Tea Party activist confronts Obama on Biden calling them terrorists.

[Jarhead]

Umm, the tea party member in the op story

The tea party member is "crying" about his/her emplyees (government) calling him/her names after they expressed disatisfaction with the way their employees are acting.

(I say his/her as there were actually two of them)

In any "employer/employee" realtionship, the employee(s) would likely be terminated and rightfully so...for if you express lack of respect for your employer, it is grounds for termination.

But for some reason, our elected reps (employees) are not concerned about termination before their term is up.

THAT is something we should really be debating.

Since when is government supposed to be OUR bosses?

This post has nothing to do with me.
He called Obama POINTING OUT that he's called names, "crying."
I reciprocated, and showed him the same thing takes place from all vantage points.
It's a corny assed circle jerk.

actually, he (the employer) had valid reason to ask why the employees feel they have the right to call the employer names.
And the response was "the employer called me names"

You opt to accept a President who says "there is nothing wrong with calling the American People names, becuase they call me names"

I dont. I think that is childish on his part...he is the President...the tea partyer is a consitutant who expressed anger that he was referred to as a terrorist by elewvcted officials.

Get off the "equal gorund" crap and look at what took place.

The president said "call me names and we weill call you names"

The PRESDIENT of the United States said that.....think about it......

 

[Full-Auto]

Democrats seldom go after an opponent personally.

That is the biggest pile I have seen posted on this board.

 

[007]

An aide to Hillary Clinton?

And?

That has zero to do with the question I asked.

It has everything to do with your question
It has always been a democrat who was the first to question the birth place of a person.
Keep trying to dig out of the hole you have dugged. It's fun to watch.

Tell you what.

Link something that she publicly came out and made an issue of that.

There's no "hole" here.

Democrats seldom go after an opponent personally.

Republicans do it all the time.

You're so full of SHIT I can smell you through the fucking computer.

You are a bald faced, mother fucking liar and shit for brains.

NO ONE has suffered MORE CRAP than CONSERVATIVE WOMEN by the LEFTIST DEMOCRATS.... NO ONE!

You are a liberal SHIT PILE and a PROGRESSIVE, COMMIE HACK.

FUCK OFF.

 

[mudwhistle]

Obama is playing games.

The White House puts out the word.

The last couple of months the word has been Terrorist. Repeat terrorist and Tea Party over and over till it attaches itself to the Tea Party. The head of the DNC, "cute" Debby calls the Tea Party terrorists.

Obama calls for civility. This gives Obama an image of being reasonable even though his Administration is the source of the accusations of terrorism.

It's just a political game he's playing. All the while he's on his 3 day bus tour blaming nasty politics for Washington's problems. His Administration is the source of the nastiness, but he sure doesn't like all of this nastiness.

 

[Sallow]

Democrats seldom go after an opponent personally.

That is the biggest pile I have seen posted on this board.

Should be easy then.

I set up the criteria.

Your google fu is strong.

Go!

 

[Sallow]

It has everything to do with your question
It has always been a democrat who was the first to question the birth place of a person.
Keep trying to dig out of the hole you have dugged. It's fun to watch.

Tell you what.

Link something that she publicly came out and made an issue of that.

There's no "hole" here.

Democrats seldom go after an opponent personally.

Republicans do it all the time.

You're so full of SHIT I can smell you through the fucking computer.

You are a bald faced, mother fucking liar and shit for brains.

NO ONE has suffered MORE CRAP than CONSERVATIVE WOMEN by the LEFTIST DEMOCRATS.... NO ONE!

You are liberal SHIT PILE and a PROGRESSIVE, COMMIE HACK.

FUCK OFF.

You are a little angry lately.

Get off the caffine..chief.

 

[G.T.]

The tea party member is "crying" about his/her emplyees (government) calling him/her names after they expressed disatisfaction with the way their employees are acting.

(I say his/her as there were actually two of them)

In any "employer/employee" realtionship, the employee(s) would likely be terminated and rightfully so...for if you express lack of respect for your employer, it is grounds for termination.

But for some reason, our elected reps (employees) are not concerned about termination before their term is up.

THAT is something we should really be debating.

Since when is government supposed to be OUR bosses?

This post has nothing to do with me.
He called Obama POINTING OUT that he's called names, "crying."
I reciprocated, and showed him the same thing takes place from all vantage points.
It's a corny assed circle jerk.

actually, he (the employer) had valid reason to ask why the employees feel they have the right to call the employer names.
And the response was "the employer called me names"

You opt to accept a President who says "there is nothing wrong with calling the American People names, becuase they call me names"

I dont. I think that is childish on his part...he is the President...the tea partyer is a consitutant who expressed anger that he was referred to as a terrorist by elewvcted officials.

