Terrorism equals a WAR forever

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by Psychoblues, Dec 18, 2005.

  1. Psychoblues
    Offline

    Psychoblues Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    2,701
    Thanks Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    North Missisippi
    Ratings:
    +143
    As long as we can even intimate disagreement with "terrorism" we will have WAR. As long as we ignore the wishes of the population, we will have WAR. As long as we put aside the plights of the masses in order to enrich the views and wealth of the powers that be, WE WILL HAVE WAR.

    The threats and damages of the powerful are well documented. Their lies, in the light of a free press, are as well. I listen to all of it. It's my right and your right. You may pick and choose. I try to get and understand a truly balanced and fair view of the way things are.

    As a United States citizen, I abhor WAR. If disagreement in the face of WAR is prevalent in attitude, whether in general or political, then it is WAR that we will have.

    I think of WAR as being rather juvenile and uncivilized. I presently think of WAR as being an extention of Imperialistic ideals.

    The Viet Nam War was actually won. It was won by the people that lived there. We had a problem, at that time, with a fear of a spreading Communism. Capitalism ultimately won out but the American stylists were sent packing with their tails between their legs. Viet Nam was a state/country in transition as it still is. Was our interference necessary? I think not. We, Americans, were a hindrance to the evolution of Vietnamese growth and politics. And we were quite murderously a party to the prevention of natural human inclination. That inclination being Democracy.

    The Vietnamese I see today are much happier than the Vietnamese I knew many years ago. The Vietnamese then were apprehensive, even afraid. The Vietnamese of today welcome the jobs as afforded by the Japanese, the Germans, the Swedish and even the Philipinos and yes the jobs that Americans offer them. Was our interference necessary? Were the wasted lives of 58,000 Americans necessary? Was it politics or prudence? You figure it out?

    The liberals in Viet Nam embrace the changes that benefit the population. The conservatives reject anything that doesn't benefit them personally. The liberals there are winning and identify on the positive end of that equation. The conservatives mount an ever increasing amount of propaganda to retain their own power and throttle the increasing power of the little people, the liberals. Viet Nam goes on, as the United States of America will go on. I hope we don't invade them once again or invade any other sovereign people for some ideologically flawed purpose or political endearment. We are better than that.

    Don't you agree?


    Psychoblues
     
  2. Hobbit
    Offline

    Hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    Messages:
    5,099
    Thanks Received:
    420
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Near Atlanta, GA
    Ratings:
    +421
    You cannot please all of the people all of the time. The only way the Muslims will leave us alone is if we institute a Muslim state. If that happens, then there will be terrorists from other religions. There is no way to end terrorism, so we can either be like Belgium and the Netherlands, bending over backward and giving in to every threat that comes along, or we can fight and show that we'll never back down. If preserving our way of life means war forever, then war it is.
     
  3. insein
    Offline

    insein Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    Messages:
    6,096
    Thanks Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Philadelphia, Amazing huh...
    Ratings:
    +356


    Well said. I dont think an aging hippy douchebag like psycho understands the meaning of self preservation.
     
  4. Psychoblues
    Offline

    Psychoblues Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    2,701
    Thanks Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    North Missisippi
    Ratings:
    +143
    Holy Shit!!!!!!

    I don't think Hobbit or insein understand the difference between self-preservation and self-annilation. What is so wrong with Belgium or the Netherlands? Are they next in OUR agenda of WORLD DOMINATION?

    Neither of you have an idea of the present Islamic state. Geographically or politically.

    If either of you are indicative of American thought, we are in deeper shit than I ever imagined.


    Psychoblues
     
  5. insein
    Offline

    insein Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    Messages:
    6,096
    Thanks Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Philadelphia, Amazing huh...
    Ratings:
    +356
    Unfortunately no one knows how America truly thinks since there is a campaign of misinformation in the public due in large part to the Mass Media controlled by socialists and communists. American troops are made to look like Terrorists and Terrorists are made to look like Freedom Fighting Evangelicals. Not the Christian evangelicals either because those are evil in communist eyes. Islamic Evangelicals. Thats the current enemy of America so it msut be good for communism. Pawns like Psycho and Max Power believe so. And anyone that opposes America has to be good because it advaces the agenda in their eyes.
     
  6. Hobbit
    Offline

    Hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    Messages:
    5,099
    Thanks Received:
    420
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Near Atlanta, GA
    Ratings:
    +421
    If we were in it for world domination, we'd start with Cuba, then hit Mexico and Venezuela for their oil, then conquor the rest of our own continent first. We also wouldn't be letting conquored citizens vote.

    The problem with Belgium and the Netherlands is that when the Nazis came for them, they rolled over and took it, opeing the door for Germany to completely take Western Europe. We, however, never just roll over and take it, although that's what you and your ilk would really like us to do, because you're living under the delusion that it will make us 'safe' somehow.

    And if you were indicative of American thought, we wouldn't be worrying about any 'dirty bombs' because a single 'dirty arab' could take over the whole country with a pocket knife.
     
  7. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    The only thing you got right is the very first sentence. The rest is your "usual" attempting to rethink the Vietnam War. Fortunate for the masses it is that YOU are not indicative of American thought.

    As long as groups choose to use terror as a weapon, there will be those willing to stand up to them instead of cowering in a corner or pretending they don't exist. Too bad for backwards-assed thinking people like you who continually apologize and/or attempt to legitmize the REAL evil while attempting to villify those willing to stand up to it.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. LuvRPgrl
    Offline

    LuvRPgrl Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    3,163
    Thanks Received:
    206
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +206
    Oh, he understands it well enough.

    The COWARD loves it that others will die supporting his freedom so that he can call those who died defending him war mongers, idiots, terrorists.
     
  9. LuvRPgrl
    Offline

    LuvRPgrl Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    3,163
    Thanks Received:
    206
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +206
    we need to add onto your sig..

    "and it will triumph even faster when idiotic COWARDS like Psycho get their way"
     
  10. manu1959
    Offline

    manu1959 Left Coast Isolationist

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2004
    Messages:
    13,761
    Thanks Received:
    1,625
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    california
    Ratings:
    +1,626
    so how do you explain england and northern ireland these days?
     

Share This Page