Texas A&M: No, Kyle Rittenhouse Won’t Be Admitted. Arizona State: He Won’t Be Coming Back Here Either

[lantern2814]

You stated that no one is going to sue him. I linked that he is, in fact, being sued. Ipso Facto.

And they’ll be laughed out of court. Self-defense bitch. Period. Cry for the dead pedo and domestic abuser some more.

 

[whitehall]

You know the world is upside down when Texas A&M won't admit a smart kid like Rittenhouse because of his politics while the University of Chicago has a freaking genuine terrorist (Bill Ayers) employed as a professor.

 

[surada]

Kyle Rittenhouse said he would be attending Texas A&M University during an episode of "The Charlie Kirk Show" podcast posted on YouTube Saturday.

"I'm going to be going there, and it's going to be awesome," Rittenhouse said after donning a baseball cap with the university's insignia on it. "Beautiful campus, amazing people, amazing food."

A university spokesperson told The Dallas Morning News on Sunday that Rittenhouse would not be in attendance.

"He has not been admitted as a student this summer or fall," Kelly Brown, the spokesperson, said.

Rittenhouse took online classes at Arizona State University last year but said he dropped them during his homicide trial and wanted to resume them afterward. Students demanded that he be expelled from the university after he was acquitted of the charges against him.

ASU previously told Insider that Rittenhouse was no longer in attendance at the university.

Kyle Rittenhouse says he's going to Texas A&M and 'it's going to be awesome.' The university disagrees.

During a radio show with the host Charlie Kirk, Rittenhouse said he would be attending the university and had visited the campus in May.

www.insider.com

He couldn't even finish high school.

 

[surada]

You know the world is upside down when Texas A&M won't admit a smart kid like Rittenhouse because of his politics while the University of Chicago has a freaking genuine terrorist (Bill Ayers) employed as a professor.

Rittenhouse is dumb like George Zimmerman.

 

[candycorn]

You know the world is upside down when Texas A&M won't admit a smart kid like Rittenhouse

 

[dblack]

Maybe he is a liar.

Maybe. But given that he's been accused of murder, isn't that nitpicking?

 

[Godboy]

Colleges don’t normally accept high school dropouts.

If you remember, he didnt actually drop out. He was forced out of school by democrats who accused him of murder when he was obviously just defending himself. Your party wanted to rip that kid from school and put him in prison for the rest of his life for defending himself against democrat rioters.

 

[JoeB131]

You know the world is upside down when Texas A&M won't admit a smart kid like Rittenhouse because of his politics while the University of Chicago has a freaking genuine terrorist (Bill Ayers) employed as a professor.

Ayers was a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago (Go Flames, said no one ever), but he retired.

Ayers was never convicted of anything because evidence proving his guilt was excluded from court... just like Rittenhouse.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Ayers was a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago (Go Flames, said no one ever), but he retired.

Ayers was never convicted of anything because evidence proving his guilt was excluded from court... just like Rittenhouse.

What was Rittenhouse guilty of? What did he admit? Ayers admitted participating in bombing New York Police Station, THE US CAPITOL, The Pentagon. These admissions took place in his own fucking memoirs and you people reward him with teaching positions and lecture events yet lose your shit over some yahoos vandalizing the US Capitol and respond by imprisoning them.

 

[JoeB131]

What was Rittenhouse guilty of? What did he admit?

Killing two people. Got off on a technicality.

Ayers admitted participating in bombing New York Police Station, THE US CAPITOL, The Pentagon. These admissions took place in his own fucking memoirs and you people reward him with teaching positions and lecture events yet lose your shit over some yahoos vandalizing the US Capitol and respond by imprisoning them.

Well, then the FBI shouldn't have planted instigators inside the Weathermen, then.

Let's not forget what the Weathermen were protesting - an illegal war against a third world country that killed three million people.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Killing two people. Got off on a technicality.


Well, then the FBI shouldn't have planted instigators inside the Weathermen, then.

Let's not forget what the Weathermen were protesting - an illegal war against a third world country that killed three million people.

LOL self defense is NOT a technicality.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Killing two people. Got off on a technicality.


Well, then the FBI shouldn't have planted instigators inside the Weathermen, then.

