Discussion in 'Donald Trump' started by Astrostar, Mar 7, 2018.
uh-huh. innocence doesn't require an ironclad memory.
Because you don't go under oath unless you absolutely have to when there's a prosecutor with nearly unlimited power and resources trying to create a case against you.
Simply because he doesn't have to. Why is this hard to understand?
In this legal system, a prosecuter with nearly unlimited power and resources can make even the most innocent look guilty. When you're up against that, you need the best legal assistance you can get. What, do you really think in this case he could rely on just being innocent? Pul-leeze.
you are being groomed to believe that.
true- he doesn't HAVE to. but why wouldn't he when it's normal protocol? what is he afraid of? he should do everything possible to prove that he is above reproach. he can't - that's why & your feeble attempt at defending his reasons are rather flaccid.
he has all the money in the world to have the best defense possible if here is any defending to be had. you are being manipulated into thinking he's being set up. you are going to be one of the crazies who will think that when the shit hit the fan... that you will say all the evidence is fabricated, riiiiiiiiight? trump can be on tape & you'll still say it's fake.
I don't know his reasons and don't have to. Being above reproach is not synonymous with being okay with strangers desperately searching every part of your financial dealings, looking for something to pretend outage about.
That's stupid. Of course if the evidence shows he broke the law he should be tried. But you are hopelessly naive if you think being innocent would protect you in these circumstances without skilled legal representation protecting you.
Separate names with a comma.