St. Louis Missouri: Crime Statistics by Race in the 4th Most Dangerous City in

[JFK_USA]

Hmmm. I honestly didn't realize it was that easy. Maybe they could offer businesses rewards for moving into St Louis making thugs leave or forcing stronger police force therefore overall safer area to live in. Where do all the thugs go when they are forced out though?

Revisit post number 14 of this thread. (See Video). Then you would understand why investment in the black community is never welcomed by the black community.

Do you understand what gentrification means? It's getting rid of poorer citizens by making it economically impossible to live there. Giving poor people no place to live. They aren't against investment but they want a place to live that they can afford.

Your racism fails to understand the actual reality in St. Louis. Black people are not some foreign creatures, they're human beings just like you. However, they are targeted consistently targeted by police for petty crimes and arrested for them.

This leads to a criminal record that they don't have the money to expunge. Which leads to less job opportunities for them. Which gets them involved in worse crimes to survive like robbery, assault and even murder. Thus perpetually giving into this ridiculous stereotype.

And white flight occurred because whites believe (and still to this day) that they are superior to the black people and didn't want their kids going to school with them. St. Louis County has 91 municipalities, most were set up to keep black people out. They all had police to make life unbearable for black people.

It's not their skin color that makes them prone to crime, it's poverty, lack of job opportunities and police harassment that puts them in this situation.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Hmmm. I honestly didn't realize it was that easy. Maybe they could offer businesses rewards for moving into St Louis making thugs leave or forcing stronger police force therefore overall safer area to live in. Where do all the thugs go when they are forced out though?

Revisit post number 14 of this thread. (See Video). Then you would understand why investment in the black community is never welcomed by the black community.

Do you understand what gentrification means? It's getting rid of poorer citizens by making it economically impossible to live there. Giving poor people no place to live. They aren't against investment but they want a place to live that they can afford.

Your racism fails to understand the actual reality in St. Louis. Black people are not some foreign creatures, they're human beings just like you. However, they are targeted consistently targeted by police for petty crimes and arrested for them.

This leads to a criminal record that they don't have the money to expunge. Which leads to less job opportunities for them. Which gets them involved in worse crimes to survive like robbery, assault and even murder. Thus perpetually giving into this ridiculous stereotype.

And white flight occurred because whites believe (and still to this day) that they are superior to the black people and didn't want their kids going to school with them. St. Louis County has 91 municipalities, most were set up to keep black people out. They all had police to make life unbearable for black people.

It's not their skin color that makes them prone to crime, it's poverty, lack of job opportunities and police harassment that puts them in this situation.

How can the police treat them well when every routine stop turns into a chase or fight?

 

[JFK_USA]

Hmmm. I honestly didn't realize it was that easy. Maybe they could offer businesses rewards for moving into St Louis making thugs leave or forcing stronger police force therefore overall safer area to live in. Where do all the thugs go when they are forced out though?

Revisit post number 14 of this thread. (See Video). Then you would understand why investment in the black community is never welcomed by the black community.

Do you understand what gentrification means? It's getting rid of poorer citizens by making it economically impossible to live there. Giving poor people no place to live. They aren't against investment but they want a place to live that they can afford.

Your racism fails to understand the actual reality in St. Louis. Black people are not some foreign creatures, they're human beings just like you. However, they are targeted consistently targeted by police for petty crimes and arrested for them.

This leads to a criminal record that they don't have the money to expunge. Which leads to less job opportunities for them. Which gets them involved in worse crimes to survive like robbery, assault and even murder. Thus perpetually giving into this ridiculous stereotype.

And white flight occurred because whites believe (and still to this day) that they are superior to the black people and didn't want their kids going to school with them. St. Louis County has 91 municipalities, most were set up to keep black people out. They all had police to make life unbearable for black people.

It's not their skin color that makes them prone to crime, it's poverty, lack of job opportunities and police harassment that puts them in this situation.

How can the police treat them well when every routine stop turns into a chase or fight?

EVERY single one? No, it doesn't. Police should treat them well regardless of what others who looked like them did before because THEY AREN'T ALL THE SAME.

 

[Publius1787]

The blacks causing the trouble need intervention and training in a way to live productive lives...

