Suddenly dissent is no longer *patriotic*. Funny how things change...

Wasn't there JUST a thread on this the other day?

This some sort of campaign push by the right? Why another thread on this?
 
Hmmm, so should I take it that the right respects dissent as long as it does not irritate the wrong people or make a mess? Maybe it's tricorn hats that make acceptable dissenters? Or maybe it is the age demographic here. Maybe the young should just accept that they are not going to inherit the world until the boomers have sucked it dry?

Hell no, dissent away. I couldn't care less. But don't bitch when I dissent. Name me a conservative who wants to shut down MSNBC. Take your time.

dissent all you want but stay the fuck out of my way and don't impede my daily life or my business.
 
Hmmm, so should I take it that the right respects dissent as long as it does not irritate the wrong people or make a mess? Maybe it's tricorn hats that make acceptable dissenters? Or maybe it is the age demographic here. Maybe the young should just accept that they are not going to inherit the world until the boomers have sucked it dry?

Yeah all those businesses on Wall Street that were nearly shut down because the OW Sheep were blocking public thoroughfares were the wrong people to be irritated.

How about the millions in property damage? It's the rest of us with jobs that have to pay for that shit not the Obnoxious Whining Sheep

They never think that far ahead. Destruction of private property is a deplorable action...one that they are all very proud to be a part.
 
Hmmm, so should I take it that the right respects dissent as long as it does not irritate the wrong people or make a mess? Maybe it's tricorn hats that make acceptable dissenters? Or maybe it is the age demographic here. Maybe the young should just accept that they are not going to inherit the world until the boomers have sucked it dry?

Dissent is fine, just not on private property.
 
Hmmm, so should I take it that the right respects dissent as long as it does not irritate the wrong people or make a mess? Maybe it's tricorn hats that make acceptable dissenters? Or maybe it is the age demographic here. Maybe the young should just accept that they are not going to inherit the world until the boomers have sucked it dry?

Dissent is fine, just not on private property.

Dissent is fine no matter where it is practiced.
 
Hmmm, so should I take it that the right respects dissent as long as it does not irritate the wrong people or make a mess? Maybe it's tricorn hats that make acceptable dissenters? Or maybe it is the age demographic here. Maybe the young should just accept that they are not going to inherit the world until the boomers have sucked it dry?

Dissent is fine, just not on private property.

Dissent is fine no matter where it is practiced.

Wrong. Destruction of private property and trespassing are crimes.

Crime is never acceptable.
 
What is different is the left's response.

When the GOP is in power, you proclaim dissent is "patriotic".

When dems are in power, you proclaim it's criminal, and call out the goons.

Who's been arrested?


Oh, and BTW....Dissent is STILL patriotic.

Irrelevant, logical fallacy. As usual.

No, you're the one who made the claim about using the power of the state. There were no examples of that dumb assed article to support the headline. OTOH, there are clear cases where the Bush people did have people arrested on public property, because they didn't like the tshirts they were wearing. Geez, even Obama didn't have those teabaggers arrested who arrived armed near his rallies, with signs talking about shedding the blood of tyrants.
 
Oh, so you approve of criminal behavior in the name of *dissent*.

Exactly what crimes do you consider ok, if you agree with the criminals committing them?

Vandalism? Assault? Theft? Burglary? Arson?
 
Who's been arrested?


Oh, and BTW....Dissent is STILL patriotic.

Irrelevant, logical fallacy. As usual.

No, you're the one who made the claim about using the power of the state. There were no examples of that dumb assed article to support the headline. OTOH, there are clear cases where the Bush people did have people arrested on public property, because they didn't like the tshirts they were wearing. Geez, even Obama didn't have those teabaggers arrested who arrived armed near his rallies, with signs talking about shedding the blood of tyrants.

Logical fallacy.

Besides so batshit crazy as to be incoherent.
 
How is lying about a fellow citizen,calling them a slut, prostitute (and demand for video) patriotic?

I was not outraged at el-Rashi-Butt for the word slut. Or for calling the woman a prositute, or demanding she post videos of her having sex.

Nope, that is typically all that Rashi's dittoheads expect and it's what he does.
 
Oh, so you approve of criminal behavior in the name of *dissent*.

Exactly what crimes do you consider ok, if you agree with the criminals committing them?

Vandalism? Assault? Theft? Burglary? Arson?

Certainly trespassing is acceptable when it is that law most often used to shut down a demonstration or arrest picketers. Too many are using the tea party mid-term election rallies as an example of how a demonstration should look, apples and oranges.
 
How is lying about a fellow citizen,calling them a slut, prostitute (and demand for video) patriotic?

I was not outraged at el-Rashi-Butt for the word slut. Or for calling the woman a prositute, or demanding she post videos of her having sex.

Nope, that is typically all that Rashi's dittoheads expect and it's what he does.

It was relevant to her actions which were aimed at damaging our country, that's how.

Now perhaps YOU can tell US how calling a fellow citizen a "****" is patriotic? Or did you just forget to mention that it wasn't back when your hero, Maher, was doing it?
 
According to Katzdogz
The left will continue to use tactics of threats and intimidation
Bad

until the people start fighting back.

Good

When union thugs showed up at a private home to intimidate a terrified 14 year old boy,

Bad

had that boy been frightened enough to shoot a couple of them, it would have stopped.

Good

When Prop 8 won, gay activists shut down a restaurant until a waitress who donated to the campaign was fired.

Bad

Had the patrons in that restaurant got up and started bodily throwning activists through windows it would stop.

Good

When gay activists went into a church service to vandalize the place on a Sunday filled with cogregants, they just sat there and let it happen.

Because it's a lie....but we'll say "Bad"

If everyone in those pews got up and started knocking heads together, it would stop.

Good

The OWS protesters targeted children walking to school so parents provided escorts past the crowd of filthy vermin screaming at the kids.

Bad

The parents should have escorted with baseball bats and tire irons.

Good

Threats and intimidation works as long as it works.

Bad

When it is forcefully stopped it won't work anymore.

Good
 

Forum List

Back
Top