Get off the "equal gorund" crap and look at what took place.

The president said "call me names and we weill call you names"

The PRESDIENT of the United States said that.....think about it......

I opted to accept nothing. I called out hipocrisy, and rightly so.

 

[Shogun]

Gosh, how many outraged righties have used terms like "boy, muslim, terrorist, negro, etc." during Obama's tenure? It's fucking hilarious that NOW their panties are sandy because they are called out as the terrorists they are.

WHAAAAAAAA!!! WHAAAAAAAAAA, you fucking crybabies.


Obama let you know how stupid it is to cry foul despite your rhetoric since 2008. Deal with it.

 

[Jarhead]

This post has nothing to do with me.
He called Obama POINTING OUT that he's called names, "crying."
I reciprocated, and showed him the same thing takes place from all vantage points.
It's a corny assed circle jerk.

actually, he (the employer) had valid reason to ask why the employees feel they have the right to call the employer names.
And the response was "the employer called me names"

You opt to accept a President who says "there is nothing wrong with calling the American People names, becuase they call me names"

I dont. I think that is childish on his part...he is the President...the tea partyer is a consitutant who expressed anger that he was referred to as a terrorist by elewvcted officials.

Get off the "equal gorund" crap and look at what took place.

The president said "call me names and we weill call you names"

The PRESDIENT of the United States said that.....think about it......

I opted to accept nothing. I called out hipocrisy, and rightly so.

i disagree.
It is not hypocrisy.....in my opinion.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with a constituant expressing being upset and hurt by an elected official calling him names whereas there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with a man who is considered the leader of the free world complaining about it being done to him....and something even MORE wrong with the leader of the free world comparing it as "the same thing".

And what really concerns me is that intelligent rational people like you actually see it as one in the same.

Have we really set the bar for the President so low?

 

[Jarhead]

Gosh, how many outraged righties have used terms like "boy, muslim, terrorist, negro, etc." during Obama's tenure? It's fucking hilarious that NOW their panties are sandy because they are called out as the terrorists they are.

WHAAAAAAAA!!! WHAAAAAAAAAA, you fucking crybabies.


Obama let you know how stupid it is to cry foul despite your rhetoric since 2008. Deal with it.

please...tell me.....of the 33% of the people that are deemed right of center...or 100 million....how many have called him "boy, muslim, terrorist, negro, etc."

Sure...you will show me a sign here and a video there.....100 freaking million and exactly how many examples can you come up with?

Easy to say, quite difficult to back up.

 

[Seawytch]

I love all this angst over the Tea Baggers being called "terrorist". If it had been the Progressive Caucus holding the country hostage over the debt ceiling, "terrorist" would have been the least innocuous thing they would have been called.

 

[Sallow]

i disagree.
It is not hypocrisy.....in my opinion.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with a constituant expressing being upset and hurt by an elected official calling him names whereas there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with a man who is considered the leader of the free world complaining about it being done to him....and something even MORE wrong with the leader of the free world comparing it as "the same thing".

And what really concerns me is that intelligent rational people like you actually see it as one in the same.

Have we really set the bar for the President so low?

Well sure.

We (Well not me) elected a man that was convicted of a crime before he entered office.

First time in history.

President George W Bush.

Grats.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Your title should be " Hypocrite Teabager cries about Biden's comment and then calls Obama a Socialist".

he is calling it like it is. Obama is a socialist. He wanted the healthcare law that is being a socialist . He wants to distribute the wealth also being a socialist. So far I have not seen one Tea partier doing anything being a terriost!!

The tea partiers wanted to destroy the country financially by stopped the raising of the debt ceiling.

That by definition is terrorism.

 

[Oldstyle]

Your title should be " Hypocrite Teabager cries about Biden's comment and then calls Obama a Socialist".

he is calling it like it is. Obama is a socialist. He wanted the healthcare law that is being a socialist . He wants to distribute the wealth also being a socialist. So far I have not seen one Tea partier doing anything being a terriost!!

I don't want to aurgue what socialism is or isn't but one could make just as strong an aurgument the tea party members are terrorists.

You could make a strong argument that the Tea Party members are terrorists? Are you kidding me? I could make a strong argument that you're an idiot for even implying that! Why should someone be labeled as a terrorist simply because they want some fiscal sanity returned to Washington? I'm getting REALLY sick of people like you...Joe Biden...and Barack Obama.