Culture is indeed very hard to change. Black people identify with black culture. Black culture promoted deviance, drug use, violence, and promiscuity. Leftist education promotes multiculturism and tolerance for other cultures (Except Western Culture) and believes in the idea of "cultural relativism;" whereas no culture is screwed up because they each live lives according to their values. Leftists will defend blacks no matter how screwed up their culture becomes because they identify with the countercultural and entitlement ridden aspects of black culture. Good luck with intervention and training.

 

[Publius1787]

Hmmm. I honestly didn't realize it was that easy. Maybe they could offer businesses rewards for moving into St Louis making thugs leave or forcing stronger police force therefore overall safer area to live in. Where do all the thugs go when they are forced out though?

Revisit post number 14 of this thread. (See Video). Then you would understand why investment in the black community is never welcomed by the black community.

Do you understand what gentrification means? It's getting rid of poorer citizens by making it economically impossible to live there. Giving poor people no place to live. They aren't against investment but they want a place to live that they can afford.

Your racism fails to understand the actual reality in St. Louis. Black people are not some foreign creatures, they're human beings just like you. However, they are targeted consistently targeted by police for petty crimes and arrested for them.

This leads to a criminal record that they don't have the money to expunge. Which leads to less job opportunities for them. Which gets them involved in worse crimes to survive like robbery, assault and even murder. Thus perpetually giving into this ridiculous stereotype.

And white flight occurred because whites believe (and still to this day) that they are superior to the black people and didn't want their kids going to school with them. St. Louis County has 91 municipalities, most were set up to keep black people out. They all had police to make life unbearable for black people.

It's not their skin color that makes them prone to crime, it's poverty, lack of job opportunities and police harassment that puts them in this situation.

How can the police treat them well when every routine stop turns into a chase or fight?

EVERY single one? No, it doesn't. Police should treat them well regardless of what others who looked like them did before because THEY AREN'T ALL THE SAME.

You are correct in your assessment that they aren't all the same. But they are one of the most group think cultures in the United States. They vote the same, they suffer from the same problems, they defend black deviance almost unanimously despite the evidence otherwise (See Treyvon martin & Mike Brown), and they largely blame their problems on other people. 1 in 6 black males will be incarcerated in their lifetime. You would not police a black neighborhood the same as you might a white neighborhood just as you wouldn't patrol Fallujah the same as you might the "green zone" in Iraq.

 

[Publius1787]

Hmmm. I honestly didn't realize it was that easy. Maybe they could offer businesses rewards for moving into St Louis making thugs leave or forcing stronger police force therefore overall safer area to live in. Where do all the thugs go when they are forced out though?

Revisit post number 14 of this thread. (See Video). Then you would understand why investment in the black community is never welcomed by the black community.

Do you understand what gentrification means? It's getting rid of poorer citizens by making it economically impossible to live there. Giving poor people no place to live. They aren't against investment but they want a place to live that they can afford.

Your racism fails to understand the actual reality in St. Louis. Black people are not some foreign creatures, they're human beings just like you. However, they are targeted consistently targeted by police for petty crimes and arrested for them.

This leads to a criminal record that they don't have the money to expunge. Which leads to less job opportunities for them. Which gets them involved in worse crimes to survive like robbery, assault and even murder. Thus perpetually giving into this ridiculous stereotype.

And white flight occurred because whites believe (and still to this day) that they are superior to the black people and didn't want their kids going to school with them. St. Louis County has 91 municipalities, most were set up to keep black people out. They all had police to make life unbearable for black people.

It's not their skin color that makes them prone to crime, it's poverty, lack of job opportunities and police harassment that puts them in this situation.

Gentrification is simply investment. There is no effort to displace communities. There are only objective investment opportunities. The reason blacks hate investment is that few of them own their own property and don't want their prices to go up. However, when poor blacks move into government sponsored projects in white suburbs or a bussed into white schools few liberals shed a tear as their property value goes down due to violence and reduced school performance. Both gentrification and white flight are two sides of the same coin. However, neither stems from "racism." They are objective objects that any reasonable white/Asian person or family might pursue. In your mind, however, whites are evil either way. If they run out of a neighborhood because of black violence and increasingly poor school performance you call it "racist white flight." If they invest in a rundown black neighborhood you call it "racist gentrification." You treat blacks as if they're this mystic forgotten tribe of the Amazon that must not be tampered with the burden of white influence lest they lose their cultural charm and ancient ways. Your double standard is clear. Whites cannot flee black violence nor move into black communities, although, blacks may do what they please amid the evil "oppressors." The odd thing is that you fail to see this double standard of yours.

