R
rdean
Guest
You're guessing. Not many news stories on women carrying a dead fetus doesn't mean it doesn't happen. Stop guessing. Show us your data. Uh, if you can.I gave you examples. You give imaginary statistics. You don't see the difference?You said: it does, considering a woman's body will automatically reject a dead fetus, i.e. miscarry.Wow, that really makes a difference.
it does, considering a woman's body will automatically reject a dead fetus, i.e. miscarry.
and when it comes to people who just read the title of the article, it the title is a lie. If you are so confident about the rightness of your position, why lie? Tell the truth.
and when it comes to people who just read the title of the article, it the title is a lie. If you are so confident about the rightness of your position, why lie? Tell the truth.
-----------------------------
Were you lying or ignorant? Which one is it.
An 82-Year-Old Woman Is Carrying A 40-Year-Old Fetus Inside Her Abdomen - BuzzFeed News
36-year-old skeleton of dead baby found inside Indian woman - Health News - Health Families - The Independent
Oh, and that's the truth.
These slapdowns could be avoided if right wingers knew how to use Google.
Yes, there are minor exceptions to the rule. But in 99.99% of the cases, the body spontaneously aborts the miscarrage, or if it doesn't the woman has a serious medical issue.
So if in 99.99% of the cases the woman's body handles it, or the woman could die, how can the law say the woman has to carry a dead fetus?
Why can't they just say the law would force the woman to carry a non-viable fetus? That would be the truth.
No slapdown here, you are just making yourself look like the partisan hack that you are. You can't even simply admit that the titles are wrong.
You gave exceptions to the rule. A question, is the title accurate?