M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
The invasion of Iraq -wasn't- a response to 9-11.Now tell me, was invading Iraq the proper response to 9-11? No it wasn't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The invasion of Iraq -wasn't- a response to 9-11.Now tell me, was invading Iraq the proper response to 9-11? No it wasn't.
Irrelevant.How many times have you or your family been in actual danger?No ban. I have arms myself,to protect myself,and family. I will NOT allow that to be taken away.
And, of course, if there is no real threat of harm from criminala, then there's no way to justify limitations on the right to arms.
Beats me - the link in the OP doesmt go to the relevant story, and treaties have no domestic effect until Congress passes legislation to enforce it.What does international small arms TRADE have to do with the 2nd Amendment?Irrelevant.How many times have you or your family been in actual danger?
And, of course, if there is no real threat of harm from criminala, then there's no way to justify limitations on the right to arms.
"The first man to raise a fist is the one who's run out of ideas"
HG Wells.
Did George Zimmerman need his gun to defend himself? Or did he put himself in a position where he had to use his gun to defend himself?
I have no problem with responsible gun ownership...having owned several. What I have a problem with is people who desire respect or admiration and see their firearm as a way to secure what they could not accomplish otherwise.
How brave is it to go into a shooting situation with a gun.
How brave is it to go into a shooting situation WITHOUT one?
Most serial shooters are stopped by UNARMED CIVILIANS.
Ok.... and?What I have a problem with is people who desire respect or admiration and see their firearm as a way to secure what they could not accomplish otherwise.
Understand that a large number of liberals have neither the means nor the mindset to do this for themselves, and so they are dependant on government for protection.Dont try distracting the conversation,libslimes. I only fear god,and it is my rught,and every law abiding citizens rights to protect life,family,and property from those who intend to do harm WITHOUT QUESTION.
Hey nutcases,that was a typo.UN treaty takes away our constitutionally given rights to defend ourselves.
Dont try distracting the conversation,libslimes. I only fear god,and it is my rught,and every law abiding citizens rights to protect life,family,and property from those who intend to do harm WITHOUT QUESTION.
No ban. I have arms myself,to protect myself,and family. I will NOT allow that to be taken away.
How many times have you or your family been in actual danger?
A good number of liberals disagree.As a federal prosecutor once told me, it is far, far better to be on trial for killing a hoodlem, then it is for him to be on trial for killing you.
A good number of liberals disagree.As a federal prosecutor once told me, it is far, far better to be on trial for killing a hoodlem, then it is for him to be on trial for killing you.
DRUDGE REPORT 2012®
News & Current Events, Breaking News, Analysis, Political Commentary
Hilary **** clinton is trying to sell our rights over the UN.
SMALL ARMS TREATY.
will make it more difficult for private,law abiding citizens to protect themselves under this right as listed in the constitution.
unfortunately,lotsa GOPs are pussies with gun rights.
takes 67 senate votes to sign the second amendment away.
SUPPORT RAND PAUL,and end the weakening of our nation now!!!
Much of what this e-mail claims is simply false. A "complete ban on all weapons for US citizens" isnt possible under our Constitution, according to the Supreme Court
Furthermore, if an arms trade treaty ever materializes, the administration wont be able to "bypass" Congress, as the e-mail maintains. All international treaties require the approval of two-thirds of the Senate before they are considered ratified and in effect.
In addition, the idea that a treaty necessarily would make U.S. citizens "subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments," as the e-mail claims, is wrong. Treaties dont subject one nations citizens to the laws of other nations.
FactCheck.org : International Gun Ban Treaty?
DRUDGE REPORT 2012®
News & Current Events, Breaking News, Analysis, Political Commentary
Hilary **** clinton is trying to sell our rights over the UN.
SMALL ARMS TREATY.
will make it more difficult for private,law abiding citizens to protect themselves under this right as listed in the constitution.
unfortunately,lotsa GOPs are pussies with gun rights.
takes 67 senate votes to sign the second amendment away.
SUPPORT RAND PAUL,and end the weakening of our nation now!!!
The ignorance of conservatives knows no bounds:
Much of what this e-mail claims is simply false. A "complete ban on all weapons for US citizens" isnt possible under our Constitution, according to the Supreme Court
Furthermore, if an arms trade treaty ever materializes, the administration wont be able to "bypass" Congress, as the e-mail maintains. All international treaties require the approval of two-thirds of the Senate before they are considered ratified and in effect.
In addition, the idea that a treaty necessarily would make U.S. citizens "subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments," as the e-mail claims, is wrong. Treaties dont subject one nations citizens to the laws of other nations.
FactCheck.org : International Gun Ban Treaty?