I NEVER MADE THE COMMENT THAT THEIR SKIN COLOR MAKES THEM PRONE TO MORE CRIME!!! I will, however, assert that their culture does. Black culture stems from a counterculture to white culture (See "Black Power Movement," See "Black Africanized Names," See "Ebonics," & etc...) Black culture simply promotes violence and resistance to authority. So don't complain about cops when they break the law and get arrested for violating the rights of others.

 

[Publius1787]

Hmmm. I honestly didn't realize it was that easy. Maybe they could offer businesses rewards for moving into St Louis making thugs leave or forcing stronger police force therefore overall safer area to live in. Where do all the thugs go when they are forced out though?

Revisit post number 14 of this thread. (See Video). Then you would understand why investment in the black community is never welcomed by the black community.

Do you understand what gentrification means? It's getting rid of poorer citizens by making it economically impossible to live there. Giving poor people no place to live. They aren't against investment but they want a place to live that they can afford.

Your racism fails to understand the actual reality in St. Louis. Black people are not some foreign creatures, they're human beings just like you. However, they are targeted consistently targeted by police for petty crimes and arrested for them.

This leads to a criminal record that they don't have the money to expunge. Which leads to less job opportunities for them. Which gets them involved in worse crimes to survive like robbery, assault and even murder. Thus perpetually giving into this ridiculous stereotype.

And white flight occurred because whites believe (and still to this day) that they are superior to the black people and didn't want their kids going to school with them. St. Louis County has 91 municipalities, most were set up to keep black people out. They all had police to make life unbearable for black people.

It's not their skin color that makes them prone to crime, it's poverty, lack of job opportunities and police harassment that puts them in this situation.

How can the police treat them well when every routine stop turns into a chase or fight?

May I make a suggestion?

 

[Publius1787]

People that call other people racist for pointing out the truth are far more racist as they have no problem with all the problems that go on within the black community. Nothing will be solved with this attitude.

It's all a sham. call it "black politics in action." It will only persist so as long as white liberals feel guilty.

 

[JFK_USA]

Hmmm. I honestly didn't realize it was that easy. Maybe they could offer businesses rewards for moving into St Louis making thugs leave or forcing stronger police force therefore overall safer area to live in. Where do all the thugs go when they are forced out though?

Revisit post number 14 of this thread. (See Video). Then you would understand why investment in the black community is never welcomed by the black community.

Do you understand what gentrification means? It's getting rid of poorer citizens by making it economically impossible to live there. Giving poor people no place to live. They aren't against investment but they want a place to live that they can afford.

Your racism fails to understand the actual reality in St. Louis. Black people are not some foreign creatures, they're human beings just like you. However, they are targeted consistently targeted by police for petty crimes and arrested for them.

This leads to a criminal record that they don't have the money to expunge. Which leads to less job opportunities for them. Which gets them involved in worse crimes to survive like robbery, assault and even murder. Thus perpetually giving into this ridiculous stereotype.

And white flight occurred because whites believe (and still to this day) that they are superior to the black people and didn't want their kids going to school with them. St. Louis County has 91 municipalities, most were set up to keep black people out. They all had police to make life unbearable for black people.

It's not their skin color that makes them prone to crime, it's poverty, lack of job opportunities and police harassment that puts them in this situation.

How can the police treat them well when every routine stop turns into a chase or fight?

EVERY single one? No, it doesn't. Police should treat them well regardless of what others who looked like them did before because THEY AREN'T ALL THE SAME.

You are correct in your assessment that they aren't all the same. But they are one of the most group think cultures in the United States. They vote the same, they suffer from the same problems, they defend black deviance almost unanimously despite the evidence otherwise (See Treyvon martin & Mike Brown), and they largely blame their problems on other people. 1 in 6 black males will be incarcerated in their lifetime. You would not police a black neighborhood the same as you might a white neighborhood just as you wouldn't patrol Fallujah the same as you might the "green zone" in Iraq.

