Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Speaking of Fail:
Answer this: Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?
Why don't you e-mail the author and find out ?
Because I know the answer. I'm surmising you're too uneducated to know the answer.
IThis thread is about what a liar Cutter is.
But the claim she is a "liar" is based on false and fraudulent information. Of COURSE you believe it. That's how hacks roll.
Let's try again:
Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?
Hint: the Household Survey doesn't track job creation.
Wow, that phony number grows with each retelling of the Myth Of St Ronnie.Why does the author use the end of the 2nd 1980's recession as the benchmark? It would be a more apt comparison to use the first recession that Reagan experienced, much like Obama.
and why the heck are they relying on the Household Survey to measure job creation?
Because she's trying to say that the 25 million jobs Reagan created happened during the recovery she's talking about (and was less than Obama's), not during the recession........and I notice you guys always cut off your claims about Obama being screwed over at 2009. You don't want to see what he did after 2009.
It goes along with the lies they tell about the job loss when Obama took office. They always say, "Job loss of 700k a month"....when in fact, it was ONLY ONE MONTH, and that those job losses came at the end of the collapse....and that the collapse ended long before anything Obama did could possibly take affect.Why does the author use the end of the 2nd 1980's recession as the benchmark? It would be a more apt comparison to use the first recession that Reagan experienced, much like Obama.
and why the heck are they relying on the Household Survey to measure job creation?
Because she's trying to say that the 25 million jobs Reagan created happened during the recovery she's talking about (and was less than Obama's), not during the recession........and I notice you guys always cut off your claims about Obama being screwed over at 2009. You don't want to see what he did after 2009.
I am not at all worried about the details of the study (and while I know some of the answers....I have no interest in letting you detrail the thread).
This is about Cutter. Her conclusions are insane. Are you going to justify her conclusions ?
It goes along with the lies they tell about the job loss when Obama took office. They always say, "Job loss of 700k a month"....when in fact, it was ONLY ONE MONTH,Why does the author use the end of the 2nd 1980's recession as the benchmark? It would be a more apt comparison to use the first recession that Reagan experienced, much like Obama.
and why the heck are they relying on the Household Survey to measure job creation?
Because she's trying to say that the 25 million jobs Reagan created happened during the recovery she's talking about (and was less than Obama's), not during the recession........and I notice you guys always cut off your claims about Obama being screwed over at 2009. You don't want to see what he did after 2009.
It goes along with the lies they tell about the job loss when Obama took office. They always say, "Job loss of 700k a month"....when in fact, it was ONLY ONE MONTH, and that those job losses came at the end of the collapse....and that the collapse ended long before anything Obama did could possibly take affect.Why does the author use the end of the 2nd 1980's recession as the benchmark? It would be a more apt comparison to use the first recession that Reagan experienced, much like Obama.
and why the heck are they relying on the Household Survey to measure job creation?
Because she's trying to say that the 25 million jobs Reagan created happened during the recovery she's talking about (and was less than Obama's), not during the recession........and I notice you guys always cut off your claims about Obama being screwed over at 2009. You don't want to see what he did after 2009.
In other words. Obama, yet again, failed miserably.
"Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?"
Bueller? Bueller?
because it doesn't fit their twisted lie or what their masters tell them to think and say....."Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?"
Bueller? Bueller?
Bueller? Listening? Anyone?
because it doesn't fit their twisted lie or what their masters tell them to think and say....."Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?"
Bueller? Bueller?
Bueller? Listening? Anyone?
because it doesn't fit their twisted lie or what their masters tell them to think and say....."Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?"
Bueller? Bueller?
Bueller? Listening? Anyone?
because it doesn't fit their twisted lie or what their masters tell them to think and say.....Bueller? Listening? Anyone?
You'd think they'd attempt to understand how easily they are lied to.
because it doesn't fit their twisted lie or what their masters tell them to think and say.....
You'd think they'd attempt to understand how easily they are lied to.
Now, that's funny coming from the left.
Do we get to recount the whole GTS experience again ?
You figure it out.
The point is that this woman is a chronic liar. Nobody...and I mean nobody is going to swallow the idea that Obama's recovery is stronger than Reagan's.
Unless, you somehow are delusional enough to think Obama will win by a 56 state landslide.
You figure it out.
The point is that this woman is a chronic liar. Nobody...and I mean nobody is going to swallow the idea that Obama's recovery is stronger than Reagan's.
Unless, you somehow are delusional enough to think Obama will win by a 56 state landslide.
Oh, so he's only gonna carry Illinois. Reminds me of Mondale.
You figure it out.
The point is that this woman is a chronic liar. Nobody...and I mean nobody is going to swallow the idea that Obama's recovery is stronger than Reagan's.
Unless, you somehow are delusional enough to think Obama will win by a 56 state landslide.
Oh, so he's only gonna carry Illinois. Reminds me of Mondale.
Obama will take NY and CA....no doubt about it. There are to many foodstamps in those two states for them not to vote for him.
Oh, so he's only gonna carry Illinois. Reminds me of Mondale.
Obama will take NY and CA....no doubt about it. There are to many foodstamps in those two states for them not to vote for him.
Now, why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?
Obama will take NY and CA....no doubt about it. There are to many foodstamps in those two states for them not to vote for him.
Now, why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?
Percentages dickweed. Multiply them up by state population and see what you get.
Have you e-mailed the author to ask them ?
Are you standing behind Cutter's claims ?
Now, why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?
Percentages dickweed. Multiply them up by state population and see what you get.
Have you e-mailed the author to ask them ?
Are you standing behind Cutter's claims ?
So Texas and the Deep South will be voting Dem because so many of them are on food stamps, especially compared to other states?
Now, why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?
