Tea Party plot in Wisconsin?

[Revere]

Too date...neither Karl Rove, the Koch Brothers, Murdoch, Kristol, the World Net Daily, NewsMax, Levin, Crowley, etc. can produce documented FACT that ACORN go fake voters registered in any state, and those fake votes were cast for Democrats.

To date, NO ONE CAN REFUTE OR DISPROVE THE GOP HISTORY OF VOTER CAGING...as I've documented on this thread.

Improving the voter rolls of every state is a noble cause......doing it under the false premise that it's because of Dem voter fraud is just plain propaganda.

Won't matter when some of these Marxists get beat by double digits.

In my lifetime, I have yet to recall a bonafide "marxist" candidate for President.....much less an "elected" marxist President in the history of the United States.

Is there a Marxist party still viable in America? Do they have any Congressional representation? If not, then I haven't a clue as to what you're on about.

Obama is a Marxist. Get over it. There is no American industry he does not believe should exist, except under the thumb of, and at the pleasure of government, and has no use for free enterprise.

 

[taichiliberal]

A Constitutional Conservative.

Really? So perhaps either he or you can tell me where in the Constitution it states that corporations are individual entities like people? And maybe all you "Constitutional Conservatives" are all happy as clams in beer now that corporations (along with unions) ....domestic and foreign" can donate ANONYMOUSLY to various political party fund raising groups?

And while you're chewing on that, maybe you can explain this:

Think Progress Ron Johnson Opposed Child Abuse Legislation Because It Would Hold Businesses Accountable


Or this:

Wednesday, September 29, 2010
WI GOPer Ron Johnson was on Finance Council of Diocese being sued over child sex abuse

AMERICAblog News: WI GOPer Ron Johnson was on Finance Council of Diocese being sued over child sex abuse

But hey, if this latest GOP voter caging stuff turns out to be true, old Russ is a shoe in, and all those questions will just melt away, right?

Corporations don't have rights? You mean you can walk into an Apple store and scoop up as many iPods as you want, because corporations have no private property rights?

Do i surrender my free speech rights when I affiliate with a corporation, but not a union?

Pay attention: I talking about corporations AND unions being treated as a living, viable human citizen in America as a political party donator. See, until the recent Shrub appointed SCOTUS ruling in the Citizens United case, it has been a historical precedent in US history to PROTECT the American citizenry from dominance by corporations or unions...and the key place to do that is in financial support of political parties. I strongly suggest you bone up on the Citizens United Case to know what I'm talking about, because obviously you're confusing the issue with the rights and protections afforded businesses.

 

[taichiliberal]

Won't matter when some of these Marxists get beat by double digits.

In my lifetime, I have yet to recall a bonafide "marxist" candidate for President.....much less an "elected" marxist President in the history of the United States.

Is there a Marxist party still viable in America? Do they have any Congressional representation? If not, then I haven't a clue as to what you're on about.

Obama is a Marxist. Get over it. There is no American industry he does not believe should exist, except under the thumb of, and at the pleasure of government, and has no use for free enterprise.

Hmmm, you make a LOT of accusations and allegations......any logical or FACT based evidence to support them, or are you just parroting tea bagger/neocon/birther rhetoric?

I can't get over willfull ignorance that you appear to be displaying with such statements, which is why demand you to prove what you say...Paul Revere would want no less of those who invoke his name.

 

[Revere]

Really? So perhaps either he or you can tell me where in the Constitution it states that corporations are individual entities like people? And maybe all you "Constitutional Conservatives" are all happy as clams in beer now that corporations (along with unions) ....domestic and foreign" can donate ANONYMOUSLY to various political party fund raising groups?

And while you're chewing on that, maybe you can explain this:

Think Progress Ron Johnson Opposed Child Abuse Legislation Because It Would Hold Businesses Accountable


Or this:

Wednesday, September 29, 2010
WI GOPer Ron Johnson was on Finance Council of Diocese being sued over child sex abuse

AMERICAblog News: WI GOPer Ron Johnson was on Finance Council of Diocese being sued over child sex abuse

But hey, if this latest GOP voter caging stuff turns out to be true, old Russ is a shoe in, and all those questions will just melt away, right?