They all vote the same because their interests will never be heard if they aren't together.

Black people make up about 13% of the population. They are the clear minority. If they were divided 50/50, they would never be heard. However, the phrase "strength in numbers" proves itself here. By making sure a political party takes them seriously as a group, they can have more power in numbers. The Democractic party doesn't view them as "lazy, criminal welfare queens" as the right does, they do their best to listen to them and solve their issues. That's why they get the votes.

But when you police a neighborhood and you use excessive force on people doing minor shit. Trayvon Martin was running away from someone who was following him. Trayvon Martin didn't commit a crime, but people on the right wanted to paint him as a hardened criminal. The most frustrating part about Trayvon Martin was 3 things:

1. People claiming George Zimmerman had a right to defend himself but Trayvon Martin did not have the right to defend himself from some stranger following him in a car.

2. In both cases, the complete 100% belief of someone TRYING TO GET OFF FOR MURDER. You don't think that person isn't going to frame the narrative in a way that makes them look innocent?

3. For both cases, the lack of respect for the deceased. Trayvon Martin was in a morgue for 72 hours as his family was looking for him and filed a missing person report. The police failure to even think that a black male could live in the complex was insulting. Michael Brown laid in the street uncovered for 4 hours. 4 HOURS?? There was already high tension and then you leave a dead teenager in the street for the whole neighborhood to see for 4 hours is insane. This apathetic response by police fueled the anger and emboldened the people's belief that the police do not care about black people.

 

[Meathead]

Revisit post number 14 of this thread. (See Video). Then you would understand why investment in the black community is never welcomed by the black community.

Do you understand what gentrification means? It's getting rid of poorer citizens by making it economically impossible to live there. Giving poor people no place to live. They aren't against investment but they want a place to live that they can afford.

Your racism fails to understand the actual reality in St. Louis. Black people are not some foreign creatures, they're human beings just like you. However, they are targeted consistently targeted by police for petty crimes and arrested for them.

This leads to a criminal record that they don't have the money to expunge. Which leads to less job opportunities for them. Which gets them involved in worse crimes to survive like robbery, assault and even murder. Thus perpetually giving into this ridiculous stereotype.

And white flight occurred because whites believe (and still to this day) that they are superior to the black people and didn't want their kids going to school with them. St. Louis County has 91 municipalities, most were set up to keep black people out. They all had police to make life unbearable for black people.

It's not their skin color that makes them prone to crime, it's poverty, lack of job opportunities and police harassment that puts them in this situation.

How can the police treat them well when every routine stop turns into a chase or fight?

EVERY single one? No, it doesn't. Police should treat them well regardless of what others who looked like them did before because THEY AREN'T ALL THE SAME.

You are correct in your assessment that they aren't all the same. But they are one of the most group think cultures in the United States. They vote the same, they suffer from the same problems, they defend black deviance almost unanimously despite the evidence otherwise (See Treyvon martin & Mike Brown), and they largely blame their problems on other people. 1 in 6 black males will be incarcerated in their lifetime. You would not police a black neighborhood the same as you might a white neighborhood just as you wouldn't patrol Fallujah the same as you might the "green zone" in Iraq.

They all vote the same because their interests will never be heard if they aren't together.

Black people make up about 13% of the population. They are the clear minority. If they were divided 50/50, they would never be heard. However, the phrase "strength in numbers" proves itself here. By making sure a political party takes them seriously as a group, they can have more power in numbers. The Democractic party doesn't view them as "lazy, criminal welfare queens" as the right does, they do their best to listen to them and solve their issues. That's why they get the votes.

But when you police a neighborhood and you use excessive force on people doing minor shit. Trayvon Martin was running away from someone who was following him. Trayvon Martin didn't commit a crime, but people on the right wanted to paint him as a hardened criminal. The most frustrating part about Trayvon Martin was 3 things:

1. People claiming George Zimmerman had a right to defend himself but Trayvon Martin did not have the right to defend himself from some stranger following him in a car.

