Study Marxism to Understand Hillary

Stephanie

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2004
70,230
10,864
2,040
If you haven't learned this about that party of Progressives (so called: Democratic) UNDER the thug Obama. you never will and it's hopeless

SNIP;


kincaid061615k.jpg
Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush’s speech that launched his presidential campaign on Monday noted that Hillary Clinton’s “progressive agenda” includes the admonition that traditional religious beliefs “have to be changed.”

Mrs. Clinton’s entire quote, in talking about opposition to her version of feminism and demands for abortion, was that “…deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.”

Bush also said of the Democrats, “They have offered a progressive agenda that includes everything but progress.”

But it’s never been the case that the progressive agenda offers real progress, as ordinary people understand the term.

Instead, the “progressives” offer what Professor Paul Kengor calls cultural Marxism.

This is the planned disintegration of the traditional family structure that has been the basis of Western civilization. Kengor, author of the new book, Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left Has Sabotaged Family and Marriage, told me in an interview that the progressives are guided by the belief that “new rights are coming all the time and that everything is in a state of evolution.”

He added, “There are no absolutes for them.” Hence, the gay rights movement has now morphed into rights for so-called transgenders, as we see in the relentless media propaganda that is designed to convince the public that men can, and perhaps should, become women.

Kengor says the next step is for “progress” or “evolution” to a new level that includes such concepts and arrangements as multiple wives, group marriages, sibling marriages, fathers and stepfathers marrying daughters and stepdaughters, and uncles marrying nieces.

ALL of it here:
Study Marxism to Understand Hillary
 
Did you take lessons from Crusader Frank?

I don't remember the left causing Pam and Jim Baker to get divorced....
 
If you haven't learned this about that party of Progressives (so called: Democratic) UNDER the thug Obama. you never will and it's hopeless

SNIP;


kincaid061615k.jpg
Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush’s speech that launched his presidential campaign on Monday noted that Hillary Clinton’s “progressive agenda” includes the admonition that traditional religious beliefs “have to be changed.”

Mrs. Clinton’s entire quote, in talking about opposition to her version of feminism and demands for abortion, was that “…deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.”

Bush also said of the Democrats, “They have offered a progressive agenda that includes everything but progress.”

But it’s never been the case that the progressive agenda offers real progress, as ordinary people understand the term.

Instead, the “progressives” offer what Professor Paul Kengor calls cultural Marxism.

This is the planned disintegration of the traditional family structure that has been the basis of Western civilization. Kengor, author of the new book, Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left Has Sabotaged Family and Marriage, told me in an interview that the progressives are guided by the belief that “new rights are coming all the time and that everything is in a state of evolution.”

He added, “There are no absolutes for them.” Hence, the gay rights movement has now morphed into rights for so-called transgenders, as we see in the relentless media propaganda that is designed to convince the public that men can, and perhaps should, become women.

Kengor says the next step is for “progress” or “evolution” to a new level that includes such concepts and arrangements as multiple wives, group marriages, sibling marriages, fathers and stepfathers marrying daughters and stepdaughters, and uncles marrying nieces.

ALL of it here:
Study Marxism to Understand Hillary


So tell us Stephanie , what works by Karl Marx have you personally read?
 
If you haven't learned this about that party of Progressives (so called: Democratic) UNDER the thug Obama. you never will and it's hopeless

SNIP;


kincaid061615k.jpg
Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush’s speech that launched his presidential campaign on Monday noted that Hillary Clinton’s “progressive agenda” includes the admonition that traditional religious beliefs “have to be changed.”

Mrs. Clinton’s entire quote, in talking about opposition to her version of feminism and demands for abortion, was that “…deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.”

Bush also said of the Democrats, “They have offered a progressive agenda that includes everything but progress.”

But it’s never been the case that the progressive agenda offers real progress, as ordinary people understand the term.

Instead, the “progressives” offer what Professor Paul Kengor calls cultural Marxism.

This is the planned disintegration of the traditional family structure that has been the basis of Western civilization. Kengor, author of the new book, Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left Has Sabotaged Family and Marriage, told me in an interview that the progressives are guided by the belief that “new rights are coming all the time and that everything is in a state of evolution.”

He added, “There are no absolutes for them.” Hence, the gay rights movement has now morphed into rights for so-called transgenders, as we see in the relentless media propaganda that is designed to convince the public that men can, and perhaps should, become women.

Kengor says the next step is for “progress” or “evolution” to a new level that includes such concepts and arrangements as multiple wives, group marriages, sibling marriages, fathers and stepfathers marrying daughters and stepdaughters, and uncles marrying nieces.

ALL of it here:
Study Marxism to Understand Hillary

Oh Stephanie, I really doubt you have ever studied Marxism.
 
Hillary Clinton is a One World Socialist.....Socialism/Marxism have government FORCE at the core...Hillary doesn't really care about women or 'the children' or gays or whatever emotional causes the left spews up.....they are all just pawns in the pursuit of centralized power...
 
