Thank You Canada!

Discussion in 'Canada' started by NATO AIR, Sep 24, 2004.

  1. NATO AIR
    Offline

    NATO AIR Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,275
    Thanks Received:
    282
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    USS Abraham Lincoln
    Ratings:
    +282
  2. CSM
    Offline

    CSM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    708
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northeast US
    Ratings:
    +708
    Amen. Maybe our neighbors to the north have a pair after all!
     
  3. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    My thanks too---I always knew you had it in ya !!!
     
  4. Said1
    Offline

    Said1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    12,087
    Thanks Received:
    937
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Somewhere in Ontario
    Ratings:
    +937
    I heard this yesterday, indeed, it's very good news.

    I do have some faith in Martin, (call it a hunch) even though I didn't vote for him. I think we might see some interesting changes coming from his government over the next few years, I hope I'm not disappointed.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Isaac Brock
    Offline

    Isaac Brock Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,104
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Ratings:
    +44
    I've heard this as well. Kudos to Martin. Darfur drastically needs this.

    I think it's a positive shift in peacekeeping. It seems that when peacekeeping forces have drastically different cultures than the prevailing culture of the country in need, there is increasing reception for the forces.

    I believe allowing other nations, under financial and logistical support from doner nations perform the peacekeeping operations may improve the success of the missions overall.

    In addition countries with anemic military resources still, like Canada, are able to provide peacekeeping support without further taxing a perhaps, overtaxed miltary.
     
  6. rtwngAvngr
    Offline

    rtwngAvngr Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Messages:
    15,755
    Thanks Received:
    511
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +511
    How, by helping the world identify "greedy donor nations". A nation of finger pointers and whiners, thanks for you contribution.
     
  7. Isaac Brock
    Offline

    Isaac Brock Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,104
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Ratings:
    +44
    So your solution involves not funding other peacekeppers? Why are nations that donate money to other countries who provide peacekeeping greedy? Or would you rather the laissez-faire approach?

    If we don't fund the AU peacekeepers then we're hypocrites, if we do fund them, we're whiners.

    :rolleyes:
     

Share This Page