Yurt
Gold Member
Sangha, Yurt's argumentation (reflective of several reactionaries and a few leftists here) depends on the force of immoral stubbornness. He can't provide an argument for burden of proof, so he keeps asking a question, demanding others refute his "evidence". He never has posted evidence other than he says he disagrees with SCOTUS, so who cares? Point out his failure enough times, he will start crying and saying others are ad homing him, then he will start neg repping. He has done this before simply because he is incapable of arguing. This is nothing new for Yurt.
I agree. I have asked Yurt for evidence that any part of the legislative process has a legal garauntee of privacy.
So far, I've gotten zippo from Yurt.
It's typical of conservatives. They have no principles and no moral center. The only concept they consistently adhere to is short-term self-interest, which is why they will say anything to avoid admitting they are wrong.
its cute how you're claiming the vote is not part of the legislative process here....apparently the signatures required to get something on the ballot for a vote is purely legislative, YET, the actual end result, the voting is not
illogical