Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
Ted Kennedy did leave that poor women to drown in the car and nothing was ever done. That was wrong. Bill Cliton should have been thrown out of office and wasn't and that was wrong.
But here I am talking about children who need support from their father. And him not providing for his children, in my opinion is unethical and immoral.
Just because there wasn't standards in the past Rep or Dem--we need to hold our representatives to some standard. And that is what I wanted to discuss here--but was shouted down by personal attacks.
Surely, this is not getting any issue debated.
Well there's not much to debate. You haven't proven your assertion. The man has not been convicted of anything. So your premise 'Guilty till proven innocent' is a non-starter for any real debate. We don't know what's going on with this man and his wife. When or if he's convicted of a crime,we can have that discussion then. But it still doesn't matter so i probably wont join that discussion.
If you don't want to discuss anything that is fine. I never said he was convicted of a crime. I did say that he needs to pay his child support in the amount of $117,000 and needs to be sactioned.
Oh, okay. You didn't say he was convicted, so that makes it okay for you to simply presume guilt and expect the rest of us to debate as though your presumption is fact.
I don't plan to discuss "Walsh is guilty because Conner says so". Do you plan to discuss "Why does Conner say accusations equal guilt?" How about we discuss YOUR moral fiber as demonstrated by your Weekly World News voyeuristic attitude toward conservative politicians?
What part of "His ex-wife saying he owes it doesn't mean he necessarily owes it" is too complicated for your peabrain to wrap around? I say shitty things about MY ex, too, but I don't expect people to be stupid enough to take my opinion about him as the unvarnished gospel truth.