Maybe texans should stop giving the Federal governement any money. Then they would have plenty of money to take care of this situation. I guess Washington forgets where it gets its money.
Actually, they wouldn't.
Yes, actually we would.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Maybe texans should stop giving the Federal governement any money. Then they would have plenty of money to take care of this situation. I guess Washington forgets where it gets its money.
Actually, they wouldn't.
Maybe texans should stop giving the Federal governement any money. Then they would have plenty of money to take care of this situation. I guess Washington forgets where it gets its money.
So they get to pay taxes to bail everyone else out, but they aren't entitled to receive anything they paid for if they object to being mulcted?
That is so beautifully fascist!
Actually, they don't pay enough to 'bail everybody out'.
No one said they paid the entire bill, knucklehead.
Apparently you agree that you're a fascist.
In fiscal 2009, the IRS collected about $163 billion from Texans and the state received about $224 billion, for a net gain of $61 billion. Federal spending in Texas also exceeded tax payments in 2008 by $8 billion. It was the other way around in 2006 and 2007, when tax payments by Texans exceeded federal spending by a total of about $47 billion.
I think it would be insulting to the great State of Texas to offer them charity like this. They are capable of handling things by themselves and don't need federal handouts
Totally agree on that. They've got their Texas Pride...it's very important.
Right, and the federal government has their tax money. They aren't entitled to any of that, are they? Only good, obedient, bootlicking liberals are entitled to government benefits.
Alabama is primarily conservative, but you've got to remember there's a HUGE democrat base here too. Many, but not all of course, being African American. There are a lot of AA's here, as opposed to other states.
That being said, there's been no discussion here about the federal guidelines and criteria for what constitutes disaster relief necessity. That's right. I said it. Perhaps one state qualified...and the other didn't. Happens all the time.
Someone bitching about Texas' need want to chime in with some relevant law and data? I doubt you will.
Maybe texans should stop giving the Federal governement any money. Then they would have plenty of money to take care of this situation. I guess Washington forgets where it gets its money.
Totally agree on that. They've got their Texas Pride...it's very important.
Right, and the federal government has their tax money. They aren't entitled to any of that, are they? Only good, obedient, bootlicking liberals are entitled to government benefits.
Alabama liberal?
Yuo have to be kidding.
Maybe Washington doesn't want to spend limited federal resources in a state that's going to succeed from the union. I'm just saying....
I think it would be insulting to the great State of Texas to offer them charity like this. They are capable of handling things by themselves and don't need federal handouts
Like Righwinger said, they say they can take care of themselves. We are letting them do that.
The people who want more of localized government, are the first to bitch when the fed doesn't come and bail them out. Just sayin.
Maybe Washington doesn't want to spend limited federal resources in a state that's going to succeed from the union. I'm just saying....
First off, douche, it's "secede", not succeed. Succeed is what we do when Dems aren't in power.
Second, Texas has not threatened to secede -- we'd be better off if we did not having to carry your asses on our backs -- that's just more leftwingnut, bullshit rhetoric.
Can you losers EVER come up with something that is actually fact-based spreading your myths around?
Like Obama is a proven liar but you can't do anything but ignore every one of his lies? Or the Democrats are liars for even using the word democrat or " there's no taxation without representation" -- you know -- that thing we committed treason against our King over? -- when Obama didn't even actually win the Democratic primary?
Want to run your suck and get served some more, dumbass?
Maybe Washington doesn't want to spend limited federal resources in a state that's going to succeed from the union. I'm just saying....
Alabama is primarily conservative, but you've got to remember there's a HUGE democrat base here too. Many, but not all of course, being African American. There are a lot of AA's here, as opposed to other states.
That being said, there's been no discussion here about the federal guidelines and criteria for what constitutes disaster relief necessity. That's right. I said it. Perhaps one state qualified...and the other didn't. Happens all the time.
Someone bitching about Texas' need want to chime in with some relevant law and data? I doubt you will.
Is Disaster Relief in the Constitution or does it fall under the General Welfare clause?
I think it would be insulting to the great State of Texas to offer them charity like this. They are capable of handling things by themselves and don't need federal handouts
Totally agree on that. They've got their Texas Pride...it's very important.