teaching kids redistribution of wealth. Halloween style


Where in the world do you goofballs get the idea that Democrats want to take everything from the wealthy and spread the wealth equally? This is where your logic is so fucked up. Asking the wealthy to pay a little more in tough times is not going to make them less wealthy in the long run. Nobody has ever suggested that everything should be equal yet you dupes continue to attempt progressing that fallacy.

A heavly progressive tax system is the 5th pillar of communism, are you saying your in favor of communism? Tell me, where is the equal protection under the law, guaranteed in the 14th amendment? Come on, be honest if you can.
 

Where in the world do you goofballs get the idea that Democrats want to take everything from the wealthy and spread the wealth equally? This is where your logic is so fucked up. Asking the wealthy to pay a little more in tough times is not going to make them less wealthy in the long run. Nobody has ever suggested that everything should be equal yet you dupes continue to attempt progressing that fallacy.

A heavly progressive tax system is the 5th pillar of communism, are you saying your in favor of communism? Tell me, where is the equal protection under the law, guaranteed in the 14th amendment? Come on, be honest if you can.

Anyone care to name the fallacy we see here?

Was Thomas Jefferson a communist? He, along with other founders, proposed the US have a progressive taxation system to balance out our natural rights.


.
 
Last edited:
"Asking those with more candy to give up some more candy in tough times is not going to make them have less candy."

Talk about fucked up logic! That's right up there with 0 - 5.3 + 2 = 7.8.





.

No it isn't .

They "worked" for it.


Now if one of the kids had 0 candy, I guarantee you they would voluntarily donated some.
They were being forced & that's different.

The part I put in quotes was a restatement of something auditor said. It is some of the most fucked up logic out there that says if you give up something, you don't have less of it.

And they like to say they are "asking" the rich to give up a little more. That's so they don't have to be honest with themselves and admit they are taking the money by force.

Gimme, gimme, gimme. And make that guy over there pay for it.


.


I think I misunderstood what ya meant.

Sorry bout dat
 

Where in the world do you goofballs get the idea that Democrats want to take everything from the wealthy and spread the wealth equally? This is where your logic is so fucked up. Asking the wealthy to pay a little more in tough times is not going to make them less wealthy in the long run. Nobody has ever suggested that everything should be equal yet you dupes continue to attempt progressing that fallacy.

well duh dumbass. the wealthy already pay the lions share. time for you 50% leeches to pay a share don'tyathink?
 
Conservative trick or treat

One kid goes through the neighborhood and collects all the candy at every house

When the other 99 kids complain that there is no candy left for them he screams.....SOCIALISTS! Redistribution of wealth........Redistribution of wealth!

That was embarrassingly bad :wtf:
 

Where in the world do you goofballs get the idea that Democrats want to take everything from the wealthy and spread the wealth equally? This is where your logic is so fucked up. Asking the wealthy to pay a little more in tough times is not going to make them less wealthy in the long run. Nobody has ever suggested that everything should be equal yet you dupes continue to attempt progressing that fallacy.

Did you here what Hillary said? "The rich don't pay their fair share in any country." That means she thinks a marginal rate of 62.38% (Denmark) isn't fair because the rich still get to keep some of their money. You are going to have a hard tome convincing me that the idea is not to take 100% of what they earn if the rate actually has to be above the 62% mark.
 
Conservative trick or treat

One kid goes through the neighborhood and collects all the candy at every house

When the other 99 kids complain that there is no candy left for them he screams.....SOCIALISTS! Redistribution of wealth........Redistribution of wealth!

That was embarrassingly bad :wtf:

More Conservative trick or treat

One kid in the neighborhood gets to allocate the candy for the whole neighborhood. So naturally, he allocates 80 percent to himself and lets the other 99 kids fight over the remaining 20 %

When the other kids complain, he points to a poor, sick kid who is unable to trick or treat and says........There is the reason you don't get enough candy
 
The super-uber-hyper rich did not get that way because their taxes are too low. All this whining about the concentration of wealth and you think the cure is to raise taxes on the rich?

This is so typical of liberals. Let's treat the symptom rather than the disease.

If a thief is stealing your shit, do you think the cure is to make the guy who lives in a bigger house pay more taxes?

Not every rich person got that way by taking advantage of others or using sooper sekrit roads and bridges no one else is allowed to use. Did it never occur to you that we ALL use roads and bridges?

So why do you want to punish every rich person? How is that NOT class warfare?

I am sick of "solutions" which just make things worse.

Listen to Obama's speeches. He is going to raise taxes AND THEN SPEND IT. He says it in the same breath. He says he will use it to lower the deficit AND to spend on all kinds of stuff. Guess what? After he spends it on all that stuff, there is none left over to use to reduce the deficit. He is buying votes with rich people's money.

Open your ears and really LISTEN.

He says he will end the wars and then use the "savings" to buy more teachers, and firemen, and cops, and roads, and bridges. Well, if the war is being funded with borrowed money, exactly where do these "savings" come from if we end the war?

You see what I mean?

Wake up.

.
 
Last edited:
Conservative trick or treat

One kid goes through the neighborhood and collects all the candy at every house

When the other 99 kids complain that there is no candy left for them he screams.....SOCIALISTS! Redistribution of wealth........Redistribution of wealth!