2. In both cases, the complete 100% belief of someone TRYING TO GET OFF FOR MURDER. You don't think that person isn't going to frame the narrative in a way that makes them look innocent?

3. For both cases, the lack of respect for the deceased. Trayvon Martin was in a morgue for 72 hours as his family was looking for him and filed a missing person report. The police failure to even think that a black male could live in the complex was insulting. Michael Brown laid in the street uncovered for 4 hours. 4 HOURS?? There was already high tension and then you leave a dead teenager in the street for the whole neighborhood to see for 4 hours is insane. This apathetic response by police fueled the anger and emboldened the people's belief that the police do not care about black people.

You realize of course that the content of your post trashes any point you may have wished to communicate.

 

[natstew]

As long as the average Negroid IQ is 15 points below the average Caucasian IQ there will be problems.

 

[Muhammed]

Many blacks, especially young black males, embrace thug culture. When you combine that with an average IQ of 85 and 20% higher testoterone levels than average you get a violent crime problem.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Revisit post number 14 of this thread. (See Video). Then you would understand why investment in the black community is never welcomed by the black community.

Do you understand what gentrification means? It's getting rid of poorer citizens by making it economically impossible to live there. Giving poor people no place to live. They aren't against investment but they want a place to live that they can afford.

Your racism fails to understand the actual reality in St. Louis. Black people are not some foreign creatures, they're human beings just like you. However, they are targeted consistently targeted by police for petty crimes and arrested for them.

This leads to a criminal record that they don't have the money to expunge. Which leads to less job opportunities for them. Which gets them involved in worse crimes to survive like robbery, assault and even murder. Thus perpetually giving into this ridiculous stereotype.

And white flight occurred because whites believe (and still to this day) that they are superior to the black people and didn't want their kids going to school with them. St. Louis County has 91 municipalities, most were set up to keep black people out. They all had police to make life unbearable for black people.

It's not their skin color that makes them prone to crime, it's poverty, lack of job opportunities and police harassment that puts them in this situation.

How can the police treat them well when every routine stop turns into a chase or fight?

EVERY single one? No, it doesn't. Police should treat them well regardless of what others who looked like them did before because THEY AREN'T ALL THE SAME.

You are correct in your assessment that they aren't all the same. But they are one of the most group think cultures in the United States. They vote the same, they suffer from the same problems, they defend black deviance almost unanimously despite the evidence otherwise (See Treyvon martin & Mike Brown), and they largely blame their problems on other people. 1 in 6 black males will be incarcerated in their lifetime. You would not police a black neighborhood the same as you might a white neighborhood just as you wouldn't patrol Fallujah the same as you might the "green zone" in Iraq.

They all vote the same because their interests will never be heard if they aren't together.

Black people make up about 13% of the population. They are the clear minority. If they were divided 50/50, they would never be heard. However, the phrase "strength in numbers" proves itself here. By making sure a political party takes them seriously as a group, they can have more power in numbers. The Democractic party doesn't view them as "lazy, criminal welfare queens" as the right does, they do their best to listen to them and solve their issues. That's why they get the votes.

But when you police a neighborhood and you use excessive force on people doing minor shit. Trayvon Martin was running away from someone who was following him. Trayvon Martin didn't commit a crime, but people on the right wanted to paint him as a hardened criminal. The most frustrating part about Trayvon Martin was 3 things:

1. People claiming George Zimmerman had a right to defend himself but Trayvon Martin did not have the right to defend himself from some stranger following him in a car.

2. In both cases, the complete 100% belief of someone TRYING TO GET OFF FOR MURDER. You don't think that person isn't going to frame the narrative in a way that makes them look innocent?

3. For both cases, the lack of respect for the deceased. Trayvon Martin was in a morgue for 72 hours as his family was looking for him and filed a missing person report. The police failure to even think that a black male could live in the complex was insulting. Michael Brown laid in the street uncovered for 4 hours. 4 HOURS?? There was already high tension and then you leave a dead teenager in the street for the whole neighborhood to see for 4 hours is insane. This apathetic response by police fueled the anger and emboldened the people's belief that the police do not care about black people.

