Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ObamaCare was the GOP healthcare plan ... until Obama passed it. Then they hated it.The GOP health plan, die early, leave a pretty corpse....
I know, but they act like George bush and the ACA was never a repub idea...ObamaCare was the GOP healthcare plan ... until Obama passed it. Then they hated it.The GOP health plan, die early, leave a pretty corpse....
I didn't think the GOP presented a plan. They want to keep things as is... forever. Why are they opposed to all people being covered. Is this not aq good thing? Health care should never be a privilege, if you care about the sanctity of life.
The Leftytoon method. Deny every disabled American benefits with red tape. Hopefully they will die before you have to pay out.The GOP health plan, die early, leave a pretty corpse....
GOP Healthplan....Wedontcare
LOL only a true idiot would think a republican doesn't care about good health care,really only a truly dense person would repeat and believe such BS.
Actually Republicans do care about healthcare
They care about blocking any universal healthcare available to all Americans. They have been doing it for 50 years
ObamaCare was the GOP healthcare plan ... until Obama passed it. Then they hated it.The GOP health plan, die early, leave a pretty corpse....
You haven't seen it? Well now you have ... the individual mandate, brought to you by those Librules over at the Heritage Foundation...ObamaCare was the GOP healthcare plan ... until Obama passed it. Then they hated it.The GOP health plan, die early, leave a pretty corpse....
Sorry but no Republican plan I ever saw
created a pseudo-govt exchange mixing federal mandates with private insurance business.
Romney was criticized as being too moderate by
passing the state version of insurance mandates, and that did not create
a federal exchange that imposed IRS penalties on all citizens.
It was on a state level which is different from federal.
If you do not know the difference between state and federal laws and govt,
then no wonder you do not understand the arguments and outrage incited over ACA.
Please tell me you understand
the limits between federal govt and state jurisdiction to pass laws for itself (by citizens voting within that State)
vs. laws passed by Congress through federal govt where the citizens of the states did NOT get to vote on it.
Do you understand the difference this makes
when it comes to decisions about Health care, which used to be a personal liberty and private choice,
made on a federal level where the tax penalties are on individual citizens?
Do you understand the concept of depriving citizens of rights previously enjoyed,
but without going through ANY due process to prove that such citizens committed a crime that warrants losing freedom?
Do you understand this is why conservatives and even liberal prochoice Constitutionalists
like me are opposed to ACA on Constitutional grounds? I'm a prochoice Democrat, and I can see it is anti-choice and pushing a belief-based agenda through federal govt as a nationalized religion based on "health care as a right through govt" and excluding equal exercise of beliefs in natural rights and freedoms as the default, not govt.
Sorry if you cannot see or understand Constitutional beliefs as valid.
Your assessment of ACA as supported by Republicans
reminds me of people who insist that Muslims support Jihadist interpretations
of killing in the name of God, when they will tell you that runs totally contrary to their Islamic beliefs.
Pretty sure 'right to life' is a right...I didn't think the GOP presented a plan. They want to keep things as is... forever. Why are they opposed to all people being covered. Is this not aq good thing? Health care should never be a privilege, if you care about the sanctity of life.
It depends on what you think the purpose of government is. If you think government is there to take care of us and provide us with our needs, then health care should be a priority for government. If you think government is there to protect our rights, and it's up to us to take care of ourselves, then government has no responsibility to provide us with health care, and no authority to dictate how we manage it ourselves.
You haven't seen it? Well now you have ... the individual mandate, brought to you by those Librules over at the Heritage Foundation...ObamaCare was the GOP healthcare plan ... until Obama passed it. Then they hated it.The GOP health plan, die early, leave a pretty corpse....
Sorry but no Republican plan I ever saw
created a pseudo-govt exchange mixing federal mandates with private insurance business.
Romney was criticized as being too moderate by
passing the state version of insurance mandates, and that did not create
a federal exchange that imposed IRS penalties on all citizens.
It was on a state level which is different from federal.
If you do not know the difference between state and federal laws and govt,
then no wonder you do not understand the arguments and outrage incited over ACA.
Please tell me you understand
the limits between federal govt and state jurisdiction to pass laws for itself (by citizens voting within that State)
vs. laws passed by Congress through federal govt where the citizens of the states did NOT get to vote on it.
Do you understand the difference this makes
when it comes to decisions about Health care, which used to be a personal liberty and private choice,
made on a federal level where the tax penalties are on individual citizens?