Corporations don't have rights? You mean you can walk into an Apple store and scoop up as many iPods as you want, because corporations have no private property rights?

Do i surrender my free speech rights when I affiliate with a corporation, but not a union?

Pay attention: I talking about corporations AND unions being treated as a living, viable human citizen in America as a political party donator. See, until the recent Shrub appointed SCOTUS ruling in the Citizens United case, it has been a historical precedent in US history to PROTECT the American citizenry from dominance by corporations or unions...and the key place to do that is in financial support of political parties. I strongly suggest you bone up on the Citizens United Case to know what I'm talking about, because obviously you're confusing the issue with the rights and protections afforded businesses.

Constitutional protections only apply to individuals?

I know the Citizens United Case.

Free speech is not at the pleasure of FEC bureaucrats.

 

[taichiliberal]

Nobody is more surprised than me to see Feingold staring death in the face. He's one of the least polarizing liberals out there and he fools the cheeseheads year in and year out.

But he's one of Obamas capos on the American march toward serfdom, and he has to go.

I notice you avoided the points I made about your boy Ron

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2820050-post257.html

As I said, Feingold has his faults, but going from bad to worse isn't the answer.

 

[Revere]

Nobody is more surprised than me to see Feingold staring death in the face. He's one of the least polarizing liberals out there and he fools the cheeseheads year in and year out.

But he's one of Obamas capos on the American march toward serfdom, and he has to go.

I notice you avoided the points I made about your boy Ron

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2820050-post257.html

As I said, Feingold has his faults, but going from bad to worse isn't the answer.

Johnson would not vote for anything Feingold would.

That's from bad to very good, in my book.

Wake me up when Johnson votes for a law to put me in prison if I don't buy the right kind of health insurance, and go bash Catholics someplace else.

 

[taichiliberal]

Corporations don't have rights? You mean you can walk into an Apple store and scoop up as many iPods as you want, because corporations have no private property rights?

Do i surrender my free speech rights when I affiliate with a corporation, but not a union?

Pay attention: I talking about corporations AND unions being treated as a living, viable human citizen in America as a political party donator. See, until the recent Shrub appointed SCOTUS ruling in the Citizens United case, it has been a historical precedent in US history to PROTECT the American citizenry from dominance by corporations or unions...and the key place to do that is in financial support of political parties. I strongly suggest you bone up on the Citizens United Case to know what I'm talking about, because obviously you're confusing the issue with the rights and protections afforded businesses.

Constitutional protections only apply to individuals?

I know the Citizens United Case.

Free speech is not at the pleasure of FEC bureaucrats.

Corporations were afforded the protestions of all businesses under the Constitution...always have. What they DID NOT have until the Citizens United Case was the ability to take their profits and directly funnel them anonymously into political campaigns. And guess what? Foreign corporations are now allowed to do so also! So much for all the past wailing about the Chinese and Al Gore.

See, we use to have a system that protected individual citizens from dominance of the corporation on most aspects....but that has been taken away in what we see in a political campaign now, as the corporation or union can out spend an opponent political party with DEEP pockets of money provided by workers and investors WHO MAY NOT share the political viewpoints of the BOT and the CEO who make those anonymous donations.

One step closer to fascism, my friend.

 

[taichiliberal]

Nobody is more surprised than me to see Feingold staring death in the face. He's one of the least polarizing liberals out there and he fools the cheeseheads year in and year out.

But he's one of Obamas capos on the American march toward serfdom, and he has to go.

I notice you avoided the points I made about your boy Ron

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2820050-post257.html

As I said, Feingold has his faults, but going from bad to worse isn't the answer.

Johnson would not vote for anything Feingold would.

That's from bad to very good, in my book.