Let's not forget what the Weathermen were protesting - an illegal war against a third world country that killed three million people.

Your logic and justification is very consistent wit a J6 supporter. They believe instigators were planted at J6 and they too were protesting something illegal.

The parallels of the mindsets and actions are intriguing yet the outcomes for each are significant: one gets rewarded while the other gets punished.

 

[JoeB131]

LOL self defense is NOT a technicality.

Well, it is if the jury doesn't hear all the evidence, and the judge won't even let the prosecutors call the people he killed "Victims".

Your logic and justification is very consistent wit a J6 supporter. They believe instigators were planted at J6 and they too were protesting something illegal.

Except the Weathermen were able to PROVE FBI misconduct. The J-6 Idiots got into this all on their own. Well, with some help from Trump, who is now pretending he never met them.

The parallels of the mindsets and actions are intriguing yet the outcomes for each are significant: one gets rewarded while the other gets punished.

Well, no, not really. the Weathermen were protesting a criminal war. The J-6 idiots were just upset they lost an election.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Well, it is if the jury doesn't hear all the evidence, and the judge won't even let the prosecutors call the people he killed "Victims".

That should be the alleged situation in every criminal case actually.

 

[JoeB131]

That should be the alleged situation in every criminal case actually.

Not really.

Most murders everyone agrees there was a murder. So no harm in calling the victims as victims.

In the Rittenhouse case, getting the judge to ban the use of the word victim bolstered Rittenhouse's claim that he totally shot two unarmed men in self defense.

Combine that with the jury not hearing about how he wished he had his gun so he could shoot a black man outside a CVS, or the picture of him handing around with the Proud Boys... whatever horseshit his lawyers spread around the court seemed probable to 12 people too stupid to get out of jury duty.

 

[Zincwarrior]

By calling them victims, it impugns that the defendant is guilty.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Well, it is if the jury doesn't hear all the evidence, and the judge won't even let the prosecutors call the people he killed "Victims".


Except the Weathermen were able to PROVE FBI misconduct. The J-6 Idiots got into this all on their own. Well, with some help from Trump, who is now pretending he never met them.


Well, no, not really. the Weathermen were protesting a criminal war. The J-6 idiots were just upset they lost an election.

Officially and legally, who or what determined Ametican involvement

Well, it is if the jury doesn't hear all the evidence, and the judge won't even let the prosecutors call the people he killed "Victims".


Except the Weathermen were able to PROVE FBI misconduct. The J-6 Idiots got into this all on their own. Well, with some help from Trump, who is now pretending he never met them.


Well, no, not really. the Weathermen were protesting a criminal war. The J-6 idiots were just upset they lost an election.

What legal body or code determined American involvement in Vietnam to be criminal, factually speaking. I don’t doubt that it was an opinion held by many just like many hold the opinion that the 2020 Election was illegal or criminal.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Well, it is if the jury doesn't hear all the evidence, and the judge won't even let the prosecutors call the people he killed "Victims".


Except the Weathermen were able to PROVE FBI misconduct. The J-6 Idiots got into this all on their own. Well, with some help from Trump, who is now pretending he never met them.


Well, no, not really. the Weathermen were protesting a criminal war. The J-6 idiots were just upset they lost an election.

The Vietnam war was not criminal NO war we have been involved in has been criminal.

 

[JoeB131]

What legal body or code determined American involvement in Vietnam to be criminal, factually speaking. I don’t doubt that it was an opinion held by many just like many hold the opinion that the 2020 Election was illegal or criminal.

Well, actually, the Pentagon Papers fully exposed the criminality of our war in Vietnam.

Yes, STUPID people think the 2020 election was illegal...

 

[LeftofLeft]

Well, actually, the Pentagon Papers fully exposed the criminality of our war in Vietnam.

Yes, STUPID people think the 2020 election was illegal...

What legal body or code deemed the Vietnam War illegal or criminal? The Pentagon Papers are NEITHER code nor legal entity. They could be used towards such a determination but where has that been the case? As such, it remains an OPINION that America’s involvement in Vietnam was illegal or criminal much like the Iraq War, the 2020 Election, and other historical events; by stupid and smart people alike.