Supreme Ct Says All Individuals Have Right To Bear Arms

[Bulletbob]

Many Americans are not allowed to bear arms

Unconstitutionally- makes you happy, correct?

Felons should not be allowed to own a gun there's a reason for that you know.

 

[Gdjjr]

he court's job is to interpret the law and they do it all the time.

Can you show me that in the rules? The courts job is to apply law- to interpret requires rewriting- making a fine a tax, etc-

 

[Gdjjr]

Felons should not be allowed to own a gun there's a reason for that you know.

According to your opinion- does shall not be infringed mean anything to you? Can you show in the words of the 2nd amendment the caveat of "except felons"? There's a thing called a dictionary, for a "reason".
Reason is a sound explanation- to try to justify is trying to excuse-

 

[Uncensored2008]

How about the right to arm bears?
And the point of going over already ruled upon law?
You afraid somebody's coming for your guns.....again?

Xi's man has vowed to disarm the peasants as the Chinese Communist Party explains here;

Biden's gun control plan would impose strict regulations on owners of assault-style rifles - CNN Politics

Joe Biden is proposing to force owners of assault-style rifles to either sell their firearms through a voluntary buyback program or register them with the federal government under the same law that was first used to strictly control sales of machine guns in the wake of the gangland shootings of...

www.cnn.com

But it's interesting to note that as Quid Pro wants to leave the proles defenseless;

American gun sales soar to staggering record high in 2020

Pass the ammo. While 2020 has been a bummer year for millions of Americans, one significant winner has been firearms. Still about 60 days until year’s end, U.S. gun sales have hit an all-time…

www.nydailynews.com

So the Maoist thugs who are behind corrupt old Bai-Degn are facing down more Americans than ever.

Quid Pro still plans to have the Furry as his czar of disarming the populace if he gets the steal, right?

Joe Biden promises to put Beto O’Rourke in charge of gun control

Moments after former Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke — who promised in a September debate to take away legally purchased assault rifles if elected — endorsed Joe Biden’s…

nypost.com

Hey, a man who dresses up like a squirrel to get buttfucked is eminently qualified to tell Americans to disarm.

 

[Uncensored2008]

District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

It's an interpretation of the Second Amendment

Leftists hate The Bill of Rights



A flawed document.



View attachment 416169

The thing the stupid leftists don't understand is that the average response time when you call the police is more than 25 minutes. The bad guy will be gone by then.

Leftists side with the bad guys - every time.

 

[Uncensored2008]

District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

It's an interpretation of the Second Amendment

Old news

Xi's man promises to end the 2nd and piss all over precedent like Heller.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

It's an interpretation of the Second Amendment

Old news

Xi's man promises to end the 2nd and piss all over precedent like Heller.

That's a lie..but you know that...LOL!

 

[Uncensored2008]

No. The 2nd amendment says the people have a right to be armed. Back in the 18th century, when the amendment was written,the only guns available were single shot muzzleloaders. The founders had no way of knowing about automatic weapons and tanks.

By the same token, the only speech protected is that written with a quill on parchment by candle light.

Stupid argument is stupid.

 

[Uncensored2008]

That's a lie..but you know that...LOL!

Well someone is lying - but it's the one who always lies - you...

Joe Biden Promise: Gun Bans, Restrictions :: Guns.com

Democratic 2020 Presidential candidate Joe Biden has a brutal gun control platform that promises to rewrite the country's firearm laws, gravely wound the world's most vibrant shooting sports industry, and cancel modern gun culture.

www.guns.com

 

[Gdjjr]

It states the law

It states what the gov't can and can't do, legally- the BoR are lines the gov't is not supposed to cross- there is one caveat, in the 4th amendment- "just cause", which is, ambiguous and has been used (especially since 9/11) nefariously to *assume* an authority on the pretext of National Security- and nary a "gov't official" complains-

Fed gov't actions restricting liberty is illegal, by definition, but, since ambiguity is what lawyers live by and thrive on, it is what we have- mostly an esoteric interpretation of whatever fits/suits an agenda to "lead" dummies into misinformation being accurate- it seems, Public Education (which is also illegal and nefarious) has convinced millions that words mean what an authority deems them to mean at a time convenient to suit/fit an agenda-

Esoteric interpretaion fails to recognize that without definition interpretation doesn't exist- yet, authoritative "lawyers" and gov't "officials" ignore the facts because it doesn't suit/fit their agenda of absolute authority-

 

[Gdjjr]

By the same token, the only speech protected is that written with a quill on parchment by candle light.

