Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
did Gorsuch and Kavanaugh vote in favor of Trump? i bet they did!
Sotomayor and Ginsburg!did Gorsuch and Kavanaugh vote in favor of Trump? i bet they did!
Two dissenters. You can guess who they were.
One "wise Latina" and one buzzard-bait.
Sotomayor and Ginsburg!did Gorsuch and Kavanaugh vote in favor of Trump? i bet they did!
Two dissenters. You can guess who they were.
One "wise Latina" and one buzzard-bait.
I agree, if by "crimes and humanity and hung" you mean "causing liberal butthurt and given a medal".This just breaking:
"The Supreme Court is allowing nationwide enforcement of a new Trump administration rule that prevents most Central American immigrants from seeking asylum in the United States.
The justices’ order late Wednesday temporarily undoes a lower-court ruling that had blocked the new asylum policy in some states along the southern border. The policy is meant to deny asylum to anyone who passes through another country on the way to the U.S. without seeking protection there.
Most people crossing the southern border are Central Americans fleeing violence and poverty. They are largely ineligible under the new rule.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the high court’s order. Sotomayor says the rule upends “longstanding practices regarding refugees who seek shelter from persecution.”
Supreme Court allows broad enforcement of asylum limits
Sotomayor is correct,. John Roberts rips off his mask and shows he is Trump's stoolie. When Democrats take care of Trump they need to take care of Roberts and his minions. They should be tried for crimes against humanity and hung.
Well..not quite...the court allowed enforcement until they rule--but it seems pretty clear that the faucet is shutting off.This just breaking:
"The Supreme Court is allowing nationwide enforcement of a new Trump administration rule that prevents most Central American immigrants from seeking asylum in the United States.
The justices’ order late Wednesday temporarily undoes a lower-court ruling that had blocked the new asylum policy in some states along the southern border. The policy is meant to deny asylum to anyone who passes through another country on the way to the U.S. without seeking protection there.
Most people crossing the southern border are Central Americans fleeing violence and poverty. They are largely ineligible under the new rule.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the high court’s order. Sotomayor says the rule upends “longstanding practices regarding refugees who seek shelter from persecution.”
Supreme Court allows broad enforcement of asylum limits
Its not the ruling, the USSC just allowed the new asylum policy while they hear the case.
Only two Justices dissented, Ginsburg and Sotomayor. What are the odds of Trump's policy being reversed when they hear it next time?
Pretty slim, I think. Especially with Ginsberg just hanging on like she is.
Ginsburg's body double, you mean
BUT IMMIGRANTS VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRATS AMERICANS WONT VOTE FORWell..not quite...the court allowed enforcement until they rule--but it seems pretty clear that the faucet is shutting off.This just breaking:
"The Supreme Court is allowing nationwide enforcement of a new Trump administration rule that prevents most Central American immigrants from seeking asylum in the United States.
The justices’ order late Wednesday temporarily undoes a lower-court ruling that had blocked the new asylum policy in some states along the southern border. The policy is meant to deny asylum to anyone who passes through another country on the way to the U.S. without seeking protection there.
Most people crossing the southern border are Central Americans fleeing violence and poverty. They are largely ineligible under the new rule.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the high court’s order. Sotomayor says the rule upends “longstanding practices regarding refugees who seek shelter from persecution.”
Supreme Court allows broad enforcement of asylum limits
This just breaking:
"The Supreme Court is allowing nationwide enforcement of a new Trump administration rule that prevents most Central American immigrants from seeking asylum in the United States.
The justices’ order late Wednesday temporarily undoes a lower-court ruling that had blocked the new asylum policy in some states along the southern border. The policy is meant to deny asylum to anyone who passes through another country on the way to the U.S. without seeking protection there.
Most people crossing the southern border are Central Americans fleeing violence and poverty. They are largely ineligible under the new rule.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the high court’s order. Sotomayor says the rule upends “longstanding practices regarding refugees who seek shelter from persecution.”
Supreme Court allows broad enforcement of asylum limits
Wow, the supremes just upheld a 9th circus ruling, that's kind of unique. LOL
.
The 9th is slowly being assimilated. If I'm correct, President Trump recently appointed a conservative to that court.
Yeah, but they're still about 2 to 1 commie.
.
You do know the 9th has never been the most overturned, that is just a myth started by talk radio.