Do you understand the concept of depriving citizens of rights previously enjoyed,
but without going through ANY due process to prove that such citizens committed a crime that warrants losing freedom?
Do you understand this is why conservatives and even liberal prochoice Constitutionalists
like me are opposed to ACA on Constitutional grounds? I'm a prochoice Democrat, and I can see it is anti-choice and pushing a belief-based agenda through federal govt as a nationalized religion based on "health care as a right through govt" and excluding equal exercise of beliefs in natural rights and freedoms as the default, not govt.
Sorry if you cannot see or understand Constitutional beliefs as valid.
Your assessment of ACA as supported by Republicans
reminds me of people who insist that Muslims support Jihadist interpretations
of killing in the name of God, when they will tell you that runs totally contrary to their Islamic beliefs.
History of the Individual Health Insurance Mandate 1989-2010 - Obamacare Health Care Laws - ProCon.org
I would link you directly to the Heritage Foundations healthcare plan, but it seems the link to that page is not working...
Assuring Affordable Health Care for All Americans
But essentially, ObamaCare was modeled on RomneyCare, and RomneyCare was modeled on the Heritage Foundation's healthcare plan.
The right loved the plan when Conservatives pitched the idea ... they hate it now because Obama passed it.
No worries ... the link is working now ...You haven't seen it? Well now you have ... the individual mandate, brought to you by those Librules over at the Heritage Foundation...ObamaCare was the GOP healthcare plan ... until Obama passed it. Then they hated it.The GOP health plan, die early, leave a pretty corpse....
Sorry but no Republican plan I ever saw
created a pseudo-govt exchange mixing federal mandates with private insurance business.
Romney was criticized as being too moderate by
passing the state version of insurance mandates, and that did not create
a federal exchange that imposed IRS penalties on all citizens.
It was on a state level which is different from federal.
If you do not know the difference between state and federal laws and govt,
then no wonder you do not understand the arguments and outrage incited over ACA.
Please tell me you understand
the limits between federal govt and state jurisdiction to pass laws for itself (by citizens voting within that State)
vs. laws passed by Congress through federal govt where the citizens of the states did NOT get to vote on it.
Do you understand the difference this makes
when it comes to decisions about Health care, which used to be a personal liberty and private choice,
made on a federal level where the tax penalties are on individual citizens?
Do you understand the concept of depriving citizens of rights previously enjoyed,
but without going through ANY due process to prove that such citizens committed a crime that warrants losing freedom?
Do you understand this is why conservatives and even liberal prochoice Constitutionalists
like me are opposed to ACA on Constitutional grounds? I'm a prochoice Democrat, and I can see it is anti-choice and pushing a belief-based agenda through federal govt as a nationalized religion based on "health care as a right through govt" and excluding equal exercise of beliefs in natural rights and freedoms as the default, not govt.
Sorry if you cannot see or understand Constitutional beliefs as valid.
Your assessment of ACA as supported by Republicans
reminds me of people who insist that Muslims support Jihadist interpretations
of killing in the name of God, when they will tell you that runs totally contrary to their Islamic beliefs.
History of the Individual Health Insurance Mandate 1989-2010 - Obamacare Health Care Laws - ProCon.org
I would link you directly to the Heritage Foundations healthcare plan, but it seems the link to that page is not working...
Assuring Affordable Health Care for All Americans
But essentially, ObamaCare was modeled on RomneyCare, and RomneyCare was modeled on the Heritage Foundation's healthcare plan.
The right loved the plan when Conservatives pitched the idea ... they hate it now because Obama passed it.
But if they don't read this, then they can't see it... So let them ignore this...
No worries ... the link is working now ...You haven't seen it? Well now you have ... the individual mandate, brought to you by those Librules over at the Heritage Foundation...ObamaCare was the GOP healthcare plan ... until Obama passed it. Then they hated it.The GOP health plan, die early, leave a pretty corpse....
Sorry but no Republican plan I ever saw
created a pseudo-govt exchange mixing federal mandates with private insurance business.
Romney was criticized as being too moderate by
passing the state version of insurance mandates, and that did not create
a federal exchange that imposed IRS penalties on all citizens.
It was on a state level which is different from federal.
If you do not know the difference between state and federal laws and govt,
then no wonder you do not understand the arguments and outrage incited over ACA.
Please tell me you understand
the limits between federal govt and state jurisdiction to pass laws for itself (by citizens voting within that State)
vs. laws passed by Congress through federal govt where the citizens of the states did NOT get to vote on it.