Oh bullshit

Stupid argument is stupid.

 

[Gdjjr]

Well someone is lying - but it's the one who always lies - you...

Biden CAN'T rewrite the laws, moron- not legally, idiot.

 

[Uncensored2008]

It states the law

It states what the gov't can and can't do, legally- the BoR are lines the gov't is not supposed to cross- there is one caveat, in the 4th amendment- "just cause", which is, ambiguous and has been used (especially since 9/11) nefariously to *assume* an authority on the pretext of National Security- and nary a "gov't official" complains-

Fed gov't actions restricting liberty is illegal, by definition, but, since ambiguity is what lawyers live by and thrive on, it is what we have- mostly an esoteric interpretation of whatever fits/suits an agenda to "lead" dummies into misinformation being accurate- it seems, Public Education (which is also illegal and nefarious) has convinced millions that words mean what an authority deems them to mean at a time convenient to suit/fit an agenda-

Esoteric interpretaion fails to recognize that without definition interpretation doesn't exist- yet, authoritative "lawyers" and gov't "officials" ignore the facts because it doesn't suit/fit their agenda of absolute authority-

I think Xi's man is arguing that the desire of the Communist party to impose tyranny is just cause to crush all civil rights.

 

[Uncensored2008]

By the same token, the only speech protected is that written with a quill on parchment by candle light.

Oh bullshit

Stupid argument is stupid.

So you believe the 2nd only covers flintlocks and muskets?

Are you sure you read carefully?

 

[hadit]

District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

It's an interpretation of the Second Amendment

The second amendment is one single two part sentence written in clear, concise and certain language so needs no interpretation. It states the law and also explains why it exists. It along with the supremacy clause renders all gun laws at any level within these United States un constitutional, un enforceable and illegal. There's a beginning and end to it. It's just that simple.

No. The 2nd amendment says the people have a right to be armed. Back in the 18th century, when the amendment was written,the only guns available were single shot muzzleloaders. The founders had no way of knowing about automatic weapons and tanks.

Of course, they had no way of knowing about the internet and debate boards where people could write things. The 1st amendment still applies, just like the 2nd.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Well someone is lying - but it's the one who always lies - you...

Biden CAN'T rewrite the laws, moron- not legally, idiot.

Just like Potentate Obamugabe couldn't legally rewrite immigration law.

democrats are not constrained by laws or the Constitution.

 

[Gdjjr]

I think Xi's man is arguing that the desire of the Communist party to impose tyranny is just cause to crush all civil rights.

Whoever can argue til the cows get home- it's campaign rhetoric to keep dummy citizens divided-

 

[Uncensored2008]

District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

It's an interpretation of the Second Amendment

The second amendment is one single two part sentence written in clear, concise and certain language so needs no interpretation. It states the law and also explains why it exists. It along with the supremacy clause renders all gun laws at any level within these United States un constitutional, un enforceable and illegal. There's a beginning and end to it. It's just that simple.

No. The 2nd amendment says the people have a right to be armed. Back in the 18th century, when the amendment was written,the only guns available were single shot muzzleloaders. The founders had no way of knowing about automatic weapons and tanks.

Of course, they had no way of knowing about the internet and debate boards where people could write things. The 1st amendment still applies, just like the 2nd.

Viktor offers a stupid argument for leftist hate sites.

The founding fathers did not expect progress to be frozen.

 

[Gdjjr]

democrats are not constrained by laws or the Constitution.

FYI, Republican subscribe to the same borrow to spend policy, the same UNjust wars, (foreign and domestic) and worldwide hegemony- those 3 items direct ALL domestic policy, which, I don't believe the constitution says is an authority- but, hey, what do I know? Oh, simple English comprehension- my bad- I have no esoteric background to present as a credential making me an '*authority*-

 

[Gdjjr]

The founding fathers did not expect progress to be frozen.

What do you mean frozen? Of course they didn't- they offered a way to "progress" legally- force was not it, thus a 2nd amendment-