Wake me up when Johnson votes for a law to put me in prison if I don't buy the right kind of health insurance, and go bash Catholics someplace else.

You need to wake up, because there is NO LAW in the Health Reform bill that will incarcerate you for not having health insurance. If you can produce the paragraph that states such, please do. If not, spare me your trying to pass off your supposition and conjecture as fact.

And if you're comfortable with a shill for an organization that protects child abusers, that's your problem, and your welcome to Johnson.

 

[Revere]

I notice you avoided the points I made about your boy Ron

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2820050-post257.html

As I said, Feingold has his faults, but going from bad to worse isn't the answer.

Johnson would not vote for anything Feingold would.

That's from bad to very good, in my book.

Wake me up when Johnson votes for a law to put me in prison if I don't buy the right kind of health insurance, and go bash Catholics someplace else.

You need to wake up, because there is NO LAW in the Health Reform bill that will incarcerate you for not having health insurance. If you can produce the paragraph that states such, please do. If not, spare me your trying to pass off your supposition and conjecture as fact.

And if you're comfortable with a shill for an organization that protects child abusers, that's your problem, and your welcome to Johnson.

Those penalties are administered through the tax code, or the IRS, which does impose jail time.

And you want people to be penalized for not buying health care, so get out of town.

What the hell are you going to do when your world comes crashing down the morning of November 3rd?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Obama is a Marxist. Get over it. There is no American industry he does not believe should exist, except under the thumb of, and at the pleasure of government, and has no use for free enterprise.

You just revealed your stupidity and colossal ignorance, revere. Please stay on the Board, because at least you will be good for grins and chuckles. How funny.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Wake me up when Johnson votes for a law to put me in prison if I don't buy the right kind of health insurance, and go bash Catholics someplace else.

This is even better entertainment than I hoped. What a loon.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Those penalties are administered through the tax code, or the IRS, which does impose jail time.

And you want people to be penalized for not buying health care, so get out of town.

What the hell are you going to do when your world comes crashing down the morning of November 3rd?

Now you are demonstrating you are a born liar. What a hoot!

Once again a believer demonstrates that libertarianism is the stronghold of the weak minded.

 

[thereisnospoon]

If that is the case, look at what will replace him! Talk about jumping from the frying pan into the fire!

A Constitutional Conservative.

Really? So perhaps either he or you can tell me where in the Constitution it states that corporations are individual entities like people? And maybe all you "Constitutional Conservatives" are all happy as clams in beer now that corporations (along with unions) ....domestic and foreign" can donate ANONYMOUSLY to various political party fund raising groups?

And while you're chewing on that, maybe you can explain this:

Think Progress Ron Johnson Opposed Child Abuse Legislation Because It Would Hold Businesses Accountable


Or this:

Wednesday, September 29, 2010
WI GOPer Ron Johnson was on Finance Council of Diocese being sued over child sex abuse

AMERICAblog News: WI GOPer Ron Johnson was on Finance Council of Diocese being sued over child sex abuse

But hey, if this latest GOP voter caging stuff turns out to be true, old Russ is a shoe in, and all those questions will just melt away, right?

Hye eee chee. When you quote think progress you leave no doubt as to your credibility vacuum.
Look, face facts. You libs had your chance to run the federal government. You blew it. You're over. We have had enough of your socialist agenda. You have damaged the country and jeopadized our economic well being. We're kicking you out( of Washington).
You go ahead and keep posting. You're the nutty neighbor that sits on their front porch and screams at people who walk by.
Think progress.....Please.

 

[DiveCon]

Those penalties are administered through the tax code, or the IRS, which does impose jail time.

And you want people to be penalized for not buying health care, so get out of town.

What the hell are you going to do when your world comes crashing down the morning of November 3rd?

Now you are demonstrating you are a born liar. What a hoot!

Once again a believer demonstrates that libertarianism is the stronghold of the weak minded.

how ironic

 

[Charles_Main]

Russ Feingold is going to lose by double digits.

If that is the case, look at what will replace him! Talk about jumping from the frying pan into the fire!

