Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah...dipshit........you have been confronted with the fact that they have a committment law in Tennessee......so you have nothing.
Boy you have a selective memory. The Russians in Afghanistan were killing everything that moved, were using chemical weapons on civilians and other terroristic actions. The alliance we supported were attacking Russian combat troops and vehicles, NOT civilians. They were partisans fighting a Guerrilla war against foreign troops invited in by a quisling government installed by the Russians.One Man's Terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
For instance, when Bin Laden and his buddies were killing dirty stinking commies who were trying to teach girls how to read in Afghanistan, Ronnie Ray-Gun called them "Freedom Fighters" and compared them to the founding fathers.
View attachment 770949
Then they killed a bunch of Americans at the WTC and Pentagon, and they became terrorists.
Now, why is the Zionist Entity surrounded by terrorists/freedom fighters?
Because the Jewish Refuse of Europe settled there and took their land, that's why. Hello.
You guys freak the fuck out because Mexicans move here and take menial jobs you don't want to do. Imagine if they came in, seized a bunch of land with weapons and made you live in a gated slum like the Zionist do to the Palestinians.
Give me a break, muskets were cheap and rifles not much more. Every farmer had at least one firearm, usually a rifle, to defend himself against hostile Indians, criminals, animals and to put food on the table. Often they had a shotgun and a rifle.They'll show up for one week after a mass shooting, then they'll get bored and go back to their jobs and lives.
As far as the Ukraine, we are getting our money's worth. Putin is getting an atomic wedgie and it hasn't cost one American life.
It's not something that ever should have been a "right". Frankly, I don't feel any safer because we have millions of nuts out there with guns. We have to live in a world of active shooter drills, security doors, metal detectors, armed guards, kids going to school with metal backpacks, and militarized, trigger-happy cops because some idiots felt that a badly worded militia amendment mean an unfettered right to a gun. That's just crazy.
The 18th century, a well-regulated militia made sense, because guns were expensive and only men of means could get them.
Today we have professional armies and police forces. We don't need a bunch of twits to show up with guns when there's an emergency. And when mentally deranged people like Holmes or Lanza or Hale can get a bunch of guns, it makes us less secure, not more.
Other than gang assassinations there haven’t been 600 mass shootings in the last two decades put together. I really don’t care if criminals massacre each others as long as they leave innocent civilians out of the crossfire. To be a little tongue-in-cheek, I wouldn’t mind if there was a sort of criminal Hunger Games; dump a few hundred murderous criminals in a sealed area and give the survivor a pardon for past crimes. To be totally frank, I don’t care what happens to convicted criminals.One mass shooting stopped, 600 that weren't.
That’s the owner’s privilege, it’s also his privilege to be sued by the survivors of a shooting for not providing security and preventing patrons from protecting themselves. And around here in Arizona, I see very few establishments including bars, with signs prohibiting guns. Even Carl’s Jr and In-N-Out don’t prohibit guns,It's in all the news reports.
Except no bar owners wants people coming in with guns.... for some reason.
NICS is ineffective because liberals and the ACLU do everything they can to prevent dangerous, mentally ill people from getting put on it.You mean the NICS that is deliberately weak because the National Rampage Association made sure it was underfunded.
You see, this is why I think the gun industry should manage the background check system. They can sell to whoever they see fit.
And the people who die or are injured can have lawsuits filed on their behalf for their negligence when they sell to the wrong person.
Why should the gun industry pay for anything? It provides a heavily regulated product. Should the auto industry pay to prevent drunk drivers from using its product to injure and kill people? Firearms are far more heavily regulated than automobiles.A commitment is actually hard to get if the person fights it, and such a commitment would have serious implications for her future employment abilities.
Again, why should families be policing whether or not unstable people have guns? The gun industry should be doing that.
Or they should pay the survivors of their fuckups.
Adam Lanza didn’t own any guns. He murdered his mother to get access to her well secured guns.Yes, that would be nice. If you are telling me you can't accept any standards, then we don't have much of a choice.
Or you could do the sensible thing and say, "Hey, maybe Adam Lanza doesn't need enough guns to fight off the Zombie Apocalypse!"
I guess... but it was never the plan to start with.
a shotgun, even a double barreled one would have resulted in a higher body count. A couple of simple Molotov cocktails would have resulted in a higher body count AND a more horrific crime,The AR just made it easier to up the body count for the beginner. The MP she had would have had a lower body count with the same number of hits and the handgun would have had even a lower body count. Again, WE ARE NOT GOING TO STOP THIS BUT WE CAN LOWER THE BODY COUNT. Now what part of that are you having trouble with.
One mass shooting stopped, 600 that weren't.
