Discussion in 'Politics' started by Lovebears65, Oct 31, 2012.
HILLARY: I'm going to take their excess candy and put it into a strategic cupboard fund that will begin to fund alternative snacks.
OBAMA: If you are a successful trick or treater, I'm going to ask you to pay me a little bit more candy. Look, behind every successful trick or treater is a sidewalk they used to go house to house. You didn't build that.
BIDEN: They want to keep their candy! They want to keep you in those chains you wore for Halloween!
USMB LIBERAL: The candy take when Obama took office dropped by 5.3 percent. After he took office, the candy take rose by 2 percent. That means Obama has increased the candy take by 7.3 percent! 0 - 5.3 + 2 = 7.8
Well, what with Obama possibly being the Anti-Christ and all.......
Where in the world do you goofballs get the idea that Democrats want to take everything from the wealthy and spread the wealth equally? This is where your logic is so fucked up. Asking the wealthy to pay a little more in tough times is not going to make them less wealthy in the long run. Nobody has ever suggested that everything should be equal yet you dupes continue to attempt progressing that fallacy.
"Asking those with more candy to give up some more candy in tough times is not going to make them have less candy."
Talk about fucked up logic! That's right up there with 0 - 5.3 + 2 = 7.8.
Don't make me get YouTube clips...
I swear you guys act like we can't remember.
Hey goofball... You answered your own question, and you're absolutely right. Nobody ever did suggest equality plays into wealth redistribution of wealth... In fact, the exact opposite is true.
No it isn't .
They "worked" for it.
Now if one of the kids had 0 candy, I guarantee you they would voluntarily donated some.
They were being forced & that's different.
The part I put in quotes was a restatement of something auditor said. It is some of the most fucked up logic out there that says if you give up something, you don't have less of it.
And they like to say they are "asking" the rich to give up a little more. That's so they don't have to be honest with themselves and admit they are taking the money by force.
Gimme, gimme, gimme. And make that guy over there pay for it.
Separate names with a comma.