That was embarrassingly bad :wtf:

More Conservative trick or treat

One kid in the neighborhood gets to allocate the candy for the whole neighborhood. So naturally, he allocates 80 percent to himself and lets the other 99 kids fight over the remaining 20 %

When the other kids complain, he points to a poor, sick kid who is unable to trick or treat and says........There is the reason you don't get enough candy

The main theme with both your (sad) stories is a lack of adult supervision. Much like this administration and most things liberal

Happy Halloween! On Friday too here in NJ :D
 
Imagine if the fatass lazy kid in the neighborhood sat in his house waiting for all the other kids to drop off some candy for him since the mayor made it a city ordinance.

Even the kid in a wheelchair that got out and worked for candy had to drop off 1-2 pieces of candy by 8pm in the fat kid's bag while he sat on his front porch.

Now, those busy body kids that made it through the neighborhood twice and have the most candy, well they need to pay their "fair share" which means double the candy payment than others.....gotta even the playing field.

These basic comparison stories show how fucked up liberals are.....
 
Last edited:
Where in the world do you goofballs get the idea that Democrats want to take everything from the wealthy and spread the wealth equally? This is where your logic is so fucked up. Asking the wealthy to pay a little more in tough times is not going to make them less wealthy in the long run. Nobody has ever suggested that everything should be equal yet you dupes continue to attempt progressing that fallacy.

A heavly progressive tax system is the 5th pillar of communism, are you saying your in favor of communism? Tell me, where is the equal protection under the law, guaranteed in the 14th amendment? Come on, be honest if you can.

Anyone care to name the fallacy we see here?

Was Thomas Jefferson a communist? He, along with other founders, proposed the US have a progressive taxation system to balance out our natural rights.


.

Don't thiink so, Jefferson voted to prohibit direct taxation by the feds, except when based on the census where every one paid the same.
 
That was embarrassingly bad :wtf:

More Conservative trick or treat

One kid in the neighborhood gets to allocate the candy for the whole neighborhood. So naturally, he allocates 80 percent to himself and lets the other 99 kids fight over the remaining 20 %

When the other kids complain, he points to a poor, sick kid who is unable to trick or treat and says........There is the reason you don't get enough candy

The main theme with both your (sad) stories is a lack of adult supervision. Much like this administration and most things liberal

Happy Halloween! On Friday too here in NJ :D

Christie said it was postponed to Monday Nov 5
 
More Conservative trick or treat

One kid in the neighborhood gets to allocate the candy for the whole neighborhood. So naturally, he allocates 80 percent to himself and lets the other 99 kids fight over the remaining 20 %

When the other kids complain, he points to a poor, sick kid who is unable to trick or treat and says........There is the reason you don't get enough candy

The main theme with both your (sad) stories is a lack of adult supervision. Much like this administration and most things liberal

Happy Halloween! On Friday too here in NJ :D

Christie said it was postponed to Monday Nov 5

Oh. In my area is will be Friday. I hope the local Mayors can survive his backlash if he finds out ;)
 
The main theme with both your (sad) stories is a lack of adult supervision. Much like this administration and most things liberal

Happy Halloween! On Friday too here in NJ :D

Christie said it was postponed to Monday Nov 5

Oh. In my area is will be Friday. I hope the local Mayors can survive his backlash if he finds out ;)

The kids will come tonight, Friday and Monday just to be sure
 
A heavly progressive tax system is the 5th pillar of communism, are you saying your in favor of communism? Tell me, where is the equal protection under the law, guaranteed in the 14th amendment? Come on, be honest if you can.

Anyone care to name the fallacy we see here?

Was Thomas Jefferson a communist? He, along with other founders, proposed the US have a progressive taxation system to balance out our natural rights.


.

Don't thiink so, Jefferson voted to prohibit direct taxation by the feds, except when based on the census where every one paid the same.

You did not know this about Jefferson?

I guess I should not be surprised.

Behold!

It should seem then that it must be because of the enormous wealth of the proprietors which places them above attention to the increase of their revenues by permitting these lands to be laboured. I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable. But the consequences of this enormous inequality producing so much misery to the bulk of mankind, legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind. The descent of property of every kind therefore to all the children, or to all the brothers and sisters, or other relations in equal degree is a politic measure, and a practicable one. Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions of property in geometrical progression as they rise. Whenever there is in any country, uncultivated lands and unemployed poor, it is clear that the laws of property have been so far extended as to violate natural right.

Equality: Thomas Jefferson to James Madison

An argument for the abolishment of primogeniture and the creation of progressive taxation.

.
 
Last edited:

Where in the world do you goofballs get the idea that Democrats want to take everything from the wealthy and spread the wealth equally?

Perhaps because about 100 times a week some libturd in this forum says exactly that.

This is where your logic is so fucked up. Asking the wealthy to pay a little more in tough times is not going to make them less wealthy in the long run.

Libturds are always demanding more from the rich. The problem with your credibility is that libturds have proven their demands for more of money from the rich is insatiable. When will they ever be satisfied?

Nobody has ever suggested that everything should be equal yet you dupes continue to attempt progressing that fallacy.

Plenty of your libturd Komrades have suggested exactly that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top