This just breaking:
"The Supreme Court is allowing nationwide enforcement of a new Trump administration rule that prevents most Central American immigrants from seeking asylum in the United States.
The justices’ order late Wednesday temporarily undoes a lower-court ruling that had blocked the new asylum policy in some states along the southern border. The policy is meant to deny asylum to anyone who passes through another country on the way to the U.S. without seeking protection there.
Most people crossing the southern border are Central Americans fleeing violence and poverty. They are largely ineligible under the new rule.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the high court’s order. Sotomayor says the rule upends “longstanding practices regarding refugees who seek shelter from persecution.”
Supreme Court allows broad enforcement of asylum limits
Wow, the supremes just upheld a 9th circus ruling, that's kind of unique. LOL
.
The 9th is slowly being assimilated. If I'm correct, President Trump recently appointed a conservative to that court.
Yeah, but they're still about 2 to 1 commie.
.
You do know the 9th has never been the most overturned, that is just a myth started by talk radio.
.
Wow, the supremes just upheld a 9th circus ruling, that's kind of unique. LOL
.
The 9th is slowly being assimilated. If I'm correct, President Trump recently appointed a conservative to that court.
Yeah, but they're still about 2 to 1 commie.
.
You do know the 9th has never been the most overturned, that is just a myth started by talk radio.
.
Politifact fact-check: the Ninth Circuit is, in fact, the most reversed federal court of appeals — Excess of Democracy
The 9th is slowly being assimilated. If I'm correct, President Trump recently appointed a conservative to that court.
Yeah, but they're still about 2 to 1 commie.
.
You do know the 9th has never been the most overturned, that is just a myth started by talk radio.
.
Politifact fact-check: the Ninth Circuit is, in fact, the most reversed federal court of appeals — Excess of Democracy
Wow, an 80% reversal rate, now that's something to brag about. So the supremes upholding one of their rulings is unique. And according to the graph in your link, they were the most overturned at one time, so I have to rate your comment with 4 Pinocchios.
.
Politifact. Holy shit you have a VOX article to follow that up?Wow, the supremes just upheld a 9th circus ruling, that's kind of unique. LOL
.
The 9th is slowly being assimilated. If I'm correct, President Trump recently appointed a conservative to that court.
Yeah, but they're still about 2 to 1 commie.
.
You do know the 9th has never been the most overturned, that is just a myth started by talk radio.
.
Politifact fact-check: the Ninth Circuit is, in fact, the most reversed federal court of appeals — Excess of Democracy
Politifact. Holy shit you have a VOX article to follow that up?The 9th is slowly being assimilated. If I'm correct, President Trump recently appointed a conservative to that court.
Yeah, but they're still about 2 to 1 commie.
.
You do know the 9th has never been the most overturned, that is just a myth started by talk radio.
.
Politifact fact-check: the Ninth Circuit is, in fact, the most reversed federal court of appeals — Excess of Democracy
Yeah, but they're still about 2 to 1 commie.
.
You do know the 9th has never been the most overturned, that is just a myth started by talk radio.
.
Politifact fact-check: the Ninth Circuit is, in fact, the most reversed federal court of appeals — Excess of Democracy
Wow, an 80% reversal rate, now that's something to brag about. So the supremes upholding one of their rulings is unique. And according to the graph in your link, they were the most overturned at one time, so I have to rate your comment with 4 Pinocchios.
.
From my link....We also found that the 9th Circuit never had the highest reversal rate in any individual term between 2004-15. (That’s the farthest back we could go.)
This just breaking:
"The Supreme Court is allowing nationwide enforcement of a new Trump administration rule that prevents most Central American immigrants from seeking asylum in the United States.
The justices’ order late Wednesday temporarily undoes a lower-court ruling that had blocked the new asylum policy in some states along the southern border. The policy is meant to deny asylum to anyone who passes through another country on the way to the U.S. without seeking protection there.
Most people crossing the southern border are Central Americans fleeing violence and poverty. They are largely ineligible under the new rule.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the high court’s order. Sotomayor says the rule upends “longstanding practices regarding refugees who seek shelter from persecution.”
Supreme Court allows broad enforcement of asylum limits
Sotomayor is correct,. John Roberts rips off his mask and shows he is Trump's stoolie. When Democrats take care of Trump they need to take care of Roberts and his minions. They should be tried for crimes against humanity and hung.
