Survey: US voters would prefer Muslim president over an atheist

There is no difference between an atheist and a muslim. Both have an ideology based in religious extremism and both would enforce that ideology at the point of a gun.

There is no difference in reality between someone that burns down a church to build a mosque and someone who burns down a church because the sight of it is offensive to them.

Who the fuck is this^ dingleberry? :lmao:
 
There is no difference between an atheist and a muslim. Both have an ideology based in religious extremism and both would enforce that ideology at the point of a gun.

What kind of bullshit is this?

There is no difference in reality between someone that burns down a church to build a mosque and someone who burns down a church because the sight of it is offensive to them.

:cuckoo:
 
Don't like the truth do you?

Christmas is coming, time for the atheists to bring out their attack machine!
 
Don't like the truth do you?

I love the truth. You're just not speaking it. You're speaking unjustified, blind hatred and religious discrimination.

Christmas is coming, time for the atheists to bring out their attack machine!

:cuckoo:

Did you really expect understanding from a crowd like this?

The last time these people understood another person was when they looked in a mirror.

(That's a big damn maybe too)
 
There is no difference between an atheist and a muslim. Both have an ideology based in religious extremism and both would enforce that ideology at the point of a gun.

There is no difference in reality between someone that burns down a church to build a mosque and someone who burns down a church because the sight of it is offensive to them.

Good point, you can't walk a mile without seeing an atheist burning a church down.





:bsflag:
 
Can you have religious discrimination against an atheist?

Only if atheism is a religion. Which it is.
 
Only if atheism is a religion. Which it is.

That depends on the atheist. For some it's not a religion at all. For others, it's every bit as dogmatic as any theistic religion.

But whatcha gonna do? :dunno:

There...is no atheist dogma?

It's up to whatever the individual atheists decide they want it to be.

Agreed. There is no 'universal' atheist dogma. But for some, their atheism is decidedly dogmatic.
 
That depends on the atheist. For some it's not a religion at all. For others, it's every bit as dogmatic as any theistic religion.

But whatcha gonna do? :dunno:

There...is no atheist dogma?

It's up to whatever the individual atheists decide they want it to be.

Agreed. There is no 'universal' atheist dogma. But for some, their atheism is decidedly dogmatic.

I would say those some are by and far the absolute minority.
 
All one needs to do to win an election in murka is go put on a fucking cowboy hat and mention Gawd in every paragraph spoken.


Everyone knows you are an idiot. You don't have to keep trying so hard.
 
There...is no atheist dogma?

It's up to whatever the individual atheists decide they want it to be.

Agreed. There is no 'universal' atheist dogma. But for some, their atheism is decidedly dogmatic.

I would say those some are by and far the absolute minority.

In the real world that's probably true. But of course the only ones that preach it online are by definition the dogmatic 'minority'.
 
[

Good point, you can't walk a mile without seeing an atheist burning a church down.





Study a little history, comrade.

History simply says that state sponsored religion (including NON religion) is dangerous no matter what.

This has nothing to do with atheism.

Should we take a look at history and see what was done in the name of religion?

That's a ball game I'm sure you'd rather steer clear of.
 

Forum List

Back
Top