Study: Homophobic individuals more likely to be closet homosexuals.

It's pretty well known in the Gay community that the loudest and most insistant homophobes have a very high chance of being in the closet. An entire cottage industry of outing such people has been created to show the hypocrisy.

The Bible Belt is happy hunting grounds for those on the Down Low.

Some, Haggard, Foley, for example. Phyllis Schlafly isn't I gather.

Her son is.

Phyllis Schafly is a virgin.
 
Yes, you caught us Pale Rider.

We are obviously trying to make people ashamed that they are homosexual.

It has nothing to do with all that hypocrisy.

Oh, well, I guess that's it, my fellow gay-bashers.... Better throw in the towel... We've been outted.

The gig was up the minute the article was written. You leftist homo lovers have been pulling this same stunt on here for years. "Oh you don't like homos, THEN YOU MUST BE A HOMO." Pffftt... :lol: It was only a matter of time until one of you posted some pathetic, bull shit HACK piece that pretends it's legitimate about it. It's BEEN apparent that the homo community and you who support them will stop at NOTHING when it comes to furthering your agenda, and you have no shame or conscience.

Your stupidity is only surpassed by your ineptness.

Yes, we get it...You are trying WAAAAAY hard there, Pale Rider. ;)

Limiting the sickness of those who hate gay humans to closeted gays is too simple a solution to a serious problem.
 
The gig was up the minute the article was written. You leftist homo lovers have been pulling this same stunt on here for years. "Oh you don't like homos, THEN YOU MUST BE A HOMO." Pffftt... :lol: It was only a matter of time until one of you posted some pathetic, bull shit HACK piece that pretends it's legitimate about it. It's BEEN apparent that the homo community and you who support them will stop at NOTHING when it comes to furthering your agenda, and you have no shame or conscience.

Your stupidity is only surpassed by your ineptness.

Yes, we get it...You are trying WAAAAAY hard there, Pale Rider. ;)

Limiting the sickness of those who hate gay humans to closeted gays is too simple a solution to a serious problem.

It's the Homos who are sick, not the normal folks.
 
The gig was up the minute the article was written. You leftist homo lovers have been pulling this same stunt on here for years. "Oh you don't like homos, THEN YOU MUST BE A HOMO." Pffftt... :lol: It was only a matter of time until one of you posted some pathetic, bull shit HACK piece that pretends it's legitimate about it. It's BEEN apparent that the homo community and you who support them will stop at NOTHING when it comes to furthering your agenda, and you have no shame or conscience.

Your stupidity is only surpassed by your ineptness.

Yes, we get it...You are trying WAAAAAY hard there, Pale Rider. ;)

Limiting the sickness of those who hate gay humans to closeted gays is too simple a solution to a serious problem.

I don't think anyone is claiming that all homophobes are closeted gays, Peach. But it sure does pop out a lot. We see it again and again and again.
 
Yes, we get it...You are trying WAAAAAY hard there, Pale Rider. ;)

Limiting the sickness of those who hate gay humans to closeted gays is too simple a solution to a serious problem.

I don't think anyone is claiming that all homophobes are closeted gays, Peach. But it sure does pop out a lot. We see it again and again and again.

The hatred of gay Americans isn't confined to closeted gays is my point; some are gay, yes. Haggard, Foley, Allen, Craig, et. al. Still, the scourge is too widespread to limit the hate group to gays afraid to come out.
 

Homophobia is entirely political because it's been made political from centuries of oppression of homosexuals through political channels. Even today, it remains a big problem.
Bull shit. It's health and lifestyle.

Not to mention this article is nothing more than a homo hack piece asuming those who don't think homos are all warm and fuzzy must be closet homos themselves. What a total load of horse shit. The old SWITCHEROO.... "if you don't like homos, then you must be one"... stupid beyond comprehension. The lengths to which the homo community won't go through to silence anyone who voices opposition to their perversion. It's just as disgusting as their illness.
Indeed. It's grapsing at straws in order to justify thier remorse because they know it's wrong.
 
No, gay humans are not ill; they have a different sexual orientation than heterosexual people.

Yeah, and many of them act real disgusting about it. Perverted.

People like you talk and think more about gay sex than even gay people do. I wonder why.

He sits up late at night watching gay porn saying over and over how disgusting it is....

But seriously, it's massively perverted to worry about what other people do in the bedroom. Bigfoot's a real sicko.
 