Do you understand the difference this makes
when it comes to decisions about Health care, which used to be a personal liberty and private choice,
made on a federal level where the tax penalties are on individual citizens?
Do you understand the concept of depriving citizens of rights previously enjoyed,
but without going through ANY due process to prove that such citizens committed a crime that warrants losing freedom?
Do you understand this is why conservatives and even liberal prochoice Constitutionalists
like me are opposed to ACA on Constitutional grounds? I'm a prochoice Democrat, and I can see it is anti-choice and pushing a belief-based agenda through federal govt as a nationalized religion based on "health care as a right through govt" and excluding equal exercise of beliefs in natural rights and freedoms as the default, not govt.
Sorry if you cannot see or understand Constitutional beliefs as valid.
Your assessment of ACA as supported by Republicans
reminds me of people who insist that Muslims support Jihadist interpretations
of killing in the name of God, when they will tell you that runs totally contrary to their Islamic beliefs.
History of the Individual Health Insurance Mandate 1989-2010 - Obamacare Health Care Laws - ProCon.org
I would link you directly to the Heritage Foundations healthcare plan, but it seems the link to that page is not working...
Assuring Affordable Health Care for All Americans
But essentially, ObamaCare was modeled on RomneyCare, and RomneyCare was modeled on the Heritage Foundation's healthcare plan.
The right loved the plan when Conservatives pitched the idea ... they hate it now because Obama passed it.
But if they don't read this, then they can't see it... So let them ignore this...
Assuring Affordable Health Care for All Americans
I don't care.You haven't seen it? Well now you have ... the individual mandate, brought to you by those Librules over at the Heritage Foundation...ObamaCare was the GOP healthcare plan ... until Obama passed it. Then they hated it.The GOP health plan, die early, leave a pretty corpse....
Sorry but no Republican plan I ever saw
created a pseudo-govt exchange mixing federal mandates with private insurance business.
Romney was criticized as being too moderate by
passing the state version of insurance mandates, and that did not create
a federal exchange that imposed IRS penalties on all citizens.
It was on a state level which is different from federal.
If you do not know the difference between state and federal laws and govt,
then no wonder you do not understand the arguments and outrage incited over ACA.
Please tell me you understand
the limits between federal govt and state jurisdiction to pass laws for itself (by citizens voting within that State)
vs. laws passed by Congress through federal govt where the citizens of the states did NOT get to vote on it.
Do you understand the difference this makes
when it comes to decisions about Health care, which used to be a personal liberty and private choice,
made on a federal level where the tax penalties are on individual citizens?
Do you understand the concept of depriving citizens of rights previously enjoyed,
but without going through ANY due process to prove that such citizens committed a crime that warrants losing freedom?
Do you understand this is why conservatives and even liberal prochoice Constitutionalists
like me are opposed to ACA on Constitutional grounds? I'm a prochoice Democrat, and I can see it is anti-choice and pushing a belief-based agenda through federal govt as a nationalized religion based on "health care as a right through govt" and excluding equal exercise of beliefs in natural rights and freedoms as the default, not govt.
Sorry if you cannot see or understand Constitutional beliefs as valid.
Your assessment of ACA as supported by Republicans
reminds me of people who insist that Muslims support Jihadist interpretations
of killing in the name of God, when they will tell you that runs totally contrary to their Islamic beliefs.
History of the Individual Health Insurance Mandate 1989-2010 - Obamacare Health Care Laws - ProCon.org
I would link you directly to the Heritage Foundations healthcare plan, but it seems the link to that page is not working...
Assuring Affordable Health Care for All Americans
But essentially, ObamaCare was modeled on RomneyCare, and RomneyCare was modeled on the Heritage Foundation's healthcare plan.
The right loved the plan when Conservatives pitched the idea ... they hate it now because Obama passed it.
Pretty sure 'right to life' is a right...I didn't think the GOP presented a plan. They want to keep things as is... forever. Why are they opposed to all people being covered. Is this not aq good thing? Health care should never be a privilege, if you care about the sanctity of life.
It depends on what you think the purpose of government is. If you think government is there to take care of us and provide us with our needs, then health care should be a priority for government. If you think government is there to protect our rights, and it's up to us to take care of ourselves, then government has no responsibility to provide us with health care, and no authority to dictate how we manage it ourselves.
[
Actually Republicans do care about healthcare
They care about blocking any universal healthcare available to all Americans. They have been doing it for 50 years