Stephanie Cutter: Whoring It Up

Percentages dickweed. Multiply them up by state population and see what you get.

Have you e-mailed the author to ask them ?

Are you standing behind Cutter's claims ?

So Texas and the Deep South will be voting Dem because so many of them are on food stamps, especially compared to other states?

Now, why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

The deep south used to be a democratic stronghold. Old habits die hard. But they are moving in the right direction.

Have you e-mailed the authors ?

Do you stand behind Cutter's conclusions ?

Listening, why are you afraid to answer my questions? The reason the author chose those figures is obvious to anyone who is literate and not a complete fucking hack.

So, prove you're not an illiterate hack and answer the questions:
Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?
 
So Texas and the Deep South will be voting Dem because so many of them are on food stamps, especially compared to other states?

Now, why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

The deep south used to be a democratic stronghold. Old habits die hard. But they are moving in the right direction.

Have you e-mailed the authors ?

Do you stand behind Cutter's conclusions ?

Listening, why are you afraid to answer my questions? The reason the author chose those figures is obvious to anyone who is literate and not a complete fucking hack.

So, prove you're not an illiterate hack and answer the questions:
Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

You are attempting to derail the thread.

Are you going to stand behind Cutter's conclusions or not ?
 
The deep south used to be a democratic stronghold. Old habits die hard. But they are moving in the right direction.

Have you e-mailed the authors ?

Do you stand behind Cutter's conclusions ?

Listening, why are you afraid to answer my questions? The reason the author chose those figures is obvious to anyone who is literate and not a complete fucking hack.

So, prove you're not an illiterate hack and answer the questions:
Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

You are attempting to derail the thread.

Are you going to stand behind Cutter's conclusions or not ?

I'm derailing the thread by asking you to explain the author you quoted?

LOL! Stop being such a pussy and answer the questions:

Now, why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?
 
Cutter: Obama's Recovery Has Been Stronger Than Reagan's, You Know - Guy Benson

I often find Team Obama's lies frustrating and galling. Not this one. The latest gem from Deputy Obama Campaign Manager Stephanie Cutter -- whose very loose relationship with the truth has been well documented -- is so preposterous on its face that it doesn't even pass the laugh test:

******************

As the author says...there are just some things that go beyond stupid.

Cutter is really a whore.

Cutter has gone the route of the insane.

Is anyone, for any reason, going to back up her claims ?
 
Cutter: Obama's Recovery Has Been Stronger Than Reagan's, You Know - Guy Benson

I often find Team Obama's lies frustrating and galling. Not this one. The latest gem from Deputy Obama Campaign Manager Stephanie Cutter -- whose very loose relationship with the truth has been well documented -- is so preposterous on its face that it doesn't even pass the laugh test:

******************

As the author says...there are just some things that go beyond stupid.

Cutter is really a whore.

Cutter has gone the route of the insane.

Is anyone, for any reason, going to back up her claims ?

Why don't you try backing up the claims of the author you cite? these, for instance:

why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?
 
Let's not forget her infamous "felon" comment.

This woman has gone off the deep end.

Stephanie Cutter Clarifies Her Comment For Wolf Blitzer: Romney Is A Liar, Not A Felon | Mediaite

Quit running from the comments in the article you, yourself use to discredit her:

why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

You can make this a lot easier on yourself by simply stating if you stand behnd Cutter's conclusions.
 
Let's not forget her infamous "felon" comment.

This woman has gone off the deep end.

Stephanie Cutter Clarifies Her Comment For Wolf Blitzer: Romney Is A Liar, Not A Felon | Mediaite

Quit running from the comments in the article you, yourself use to discredit her:

why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

You can make this a lot easier on yourself by simply stating if you stand behnd Cutter's conclusions.

Trust me, watching you run away from the comments you, yourself posted is easy enough. Let's try again:

why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?
 
Quit running from the comments in the article you, yourself use to discredit her:

why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

You can make this a lot easier on yourself by simply stating if you stand behnd Cutter's conclusions.

Trust me, watching you run away from the comments you, yourself posted is easy enough. Let's try again:

why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

So, I can take that to mean you don't.

The rest is moot.
 
You can make this a lot easier on yourself by simply stating if you stand behnd Cutter's conclusions.

Trust me, watching you run away from the comments you, yourself posted is easy enough. Let's try again:

why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

So, I can take that to mean you don't.

The rest is moot.

why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?
 
Trust me, watching you run away from the comments you, yourself posted is easy enough. Let's try again:

why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

So, I can take that to mean you don't.

The rest is moot.

why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

Good luck with your landslide. With solid support from people like you (who won't account for the moronic statements of your leaders), Obama is a lock to be in Chicago by Feb 2013.
 
