REALLY thought, believed and stood for. For one thing, they are completely crazy, so only a nutcase thinks they make sense when closely examined. That is why Democrats have this massive propaganda machine for putting out what they WANT supporters and voters to believe!
“In a rare and somewhat frightening bout of honesty, California Democrat Ted Lieu made two stunning (or maybe not) admissions on the air recently 1) that he would love to control speech and 2) the only thing stopping him from doing so is that danged US Constitution.”
That Danged Constitution - Victory Girls Blog
There isn’t a Leftist alive who doesn’t want to control speech.
