Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,899
- 1,530
Really and how would one who is brain dead know how to write those words?[CITATION NEEDED]
You seem braindead to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Really and how would one who is brain dead know how to write those words?[CITATION NEEDED]
You seem braindead to me.
Not the same thing.
I am a living autonomous sentient being a 3 week old fetus is not those things
A fetus isn't a toddler.
That is quite an unhinged rant, Bubba. Get a grip. I did go beck to 800 and that is all I'm going to do. Nowhere did you say thatyou support legal same sex marriage. The closest that you came is to say that gays should have equal rights but you never explained what that would look like. Then you say right here that you don't care "if the Fereral Government recognises it" That still don't cut it. It is not enough to not care what people do. If you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem. And, your OP is clearly supportive of Thomas'n remarks. That is what I know about you and it is quite enough. So much for not caringStart with post 800 then go back further, THEN use the USMB search app to search for the DOZENS of times I have posted it in numerous threads...
...or don't and just keep falsely accusing me of opposing it.
At this point I don't give a damn what you think, what you feel, or what you believe.
Let me make this simple for you since you are obviously an idiot:
I don't care what you do with your same-sex partner in your own bedroom, don't care who you choose to spend your life with, don't care if the federal govt recognizes it the same as a heterosexual marriage. I believe everyone should be treated equally.
You and your same-sex partner getting married is none of my business, and you don't need my permission - or blessing, for that matter - to do it. The same thing goes for heterosexual marriages.
If you and your same-sex partner decide to head to the court house to get married you won't find me blocking the door with a protest sign. Go for it - Congrats, and have a long happy life together.
I've repeatedly posted this several dozen times over the last few years in numerous threads, and your continued harassment, false accusations, and questioning shows you still don't know me, still don't know what I believe or think, so STOP trying to speak FOR me, tell me and others what I think / feel / believe.
If that isn't clear enough for you, piss off.
Thomas is a corrupt partisn hack who does the bidding of all of the right wing special interest groups that his wife is in bed withSo Thomas wants to do his fucking job and respects the Constitution.
Shame we didn’t have 8 more like him.
F* off, troll.That is quite an unhinged rant, Bubba. Get a grip. I did go beck to 800 and that is all I'm going to do. Nowhere did you say thatyou support legal same sex marriage. The closest that you came is to say that gays should have equal rights but you never explained what that would look like. Then you say right here that you don't care "if the Fereral Government recognises it" That still don't cut it. It is not enough to not care what people do. If you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem. And, your OP is clearly supportive of Thomas'n remarks. That is what I know about you and it is quite enough. So much for not caring
Haveing said that, let me point out that you do not know me as evidensed by all of that crap about "my same sex partner." I know a hell of a lot nore about you than you know about me. To assume that you know something about my sexuality based on my politics and advocacy is as stupid as stupid gets
Are we getting a wee bit defensive? What exactly am I lying about? I am not stalking you . You started this and I am calling you out on yur hipocrissy . You claim to suport equality but then not really.F* off, troll.
You have been proven to be a pathetic liar. Go stalk someone else.
All states must reccognize opposite sex marriage is found no where in the US Constitution Marrige of any sort is found no where in the US Constitutiom.
HOWEVER, since the begining, marriage for heterosexuals has been treated as a rigth while it was denied to homoexuals. That is discriniation and a denial of equal protetion under the law.
Your religious beliefs have nothing to do with what other believe or how they live. Live your life and let others live theirs and you won't be branded bigot
I can only imaging the howling –much coming from conservatives who are married and enjoying all of the perks that go with it- if a state decided not to recognize heterosexual marriage
There is a hell of a lot of damaging news about Thomas for it all to be fake https://www.usmessageboard.com/members/carsomyrplussix.87475/Thomas is a corrupt partisn hack who does the bidding of all of the right wing special interest groups that his wife is in bed with
The only relevant difference between a fetus, a toddler, and you, is how much support is needed from others in order to survive.
But it is an autonomous sentient beingAnd a toddler is not an adult.
But it is an autonomous sentient beingAnd a toddler is not an adult.A fetus isn't a toddler.
Put him out on the street, to fend for himself, and see how “autonomous” he really is.
1. Same sex marriage is a matter of religious freedom. So relying on govt to establish your religious beliefs violates the first amendment. People should be able to practice religious rituals without govt having to force this policy in everyone.How does same sex marriage impact your life or your religious faith?
1. Same sex marriage is a matter of religious freedom. So relying on govt to establish your religious beliefs violates the first amendment. People should be able to practice religious rituals without govt having to force this policy in everyone.
2. There is nothing wrong with people getting married by their beliefs and practices. This is like the differences in beliefs about Baptisms, communion, funeral services etc. Likewise anyone can go pursue and perform a same sex wedding or marriage if that is their belief. That's a private personal choice and freedom, but not an area that govt is supposed to regulate or establish.
3. The problem is tying govt benefits to marriage. Which is why so many Conservatives Libertarians and Constitutionalists argue that neither marriage nor benefits should be regulated through govt in the first place . Those are subjective and people will want their own choice of beliefs and interests represented.
What govt can regulate are the neutral and objective "civil unions" "domestic partnership" "estate or custody agreements" guardianship and other legal and financial agreements.
And if benefits are managed relatively by party or banks or other institutions where citizens have a choice in what terms of benefits they want to fund and follow, then we wouldn't have to argue or compete to impose one set of conditions for everyone.
It is still the govt endorsing or establishing a policy that people do not all believe inSame sex marriage doesn't cost you anything. They pay taxes too.
Same sex marriage, like marriage in general, is a civil right. People are free to bring religion into it if they so choose. They are also free to allow religion to define marriage... for themselves, and ONLY for themselves.1. Same sex marriage is a matter of religious freedom. So relying on govt to establish your religious beliefs violates the first amendment. People should be able to practice religious rituals without govt having to force this policy in everyone.
Yes people can perform a same sex wedding or marriage if that is their belief. But without government they do not enjoy the financial benefits and legal protections and rights of marriage. You seem to be confused. Government regulation of legal marriage does not kean that government is regulating the religious aspects of marriage.2. There is nothing wrong with people getting married by their beliefs and practices. This is like the differences in beliefs about Baptisms, communion, funeral services etc. Likewise anyone can go pursue and perform a same sex wedding or marriage if that is their belief. That's a private personal choice and freedom, but not an area that govt is supposed to regulate or establish.
3. The problem is tying govt benefits to marriage. Which is why so many Conservatives Libertarians and Constitutionalists argue that neither marriage nor benefits should be regulated through govt in the first place . Those are subjective and people will want their own choice of beliefs and interests represented.ying govt benefits to marriage
"civil unions" "domestic partnership" ?? Separate but "equal" Didn't work during Jim Crow and it doesn't work nowWhat govt can regulate are the neutral and objective "civil unions" "domestic partnership" "estate or custody agreements" guardianship and other legal and financial agreements.