Ted Stevens GUILTY

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by sealybobo, Oct 27, 2008.

  1. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    50,581
    Thanks Received:
    3,193
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +10,167
    Sen. Stevens convicted on corruption charges - Capitol Hill - MSNBC.com


    Even with all the Federal Prosecutors being loyal Bushies, Ted still found guilty!!! Gotta love it!!

    WASHINGTON - Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens was convicted of corruption charges Monday in a trial that tainted the 40-year Senate career of Alaska's political patriarch.

    Stevens, 84, was convicted of all seven charges he faced of lying about free home renovations and other gifts he received from a wealthy oil contractor. Jurors began deliberating Wednesday at noon.

    Stevens faces up to five years in prison on each count when he is sentenced Jan. 26, but under federal sentencing guidelines, he is likely to receive much less prison time, if any.
     
  2. xaxeptance449
    Offline

    xaxeptance449 Xaxe449

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    77
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +7
    Stevens Found Guilty in Corruption Case By MATT APUZZO and JESSE J. HOLLAND, AP
    posted: 4 MINUTES AGOcomments: 42filed under: Crime News, Political NewsPrintShareText SizeAAAWASHINGTON (Oct. 27) - Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens was convicted of seven corruption charges Monday in a trial that tainted the 40-year Senate career of Alaska's political patriarch.
    A Senator on TrialGerald Herbert, AP10 photos Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, here leaving Federal Court in Washington Monday, was found guilty in a corruption trial. The political patriarch was convicted of all seven charges he faced of lying about free home renovations and other gifts he received from a wealthy oil contractor.(Note: Please disable your pop-up blocker)

    The verdict, coming just days before Election Day, adds further uncertainty to a closely watched Senate race. Democrats hope to seize the once reliably Republican seat as part of their bid for a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.
    Stevens, 84, was convicted of all seven charges he faced of lying about free home renovations and other gifts he received from a wealthy oil contractor. Jurors began deliberating Wednesday at noon.
    Stevens faces up to five years in prison on each count when he is sentenced Jan. 26, but under federal sentencing guidelines, he is likely to receive much less prison time, if any.
    The monthlong trial revealed that employees for oil services company VECO Corp. transformed the senator's modest mountain cabin into a modern, two-story home with wraparound porches, a sauna and a wine cellar. Stevens never paid for VECO's work.
    The Senate's longest-serving Republican, Stevens said he had no idea he was getting freebies. He said he paid $160,000 for the project and said he believed that covered everything.
    Stevens asked for an unusually speedy trial, hoping he'd be exonerated in time to return to Alaska and win re-election. He kept his campaign going and gave no indication that he had a contingency plan in case of conviction.
    Despite being a convicted felon, he is not required to drop out of the race or resign from the Senate. If he wins re-election, he can continue to hold his seat because there is no rule barring felons from serving in Congress. The Senate could vote to expel Stevens on a two-thirds vote.
    "Put this down: That will never happen — ever, OK?" Stevens said in the weeks leading up to his trial. "I am not stepping down. I'm going to run through and I'm going to win this election.
    Democrats, who are hoping to capture a filibuster-proof Senate majority, have jumped at the chance to seize the once reliably Republican seat. They have invested heavily in the race, running television advertisements starring fictional FBI agents and featuring excerpts from wiretaps.
    Stevens' conviction hinged on the testimony of Bill Allen, the senator's longtime drinking and fishing buddy. Allen, the founder of VECO, testified that he never billed his friend for the work on the house and that Stevens knew he was getting a deal.
    Stevens spent three days on the witness stand, vehemently denying that allegation. He said his wife, Catherine, paid every bill they received.
    Living in Washington, thousands of miles away, made it impossible to monitor the project every day. Stevens relied on Allen to oversee the renovations, he said, and his friend deceived him by not forwarding all the bills.
    Stevens is a legendary figure in Alaska, where he has wielded political influence since before statehood. His knack for steering billions of dollars in federal money to his home state has drawn praise from his constituents and consternation from budget hawks.
    http://news.aol.com/article/stevens-found-guilty-in-corruption-case/227428
     
  3. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,552
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,428
    Not all the federal prosecutors. Don't think that people don't do their jobs. They do. And a good prosecutor is a good prosecutor.
     
  4. xaxeptance449
    Offline

    xaxeptance449 Xaxe449

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    77
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +7
    Makes the 60 majority much more of a reality?
     
  5. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,148
    Thanks Received:
    10,164
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,718
    :badgrin:
     
  6. doeton
    Offline

    doeton Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,213
    Thanks Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +65
    :badgrin:
     
  7. xaxeptance449
    Offline

    xaxeptance449 Xaxe449

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    77
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +7
    And another one bites the dust? I have to think he may not serve any time at all, however a conviction is still a conviction.
     
  8. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,148
    Thanks Received:
    10,164
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,718
    Anything to make the libwals happy! anything at all.
     
  9. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    50,581
    Thanks Received:
    3,193
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +10,167
    More than wondering what the 8 US Attorneys wouldn't do for Bush, I wonder what the others did go along with in order to keep their jobs.

    Bush fired those 8 because they wouldn't do his political bidding. I can only assume the others WOULD do his political bidding.

    Remember, Bush lied about why they were fired. Had he just kept his mouth shut, no one could have questioned his decision, even though the timing was suspecious. But the White House said they let them go because of job performance. And that wasn't true. That's why the 8 came forward to spill the beans. Bush tried throwing them under the bus.

    In my opinion, the 8 Bush let go were probably the good ones.

    David Iglesias, the former U.S. attorney of New Mexico, talks to NOW about the pressure he says he received from the Justice Department to engage in "unlawful activities," his resistance, and why he believes it cost him his job. This is a longer version of the interview that appeared in the broadcast.

    Interview: David Iglesias . NOW | PBS
     
  10. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,552
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,428
    because, of course, he wasn't corrupt, right? nope.. nope and nope.

    i'm guessing there were no "liberals" on the jury.

    Is spelling difficult for you?
     

Share This Page