So says the Liberal.

 

[DiveCon]

Russ Feingold is going to lose by double digits.

If that is the case, look at what will replace him! Talk about jumping from the frying pan into the fire!

So says the Liberal.

this kid is as clueless as rdean

 

[elvis]

If that is the case, look at what will replace him! Talk about jumping from the frying pan into the fire!

So says the Liberal.

this kid is as clueless as rdean

I didn't think that was possible.

 

[DiveCon]

So says the Liberal.

this kid is as clueless as rdean

I didn't think that was possible.

it is hard to believe

 

[taichiliberal]

Johnson would not vote for anything Feingold would.

That's from bad to very good, in my book.

Wake me up when Johnson votes for a law to put me in prison if I don't buy the right kind of health insurance, and go bash Catholics someplace else.

You need to wake up, because there is NO LAW in the Health Reform bill that will incarcerate you for not having health insurance. If you can produce the paragraph that states such, please do. If not, spare me your trying to pass off your supposition and conjecture as fact.

And if you're comfortable with a shill for an organization that protects child abusers, that's your problem, and your welcome to Johnson.

Those penalties are administered through the tax code, or the IRS, which does impose jail time.

And you want people to be penalized for not buying health care, so get out of town.

What the hell are you going to do when your world comes crashing down the morning of November 3rd?

YOU made a declarative statement that one would be JAILED for not having health insurance under Obama's health care reform bill. I asked for you to provided PROOF of your statement by quoting the paragraph of the bill that states just that.

YOU COULDN'T DO IT.

But instead of having the maturity and honesty to admit such, you just continue with yet another generalized statement....but as the say the devil is in the details


Health Care Reform Bill Summary: A Look At What's in the Bill - Political Hotsheet - CBS News

Seems YOU want uninsured people to just drop dead, because folk of your mindset wail like banshee's at the thought of uninsured people using the local emergency room as a hospital. You can't have it both ways, bunky.


AND YOU STILL HAVEN'T RESPONDED TO OR ACKNOWLEDGED THE FACT OF JOHNSONS DEFENSE OF AN ORGANIZATON ACCUSED OF PROTECTING CHILD ABUSERS.

Paul Revere is spinning in his grave by the use of his good name to parrot neocon platitudes.

 

[taichiliberal]

A Constitutional Conservative.

Really? So perhaps either he or you can tell me where in the Constitution it states that corporations are individual entities like people? And maybe all you "Constitutional Conservatives" are all happy as clams in beer now that corporations (along with unions) ....domestic and foreign" can donate ANONYMOUSLY to various political party fund raising groups?

And while you're chewing on that, maybe you can explain this:

Think Progress Ron Johnson Opposed Child Abuse Legislation Because It Would Hold Businesses Accountable


Or this:

Wednesday, September 29, 2010
WI GOPer Ron Johnson was on Finance Council of Diocese being sued over child sex abuse

AMERICAblog News: WI GOPer Ron Johnson was on Finance Council of Diocese being sued over child sex abuse

But hey, if this latest GOP voter caging stuff turns out to be true, old Russ is a shoe in, and all those questions will just melt away, right?

Hye eee chee. When you quote think progress you leave no doubt as to your credibility vacuum.
Look, face facts. You libs had your chance to run the federal government. You blew it. You're over. We have had enough of your socialist agenda. You have damaged the country and jeopadized our economic well being. We're kicking you out( of Washington).
You go ahead and keep posting. You're the nutty neighbor that sits on their front porch and screams at people who walk by.
Think progress.....Please.

Hey chuckles, I notice you couldn't logically or factually disprove or refute the CONTENT of the Think Progress link, much less the other link to the blogger. Like a typical neocon parrot, you can't think for yourself....so when information comes along that disproves your handed down talking points, you just avoid an actual honest discussion and just slander the source.....so much more to pity you.


The rest of your response is just the typical neocon bullhorn....let me know when you stop being an intellectual coward.