Homophobia is entirely political because it's been made political from centuries of oppression of homosexuals through political channels. Even today, it remains a big problem.
Bull shit. It's health and lifestyle.

Not to mention this article is nothing more than a homo hack piece asuming those who don't think homos are all warm and fuzzy must be closet homos themselves. What a total load of horse shit. The old SWITCHEROO.... "if you don't like homos, then you must be one"... stupid beyond comprehension. The lengths to which the homo community won't go through to silence anyone who voices opposition to their perversion. It's just as disgusting as their illness.
Indeed. It's grapsing at straws in order to justify thier remorse because they know it's wrong.

HOW do you come to that conclusion? HOW is it wrong to be as one is born?
 
Bull shit. It's health and lifestyle.

Not to mention this article is nothing more than a homo hack piece asuming those who don't think homos are all warm and fuzzy must be closet homos themselves. What a total load of horse shit. The old SWITCHEROO.... "if you don't like homos, then you must be one"... stupid beyond comprehension. The lengths to which the homo community won't go through to silence anyone who voices opposition to their perversion. It's just as disgusting as their illness.
Indeed. It's grapsing at straws in order to justify thier remorse because they know it's wrong.

HOW do you come to that conclusion? HOW is it wrong to be as one is born?

Science is still OUT on the subject...Morally? it's WRONG. I personally don't give a shit. *I* don't want to know about it, and I don't want it becoming 'Normal'...as in exposing young people to it.

Liberty has consequences...some of us would rather they shut up about it and keep the sexuality where it belongs...(ON BOTH SIDES...Homo AND Hetero)...

Just *SHUT UP* and keep it private.
 
Indeed. It's grapsing at straws in order to justify thier remorse because they know it's wrong.

HOW do you come to that conclusion? HOW is it wrong to be as one is born?

Science is still OUT on the subject...Morally? it's WRONG. I personally don't give a shit. *I* don't want to know about it, and I don't want it becoming 'Normal'...as in exposing young people to it.

Liberty has consequences...some of us would rather they shut up about it and keep the sexuality where it belongs...(ON BOTH SIDES...Homo AND Hetero)...

Just *SHUT UP* and keep it private.

Young people who are "exposed", as you term it, are no more likely to be gay than those who know no gay Americns.
 
First, for the righties: Define "perverted" for me, please, because I think I must be pretty desensitized. How can what two adults, of sound mind, agree to do with one another be perverse?

Now, onto my main thought, choice vs genetics. I'll preface by saying that I don't think that homosexuality is a choice, any more than any other preference. Saying that it's therefore genetic, however, seems like a hardcore straw man argument. Even in light of the twin studies, which I don't believe prove genetics over social environment. It seems fairly obvious to me that if you subject people with close to identical genetics to identical social situations, their responses will be more similar to each other's than would be two people of less identical genes. This doesn't prove that the responses themselves are a direct result of any particular gene, just that you're subjecting two -more similar- test subjects to the same situations in one study than you are in the other.

That said, even if homosexuality is simply a matter of preference, it still isn't a choice. I don't think there's a gene that makes people prefer the taste of chocolate to the taste of celery, or a gene that makes people prefer country music to jazz, but I defy anyone reading this to just change one of your preferences. Quick test: those of you who prefer country music, stop liking it. Right now! I'll give you a minute. . . .

. . . .

. . . done yet? Do you hate country now? Good. Next step, I want you to make yourself honestly enjoy the hiphop rantings of popular artist, Ludacris. I know this is difficult for you newly ex-country listeners, but if preference is choice, you should be able to do it. Again, I'll give you a minute. . . .

. . . .

. . . done yet? Good. Now you've gone from loving country to hating it and loving Ludacris in stead, right? Purely a matter of choice, as is anything that isn't decided by your genes.

Excellent theory.

Lastly, to tie into the OP, I can't put a lot of faith into this study either. It's obvious that if someone is raised in an environment wherein he/she ends up viewing homosexuality as a sin or social deformity, yet possesses/develops (depending on whether its nature or nurture. . . I don't claim to know for certain) homosexual tendencies, they're going to be a lot more likely to be closeted than open. Finding examples where people who are overtly anti-gay are hiding their own homosexual desires doesn't prove that all or even most homophobes are closet gays, it only proves that gay people exist even in pockets of our society that abhor homosexuality, and that people who are raised within a culture that demonizes a trait that they possess end up being some conflicted motherfuckers. In essence, it proves only what's obvious, and to try and take it any further requires a leap in logic.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top