 

[Sallow]

I love all this angst over the Tea Baggers being called "terrorist". If it had been the Progressive Caucus holding the country hostage over the debt ceiling, "terrorist" would have been the least innocuous thing they would have been called.

Absolutely.

 

[Oldstyle]

I love all this angst over the Tea Baggers being called "terrorist". If it had been the Progressive Caucus holding the country hostage over the debt ceiling, "terrorist" would have been the least innocuous thing they would have been called.

Absolutely.

And if Barack Obama REALLY wanted "civility" returned to political discussion in this country then he'd denounce anyone who uttered such a thing...including his own Vice President.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

An aide to Hillary Clinton?

And?

That has zero to do with the question I asked.

It has everything to do with your question
It has always been a democrat who was the first to question the birth place of a person.
Keep trying to dig out of the hole you have dugged. It's fun to watch.

Tell you what.

Link something that she publicly came out and made an issue of that.

There's no "hole" here.

Democrats seldom go after an opponent personally.

Republicans do it all the time.

Democrats seldom go after an opponent personally.

Did you actually type this without laughing? You have got to be joking.

 

[G.T.]

actually, he (the employer) had valid reason to ask why the employees feel they have the right to call the employer names.
And the response was "the employer called me names"

You opt to accept a President who says "there is nothing wrong with calling the American People names, becuase they call me names"

I dont. I think that is childish on his part...he is the President...the tea partyer is a consitutant who expressed anger that he was referred to as a terrorist by elewvcted officials.

Get off the "equal gorund" crap and look at what took place.

The president said "call me names and we weill call you names"

The PRESDIENT of the United States said that.....think about it......

I opted to accept nothing. I called out hipocrisy, and rightly so.

i disagree.
It is not hypocrisy.....in my opinion.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with a constituant expressing being upset and hurt by an elected official calling him names whereas there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with a man who is considered the leader of the free world complaining about it being done to him....and something even MORE wrong with the leader of the free world comparing it as "the same thing".

And what really concerns me is that intelligent rational people like you actually see it as one in the same.

Have we really set the bar for the President so low?

He's a man like anyone else. He's allowed to take issue with ridicule, especially if he's being expected to answer for his co-workers.

This is not an example of a constituant approaching Obama about something Obama said. He's expecting Obama to answer for someone else. The constituent needs to grow up, and Obama said the right thing. I don't care if he's the biggest celebrity on the planet, he should still & always as a man stick up for himself. There's nothing wrong with that.

 

[Jarhead]

i disagree.
It is not hypocrisy.....in my opinion.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with a constituant expressing being upset and hurt by an elected official calling him names whereas there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with a man who is considered the leader of the free world complaining about it being done to him....and something even MORE wrong with the leader of the free world comparing it as "the same thing".

And what really concerns me is that intelligent rational people like you actually see it as one in the same.

Have we really set the bar for the President so low?

Well sure.

We (Well not me) elected a man that was convicted of a crime before he entered office.

First time in history.

President George W Bush.

Grats.

Sure....twice for that matter.

So now you are comparing Obama to Bush....

You do realize that you are comparing Obama to what many believe is "the worst president in the history of our country"

That is like saying "my car is the best made in history....and if you think otherwise, remember how bad the pacer was....it is just like that".

 

[mudwhistle]

An aide to Hillary Clinton?

And?

That has zero to do with the question I asked.

It has everything to do with your question
It has always been a democrat who was the first to question the birth place of a person.
Keep trying to dig out of the hole you have dugged. It's fun to watch.

Tell you what.

Link something that she publicly came out and made an issue of that.

There's no "hole" here.

Democrats seldom go after an opponent personally.

Republicans do it all the time.

Sarah Palin - ****, stupid ****
GWB - hates black people, murderer, liar, traitor, stupid,etc
Tea Party - racists, terrorists
Michele Bachmann - nut-case, religious extremist, stupid
Herman Cain - uncle tom, house-negro, racist
Allen West - criminal
Dick Cheney - EVILE, criminal
Condi Rice - oreo, house-negro
Clarence Thomas - sex-offender, uncle tom, house-negro
Glenn Beck - cry-baby, nut-case, drunk
Rush Limbaugh - racist, heroin-addict
Mitt Romney - Mormon
Gerald Ford - clutz, stupid
Ronald Reagan - racist, stupid, war-monger
Fox News - faux news

The list goes on and on.

I'm trying to figure out what planet you're on.