Is this the same Cutter that said she didn't know the details of Joe Soptic? THAT Stephanie Cutter?

:lol:

She's pretty much been dismissed as a lying sack of shit.
 
Is this the same Cutter that said she didn't know the details of Joe Soptic? THAT Stephanie Cutter?

:lol:

She's pretty much been dismissed as a lying sack of shit.

Yep, that one is in there too.

If they sold dart board with her face on it....they'd make a million.
 
Reagan didn't have a Republican Congress like Obamination had with his Democrap Congress when he passed the Porkulus and Obamacare which has made this worse.

Obamination's goons are just scum making up bullshit to make him look good.

They claim they are the reason why oil drilling permits passed under Bush are now providing domestic oil, while they cover up the FACT that they are preventing new oil dilling permits and even giving American taxpayer money to Brazil for their oil drilling exploration.
 
So, I can take that to mean you don't.

The rest is moot.

why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

Good luck with your landslide. With solid support from people like you (who won't account for the moronic statements of your leaders), Obama is a lock to be in Chicago by Feb 2013.

Why do you refuse to defend the very article you posted?

why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?
 
Reagan didn't have a Republican Congress like Obamination had with his Democrap Congress when he passed the Porkulus and Obamacare which has made this worse.

Obamination's goons are just scum making up bullshit to make him look good.

They claim they are the reason why oil drilling permits passed under Bush are now providing domestic oil, while they cover up the FACT that they are preventing new oil dilling permits and even giving American taxpayer money to Brazil for their oil drilling exploration.

You got that right.

The goon ain't doing so good either. Not only do they look stupid, but they are transfering that to Obama.
 
Reagan didn't have a Republican Congress like Obamination had with his Democrap Congress when he passed the Porkulus and Obamacare which has made this worse.

Obamination's goons are just scum making up bullshit to make him look good.

They claim they are the reason why oil drilling permits passed under Bush are now providing domestic oil, while they cover up the FACT that they are preventing new oil dilling permits and even giving American taxpayer money to Brazil for their oil drilling exploration.
There is no end to the lies a CON$ervoFascist is stupid enough to believe.

2/3 of the drilling permits are going unused and any new domestic oil that is found is capped. Remember the new oil found by BP's deepwater horizon site was capped but the cap blew. The only oil from that new find that made it onto the market was the oil skimmed off from the leak. Brazil on the other hand puts any new oil they find on the market.
 
Last edited:
Reagan didn't have a Republican Congress like Obamination had with his Democrap Congress when he passed the Porkulus and Obamacare which has made this worse.

Obamination's goons are just scum making up bullshit to make him look good.

They claim they are the reason why oil drilling permits passed under Bush are now providing domestic oil, while they cover up the FACT that they are preventing new oil dilling permits and even giving American taxpayer money to Brazil for their oil drilling exploration.
There is no end to the lies a CON$ervoFascist is stupid enough to believe.

2/3 of the drilling permits are going unused and any new domestic oil that is found is capped. Remember the new oil found by BP's deepwater horizon site was capped but the cap blew. The only oil from that new find that made it onto the market was the oil skimmed off from the leak. Brazil on the other hand puts any new oil they find on the market.
very true... they cap it and hold it, it doesn't hit the market....and leases they have gotten for the land, they don't even drill sometimes, they just sit on it....so that prices stay high and they can rape us on prices... it's amazing how little people really know on the topic.
 
Reagan didn't have a Republican Congress like Obamination had with his Democrap Congress when he passed the Porkulus and Obamacare which has made this worse.

Obamination's goons are just scum making up bullshit to make him look good.

They claim they are the reason why oil drilling permits passed under Bush are now providing domestic oil, while they cover up the FACT that they are preventing new oil dilling permits and even giving American taxpayer money to Brazil for their oil drilling exploration.
There is no end to the lies a CON$ervoFascist is stupid enough to believe.

2/3 of the drilling permits are going unused and any new domestic oil that is found is capped. Remember the new oil found by BP's deepwater horizon site was capped but the cap blew. The only oil from that new find that made it onto the market was the oil skimmed off from the leak. Brazil on the other hand puts any new oil they find on the market.
very true... they cap it and hold it, it doesn't hit the market....and leases they have gotten for the land, they don't even drill sometimes, they just sit on it....so that prices stay high and they can rape us on prices... it's amazing how little people really know on the topic.

Why don't you enlighten us. Even though this is a thread about what a liar Stephanie Cutter is.

Why would they sit on it if they could be monetizing it ?

And who are "they" ?
 

Forum List

Back
Top