Boy you have a selective memory. The Russians in Afghanistan were killing everything that moved, were using chemical weapons on civilians and other terroristic actions. The alliance we supported were attacking Russian combat troops and vehicles, NOT civilians. They were partisans fighting a Guerrilla war against foreign troops invited in by a quisling government installed by the Russians.
No, they really didn't. A firearm in that period cost as much as a months wages of a skilled craftsman. Farmers of that time period relied on farming or trapping to put food on the table, not guns.Give me a break, muskets were cheap and rifles not much more. Every farmer had at least one firearm, usually a rifle, to defend himself against hostile Indians, criminals, animals and to put food on the table. Often they had a shotgun and a rifle.
Other than gang assassinations there haven’t been 600 mass shootings in the last two decades put together. I really don’t care if criminals massacre each others as long as they leave innocent civilians out of the crossfire. To be a little tongue-in-cheek, I wouldn’t mind if there was a sort of criminal Hunger Games; dump a few hundred murderous criminals in a sealed area and give the survivor a pardon for past crimes. To be totally frank, I don’t care what happens to convicted criminals.
In IL, I see them on every restaurant and bar.That’s the owner’s privilege, it’s also his privilege to be sued by the survivors of a shooting for not providing security and preventing patrons from protecting themselves. And around here in Arizona, I see very few establishments including bars, with signs prohibiting guns. Even Carl’s Jr and In-N-Out don’t prohibit guns,
NICS is ineffective because liberals and the ACLU do everything they can to prevent dangerous, mentally ill people from getting put on it.
Why should the gun industry pay for anything? It provides a heavily regulated product. Should the auto industry pay to prevent drunk drivers from using its product to injure and kill people? Firearms are far more heavily regulated than automobiles.
Adam Lanza didn’t own any guns. He murdered his mother to get access to her well secured guns.
Was the gun he used black? In a lefty-loonie's mind ... an assault weapon is anything that is black. I propose that gun manufacturers make AR-15s yellow. That would make everyone happy. True American patriots get to keep their guns and lefty-loonies won't whine about bogyman "assault" rifles anymore.So it wasn't an AR-15 type, just a carbine using pistol rounds.
Surveillance photographs and video footage shows the 28-year-old transgender suspect who attacked the Nashville Christian school was using a carbine which fires pistol rounds, not an AR-15.The 28-year-old was armed with three firearms, and police photos of the guns show that an AR-15 was not one them.The firearms were an AR-pistol, a handgun, and a carbine. The type of carbine possessed by the attacker uses 9mm or .40 caliber handgun rounds.From surveillance video, it appears the attacker may have used the AR-pistol to shoot and shatter the glass on the front door. But in photos and videos that show her walking the halls, looking for potential targets, she is holding the carbine.She can be seen holding the carbine in the following video as she approaches the school office:NPR reported that the attacker used a handgun and “two AR-style guns,” but she did not. She had a carbine — which is not an “AR-style” gun — an AR-pistol, and a handgun....
Footage Shows Nashville Shooter Holding Carbine, Not AR-15
Surveillance photographs and video footage shows the 28-year-old transgender suspect was using a carbine which fires pistol rounds, not an AR-15.www.breitbart.com
Was the gun he used black? In a lefty-loonie's mind ... an assault weapon is anything that is black. I propose that gun manufacturers make AR-15s yellow. That would make everyone happy. True American patriots get to keep their guns and lefty-loonies won't whine about bogyman "assault" rifles anymore.
Mine happens to be black and desert tan. It's only been "destructive" when I pulled the trigger and hit the milk jug. It's 100% benign when it's in its case in the corner of my room.Would you please stop this nonsense. I know a pink ARs. You used to be able to order them directly from Colt. Is a Pink ar less destructive than a black one? Nope, both are extremely destructive. Your color method died long ago but you gunnutters keep filling the air waves with it.
No, six people are dead because someone with mental issues was able to buy seven guns.
What you are telling me is that we can't prevent lunatics from getting guns without depriving the regular gun fanatic from his fetish.
To which I say, "not my problem".
The problem is, what is the legal definition of "lunatic?" And can someone, upon being labeled a "lunatic" still buy a gun? If not, how can you deprive them of their rights without due process?
My opinion... forever, if that what it takes.
Every last fucking time we have a mass shooter, we find out within days that the person was severely mentally disturbed. Lanza, Holmes, this chick who wanted a dick.
So here's a crazy idea. Instead of detailing their crazy after they've left a pile of bodies, how about actually vetting them BEFORE they get a gun?
Then you have a stronger background check.They did..........and they passed the federal background check.
Then you have a stronger background check.
Just like you do with anything else that fails... you get a better version.
Unless you are a wingnut... where you just figure that a few dead kids don't matter as long as you get to "compensate".
He's a wingnut so why try with him.
