Moonglow
Diamond Member
No, he said he refused to sell them a wedding cake but offered to sell them other types of cakes...Plus there is already a thread on the subject.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As long as PA laws are gone for ALL instances. All instances.I hope so. People have a right to be bigots if they wish.
PA laws are fascist bullshit.
Supreme Court rules narrowly for Colorado baker who wouldn't make same-sex wedding cake
The lyin' media calls a 7-2 decision "narrow"...
Here's your cake!
As long as PA laws are gone for ALL instances. All instances.I hope so. People have a right to be bigots if they wish.
PA laws are fascist bullshit.
But, can they have it and eat it, too?Interesting. I think this is a good decision because few bakeries will turn down business for this reason. Gays don't need that protection as they are not at risk of not being able to have their cake.
Every damn one of them.As long as PA laws are gone for ALL instances. All instances.I hope so. People have a right to be bigots if they wish.
PA laws are fascist bullshit.
Not much to the link. This has just happened.
5 or 6 year old case where Baker refused, on religious grounds and beliefs
that he wouldn't bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. SCOTUS
overruled all the other courts in this case.
Notice one thing about the link, which is from CNN. Their wording. "A narrow
decision." lol. In SCOTUS rulings 7-2 isn't narrow, it's a fucking rout.
Supreme Court rules for Colorado baker in same-sex wedding cake case - CNNPolitics
Not much to the link. This has just happened.
5 or 6 year old case where Baker refused, on religious grounds and beliefs
that he wouldn't bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. SCOTUS
overruled all the other courts in this case.
Notice one thing about the link, which is from CNN. Their wording. "A narrow
decision." lol. In SCOTUS rulings 7-2 isn't narrow, it's a fucking rout.
Supreme Court rules for Colorado baker in same-sex wedding cake case - CNNPolitics
To some, the governments abuse of power is a religion.Religion is just another tool of discrimination.
Not much to the link. This has just happened.
5 or 6 year old case where Baker refused, on religious grounds and beliefs
that he wouldn't bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. SCOTUS
overruled all the other courts in this case.
Notice one thing about the link, which is from CNN. Their wording. "A narrow
decision." lol. In SCOTUS rulings 7-2 isn't narrow, it's a fucking rout.
Supreme Court rules for Colorado baker in same-sex wedding cake case - CNNPoliticsNot much to the link. This has just happened.
5 or 6 year old case where Baker refused, on religious grounds and beliefs
that he wouldn't bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. SCOTUS
overruled all the other courts in this case.
Notice one thing about the link, which is from CNN. Their wording. "A narrow
decision." lol. In SCOTUS rulings 7-2 isn't narrow, it's a fucking rout.
Supreme Court rules for Colorado baker in same-sex wedding cake case - CNNPolitics
Basically it seems like they ruled in favor of the baker, but NOT in favor of all religious people who want to discriminate.
and the use of a religion to a human is like a drug..To some, the governments abuse of power is a religion.Religion is just another tool of discrimination.
AP is reporting that the SCOTUS has ruled in favor of the baker who would not bake a cake for a gay wedding. Links forthcoming.
This will have a massive effect.
A link to the decision:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-111_j4el.pdf
A quick scan of it makes me think this isn't a 100% win for the baker. Their case goes back to the commission that made the original ruling, but the SC directs the commission they have to take into account the baker's religious beliefs, something they did not think the commission originally did.
Yup. Those beliefs were discounted in the original case. Now the free exercise clause must be applied. It's quite a significant decision in the overall order of things.
The key is will the commission do the right thing, or double down on persecution.
Every damn one of them.As long as PA laws are gone for ALL instances. All instances.I hope so. People have a right to be bigots if they wish.
PA laws are fascist bullshit.
AP is reporting that the SCOTUS has ruled in favor of the baker who would not bake a cake for a gay wedding. Links forthcoming.
This will have a massive effect.
A link to the decision:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-111_j4el.pdf
A quick scan of it makes me think this isn't a 100% win for the baker. Their case goes back to the commission that made the original ruling, but the SC directs the commission they have to take into account the baker's religious beliefs, something they did not think the commission originally did.
Yup. Those beliefs were discounted in the original case. Now the free exercise clause must be applied. It's quite a significant decision in the overall order of things.
The key is will the commission do the right thing, or double down on persecution.
If so, the legal path will be repeated.
What they said is the religious beliefs of the people in question cannot be ignored, and have to be taken into account when deciding cases like this.
The 7-2 ruling returns the case to the commission directing them to review and take into consideration the religious views of the baker.
The commission, apparently, did not take those views into consideration in the original ruling.
The original law probably did not require such consideration, but considering the 1st Amendment's protection of religious belief, the commission should have at least mentioned why they were giving the PA requirements preference.