KARL MARX LIVED IN FILTH AND NEGLECTED HIS CHILDREN
AND FOUR DIED


WHEN AN EDUCATED MAN CHOOSES TO LIVE IN POVERTY, AND RAISE HIS CHILDREN IN POVERTY, THAT IS ABUSE.

When Marx and his wife and children were living in London, a visitor wrote a description of their lifestyle in their 3-room flat.

Not only did the Marx children have to endure the hunger of poverty, they were raised in filth, or what his friend described as "a pig-sty".

There was not one good piece of furniture in the flat. There was a chair with a leg missing, a sofa "tattered and torn".

The table where Marx sat on his backside to read and write was covered with pages of his writings, with newspapers and books, his glasses, his inkstand and pen, and his pipe, as well as dirty and chipped tea cups, dirty spoons, and whatever else someone dropped there, such as some children's playthings and his wife's sewing.

Everything in his flat, according to his friend, was dirty and covered with dust.

The flat was also in one of the worst sections of London, where the rent was low.

Marx and his wife knew each other as children and married when Marx was twenty-five, not so young in those days of 1843. He would have been considered a grown man, mature and able to assume the responsibilities of husband and father.

Both Marx and his wife came from comfortable homes, hers more prominent. Her father was a Prussian Baron. And she, Jenny, was an educated woman when she married Marx.

Together they had 7 children. Four of those children died young. Only three survived to achieve adulthood.

Every biography of Marx reports that his four children who died young died because of the poverty they had to endure.

The Marx way of life has been described as a hand-to-mouth existence, which generally means you don't know where your next meal is coming from.

Marx occasionally wrote articles for newspapers and he wrote his long papers and books full of his philosophies about the 'struggle' of workers, but he never worked a day in his life.

Instead, he sat in his pig-sty and found all sorts of reasons he shouldn't work.

Mainly, he thought he was too important to work.

Marx wrote that a slave needs a master and the master needs a slave. And that opposites must be equalled. And that a slave cannot be separated from his master.

Care to argue with that nonsense?

I've known men like Marx. They're just plain lazy. As he was. He didn't want to work, he wanted to sit in the filth at his table and pretend to be thinking important thoughts.

Marx was also a hypocrite. While he wrote with such sympathy for the men who worked in factories, calling them slaves, the money he lived on, the charity he received from his friend Friedrich Engels, came from the Engels family interest in a factory. So the 'slaves' were supporting the Marx family, while Marx sat and thought.

Watching his children go hungry, seeing them live in filth, is neglect. It is abuse. There was no need for it. He had an education and could have earned an income, and he knew where he had come from, a comfortable life with his parents. He could have provided for his family as his father had provided for him, but obviously that was not important to him.

Karl Marx was not well known in his lifetime. It was only a small circle of fellow Communists who knew who he was by his writings.

An eighth child was born to Marx, but not with his wife. It was an illigitimate child.

As it happened, Jenny, Karl's wife, received an inheritance and so she hired a housekeeper to oversee their better quarters. His eighth child was born to the housekeeper.

Marx tried to convince his wife that the child had been fathered by his friend Engels, but she didn't believe him. Let's add liar to his description.

Eventually, Marx admitted the truth. The child was his son.

No one ever reported the housekeeper's side of the story. Had she been a willing partner for Marx? Or did he take advantage of her lowly position in his home? Personally, I think he saw her as nothing but a servant and one he could 'have his way' with.

By any standard, Marx' life was a failure, as a husband, as a father, as a provider.

His theory of Marxism has been a failure, too. The Soviet Union failed dramatically. Cuba's people live in poverty. And in North Korea the people truly are slaves to their Marxist beloved leader.

Under Marxism, more than one hundred million people have died, either from being murdered or from starvation.

When a man in his selfishness and laziness is willing to watch his own children die from the poverty he has imposed on them, of course his philosophy will do the same to anyone forced to endure it.

Marx abused his children, his wife, his housekeeper, and Marxism continues to abuse everyone living under a brutally uncaring Marxist government.
 
Every biography of Marx reports that his four children who died young died because of the poverty they had to endure.

How nondescript...Is the author aware of the mortality rate of children back then, even in clean homes, homes with food and no poverty?
 
Marx abused his children, his wife, his housekeeper, and Marxism continues to abuse everyone living under a brutally uncaring Marxist government.

Does the author not know of any Marxist nations?
 
Call it the latest in proof positive some Millennials are hell-bent on being ignorant and brash........ they did all they could to live up to their poor reputation earlier in March. A group of Millennials denigrated the taking photos of themselves flipping it the middle finger, then posting and bragging about their slimy conduct on social media.

Millions of people have been murdered, tortured, and persecuted by communist dictators like Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Fidel Castro. The memorial was built to honor those innocent lives. The front pedestal reads, “To the more than one hundred million victims of communism and to those who love liberty.”

5 Reasons Marxism has Nothing to Offer Millennials - STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY

Millennials on communism: Proof of our education system's failure

Why Millennials Prefer Marxism to Capitalism - The Michael Medved Show
 

Forum List

Back
Top