So what you're saying is don't police neighborhoods instead let black people rob, murder, and rape white people. Don't be careful in traffic stops when 90% of resistance is from black people. As a cop you just want them to die. Go be in officer and see how long your method works. The media pretended Michael Brown was an innocent child when in fact he's a large man that just robbed a store and then proceeded to assault a police officer when stopped. He gets shot. No shit. I would expect to die as a white man if I did that. All you're saying is how things should be but not what is functional. You clearly have no life experience near these type of communities.

 

[Publius1787]

Revisit post number 14 of this thread. (See Video). Then you would understand why investment in the black community is never welcomed by the black community.

Do you understand what gentrification means? It's getting rid of poorer citizens by making it economically impossible to live there. Giving poor people no place to live. They aren't against investment but they want a place to live that they can afford.

Your racism fails to understand the actual reality in St. Louis. Black people are not some foreign creatures, they're human beings just like you. However, they are targeted consistently targeted by police for petty crimes and arrested for them.

This leads to a criminal record that they don't have the money to expunge. Which leads to less job opportunities for them. Which gets them involved in worse crimes to survive like robbery, assault and even murder. Thus perpetually giving into this ridiculous stereotype.

And white flight occurred because whites believe (and still to this day) that they are superior to the black people and didn't want their kids going to school with them. St. Louis County has 91 municipalities, most were set up to keep black people out. They all had police to make life unbearable for black people.

It's not their skin color that makes them prone to crime, it's poverty, lack of job opportunities and police harassment that puts them in this situation.

How can the police treat them well when every routine stop turns into a chase or fight?

EVERY single one? No, it doesn't. Police should treat them well regardless of what others who looked like them did before because THEY AREN'T ALL THE SAME.

You are correct in your assessment that they aren't all the same. But they are one of the most group think cultures in the United States. They vote the same, they suffer from the same problems, they defend black deviance almost unanimously despite the evidence otherwise (See Treyvon martin & Mike Brown), and they largely blame their problems on other people. 1 in 6 black males will be incarcerated in their lifetime. You would not police a black neighborhood the same as you might a white neighborhood just as you wouldn't patrol Fallujah the same as you might the "green zone" in Iraq.

They all vote the same because their interests will never be heard if they aren't together.

Black people make up about 13% of the population. They are the clear minority. If they were divided 50/50, they would never be heard. However, the phrase "strength in numbers" proves itself here. By making sure a political party takes them seriously as a group, they can have more power in numbers. The Democractic party doesn't view them as "lazy, criminal welfare queens" as the right does, they do their best to listen to them and solve their issues. That's why they get the votes.

But when you police a neighborhood and you use excessive force on people doing minor shit. Trayvon Martin was running away from someone who was following him. Trayvon Martin didn't commit a crime, but people on the right wanted to paint him as a hardened criminal. The most frustrating part about Trayvon Martin was 3 things:

1. People claiming George Zimmerman had a right to defend himself but Trayvon Martin did not have the right to defend himself from some stranger following him in a car.

2. In both cases, the complete 100% belief of someone TRYING TO GET OFF FOR MURDER. You don't think that person isn't going to frame the narrative in a way that makes them look innocent?

3. For both cases, the lack of respect for the deceased. Trayvon Martin was in a morgue for 72 hours as his family was looking for him and filed a missing person report. The police failure to even think that a black male could live in the complex was insulting. Michael Brown laid in the street uncovered for 4 hours. 4 HOURS?? There was already high tension and then you leave a dead teenager in the street for the whole neighborhood to see for 4 hours is insane. This apathetic response by police fueled the anger and emboldened the people's belief that the police do not care about black people.

They all vote the same because they are mostly culturally the same. Whites don't vote the same. Why?

Tell me the difference between white voting interests and black voting interests. Is there a difference? You already claim that entitlement is a black interest. What else have you got?

The evidence on the Trayvon Martin incident disagrees with you. Primarily the back of Zimmerman's head. Zimmerman also never posed a threat to Trayvon. Walking away huh?

You've already convicted the accuse by calling it "murder" despite all evidence to the contrary and the jury that thought otherwise. I suppose they didn't have a right to a defense?

I don't care how long they laid in the street. I would say the same if they were white. Would you?